Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

NO WONDER THE LEFT HATES TWITTER:

And no wonder they want an echo chamber where they can reign supreme. So how is it going over at Bluesky?

More details here: Twitter rival Bluesky fights a flood of spam, scams, and harmful content as millions join.

Millions join, but they may not stick around all that long:

THE HOUSE OF STEPHANOPOULOS: Trump Has No Mandate:

Time magazine: Hold my Sauvignon Blanc:

But hey, it’s the DNC-MSM: Their party’s presidents get “mandates” no matter if they needed a third party candidate to help them squeak by; the other side isn’t allowed a mandate no matter how popular he was at the ballot box.

Of course, prior to the election, Whoopi Goldberg, the co-host of the ABC News program was predicting that “Donald Trump Will ‘Disappear’ Journalists And ‘Gay Folks,’” and that “Trump will break up interracial marriages by deporting the spouses of White men.” Now they’re simply discussing how big of a mandate for change he will have.

(Curiously, she was also using the same level of inflammatory rhetoric about the now sainted John McCain in 2008, asking him during his appearance the show, “Do I have to worry about becoming a slave again?”)

NOW’S ZE TIME ON SPROCKETS VEN VE DANCE! Jaguar Decides to Burn Its Brand to the Ground With New Confusingly Woke Ad Campaign.

After Bud Light contracted Dylan Mulvaney, a “transgender influencer,” for an ad campaign that blew up in the company’s face, you’d think other major corporations would learn some lessons. To be fair, some did. Others, not so much, and that includes Jaguar.

The “luxury” car brand has decided to set itself on fire with a new confusingly woke ad campaign. What’s conspicuously absent? Any mention of cars.

I have no idea what I just watched, and judging by the replies to the video, I don’t think anyone else does either. At least one man in women’s clothing is marching around along with what appears to be a male child in drag. The phrases “live vivid” and “delete ordinary” flash across the screen. “Break moulds” (that’s not a typo on my part) is also shown with what looks like a man in a dress holding a sledgehammer. To be fair, though, it’s hard to tell. Which I guess is the point of the ad?

To reassure British motorists that Tata Motors, the Indian company that has owned the Jaguar brand since acquiring it from Ford in 2008, still understands who its primary buyers are:

I’M CONVINCED: MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin fuels ‘Morning Joe’ boycott after Trump meeting: They don’t ‘appreciate’ their audience.

MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin is encouraging a boycott of “Morning Joe” after its hosts revealed they had a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump.

“Morning Joe” co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, two of Trump’s fiercest critics, shocked the nation on Monday by disclosing their visit to Mar-a-Lago on Friday, suggesting that reviving communications and extending an olive branch was the best path forward following Trump’s historic election victory.

“Disgusting,” Rubin reacted to the meeting on the social media platform Bluesky.

Rubin later ratcheted up the rhetoric, encouraging her followers to turn off “Morning Joe” to send a message.

“The market works great. You can stop watching Morning Joe anytime,” Rubin wrote Monday evening.

I’m totally convinced by Rubin’s argument, to the point where I stopped watching shortly before Morning Joe debuted in April of 2007.

Say, when does Rubin resign from the Washington Post for their non-endorsement of Kamala Harris, after she egged on L.A. Times staffers to resign when their paper’s management similarly refused to endorse her last month?

In response to Sewell Chan’s resignation from the Times, she wrote, “Bravo. All respect.” Followed by, “and where are the rest of them?”

The implication is clear: now that her paper, too, is refusing to endorse the sainted Kamala Harris, Rubin must be set to join the charge of resignations in disgust, along with Robert Kagan, as a sort-of Potomac Joan of Arc. The prospect brings a tear to Cockburn’s eye. Such bravery.

Or the lack thereof:

When does the branch she’s sawing give way?

THE NIGHT THAT WRECKED HOLLYWOKE:

[Rachel] Zegler ends with the coup de grace on Snow White and possibly her career, an actual threat. “May Trump supporters and Trump voters and Trump himself never know peace.”

Naturally Disney made her walk the plank again with another groveling insincere apology. “I let my emotions get the best of me,” Zegler wrote on Instagram.” Hatred and anger have caused us to move further and further away from peace and understanding, and I am sorry I contributed to the negative discourse.”

“This week has been emotional for so many of us but I firmly believe that everyone has the right to their opinion, even when it differs from my own,” she continued.

You can almost feel sorry for the poor, indoctrinated Zegler, discovering the limits of her Hollywoke bubble. If she thought November 5th, 2024 was a rough night, she should wait till March 21st, 2025, premiere date for Snow White. She’ll be begging Trump voters to fill those empty theater seats.

Assuming it actually arrives in theaters at all; Disney could still do a Batgirl on the project and toss it down the memory hole. As Ed Morrissey wrote on Friday after Zegler’s faux-pology, “I doubt this apology will do much to ameliorate it, which raises the question of whether Disney will release Snow White at all. The added costs of distribution and marketing will make this a $500M release, with almost no hope of recouping much. Is it better to Batgirl it and get the insurance payout?”

MODERN PROBLEMS REQUIRE MODERN SOLUTIONS:

TRUMP PICKS FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR AND FORMER REP. SEAN DUFFY FOR TRANSPORTATION SECRETARY:

President-elect Donald Trump announced Monday that he will nominate former Wisconsin Rep. Sean Duffy to be secretary of transportation.

The choice of Duffy, 53, is the second time Trump, 78, has raided the Fox News talent stable to help staff his administration.

Duffy, a former prosecutor who represented the Badger State’s 7th District for more than eight years, is a Fox News contributor and co-hosts the evening Fox Business Network program “The Bottom Line.” His wife, Rachel Campos-Duffy, co-hosts “Fox & Friends Weekend.”

On the program, Duffy has been critical of current Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, including for the airline travel chaos that unfolded under his watch back in 2022.

Assuming Duffy is confirmed, we’ll know how good a job he’s doing by how anonymous he becomes:

TAYLOR LORENZ: NPR is “Extreme Right Wing:”

But in Taylor’s mind, is NPR more or less “right wing” than the New York Times? Taylor Lorenz Says NYT Only Allows Right-Wing Opinions At Newspaper.

As I wrote a year ago, “Elderly Socialist Tacitly Admits That Her Worldview is to the Left of Stalin”; she’s just confirmed it again, and she’ll be right at home on Bluesky: End Wokeness’ ‘Two Genders’ Post on Bluesky Doesn’t Last 30 Seconds.

NFL CAN’T FLEX BENGALS-COWBOYS MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL FOR HILARIOUS REASON:

The NFL has a mechanism for when prime time games aren’t as important as they’re supposed to be late in the year. Networks like ESPN can work with the league to “flex” the game out of the time slot and replace it with a more enticing contest. Thus, after the Bengals lost to the Los Angeles Chargers on Sunday evening to fall to 4-7, many expected Bengals-Cowboys to be flexed out and replaced by a more competitive matchup.

And normally, it would be! But on Monday it was revealed the game can’t be flexed out for a truly hilarious and unexpected reason: The Simpsons.

ESPN and Disney have been planning a Simpsons alternate cast for the December 9 Monday Night Football game and apparently it is standing in the way of the game being replaced.

“For those asking, the Bengals-Cowboys MNF game is not eligible to be flexed out because of all the drawings, voiceovers and other work that has been done for The Simpsons alt-cast that will air that night,” reports Bengals beat writer Jay Morrison of BengalsTalk.com.

Who would have guessed that Homer Simpson would be the reason millions would be subjected to a subpar football game instead of one with stakes and quality play?

What a world.

To be fair, at least watching the Simpsons, we’ll know which is the more professionally produced cartoon airing that night.

CHOCOLATE RATION INCREASED! Such a Deal:

“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be REDUCED to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

UP IN SMOKE: A ‘monstrous problem’ created seven years ago haunts California’s weed industry.

Chris Anderson, the owner of Redwood Roots distribution in Humboldt County, can pinpoint the exact moment California’s small farmers were first betrayed. It was in November 2017, two months before legal sales were to begin, and the California Department of Food and Agriculture released rules that shocked the farming community: The state would allow legal pot farms to grow as large as they want.

“That was a monstrous problem,” Anderson told SFGATE. “That is where the collapse of the marketplace and oversupply came from.”

Keeping legal pot farms small was a key promise made to Northern California’s legacy farmers. Proposition 64, the initiative that legalized cannabis, blocked any farm from growing larger than 1 acre for the first five years of legalization. California’s pioneering pot farmers use small plots of land, and were worried they couldn’t compete against mega farms. They wanted five years to get a running start before large farms were legal, but suddenly that head start was taken away.

It’s still unclear why the state erased the 1-acre cap. Large farming interests in the Salinas Valley and Santa Barbara appear to have lobbied for the effort, according to reporting by Leafly News in 2017. A spokesperson for the state’s Department of Food and Agriculture said they changed the rule based on input from unnamed stakeholders.

The DCC said in a statement to SFGATE that Newsom, who was lieutenant governor in 2017, did not have authority over the decision nor did he endorse the change. But Newsom also declined to argue against it when asked by the San Francisco Chronicle at the time. (The Chronicle and SFGATE are both owned by Hearst but have separate newsrooms.)

Judi Nelson, the owner of Sol Spirit Farm in Trinity County, said she supported the law largely because of the acreage cap, and can still remember Newsom making that promise when he visited Humboldt County.

“Newsom came up and stood there with us and said to our faces there was going to be this 1 acre cap,” Nelson said.

To revise and extend  P.J. O’Rourke’s classic quote, you can’t get good Chinese takeout in China and Cuban cigars are rationed in Cuba. And you can’t survive as a pot grower in California. That’s all you need to know about communism.

BIDEN REALLY MAKING THE MOST OF HIS 63 DAYS LEFT IN OFFICE: Sweden tells citizens to prepare for WAR: Five million households get pamphlets on how to get their home ready for nuclear armageddon… as Biden is accused of trying to start World War Three.

Sweden is sending out five million pamphlets to residents urging them to prepare for the possibility of war, with instructions on how to stockpile food and even seek shelter during a nuclear attack, as fears grow of a conflict between Russia and NATO.

Since the start of the war in Ukraine, Stockholm has repeatedly urged Swedes to prepare both mentally and logistically for a possibile conflict, citing the worsening security situation in its vicinity.

The booklet ‘If Crisis or War Comes’, sent out by the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), contains information about how to prepare for emergencies such as war, natural disasters, cyber attacks and terrorism.

It is an updated version of a pamphlet that Sweden has issued five times since World War II. However, underlining the seriousness of the potential threat, the pamphlet is twice the size of previous years.

‘An insecure world requires preparedness. The military threat to Sweden has increased and we must prepare for the worst – an armed attack,’ its new introduction states.

In one of the more worrying excerpts, which harks back to advice given by governments during the darkest days of the Cold War, it informs people of the risk of nuclear weapons.

‘The global security situation increases the risks that nuclear weapons could be used. In the event of an attack with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, take cover in the same way as in an air attack,’ the pamphlet instructs readers.

Related: Biden Allows Ukraine to Strike Russia With Long-Range U.S. Missiles.

When the New York Times refers to “Biden,” who exactly are they talking about as leading the country? Watch: Joe Biden wanders through Amazon rainforest after climate change speech.

WE’VE DESCENDED INTO SOME SORT OF BIZARRE HELL-WORLD IN WHICH JUSTINE BATEMAN IS A VOICE OF SANITY: The Case of Justine Bateman—And Why Gen X Broke for Trump.

One of the biggest headlines to come out of the recent election is that Gen X—hardly nationalist or populist—broke for Trump. Broke hard—backing him by 10 points. (Boomers, by contrast, split their vote between Trump and Kamala Harris.) Maybe part of it was that we had grown up in a distinctly unpolitical moment, when there were no wars to protest and no civil rights to champion. There was, about us, an all-pervasive don’t-give-a-shit quality, and it was reflected in our Ray-Bans, our irony, our apathy. Mostly, we wanted to be left alone—by our parents, by the sex ed counselors preaching abstinence, by Nancy Reagan telling us to “Just say no.” We were, for the most part, ideologically committed to nothing.

Growing up in the San Fernando Valley, Bateman told me when we spoke last week via Zoom, she never gave politics much thought. It was “like one tiny part of you, one grain of sand on a huge beach.”

She said she started to notice a change in the political climate around 2012. Although she initially felt that Black Lives Matter and #MeToo “were important movements,” she concluded that eventually, “there was an overgrowth of people wanting to be part of it, wanting to qualify, and the qualifications for these particular hashtags became wider and wider, and more diluted.”

In other words, it went too far, became too extreme—especially the #MeToo movement, “with people going, ‘Oh, I want to be part of that, but I don’t know that I qualify,’ and then other women talking you into it, saying, ‘No, you have been sexually assaulted, you just repressed it.’ ”

Then came 2020: the pandemic, George Floyd, the riots, the groupthink—“these people necessitating that I think like them, and policing what people say, and what they tweet, and what they like on a social media post.”

She hated the rise of the progressive mob. It was antithetical to everything she believed in. “The only way you get that kind of momentum behind destroying peoples’ lives is when you have a mob mentality,” Bateman said. “I felt like the fact that Trump won cut the momentum of that mob mentality.”

When I asked Bateman why she had “come out,” as it were, on X, why she’d decided to make herself something of a pariah in uber-progressive Hollywood, she said: “Everyone should be able to live their life the way they want to, without infringing on somebody else’s ability to freely live their life the way they want, and that’s the whole thing. You follow that within a society, and you’re golden—you know what I mean? You can’t fail.”

She didn’t want to say whether she’d voted for Trump. “I’m just not playing that game. I don’t want to participate in that, like, ‘Okay, here we go, we can put you in this box.’ ” Nor did she want to say what her brother, the star of the Emmy-winning series Ozark, thought of his sister coming out of the “political closet.”

Immediately after the election, when hardcore leftists suffering from massive cases of disconfirmed expectancy reverted to performative shrieking into their iPhones, Bateman’s droll Hollywood directorial critiques of their poor lighting, sound and compositions were something to behold: #SocialMediaVideoCritique: Justine Bateman Offers HILARIOUS Film Tips to Melting Down TikTokers.

TRUMP – A UNITER, NOT A DIVIDER: Hilarious! Mourning Joe and Mika Kissed Trump’s Ring at Mar-a-Lago on Friday.

During the run-up to the election, Joe, Mika, and their guests went full Olivier in The World at War to describe the horrors of a potential looming Trump administration:

The hosts frequently aired segments about Trump being an authoritarian threat to democracy and spoke about the election in existential terms.

“This is an increasingly desperate person. An increasingly desperate family, who is preparing for civil war,” Scarborough said of Trump last month. He was responding to the “enemy from within” rhetoric Trump used to describe his political opponents.

On election day, historian Jon Meachem appeared on Morning Joe and suggested Trump would ban historians from writing books if he returns to office and likened him to fascist dictators.

But post-election, and staring into flat-lined ratings, and a potential sale by Comcast, and wouldn’t you know it – suddenly, it’s Orange Man Not-So-Bad:

UPDATE: Manhattan waiter quite angry about his favorite cable channel’s new direction:

FORMER SOCIALIST “IT GIRL” SEARCHING FOR HER NEXT 15 MINUTES OF FAME: AOC says there are ‘things we can learn’ for Republicans as Democrats admit they are ‘out of touch.’

Asked why Democrats lost, Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said his party needs to stop ‘canceling’ people that might disagree with them on something.

‘We have policy issues that are out of touch with the American people,’ Moskowitz acknowledged when speaking with CNN.

‘Our tent’s got to get there,’ he continued, ‘we’ve got to be more accepting of positions all across the spectrum without the shaming and the canceling that goes on on our side of the aisle.’

Meanwhile, AOC also told the network: ‘I think there are things we can learn about digital communication, about constant, direct communication with people and about sending a very clear and easy-to-understand message.’

‘Even if those messages are very, very different in their values, proposals and dispositions,’ she added.

She better brush up on her messaging skills pretty quickly, as mankind only has a few years left! Ocasio-Cortez: ‘World will end in 12 years’ if climate change not addressed.

The Hill, January 22, 2019.

JULIE BURCHILL: The tyranny of the cry-bully.

Do the grown men and women with Trump Derangement Syndrome not feel shame about displaying their emotions in such a way? No, because they’ve grown up believing that acting in a way that would make Chicken Licken seem chillaxed is somehow proof of their ‘authenticity’. You can see them all over the socials, adults wailing like toddlers in need of a nap and a weighted blankie. They’re shaving their heads and swearing off sex. Some are apparently so scared for their lives that they’re seeking out ‘safe houses’, ‘listening circles’ and ‘therapy ducks’. They talk darkly of mass trans suicides and the death of democracy and repeatedly say, ‘no words’ (which is two words).

Whoopi Goldberg has claimed that Trump intends to make interracial marriages illegal, separate non-white wives from their white husbands and forcibly marry the white men to white women. I don’t know how vice-president-elect JD Vance, proudly uxorious husband to a beautiful woman of Indian heritage, missed that memo.

The most educated, as ever, are the dumbest. Students at Georgetown’s McCourt School of Public Policy were reportedly offered treats like ‘milk and cookies’ and ‘hot cocoa’, as well as Lego toys and ‘colouring and mindfulness exercises’ to take their minds off the election results. The Guardian, that bastion of mental excellence, has been offering free counselling to its journalists.

You can see the most entertaining examples of fit-witism on the excellent Rita Panahi’s Sky News Australia segment, amusingly called ‘Lefties losing it’. You get the impression that this type of behaviour may have started out as performative and a bit keeping-up-with-the-Owen-Joneses (more on him later). But just as fame is a mask that eats the face, emotional incontinence is a poison that eats the brain. It’s possible that these people are suffering from an actual thing called ‘disconfirmed expectancy’, a type of cognitive dissonance produced when new information directly contradicts an individual’s existing beliefs. This causes disciples to double down on the trounced worldview, much as followers of apocalyptic religious cults, disappointed when the aliens fail to land, say it’s going to happen next year instead.

While this is true of the wretched followers, the leaders are good old-fashioned ‘cry-bullies’, a splendid phrase I created nearly a decade ago: ‘This is the age of the cry-bully, a hideous hybrid of victim and victor, weeper and walloper. They are everywhere, these duplicit Pushmi-Pullyus of the personal and the political, from Celebrity Big Brother to the frontline of Islamism.’

The Democrats’ path out of the wilderness, when they went all-in during the last weeks of the election playing the Nazi card, but unlike 1948, didn’t get a “Dewey Defeats Truman” photo at the end, will be fascinating to watch. That they’re still shouting the F-word even after the election hints that it’s going to take them quite a while to learn their lessons for next time.

DISPATCHES FROM THE PARTY OF TOLERANCE FOR DIVERSITY: Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Resigns After MAGA Meltdown Went Viral.

Legal Insurrection readers may recall that shortly after President-Elect Donald Trump emerged as the winner on election night, Scientific American Editor-in-Chief Laura Helmuth lost all sense of professional decorum and scientific objectivity and had herself a spectacular social media meltdown.

In a social media rant, Helmuth raged against Trump supporters, some of whom are likely to be science-curious potential readers of her publication. As a reminder, here is what it looked like:

This is not a good look for someone supposed to have scientific objectivity or professional decorum. Many who read the screed called for her resignation.

Read the whole thing.

IN THE FUTURE, EVERYONE WILL BE HITLER FOR 15 MINUTES – AND THE FUTURE IS NOW!

Is Pete Hegseth a Nazi? Are Christians White Supremacists? One News Outlet Thinks So.

Dems Call Moulton a ‘Nazi Cooperator’ For Questioning Trans Agenda.

James Clyburn Likens Trump to Hitler and Mussolini, Cavuto Offers Gentle Pushback: ‘A Little Hyperbolic.’

Will Trump be a bigger Hitler during his second term than he was in his first term? As Jeff Dunetz wrote in March of 2019: Rep. Clyburn (D-SC) Debases The Suffering Of Holocaust Victims AGAIN.

He did it again. For the second time in a month and the third time in memory,  House Majority Whip, James Clyburn has made inappropriate references to the Holocaust which only serve to reduce the perception of the horrors suffered by victims at the hands of Hitler and the Nazis.

In an interview with NBC News Clyburn (D-SC) compared President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler, saying the president and his family are the “biggest threat to democracy” in his lifetime.

Hilariously in retrospect, Clyburn compared Trump to Hitler on the eve of Dr. Fauci’s lockdown of the entire country: “Why Is Rep. Clyburn Allowed To Use The Holocaust As A Political Weapon? Where’s The Media?”, Dunetz asked on March 16th, 2020:

It’s a basic rule of American politics, never use the Holocaust or any of its related terms such as Nazis or Hitler, for political warfare. The Holocaust is a singular event in world history and not just because of its scale and inhuman horror. Yes, there have been, and sadly will be other genocides of other groups, and there have even been other atrocities against the Jewish people.  But generally, a genocide is waged to suppress a group, keep them out of a countries politics, or to take their land or some other economic reason.  The Holocaust was different– the Jews targeted by Hitler, and the Nazis had no desires to take over the country’s land and held relatively little power–they were just hated. The Nazis took Jews from all over Europe and killed them. Rep.James Clyburn continually uses the Holocaust as a political weapon without facing any criticism from the mainstream media. Rep. Clyburn Holocaust

His latest inappropriate reference was Sunday night during an interview on the Axios program on HBO:

March 16th was the day the AP announced: New federal coronavirus guidelines to ‘slow the spread.’

What we now remember as 2020 had officially begun.

The following week, Clyburn vowed to never let a crisis go to waste: Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision.’

Hey, you know else saw a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit his vision…?

In 2018, the late Kathy Shaidle noted: When I say “Trump is my fourth Hitler,” it’s only because I’m too young to remember Goldwater.

Since 1944, it’s been Hitlers all the way down for Democrats at election time.

But for Jim Clyburn and his massive case of TDS, it’s never a bad time to red-line the Godwin Meter.

ACCIDENTAL STAR OF 2024 RETIRING TO SPEND MORE TIME WITH HER FAMILY: Ann Selzer leaving election polling after Iowa whiff.

Two weeks after her firm incorrectly found Vice President Kamala Harris surging in increasingly red Iowa, pollster J. Ann Selzer said Sunday she is leaving election polling and ending her longstanding relationship with the Des Moines Register, which dates back to 1997.

“Over a year ago I advised the Register I would not renew when my 2024 contract expired with the latest election poll as I transition to other ventures and opportunities,” Selzer wrote in an op-ed for the newspaper.

The final Des Moines Register poll, released the Saturday before the election, found Harris (47 percent) and Donald Trump (44 percent) neck and neck, a shocking result in a state not considered competitive. According to unofficial results, Trump won Iowa by 13 points, 56 percent to 43 percent.

“Would I have liked to make this announcement after a final poll aligned with Election Day results? Of course,” Selzer wrote. “It’s ironic that it’s just the opposite. I am proud of the work I’ve done for the Register, for the Detroit Free Press, for the Indianapolis Star, for Bloomberg News and for other public and private organizations interested in elections. They were great clients and were happy with my work.”

The Iowa poll has taken on a near-mythical status over the past two decades, mostly driven by the state’s role in the presidential nominating process. It was the only survey to nail the order of Democratic candidates in the 2004 caucuses. Selzer’s final poll before the 2008 caucuses accurately predicted that a surge of first-time caucus-goers would propel Barack Obama to a decisive victory.

At NRO, Jeffrey Blehar adds: Give Iowa Pollster Ann Selzer Her Due in Retirement.

More than any other pollster, ironically enough, it was Ann Selzer who convinced intelligent poll-watchers all the way back in 2016 that Iowa had flipped forever into MAGA Country, so before you laugh at her now, understand that she led the way and had to surprise thousands in the industry each time in order to do so.

But the 2024 omen was inauspicious indeed. Timed in advance or not, it feels like this was the right moment for Selzer to finally hang the ol’ phone up on the cradle, if only because her polling methodology may have finally hit a wall. If you look at this list of Selzer & Co. final pre-election polls for every race since 1996, you will notice something about the final run of them, dating from 2016 specifically — yes, the Trump era. The error has always been in favor of Democrats. She whiffed on her 2018 call for Iowa governor by nearly 5 percent (and thus mistakenly had Kim Reynolds losing), but the error usually averaged out to about +2 in favor of the Dems . . . until it absolutely exploded this year. What happened?

Because we cannot know for sure, it’s time for some mild speculation. Selzer famously refuses to adjust or weight her polling numbers, instead trusting in her (up until now) proven ability to get the proper regional and demographic spread. This task has traditionally been easier in Iowa than most states, simply because of its overwhelming racial homogeneity. But one is tempted to wonder whether the methods Selzer made her name by using are of less value in an era of both extreme polarization as well as a special problem unique to our present culture that I like to call the “Revenge of the Karens” — a severe overresponse from progressive women to polling phone calls, because they (disproportionately relative to the rest of the American population) feel self-actualized by registering their opinion, whether to a machine or especially to a live human being. When the Des Moines Register wrote up Selzer’s final shock 47–44 Harris poll at the beginning of November, they cited an apparent surge of female support that had put her over the top.

This was entirely illusory; note that Harris ended up with just 42.7 percent of the vote. The only explanation for the wild miss is a disproportionate female over-response: Understand that because of Selzer’s methodology, this is not an intentional oversampling or overweighting of polled women, but rather their natural response rate. That suggests any number of sociological phenomena this column is ill-equpped to begin unpacking here — but that are worth pondering in silence. In the meantime, even as I question whether Selzer’s classic methodology remains viable in a rapidly changing era, it’s worth saluting one of the great, and fearlessly individualistic, pollsters of the modern era. Give Ann Selzer her due in retirement.

Exit question: If landline phones are dying out, how do political polls work today?

(Via Joseph Campbell, who adds “#pollfail.”)

UPDATE: Disgraced Pollster Ann Selzer Retires After Iowa Poll Miss. “‘Literally the first comment I saw on Twitter after her Harris +3 poll was someone saying it was time for her to retire,’ Mark Mitchell, the head pollster at Rasmussen Reports told me in response to the news. ‘The only question now, is did she just buy a lake house?’”

THIS WEEK ON MAR-A-LAGO VICE:

And speaking of drugs:

Heh, indeed.™

UPDATE: Trump gives RFK Jr McDonald’s ‘poison’ to eat on private plane.

RFK Jr was highly critical of the modern diet during the election campaign, vowing to “Make America Healthy Again”, and even described Mr Trump’s diet as “really bad”.

“Campaign food is always bad, but the food that goes on to [Trump Force One] is, like, just poison,” the 70-year-old told podcaster Joe Polish on Monday.

“You have a choice between – you don’t have the choice, you’re either given KFC or Big Macs. That’s when you’re lucky, and then the rest of the stuff I consider kind of inedible.”

Reaction to the photograph was swift on social media, with users – including Mr Trump’s own son – pointing out the irony of RFK Jr posing with a McDonald’s meal.

RFK Jr. certainly doesn’t look happy in the above photo, a post-election rerun of when John Kerry and John Edwards posed stiffly at a Wendy’s during the 2004 campaign for a photo-op, but as Mark Steyn wrote in August of 2004, the Wendy’s meals were simply campaign props:

It then emerged that Wendy’s had just been an appetiser. The campaign advance team had ordered 19 five-star lunches from the Newburgh Yacht Club for Kerry, Edwards, Affleck and co to be served back on the bus: shrimp vindaloo, grilled diver sea scallops, prosciutto, wrapped stuffed chicken, etc.

I’m not sure whether Ben had the shrimp and Teresa the scallops, but, either way, it turns out John Edwards is right: there are two Americas – one America where folks eat at Wendy’s, another America where the elite pass an amusing half-hour slumming among the folks at Wendy’s and then chow down on the Newburgh Yacht Club’s specials of the day. The Elizabeth Edwards anniversary-at-Wendy’s shtick was meant to emphasise her husband’s authenticity, but it now looks as inauthentic as Kerry’s own blundering “regular guy” routine.

Just wait until RFK Jr. finds out what meals will be like during Trump’s second term in the White House:

AN EMPLOYEE OF JEFF BEZOS HAS SOME CALM AND RATIONAL THOUGHTS ON THE PRESIDENT-ELECT:

As Mark Steyn once wrote, regarding a 2006 blogpost by the late Kathy Shaidle:

When I was on the Rush Limbaugh show a couple of months back, a listener called up to insist that 9/11 was an inside job. I asked him whether that meant Bali and Madrid and London and Istanbul were also inside jobs. Because that’s one expensive operation to hide even in the great sucking maw of the federal budget. But the Toronto blogger Kathy Shaidle made a much sharper point:

“I wonder if the nuts even believe what they are saying. Because if something like 9/11 happened in Canada, and I believed with all my heart that, say, Stephen Harper was involved, I don’t think I could still live here. I’m not sure I could stop myself from running screaming to another country. How can you believe that your President killed 2,000 people, and in between bitching about this, just carry on buying your vente latte and so forth?”

Over to you, Col. de Grand Pre, and Charlie Sheen, and Alan Colmes.

And over to you, Jen.