TO BE FAIR, THE TARGETS WERE BULL****: Only 5% of countries deliver climate plans for meeting targets under the Paris Agreement. “The nonbinding multinational agreement commits signing nations to limit greenhouse gas emissions to 1.5 degrees celsius of warming above pre-industrial levels. President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the agreement upon taking office last month.”

It’s not exactly cute when world leaders plot to restrict liberty and impede economic growth to fine-tune a relationship between carbon and global temperatures, which we don’t fully understand and might not exist at all.

DATA REPUBLICAN TEACHES HOW TO READ THE DATA: TURNING POINT DOES NOT RECEIVE USAID DOLLARS.

USAID grant money is everywhere. It’s so deeply woven into the nonprofit world that tracing it is like testing $100 bills for cocaine—at a certain scale, every charity has some residue.

That’s why the disclaimer at the top of the website exists:

**”NOTE: Funding is fungible, meaning USAID dollars do not directly flow into these NGOs in a literal sense. Instead, the money moves through multiple layers, with various entities handling and redistributing it.

Rather than focusing solely on individual grants or making definitive statements about how NGOs benefit from USAID, it’s more important to recognize the broader pattern of funding distribution and influence—and to cut through the layers of unaccountability.”**

So, how do you determine if an NGO is truly dependent on USAID money? Context matters.

Let’s go back to the cocaine analogy: Every $100 bill has trace amounts, but a drug dealer’s cash will be covered in it. The same logic applies here.

🔹 Look at the graph on the left. That’s Defending Democracy Together Institute, Bill Kristol’s group. Over half of their funding comes from major grants. That’s a lot of cocaine.

🔹 Now, compare it to Turning Point USA on the right. Their USAID connections are multiple hops away and bottlenecked by the smallest possible intermediary grants. Even with the most extreme assumptions, only 0.2% of their funding could possibly come from this path.

This isn’t just theory for me. I worked with Charlie Kirk during the 2024 election on early voting analysis. I saw firsthand how his operation worked, and I can say with confidence: President Trump would not have won re-election without him. He flipped voter registrations on their head and made a direct push for young male voters.

I missed this thread over the weekend, but it hasn’t lost any relevance.

Exit quote: “The system is built to entangle everyone, making true accountability impossible.”

ANYBODY BUT THE NORMAL-AMERICAN COMMUNITY, WHICH THEY REGARD AS DEADLY ENEMIES:

IMMIGRATION HYPOCRISY:

THE LEFT’S PATHETIC AND YET PERSISTENT PROPAGANDA. HOW MANY VERSIONS OF THIS ARE THERE, AND IS ANY OF THEM TRUE?

A father of five was detained by ICE on his way to work. Now his family is losing their home.

Texas Woman Sends Message to Trump After Husband Detained by ICE.

And there’s this: LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, JOSE LUIS.

Of course, the answer to the sob story is “I really don’t care, Margaret.” BUT digging further, there are more things that don’t add up than in Paul Pelosi’s hammering story.  Like, excuse me they have at least three children together, how come he never applied for a green card? If you marry a citizen, you can, you know? So, why not? Is she also illegal? No? Then why not?

Of course, he wouldn’t be eligible for a green card if he has a criminal record.  Which brings us to, you know and I know that right now, at this point, they’re not deporting just random illegals (unless they’re caught near criminal illegals, but that’s not what’s described here. So, what does this lovey do, and what does he have in his past?
Is he the subject of the third link? Maybe not, but would you bet given the slipperiness of records?  What do you think?

So, tell the peddlers of sob stories “I really don’t care Margaret” and ignore their Hostage Puppies.