Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

IT’S COME TO THIS: The Film Students Who Can No Longer Sit Through Films.

Everyone knows it’s hard to get college students to do the reading—remember books? But the attention-span crisis is not limited to the written word. Professors are now finding that they can’t even get film students—film students—to sit through movies. “I used to think, If homework is watching a movie, that is the best homework ever,” Craig Erpelding, a film professor at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, told me. “But students will not do it.”

I heard similar observations from 20 film-studies professors around the country. They told me that over the past decade, and particularly since the pandemic, students have struggled to pay attention to feature-length films. Malcolm Turvey, the founding director of Tufts University’s Film and Media Studies Program, officially bans electronics during film screenings. Enforcing the ban is another matter: About half the class ends up looking furtively at their phones.

A handful of professors told me they hadn’t noticed any change. Some students have always found old movies to be slow, Lynn Spigel, a professor of screen cultures at Northwestern University, told me. “But the ones who are really dedicated to learning film always were into it, and they still are.”

Most of the instructors I spoke with, however, feel that something is different now. And the problem is not limited to large introductory courses. Akira Mizuta Lippit, a cinema and media-studies professor at the University of Southern California—home to perhaps the top film program in the country—said that his students remind him of nicotine addicts going through withdrawal during screenings: The longer they go without checking their phone, the more they fidget. Eventually, they give in. He recently screened the 1974 Francis Ford Coppola classic The Conversation. At the outset, he told students that even if they ignored parts of the film, they needed to watch the famously essential and prophetic final scene. Even that request proved too much for some of the class. When the scene played, Lippit noticed that several students were staring at their phones, he told me. “You do have to just pay attention at the very end, and I just can’t get everybody to do that,” he said.

The idea of a two-hour adaptation of a famous novel was an invention of early Hollywood in the first couple of decades of the 20th century. Will the form die once movie theaters vanish?

THE LEFT DOESN’T WANT TO DEFUND THE POLICE, THEY WANT TO BE THE POLICE: Border Control.

AMERICA’S NEWSPAPER OF RECORD:

UPDATE:

GOOD AND HARD, FUN CITY: 16 Dead in NYC From Warmth of Collectivism.

At least 16 people have died outdoors in New York City after a winter storm and days of subfreezing temperatures, intensifying scrutiny of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s (D.) handling of the cold snap and his decision to halt the removal of homeless encampments.

The death toll climbed to 16, Mamdani announced Monday, and hypothermia played a role in at least 13 of the deaths. Fourteen New Yorkers died from Hurricane Ida in 2021.

Mamdani announced in December that he would drop former mayor Eric Adams’s policy of clearing homeless encampments and encouraging people to go to shelters, saying that displacement was ineffective. Critics argue the reversal left the homeless vulnerable when temperatures plunged.

Adams said he pleaded with Mamdani not to abandon the city’s established policy. “I begged him not to reverse our policy that kept homeless New Yorkers from freezing outdoors in makeshift encampments,” Adams wrote Thursday on X. “He didn’t listen.”

“Reinstate the policy now. Every day of delay risks more lives,” the former mayor said.

Mamdani on Monday, though, said that “It does not appear there’s any relationship between encampments and what we’ve seen with these 16 New Yorkers.”

The mayor also took heat from Rep. Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.). “So much for the ‘warmth of collectivism,’” Stefanik said. “The cold hard truths of Socialism have arrived in NYC. People are literally dying on the streets in the cold because of inexperience, ineptitude, and a dehumanizing radical ideology.”

The optics of this risk backfiring very badly on our theater kid mayor:

UPDATE: While Mamdani is the only open communist of blue city mayors, he’s far alone in his incompetence:

It’s not quite that if you elect a Democrat, you’re signing on for at least one term of poorly run government. But in one big U.S. city after another, highly touted mayors — all progressive Democrats, of course — are proving deeply subpar in delivering services when their cities need them most.

The failures of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson are well-documented. Closer to home for me, Muriel Bowser is in the final year of a twelve-year run as mayor of the District of Columbia, isn’t running for reelection, and apparently is gripped by what the high schoolers used to call “senioritis.”

As you likely know, one week ago, the northeast got hit by a major snow and ice storm. Bowser attended a party at the U.S. Conference of Mayors Thursday, while her city still hadn’t completed the basic duty of plowing the streets.

The virtue signal to reward ratio is astonishing:

ANNALS OF LEFTIST AUTOPHAGY:

UPDATE (FROM GLENN): The purpose of a system is what it does. Not what it says it’s for.

WEEKEND AT BERNIE’S: How Bernie Sanders built a device to give himself ‘cosmos-shattering orgasms.’

Bernie Sanders was a follower of the ‘Father of Free Love’ in his youth and built himself a device so he could achieve ‘cosmos-shattering orgasms’, according to a new book on the senator.

He was heavily influenced by the controversial sex therapist Wilhelm Reich who believed that liberation could be achieved via enhanced climaxes.

During his 20s and while at college, Sanders became a devotee of Reich, an Austrian psychoanalyst, who believed that a universal energy called ‘orgone’ powered everything.

Reich constructed a shed-like device called an ‘Orgone Accumulator’ which supposedly collected energy to be later released in the form of explosive orgasms.

According to the upcoming book ‘Bernie for Burlington’, Sanders saw Reich’s teaching as the ‘answer’ to his own hardscrabble childhood.

Such was his devotion to Reich that he even built his own orgone orgasm device, a 5ft-long prayer mat made of copper wire with spikes on it that he slept on to channel the ‘energy’ into his body, author Dan Chiasson claims.

Chiasson, a poet and journalist who is a regular contributor to The New Yorker magazine, grew up in Burlington, the largest city in Vermont, where a the now 84-year-old Sanders became mayor before becoming a US Representative and then Senator.

The book charts Sanders’s ideological development as a democratic socialist and says that he was ‘deeply influenced’ by Reich, who ‘connected political liberation with the successful cultivation of cosmos-shattering orgasms’.

The New York Times assures me that everyday sex in the former Soviet Union was nothing but cosmos-shattering orgasms.

ACE OF SPADES: Major British Labour Politician Pressured to Resign Over Epstein Payoffs; Epstein Had a Secret Baby?

Peter Mandelson is a major fixer for Labour who is responsible for the rise of Tony Blair.

There are at least two occasions on which it is alleged Epstein handed large sums of money to Lord Mandelson or his husband.

His husband.

Mandelson directly referenced one of the claims when announcing his resignation from the Labour party. Bank statements held among the Epstein files released by the US Department of Justice appear to show that in 2003 to 2004 the disgraced financier paid a total of $75,000 (£54,750) into bank accounts of which Mandelson — then a Labour MP — was believed to be a beneficiary.

The former cabinet minister had already come under pressure over the second allegation that his husband, Reinaldo Avila da Silva, had received £10,000 from Epstein about two months after the registered sex offender was released from prison in 2009.

Related: There’s no way back for Peter Mandelson.

Filed related to the paedophile financier suggest that Mandy may have received $75,000 from Epstein and also lobbied against a tax on British bankers’ bonuses. Mandelson says he has no record of the payments. Documents released by the US Department of Justice in recent days suggest that Epstein also sent £10,000 to Peter Mandelson’s partner Reinaldo Avila da Silva in 2009. Mandelson did not comment on this report and there is no suggestion Da Silva was involved in any wrongdoing. But what seems all too clear is that Mandelson’s Achilles heel – his love of associating with powerful, wealthy men – has led to his final downfall.

Mandelson’s statement last night was more graceful than some of his more defiant public pronouncements in the past. (Who can forget his Gloria Gaynor-esque statement in 2001 that “I’m a fighter, not a quitter”?) He declared that “I have been further linked this weekend to the understandable furore surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and I feel regretful and sorry about this. Allegations which I believe to be false that he made financial payments to me 20 years ago, and of which I have no record or recollection, need investigating by me.” Even allowing for the conditionals attached, he knew that the game was up, and so announced that: “While doing this I do not wish to cause further embarrassment to the Labour party and I am therefore stepping down from membership of the party.”

Mandelson was right to use a phrase that the other embattled Epstein veteran Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor seems to have been unable to utter: “I want to take this opportunity to repeat my apology to the women and girls whose voices should have been heard long before now”. But given that the one-time master of the dark arts is no longer seen in the House of Lords, his resignation from Labour means that, at the age of 72, Mandelson has now effectively quit public life.

Further thoughts from Mark Steyn: “If you’re wondering why the British political class are so indifferent to the gang-raped working-class girls of every town up and down England, well, it’s clear from a cursory glance at the Epstein files that our rulers are relaxed about the way of the world: under the new class system, there are those who are pleasured and those who do the pleasuring.”

THE WRATH OF KIRK: William Shatner’s fiber commercial is on pace to get more views than the woke new Star Trek show.

This is a real ad:

[Warning: It’s a fiber commercial, so there’s PG-13 potty humor]

On X alone, Shatner’s ad has racked up 1 million views.

The premiere of the woke Star Trek show, meanwhile, only had 1300 live viewers on YouTube and was eventually pulled after only 218,000 views in nine days, with 8,000 likes and 27,000 dislikes.

Geeks & Gamers put it this way:

One man boldly going with a bowl of cereal just outperformed an entire streaming rollout. That should worry Paramount far more than any dislike counter ever could.

There are only three cast members of the original show still alive, and by far, Shatner is the biggest star, so if he wants to cash in at age 94 on the enormous goodwill he’s built up over the decades for starring in a beloved TV and movie series, he deserves every dollar he gets for such an ad. Conversely, the showrunners of the various streaming versions of Trek deserve all of the scorn they’re receiving for ruining the franchise they inherited.

As far as the actual cereal that Shatner is promoting though, let’s face it, it’s no Colon Blow:

NO. NEXT QUESTION? Can AI Movie Stars Replace the Genuine Article?

Much of Hollywood, to say nothing of moviegoing audiences at large, have resigned themselves to the idea that most of what we do will soon be replaced by AI. Judging by the general tenor of the comments I receive, many of my regular readers are actively rooting for this outcome. And if the various creative guilds (WGA/DGA/SAG) decide to go on strike later this summer, you can bet that this fear of AI will be one of the primary reasons why they do so. But given that Hollywood rushed headlong into streaming without understanding how the economics would work (spoiler alert: they don’t), before we enthusiastically embrace our new AI overlords we should, at least for one brief moment, resist the tech bro impulse to “move fast and break things” and ask a few important questions… questions like “what is a movie star?”

Most of the time, if you press someone in Hollywood for an answer, the one you’ll get will not be particularly useful or practical. Often the answer will sound a bit like the famous quote from Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart who, while discussing the definition of pornography, said “I can’t define it, but I know it when I see it.”

My own personal definition of what makes a movie star has always been some version of this… “a movie star is someone who takes your breath away the first time you see them on film, even when they’re doing nothing at all.”

A machine can’t replace the million dollar charisma a legendary actor brings to his or her role. I suppose we will see AI-versions of the early Pixar movies coming out of Hollywood, where the visuals are created from a series of AI prompts, but a mixture of superstars and veteran character actors create the personas of the onscreen characters, based on the goodwill they’ve accumulated over the decades. But where AI is going to really shine is for everyday people to type in the prompts and generate the otherwise missing scenes from movies and TV series they’ve enjoyed, such as this fan-made AI Star Wars homage:

But we’ll eventually see how AI recreations of legendary actors compare when they’re intercut together: Deepfaking Orson Welles’s Mangled Masterpiece. Will an A.I. restoration of “The Magnificent Ambersons” right a historic wrong or desecrate a classic?

I hate to be a cynical, but alas, my money is on the latter. At least for the next few years.

OLD AND BUSTED: “Nobody is illegal on stolen land.”

The New Hotness? Let’s celebrate America stealing some land!

“THE AESTHETICS OF REBELLION ARE WORN BY THE ACOLYTES OF THE REGIME:”

This is why the British government coding Amelia with the aesthetics of rebellion was such a strange choice: Amelia Victorious: How to Lose the Culture War With a Video Game.

There’s something genuinely funny going on in the United Kingdom right now.

The British government’s Prevent office, housed under the Home Office (think Department of the Interior, but allergic to dissent), partnered with a media nonprofit called Shout Out UK (like a PBS focused on preventing “radicalism”) to come up with a clever new way to re-educate British youth.

The concern, as always, was “radicalization.” They thought the solution was inspired: a choice-based video game. Kids like games. Games involve decisions. Decisions shape values. What could possibly go wrong?

Thus Pathways was born, a government-funded interactive morality play designed to gently shepherd British children toward being properly antiracist, properly accepting, and properly enthusiastic about the ever-increasing number of migrants reshaping their country. Civics class, but fun. And digital. And corrective.

As part of this effort, the designers introduced a character named Amelia, a cute, purple-haired, vaguely goth girl who carries a Union Jack and talks about Britain being for the British. She was meant to function as a warning, a living illustration of how nationalism can look attractive, even charming, and yet be dangerous to the impressionable youths of Britain who may not have fully internalized the idea that Brexit is bad and they are to obey their elitist overlords.

What they did not anticipate was that the public would take one look at adorable, charming Amelia and decide she was the good guy.

QED:

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS:

Shot:

Chaser: Billie Eilish gets permanent restraining order against man who repeatedly turned up to her home.

Metro News, June 19th, 2020.

TOP ENERGY EXPERT SAYS PROBABILITY THE U.S. WILL ATTACK IRAN SOON IS 75% AS RISK OF MAJOR DISRUPTION TO OIL SUPPLY IS PRICED IN — ‘THIS ONE IS REAL.’

Oil markets could be in for a major shock as President Donald Trump mulls a military strike on Iran, according to a top energy analyst.

The Islamic Republic responded to domestic unrest with unprecedented violence, slaughtering tens of thousands of people since protests broke out in late December.

Trump warned the regime not to kill protesters and vowed help was on the way. While he reportedly held off on an attack last month, the recent arrival of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Middle East has raised expectations that a strike is imminent.

“We would put 75% odds in the coming days to weeks there will be some sort of U.S. attack on Iran,” Bob McNally, Rapidan Energy Group founder and former White House energy advisor, told CNBC on Thursday.

Brent crude oil futures have jumped 5% in the past week and 14% since the start of the year. Prices have now broken their year-long pattern of a steady decline punctuated by brief spikes that quickly reverse to resume the downtrend, he noted.

The U.S. attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities last year only resulted in a temporary price surge as the conflict remained limited in scope and avoided the country’s oil infrastructure.

In addition, the U.S. military raid last month to capture Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro failed to move the needle much in oil markets as production wasn’t interrupted.

“But this one is real,” McNally warned. “The markets are pricing the risk that this time the past will not indicate the future—that we could have a sustained disruption in energy flows.”

Iran pumped 4.7 million barrels per day last year, accounting for 4.4% of global oil supplies. Much of its heavily sanctioned shipments go to China via a so-called shadow fleet.

Related: A ‘tear down the wall’ moment in Iran will damage both the Islamic Republic — and China.

ES IST SO WEIT GEKOMMEN: Berlin Hospitals Struggle to Treat Hundreds of Falls During Winter Freeze Because Environmental Laws Forbid Use of Salt on Sidewalks.

This morning, Berlin’s hapless Governing Mayor Kai Wegner appealed to the House of Representatives “to allow the use of de-icing salt in exceptional cases” to “alleviate the dangerous situation”. After everybody had a good laugh at Wegner for his impotent social media appeals, the man discovered that he is actually in charge of the whole executive and that he can just do things:

Berlin Mayor Kai Wegner has… commented in a press release: “The safety of Berliners is my top priority. That is why I have instructed the Senator for Transport today to issue a general ruling without delay, allowing private individuals and the VSR to use road salt on sidewalks to remove the ice cover.” Wegner further emphasised that he was aware that this decision was “associated with legal uncertainties.” Nevertheless, he considered it appropriate due to the “special situation”. “There is still a need for the fastest possible legal regulation to create legal certainty for the future. We will continue to discuss this in the coalition in the near future.”

Of course Wegner could have waived these retarded rules weeks ago before all those elderly people ended up with grievous injuries in overflowing emergency rooms. At least the harm to Berlin’s trees has been minimised, I guess.

But what is this snow and ice? All the best scientists assured me these conditions would be long gone in Europe by 2025.

DISPATCHES FROM THE NATIONAL FELONS LEAGUE: NFL’s Super Bowl Chief Kindness Officer has checkered past.

To this point, Schefter’s tweet is the only actual news on this topic. The NFL has not said what duties the Chief Kindness Officer will have. Maybe it’s going to strictly enforce taunting and roughing the passer penalties and demanding that players shake hands after every play? Maybe it will be going around Super Bowl Media Day and only asking questions about what their favorite ice cream flavor is? Maybe Mann will be in the broadcast booth and join Mike Tirico and Cris Collinsworth as NBC’s kindness expert.

Dhar Mann is a name that’s probably not familiar to too many NFL fans. And his selection by the NFL one is quite a bizarre one given the normally safe and conservative way that the league does business.

Mann first entered the headlines in 2012 when he was charged with 13 felonies for defrauding the city of Oakland through his medical marijuana business. He later pled no contest to five of those charges and was sentenced to probation.

After those legal troubles, Mann shifted to content creation where he found much greater success. His YouTube page Dhar Mann Studios has over 25 million subscribers. The content is mainly scripted short movies around 20-30 minutes in length that features some celebrity appearances and thought-provoking titles like “Mikey Falls in Love with YouTuber” and “Vegan Teacher Bans All Meat Inside School.” The videos are quite popular and have an uplifting meaning, which is clearly what inspired the NFL to partner with him.

The ozone layer of NFL management is determined to make its product the dreaded “second screen” in the background while everyone is concentrating on their iPhones and iPads. I greatly miss the days when Pete Rozelle would have laughed in an interviewer’s face had he suggested the league needed a “chief kindness officer:”

MELANIA MOVIE HUMILIATES CRITICS AND MEDIA NAYSAYERS WITH HISTORIC BOX OFFICE:

The legacy media must be devastated. Melania just had a huge box-office opening for a documentary, despite all the efforts to destroy the film before its release.

Deadline reports that Melania will finish the weekend in third place, with an $8 million opening.

Coming in at third is Amazon MGM Studios’ Brett Ratner-directed documentary Melania, which is eyeing $2.85M today (no previews) for an $8M opening in third place — that result would mark the best start for a docu in the last decade (beating Angel Studios’ 2023 doc After Death, which opened to $5M and finaled at $11.5M stateside). I’m hearing sales are gaining, with Florida and Texas quite large, for the First Lady’s big-screen debut.

According to Deadline, “EntTelligence showed Melania presales overindexing in rural areas with populations under 500,000.” The outlet noted that while “license fees plus marketing on this pic equals $75M.”

“Are MAGA groups driving sales? Maybe, but that will be sussed out as the weekend goes on. Know this: This isn’t an Angel Studios release fueled by some semblance of fan sales or an Amazon Prime super-ticket.”

The film’s success isn’t just a win for Melania Trump. It’s a crushing blow to the mainstream media, which subjected the film to a relentless propaganda campaign aimed at undermining it.

Sometimes without even bother to see the movie they’re ostensibly “reviewing:” Film Critic Torches Melania, Admits He Didn’t See It.

The Grauniad’s film critic, not surprisingly, went full-on Godwin and wrote one of the zaniest comparisons for his review: Melania review – Trump film is a gilded trash remake of The Zone of Interest.

It’s dispiriting, it’s deadly and it’s spectacularly unrevealing. Ratner’s film plays like a gilded trash remake of Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest in which a button-eyed Cinderella points at gold baubles and designer dresses, cunningly distracting us while her husband and his cronies prepare to dismantle the Constitution and asset-strip the federal government. “White and gold – that’s so you,” purrs one of her lickspittles as she busies herself with the colour-scheme for the ball and the incoming first lady allows that yes indeed, this is true.

Zone of Interest was of course an avant-garde 2023 film about the commandant of Auschwitz and the bourgeois life he and his family live as unspeakable horrors occur just beyond his home’s backyard. What exactly does the Grauniad think Trump has done that compares to that? Similarly, as Jonah Goldberg wrote in 2001, “Aside from the murder and genocide, what exactly don’t you like about National Socialism?” As Jonah has written, “I’ve never met a real social-welfare state leftist who could answer [that] question without having to think real hard.”

And on occasion, the Grauniad hasn’t seemed to mind murder and genocide all that much. Also, unlike that leftist British publication and the makers of the Zone of the Interest, curiously enough, the man they see as Hitler seems rather fond of Israel.

Related: Mass Media and Mass Formation on the Left.

THE PEOPLE WHO CAST THE VOTES DECIDE NOTHING. THE PEOPLE WHO COUNT THE VOTES DECIDE EVERYTHING:

OLD AND BUSTED: Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past.

The New Coldness? Two Memphis leaders question whether snow was man-made.

A new debate on snow is heating up online with posts from two Memphis City Council members, one of whom claims she’s getting threats over the post.

Pearl Walker and Yolanda Cooper-Sutton shared social media posts this week questioning whether the snow that fell across the city was real, or possibly man-made. The topic is trending on TikTok.

The comments quickly took off online, drawing strong reaction as crews across Memphis were still dealing with icy roads, school closures, and cleanup from one of the city’s more significant winter storms in recent years.

I blame the Rothschilds.

Much more here:

THE DE-GLEICHSCHALTUNG* CONTINUES: Jury Awards Detransitioner $2 Million In Historic Medical-Malpractice Lawsuit:

A woman who received a double mastectomy at the age of 16 under the guise of transgender-related healthcare was just awarded $2 million in the first successful medical-malpractice lawsuit brought by a destransitioner.

Fox Varian sued her New York-based psychologist and plastic surgeon for facilitating her gender-transition double mastectomy in 2019, independent reporter Benjamin Ryan who attended Varian’s recent trial, said. Although a host of detransitioners have sued doctors who rush to “affirm” gender confusion with life-altering surgeries, Varian’s is the first known successful lawsuit.

Claire Deacon, Varian’s mother, was led by her daughter’s psychologist to believe that breast removal was the only way to heal Varian’s gender dysphoria, she told the jury. At first Deacon told Varian’s psychologist Kenneth Einhorn that top surgery was “never gonna happen” if she could help it.

“This man was just so emphatic, and pushing and pushing, that I felt like there was no good decision,” she said, according to an Epoch Times report. “I think it was a scare tactic: I don’t believe it was malice, I think he believed what he was saying … but he was very, very wrong.”

The idea of her 16-year-old daughter receiving a mastectomy made her “physically ill,” Deacon said. But Deacon was led to believe by Einhorn that Varian would be unhappy unless she was affirmed in her gender dysphoria. It was the “the hardest, most difficult, gut-wrenching” decision, Deacon told the jury.

Two million? Those are rookie numbers. Red states need to pump those numbers up much higher:

* As Ace warned in 2024, the establishment left will likely be breaking out the airbrushes on a Stalinist level: The Trans-Children Era is About to Be Memory-Holed and the Perpetrators Will Be Disavowing Involvement. Particularly since, as Rich Lowry wrote that November, “Trans Moralism Is Killing the Democrats.” “This is what happened on trans issues in the election. Donald Trump’s ‘she’s for they/them’ attack ad was the most effective and consequential political spot of this century.”