Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

RIP: Jimmy Cliff, 81, Jamaican singer who took reggae international with “You Can Get It If You Really Want.”

Jimmy Cliff, who has died aged 81, was a singer, songwriter and actor whose work opened up the music and culture of Jamaica to an international audience.

Blazing a trail for Bob Marley, Cliff enjoyed a string of hits in the early 1970s that combined his unusually pure singing voice with a lilting reggae rhythm. But his real breakthrough came when he starred as the gun-toting, drug-dealing rude boy in the low budget blockbuster The Harder They Come (1972).

A brutal depiction of life in the Jamaican capital, Kingston, the film followed the travails of an underdog musician adrift in a big city where corruption was endemic. The accompanying score established reggae in America and became a bestselling soundtrack album.

Although it included songs by accomplished performers such as Toots and the Maytals and Desmond Dekker, it was Cliff’s compositions “You Can Get it if You Really Want” (which became the Conservative Party’s anthem at their annual conference in 2009), the hymn-like “Many Rivers To Cross,” as well as the title track, that particularly stood out.

Absolutely killer soundtrack album; Cliff would go on to appear as a musical guest on the first season of Saturday Night Live (with Dick Cavett as the show’s host), and co-star in the 1985 Harold Ramis-directed movie Club Paradise, alongside Robin Williams, Peter O’Tooole and Rick Moranis.

JAMES CARVILLE, TRAPPED IN 2020: Why Don’t Democrats Try Being Revolutionary Lunatics?

While utterly reckless, urging Democrats to gnash their teeth over “the system” would help the party’s candidates paper over their contributions to the very crisis against which they’re supposed to be raging. Carville lists the younger generation’s grievances: the high cost of housing (a function of limited housing stock exacerbated by municipal zoning regulations, environmental studies, and legal compliance costs), rising utility rates (due to insufficient capacity resulting, in substantial part, from environmentalist activism and policy prescriptions), and the cost of food (which was too high even before Donald Trump’s tariffs, owing to the Democratic Party’s heedless 2021-22 spending spree and its inflationary effects). If Democrats do not rage constantly and monomaniacally against these conditions, “we will continue to be viewed as part of it.”

In other words, the idiot masses can be bamboozled into forgetting the Democratic Party’s role in their malaise if the party’s messengers are sufficiently irrational about it. Coincidentally enough, Carville’s advice just happens to align with the political project in which the progressive movement’s youngish revolutionaries are already engaged. He’s got his finger on the pulse.

In 1968, Democrats embraced  “Getting Clean for Gene,” shaving off their Zapata moustaches, trimming their Sgt. Pepper-length hair and donning coats and ties to appear centrist for Eugene McCarthy’s candidacy. That strategy paid off brilliantly in 1992 with Bill Clinton and in 2008 with Barack Obama. (Of course, it helps in both cases that your youthful candidates have rock star levels of charisma.) Going full Rage Against (Your Own) Machine seems like a curious strategy for Carville to embrace in his dotage.

Exit quote: “The art department at the [New York] Times did Carville no favors by gracing his effort to flatter progressive pretensions with a portrait of a feral donkey, spittle erupting from its clamorous muzzle. The image did, however, capture the spirit of the piece.”

FINALLY: California City Bans Pickleball Over Noise Complaints.

If you’ve ever been to Carmel, you’ll know that the vibe of the wealthy tourist town filled with retirees is more quaint-German-storybook, less Plinko.

The town put in place a one-month temporary ban last month while they came up with a better long-term solution, but residents enjoyed the break from the constant noise so much, the council voted to keep the ban in place permanently.

One resident, Kimberly Edwards, said in the council meeting that while there’s been an uptick in people playing tennis,

It’s been so peaceful and quiet.

She went on to say that she wasn’t sure how effective the ban would be, noting that,

These aren’t supervised courts. You know that. They’re not — there’s no parks and rec department. So as I addressed in my letter: Who’s going to enforce this? … Am I going to have to hear a noise and then call the police? Is a police officer going to have to be, you know, sitting there on these courts, supervising them?’

Carmel Mayor, Dale Byrne, is in favor of the ban, but admitted,

It’s just a really difficult thing to enforce. And I can’t ask the [police] chief to send his people up there. … It’s really sad that we can’t figure this out.

I don’t know about you, but if I were a pickleball player, I think I would take that statement as permission to go ahead and play the game just as loud as I want.

I disagree — aficionados of the sport should stick to playing it where they’re actually wanted: Movie theaters are trying everything to bring audiences back — from pickleball to cocktail bars.

WHOA: Major Foreign Propagandists Utterly Exposed After X Glitch Reveals Account Locations.

A temporary glitch on X led to a credibility bloodbath for a variety of foreign propaganda accounts that were either posing as Americans or lying about their locations in other ways.

Days prior, Head of Product Nikita Brier had announced a new feature revealing the origin and current location of users. When it rolled out, though, only account owners could view it. That all changed on Friday night, though. In what is assumed to have been a mistake, everyone’s origins and current locations were made public for about an hour before disappearing.

In one instance, it was revealed that one of Hamas’ biggest simps has been lying about being in Gaza.

The above was posted when it was 65 degrees at night (and 80 during the day), just to give you an idea of the kind of propaganda being spewed. For years, the above account has claimed to be reporting from the ground in Gaza. He’s made hundreds of posts pushing fake claims about genocide, famine, and his own supposed hardships. In reality, his account was created in the United Kingdom, and he’s currently residing in Poland.

More account locations revealed here:

Great moments in projection:

UPDATE: The Daily Beast spins the story as being an issue entirely with the right: Top MAGA Influencers Accidentally Unmasked as Foreign Trolls.

And while the glitch has exposed ostensibly pro-MAGA trolls as being foreign actors…

 

…it’s not just an issue on the right:

MORE: Geographic Reveal Exposes Fakes.

THE ONLY STRATEGY THAT WORKS AGAINST WEAPONIZED LANGUAGE:

3. Shift the Conversation to Shared Moral Ground

Progressives still claim to value:

  • fairness
  • autonomy
  • freedom of conscience
  • diversity of thought
  • basic dignity

So stand inside their stated principles:

“We both believe people should speak without fear. That’s the principle I’m defending.”

Radicals can’t reject their own values without revealing themselves. Normal people respond instantly to shared moral ground.

The People You Cannot Reach

Accept this early to avoid wasting energy. You cannot reason with:

  • people whose politics function as religion
  • purity activists
  • Antifa-style street ideologues
  • online radicals addicted to emotional escalation
  • anyone who treats emotions as truth and words as ritual

These people aren’t debating. They’re policing. And they are not your audience.

Your audience is everyone watching, the people who still believe language has meaning, that disagreement isn’t violence, and that labels should not replace arguments. Be true to them, not your “debate” opponent.

QED:

GREAT MOMENTS IN CHUTZPAH: White House press corps becoming ‘Kremlin-esque,’ former press sec Jen Psaki claims.

Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki accused the Trump administration of forming a “Kremlin-esque” press corps full of “sycophants” during briefings.

Psaki, who served as press secretary under the Biden administration, discussed her time behind the podium with journalist Katie Couric on Wednesday, contrasting her experience with that of the current administration. The MS NOW host argued that more recently the White House has been “re-shaping” the people in the press pool.

“More and more of the questions in there are by sycophants — by people who are not asking about news that the American people care about,” Psaki said, accusing those reporters of pushing conspiracy theories in their questions.

Like Will Smith with the Men In Black memory wipe tool, Psaki wants you to entirely forget her role in propping up Joe Biden’s (p)residency, which began with many on the right noting his already dissipated state during the 2020 campaign, and some spotting “Biden’s Brezhnev vibes” two months before he actually took office:

At least nobody in the Soviet Union voted for Brezhnev — the elections were a sham with Communist party candidates running unopposed. Everything was a sham, actually. In his mumbling, robotic tones, the general secretary delivered long-winded, heavy on Marxist cliches and utterly incomprehensible televised speeches. The economy flattered, dissidents were subjected to psychiatric torture, corruption proliferated, and the rate of substance abuse skyrocketed. That period of Soviet history is known as zastoi, or stagnation. It only made sense that the man on top was some sort of sclerotic.

Like Brezhnev, Biden’s rhetoric is ridden with clichés, but of a different, folksy kind. At the time when political slogans are catchy and provocative — Make America Great Again, Black Lives Matter — Biden’s yard signs read ‘Our best days are still ahead’, and ‘Build back better’. His Twitter account is full of platitudes like ‘This is our moment — ours together — to write a newer, bolder, more compassionate chapter in the life of our nation.’ He’s just a boring ordinary guy — until he lashes out at a voter, or bites on his wife’s finger.

Is Biden the candidate of American stagnation? His cognitive and physical decline is increasingly difficult to hide and it’s highly disturbing to witness it become a subject of speculation. I’ve lived through it before and it gives me the creeps. Free citizens of a free republic shouldn’t need a Kremlinologist to decipher what’s wrong with their president.

As I wrote back then, “Just think of the media as Democratic Party operatives getting a head start on their four year nap, and the need to study Biden like a Kremlinologist makes perfect sense.” I had no idea that his inner circle would call themselves the “politburo” as they kept pushing their Brezhnev-like figurehead onstage, while they ran the government (badly) in the background: Meet the Biden ‘politburo’ accused of running the country in secret: There was the aide who demanded $4 million to advise the re-election campaign. There was the enforcer who ‘cast out heretics’. And there was Jill Biden.

However, as the book is published there is little chance of a reprieve for those accused of covering up, or wilfully ignoring, Biden’s decline. “I don’t think there is a way to make it stop,” one Democrat sighs. “Every Democrat is going to need to have an answer on Biden and why we let him stay for so long.”

The blame game is moving to a cabal of advisers, dubbed the “politburo” by colleagues in a nod to the highest decision-making body of the Soviet Union, a group said to have enjoyed unprecedented power.

“Five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board,” one cabinet member claims. “I’ve never seen a situation like this before, with so few people having so much power. They would make huge economic decisions without calling [Treasury] secretary Yellen.”

Back in May, Glenn wrote, “It was a coup, and they were usurpers. And every Democrat should have to answer for it.”

Including Psaki, who in May tried the KBJ/KJP defense: Jen Psaki Defends Missing Signs of Biden’s Decline: ‘I’m Not a Doctor.’

Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki has shared the truth about when exactly she realized that President Joe Biden was in decline: the first presidential debate in late June 2024.

Appearing on Semafor’s Mixed Signals podcast with hosts Max Tani and Ben Smith this week, Psaki discussed the moment she realized there was potentially no path forward for Biden. She recalled telling her colleagues partway through the debate, “This is a f—ing disaster,” adding that while she didn’t personally know what was going to happen from there, it became clear that many Democrats felt there was no path forward.

In response to a question from Smith about whether there was a cover-up regarding Biden’s condition, Psaki said, “I think ‘cover-up’ is such a loaded phrase… People use that term as related to Watergate or the covering up of not sharing public information about a war.”

During her time as press secretary, she continued, she “never saw that person… that was on that debate stage,” despite being in the Oval Office every single day. She added, “I’m not a doctor. Aging happens quite quickly.”

Psaki infamously kept schtum after the 20204 debate that made Biden’s decline too obvious to continue to deny:

And she was around Biden enough in person prior that to see him malfunctioning regularly:

Although based on past actions and haberdasherial choices, perhaps she doesn’t mean “Kremlin-esque” as an insult: Resurfaced photo shows Biden press sec Jen Psaki wearing hammer and sickle hat with Russian official.

PAUL SPERRY: How Trump’s Own Appointees Aided Russiagate Plot Against Him.

When Obama administration officials manufactured U.S. intelligence tying Donald Trump to Moscow following his stunning 2016 victory, they had no idea Trump’s own political appointees would help them undermine Trump’s presidency – and his chances of reelection in 2020.

RCI’s review of recently declassified documents and exclusive interviews with former Trump officials reveals for the first time how key members of Trump’s cabinet and other appointees during his first term shrouded the previous administration’s machinations and either deliberately or inadvertently misled the public into thinking the fake Russiagate intelligence was real.

Former Special Counsel John Durham, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former CIA Director Gina Haspel dismissed or buried evidence that cast doubt on a foundational document of the Russigate hoax – the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) prepared in the waning days of the Obama administration.

Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General William Barr, stopped the declassification and release of key exculpatory evidence debunking the ICA on the eve of the 2020 election, which has not been reported previously.

Read the whole thing.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS: CBS Saturday Morning Concludes With German Author Comparing US To East Germany.

Before CBS Saturday Morning officially headed off into its uncertain future, co-host Michelle Miller used her final episode to interview German author Daniel Kehlmann about his recent novel about G.W. Pabst, the silent film director who originally fled the Nazis only to return and make propaganda movies. Naturally, much of the conversation was about life in a dictatorship, but unnaturally, towards the end of their conversation, Kehlmann would compare the current United States to the East Germany his wife grew up in, and Miller offered up little resistance to the crazy idea.

I’m so old, I can remember as far back as February, when CBS News hosts exclaimed that East German-levels of censorship were the knees of the bee. Europeans Don’t Get Free Speech, and Neither Does CBS News, Apparently.

No wonder the Germans were weeping by the end of it all. Vance had called everybody in the audience on their bluff. “You’re not afraid of your own people, are you?” Of course they are. (And also, let’s not kid ourselves, either: They have their reasons, especially if they’re Germans.)

You know who also is terrified of the people? CBS News. Yes, CBS had a true banner Sunday for itself this weekend by tagging along with Vance to Munich. And they made it clear they were on the side of the Europeans weeping about having to listen to the angry voices of their constituents. Margaret Brennan made headlines pontificating about the origins of the Holocaust from too much “free speech” — a topic for tomorrow’s Carnival of Fools because few in the media have more willingly donned clown makeup in recent weeks — but really it was 60 Minutes’ remarkable praise of Germany’s anti-free-speech laws that took the cake for me.

Including this incredible quote:

 

SMART CITIES WILL KILL FREEDOM:

This same urge might explain the impatience of the smart city urbanist, née venture capitalist, who told The New York Times that “human beings currently live in cities that are the equivalent of flip-phones”. There’s a keen sense of waste; our sheer lack of optimisation offends. Another investor-urbanist, a Mr Huh, complains: “We have not affected the fundamental building blocks of infrastructure and society.” The Times reporter writes that Mr Huh gestured to his laptop and said: “We’ve made this better. We’ve made the new things better. We haven’t made the old things better.” In a helpful gloss, the reporter points out that in thinking about how to make the old things better, “people in tech prize ‘first principles’, a concept that suggests that historical awareness and traditional expertise can get in the way of breakthrough ideas”.

Here we see the old drama of modernism playing out one more time. The urban blank slater reminds us of Thomas Hobbes’ disgust with the customary or common law, that body of precedents and practices that ordered English life, but which appeared to his impatient mind as a sediment of inherited mindlessness. For him, life needed to be governed by laws that would be excogitated from scratch (by him), according to clear principles, not by the haphazard accumulation of informal usages and understandings. Rather than seeking the reasons latent in our unthought practices, and from them trying to reverse-engineer the logic of a city, the smart city epigones of Hobbes place their trust in their own powers of a priori reason.

But governing by syllogism doesn’t work very well. For one thing, the sovereign forfeits that easy, habitual law-abidingness that custom secures. As Thomas Schrock said in his critique of Hobbes: “We follow customary laws, not out of fear, but because they are here with us, our own, part of us.”

Governing by syllogism, on the other hand, requires heavy police work. Call Security!

It sure does, particularly when the smart cities’ residents’ lifeclocks start blinking red:

The 15-minute city idea trades freedom for a life of routine drudgery, mating high-tech with urban density:

But as we saw in 2020, at quite a cost:

As Glenn wrote in 2020: Coronavirus lessons on density, mass transit, bureaucracy and censorship: They kill.

AMERICA’S NEWSPAPER OF RECORD:

To be fair, it’s not the first time that Hamas has breached the White House parameter:

THEATER KID QUIVERS:

WHEN YOU’RE A DEMOCRAT WHO’S LOST CNBC: Hakeem Jeffries Flips Out on CNBC After Anchor Calls Him Out on Obamacare.

Jeffries immediately shifted into campaign mode. He declared, “Leader Schumer offered a one-year extension in the context of trying to end the Trump Republican [sic] shutdown.” He went straight to the past, ignoring the question. [CNBC’s Rebecca] Quick stopped him.

“That’s different. I’m talking about what you have now,” she said. “Let’s not go back to what’s done in the past and what has not been extended.”

Jeffries started getting irritated at this point. “You can ask me the question. I’ll provide the answer,” he snapped.

Quick didn’t flinch. “Answer the question instead of going back.”

That’s when Jeffries’ temper started to flare. “I’m providing an answer in order to provide context,” he insisted, puffing himself up as if he were educating a misbehaving student. He accused Republicans of refusing to accept a “very reasonable multi-year extension,” insisting that Democrats had offered a one-year extension plus a long-term bipartisan commission. He lectured her, saying, “Having that context is absolutely important, regardless of what you may think.”

Quick could clearly tell that Jeffries was dodging because he doesn’t actually want a deal. And she called him out on it: “It’s important context to make me realize that I don’t think you want to get a deal done. I think this is something where you’d like to see the rates go higher and allow the Republicans to hang themselves with that. Is that the answer? Is this politics?”

Jeffries lost it. “That’s absolutely a ridiculous assertion,” he barked. “And really, shame on you for saying that.”

Shame? For noticing the obvious? For pointing out the Democrats’ favorite midterm strategy: engineer a crisis, blame Republicans, cash in politically?

Jeffries insisted, yet again, that this was a noble mission. “Listen, this is not a partisan fight for us, it’s a patriotic fight,” he declared. Quick responded with an eye roll that said everything.

Indeed: GIF Giving: CNBC Anchor Battles Liar Hakeem Jeffries Over Obamacare and Delivers Perfect Animated Meme.

OLD AND BUSTED: 12 Angry Men.

The New Hotness? ‘It defies logic:’ Dallas County’s first fentanyl dealing conviction tossed. Why? No proof of 12 jurors at trial.

The Dallas-based Fifth Court of Appeals has tossed Dallas County’s first conviction for fentanyl drug dealing because there’s no proof in the trial record that there were actually 12 jurors.

In April, a jury convicted Richard Leal of possession with intent to deliver fentanyl and sentenced him to 30 years in prison.

“It defies logic that neither the trial judge, nor the bailiff, nor the court reporter, nor either party noticed throughout the entire trial that the jury box was missing a twelfth juror,” Justice Mike Lee wrote. “…Logic dictates there must have been twelve jurors; otherwise, someone would have said something about the empty seat in the jury box. But the record reflects the seating of eleven jurors, nothing more. And on appeal, the record matters.”

Evergreen:

UPDATE (FROM GLENN): Former student John Steakley, now a bigshot criminal lawyer in Atlanta, writes:

Wait. Who says the defense didn’t notice?

It isn’t a defense attorney’s job to help the State convict our clients. In many cases, if we point out errors then the State is allowed to fix the error. So why would we point them out?

In Georgia, for example, if we move for a directed verdict based on lack of venue, even after the State has rested, the court will allow the State to reopen evidence and fix the problem. But a lack of venue is a fatal flaw that can’t be waived by silence. So a smart defense attorney remains silent at trial and keeps the issue for appeal.

“But wait,” you say, “wouldn’t it be more efficient to just hold the State responsible at the trial level and dismiss a flawed case after the State has rested?”

Sure, but this is Georgia. We hate judicial efficiency. Maybe Texas does too.

Maybe so.

ACE OF SPADES: Hollywood Is Dying and Good Riddance.

“Dying” is overstated. But they are experiencing a reduction in status, a loss of wealth and social position, which for almost everyone, and particularly for narcissists, is a deathly bitter pill.

* * * * * * * *

The palm-fingering Weird Sisters of the gay Oz movie have been put on hold, possibly because the studio just doesn’t want them weirding the public out before the second part of Wickeddebuts.

Wacko Wicked Press Tour Put on Ice After Erivo’s Voice Fails and Grande Opts Out “In Solidarity” — Did Universal Pull the Plug on Weird Interviews?November 18, 2025

The Wicked: For Good [the part two sequel] press tour was abruptly suspended in New York City just days before the movie’s release, with Hollywood outlets claiming Cynthia Erivo “lost her voice” and Ariana Grande refused to continue press appearances without her.

But the official narrative isn’t sitting well with online observers. After all, since when does a singer temporarily losing her voice require a full-blown solidarity pact from her co-star, complete with the studio shutting down scheduled interviews?

It’s a question fans, influencers, and industry watchers have been asking nonstop since the news broke. Speculation has only intensified because the Wicked press tour had already become something of a spectacle for reasons Universal probably didn’t anticipate.

Long before the Wicked: For Good press tour was pulled, fans noticed something unusual about the promotional circuit. Instead of straightforward discussions about the film, fans were treated to a highlight reel of baffling moments featuring Grande and Erivo seemingly locked in their own private wavelength — one that didn’t always translate to the rest of the audience. Or, you know, Planet Earth…

Here, a dirty man vigorously shook Ariana Grande’s hand in a “hail the victor” sort of way. She pretended her arm was injured, and her lesbian co-star kissed it to “make it better.” This guy isn’t a rando; it’s Marc Platt, producer of the movie. He’s promoting the movie, too.

Erivo always seems on the edge of a panic attack or nervous breakdown so Ariana Grande is always soothing her with uncomfortab-to-look-at hand holding.

Sometimes it’s just finger-holding.

If it sounds like I’m implying a lesbian relationship, I’m not necessarily claiming that. But I am claiming that they are definitely putting on a show of lesbian touching for the largely-gay fan base of the movie. Almost every gay-crazy twitter account is celebrating this touchy-touchy cringefest, some saying “We’re winning!” As in, “gays and lesbians are winning, just look at these Hollywood adult pretenders engaging in lesbian hand-play.” Erivo is a very out lesbian, and Ariana Grande is either a convert or else is just role-playing. Gay 4 Pay, as they say.

There’s another cringe-inducing element to Grande, as Kara Kennedy writes in a likely paywalled-posted at the Free Press:  In ‘Wicked,’ There’s a Very Thin Elephant in the Room.

Since the release of the first film, Grande hasn’t explicitly addressed any concerns about her weight loss. But last December, when an interviewer asked how she deals with the pressure to always look perfect, she welled up and said “I’ve heard every version . . .of what’s wrong with me”—before saying she thinks it’s “dangerous” to live in a society where “if you go to Thanksgiving dinner and someone’s granny says, ‘Oh my God, you look skinnier! What happened?’”

“No one has the right to say shit,” she said.

When Grande did address fans’ concerns about her health, via a TikTok video in 2023, she claimed that those who point to old pictures of her looking healthier are in fact idealizing “the unhealthiest version of my body,” adding: “I was on a lot of antidepressants and drinking on them.”

She then asked for universal silence on the subject, saying we should all be “less comfortable commenting on people’s bodies. . . healthy, unhealthy, big, small, this, that.”

Grande’s comments have been met with overwhelming support from the same progressive media that once complained about “Disney’s teeny, tiny princesses.” “Ariana Grande Doesn’t Owe the Internet an Explanation of Her Weight Loss,” one headline scolded; another praised her for addressing “body-shaming” critics in her “heartbreaking” TikTok. The public has been instructed: Stand down. We look on as she wastes away, our tongues tied. Ariana is taking no further questions at this time.

And maybe silence is her prerogative. Maybe it is upsetting for strangers to ask, based on your appearance, if you’re okay. I guess it would be nice for famous people if we didn’t have opinions on their bodies. But we do. We always will. Their bodies, often, are part of the reason they’re famous. And it feels bizarre that viewers who flock to the theaters to feast their eyes on a spectacle should be told not to comment on what they see.

* * * * * * * *

And this is where the issue stops being abstract and becomes visceral. Mothers—especially mothers of daughters—have always been the first to sense when the culture is drifting into dangerous territory. They are the ones who watch their children inhale these images like oxygen, the ones who know that girls mostly do not dream of being “healthy” in the clinical sense; they dream of being beautiful and they dream of being chosen. When a celebrity appears on-screen looking as fragile as a porcelain doll, it’s personal. It’s the question every mother asks herself at some point: Is this the body my daughter will believe she must grow into?

For years, celebrities have acted as role models when it’s convenient for them to do so—when they can polish up their profiles by speaking about voting, or mental health, or recycling. But when being an influencer becomes inconvenient, they try to slip out of it. Miley Cyrus insisted she wasn’t a role model right after her chaotic post-Disney rebrand but that didn’t stop her haircut and wardrobe from instantly reshaping the aesthetic landscape for millions of girls. Female celebrities might not want that great power, but they’ve got it—and they ought to handle it with care. Instead of telling the millions who pay to watch their work: I owe you nothing.

In the end, the question isn’t whether Grande is too thin. It’s whether she will one day, like [Meghan] Trainor, admit that the body she insisted was beautiful wasn’t actually healthy. For now, we’re not allowed to talk about what’s standing right in front of us—a gorgeously clad frame that millions of girls have watched walking the red carpet on TikTok this week—even as their mothers, who came of age in the era of heroin chic models, get a weary sense of déjà vu.

Perhaps the producers of a film that takes place in the same universe as 1939’s beloved Wizard of Oz wanted to really adhere to the source material: Judy Garland Filmed The Wizard of Oz Under Grueling Conditions. The studio put the teen actor on a strict diet and encouraged her to take “pep pills,” a move that eventually resulted in her early death.

UPDATE:

UPDATE (11/21/25): Ariana Grande tests positive for COVID after tumultuous ‘Wicked: For Good’ press tour.

Flashback to December of 2021: Jimmy Fallon, Ariana Grande and Megan Thee Stallion release pro-booster ‘It Was A (Masked Christmas).’

NOT WITH A BANG, BUT A WHIMPER: Streaming is overtaking theaters for movie watchers, new poll finds.

Americans are more likely to watch newly released movies from the comfort of their own homes instead of heading out to a theater, according to a new poll.

About three-quarters of U.S. adults said they watched a new movie on streaming instead of in the theater at least once in the past year, according to the survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, including about 3 in 10 who watched new movies on streaming at least once a month.

Meanwhile, about two-thirds of Americans said that they’ve watched a recently released movie in a theater in the past year, and only 16% said they went at least once a month.

The results suggest that, on the whole, American moviegoers are more likely to stream a film than see it in the theaters, a shifting tide that was only accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath. Convenience and cost are both factors for many people who can’t find the time to go to a theater or pay the increasingly high price for a ticket.

Movies were one of the last mass-media events. I’m sorry to see them abandon this model after 125 frequently brilliant years: Like Golfballs Through A Garden Hose…This is the streaming suck of our lives.

UPDATE: There Are Too Many Streaming Services & Many Will Be Forced to Shutdown Soon or Merge.

UPDATE (11/21/25): If only there was a tried and true method to put butts in seats in front of a big screen:

DISPATCHES FROM MR. KISS KISS FANG FANG: Eric Swalwell Runs for California Governor. Comedy Ensues.

Swalwell says he is ready to bring the fight home. The only question is which home. Californians are still trying to figure out where he actually lives, since his mortgage filings seem far more confident about Washington than California. Hard to govern a state when your paperwork thinks you are a part-time resident with a full-time East Coast hobby.

California is a beautiful but battered state, filled with people who deserve an actual leader. Someone who shows up, tells the truth, and does the work. What they do not need is another politician who treats public office like a personal spotlight. Or a man who seems more interested in pleasing cable news bookers than solving real problems. California has seen enough of that kind of nonsense.

Gooder and harder, California:

JOSEPH CAMPBELL: A look back at the Dayton accords that ended war in Bosnia 30 years ago.

“The central fact for us as Americans is this,” Clinton said in announcing the accords had been reached. “Our leadership made this peace agreement possible and helped to bring an end to the senseless slaughter of so many innocent people. … Now American leadership, together with our allies, is needed to make this peace real and enduring.”

Clinton’s rhetoric anticipated a more robust expression of “American Exceptionalism” by Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright, who declared in a television interview in 1998: “We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future, and we see the danger here to all of us. I know that the American men and women in uniform are always prepared to sacrifice for freedom, democracy and the American way of life.”

U.S. peacekeeping forces began arriving in Bosnia in December 1995; they were to stay no more than a year. As it turned out, the last U.S. peacekeeping troops left Bosnia in 2004. There was not one U.S. fatality in hostile action during the nine-year commitment.

The Dayton accords, though hardly without defect, gave rise to a creaky and uneasy peace that has lasted 30 years. Such longevity — remarkable as it was unimagined — signals a seldom-recognized reality that diplomacy’s fruits need not be flawless to endure.

Read the whole thing.

OLD AND BUSTED: “Only Nixon Could Go to China.”

The New Cold War Hotness? Only Trump Can Negotiate with Communist New York: Karoline Leavitt Minces NO Words Framing Trump’s Mamdani Meeting and Proves How Unhinged Dems Have Become.

KATIE COURIC, SUDDEN CHAMPION OF DISPASSIONATE OBJECTIVITY: Katie Couric claims new owners of CBS, Bari Weiss are ‘compromising independent journalism.’

“These are really perilous times,” Couric said, pointing to what she described as eroding boundaries that once shielded newsrooms from business-side interference.

She recalled her early career at NBC News, where she said executives honored “an unwritten rule that there was a separation of church and state.”

Couric argued that the line has blurred as media companies face political threats, regulatory pressure and aggressive ownership changes.

“This idea that these corporations are putting pressure on their journalists is so repugnant,” she said.

Does Katie Couric not know she’s Katie Couric?

UPDATE: Bari Weiss’s Plans for CBS News: ‘I Wanna Blow This Up.’

Bari Weiss, the new editor-in-chief at CBS News, is already making waves.

The founder and editor of The Free Press and former New York Times columnist has adopted a rallying cry in meetings with colleagues, according to the Wall Street Journal.: “I wanna blow this up.”

Weiss’s plan “is working to overhaul the organization’s evening news program, counter what she sees as a left-leaning bias in legacy media and make the newsroom operate more efficiently,” reports the Journal.

Paramount Global and its new boss, Dave Ellison, recently acquired CBS in a deal that was harshly criticized by other legacy media outlets.

Katy Couric, the former anchor of the “CBS Evening News,” warned that “the whole setup with the Ellisons bringing her in and buying the Free Press is compromising independent journalism.”

Couric neglected to explain what or who was being “compromised,” but that’s par for the course. The unspoken criticism is that Weiss just isn’t left-wing enough. She’s an anti-woke crusader who wants to get legacy media to take their thumbs off the scale and report the news honestly. She’s no MAGA cheerleader, even though some media critics fear that CBS will now kowtow to Trump.

Alas, “blow this up” means return CBS News to mid-’90s Clintonian levels of liberalism. But even that worldview would likely translate into a major improvement to its news product.