Author Archive: Robert Shibley

FROM A STUDENT, A ‘VIA MEDIA’ ON AI. I suspect this is about where most people will end up, once the hype/doom cycle starts to get boring. I do think the concern about it destroying writing skills is misplaced, though, because writing skills had been destroyed years before AI came around.

UNIVERSITIES MUST POLICE FOREIGN INFLUENCE. Maybe, but you know what would be even more effective? Having a diversity of views on the faculty and among students. If everyone has to actually defend their arguments and has the change to be exposed to counterarguments, the policing happens automatically. Wild, I know.

RACE-BASED SCHOLARSHIP SHOT DOWN AGAIN IN COURT, BUT MANY STILL REMAIN. Look, this is not hard. If we don’t want colleges to have awards like a Ku Klux Klan Scholarship for Excellence in Whiteness–and, contrary to what some on the left would have you believe, virtually no American wants to live in a society that does–you also can’t have awards meant only for black people, Latinos, or (in the linked case, oddly) Asians from Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia but not Thailand (because screw Thailand, I guess?). Just stop with the race discrimination already. We’re done. It’s over.

BANS ON DIVISIVE CONCEPTS RISK STIFLING SPEECH. Rather than go tit-for-tat trying to shut down the people who have been shutting you down, you know what would really throw them off their game? Creating an environment where they have to make and defend their arguments.

WHAT PUBLIC POLICY SCHOOL SHOULD TEACH. As the article points out, maybe the Trump Administration would be a little less, er, exciting if right-leaning students didn’t have every reason to avoid public policy schools. Heck, I knew to avoid them back in the year 2000. I can only imagine what 20+ more years of that trend has wrought.

THE SOLUTION TO AI CHEATING: PEN AND PAPER. I would also support IBM Selectric III typewriters with that cool correction tape that sucks letters off the page. That’s peak tech right there.

WILL RACE-BASED SCHOLARSHIPS SURVIVE? I hope not. I can imagine a world where they might solve more problems than they cause, but it’s clear we don’t live in that world.

DO THE WORST GET ON TOP IN ACADEMIA? A Hayekian analysis. I don’t know if the “worst” get on top in academia any more than normal corporate jobs. But it’s worth considering the idea of more administration being done by faculty on rotation.

THE LAW SCHOOL ACCOMMODATIONS RACKET. This is a huge problem at all sorts of schools. Are you the chump if you’re not taking advantage of it? I wonder…

WHEN TRUTH IS NO LONGER PARAMOUNT. I don’t think it’s clear what a campus is supposed to be doing if truth-seeking is not primary to its mission, but plenty of folks on campus don’t agree.

SOCIAL JUSTICE RUINS EVERYTHING, ARCHIVIST EDITION: “Archiving is about shaping memory, advancing justice, and ensuring access in a digital age. Our ARM students preserve the past and build ethical frameworks for the future…”

No, it’s not. Nobody wants this. The constituency of people who want archivists making decisions based on “shaping memory” (Orwell much?) or “advancing justice” is effectively 0% of the population. Not everything has to be politics. People are begging higher ed to stop being this way.

BOOK REVIEW: THE UNIVERSITY UNFETTERED. George Leef is skeptical: “Whether the University achieved excellence is debatable, but it certainly spent a lot of money.”

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS:

How it started: “No more Tuskegee experiments!”

How it’s going: “Idil Issak at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville is an anthropology student who wants to conduct research by interviewing eight female Ethiopian nationals working in the domestic service industry in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)..Issak’s experience with the IRB has been a Kafkaesque nightmare.”

NCLA does great work.

COLLEGE ATHLETES NOW GET PAID. IS UNIONIZATION NEXT? Maybe, but it doesn’t work that well with the NIL money scheme. Will the big stars really strike (and lose games) so they can give some of their money to the benchwarmers?

WHAT’S HOBBLING HIGHER-ED REFORM? There is a real (though nascent) effort from within higher ed to try to save the sector and make it something we can be proud of again. Rick Hess lays out some of the issues tripping them up.

HOW DO WE REFORM LAW SCHOOL ADMISSIONS? Some suggestions here, because let’s face it, AI is not going to make lawyers obsolete. (And that’s not just because we lawyers will make that illegal…)

PROF ALLOWS STUDENTS TO USE AI FOR ESSAY; THEY MOSTLY DECLINE. And (at least the honest ones) had some fairly thoughtful reasons why:

Anxiety was one dominant theme. Students reported choosing the traditional assignment because they feared they would mess up using AI and get punished for cheating. Students also said they were nervous that AI would give them wrong information or lead them to fail to meet the assignment’s expectations or make them sound robotic. “I feel like AI gives me ideas and phrases that sound too fake,” as one student put it.