Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

THE CORBYNIZATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONTINUES APACE: Maine Shows Antisemitism Is a Shortcut to Success in the Modern Democratic Party.

Governor Janet Mills on Thursday announced that she was dropping out of the Maine Senate race, with polls showing her way behind Graham Platner, who is now presumed to be the Democrat who will go up against Senator Susan Collins in one of the most hotly contested races of the year.

Platner was largely unknown at this point last year and yet managed to drive a sitting governor out of the primary before a single vote was cast. But he had one thing going for him, which is that he gained attention for his antisemitism. That is a ticket to success in the modern Democratic Party.

Al Sharpton smiles.

UPDATE: Question asked:

Flashback: Steve Hayward’s review of Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism, from the January 2008 edition of the Weekly Standard.

MORE:

ALL OUTER PARTY MEMBERS FEAR DOUBLEPLUS UNGOOD CRIMETHINK:

Related:

Tweet continues, “We’ve not spoken since. I was a great guy and scholar until I expressed a political opinion that was ‘heretical.’ I then became a subhuman. This is coming from an individual who support the Party of Empathy.”

Regarding Mark Hemingway’s comment that “the contemporary left is constantly blindsided by their support for issues they’ve been told are popular only to wake up one day and find out they’re a huge liability,” we saw this recently play out when Bill Maher interviewed leftist actor/comedian David Cross, who was oblivious to what flyover country thinks about transing kids. As Maher told him, “Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.”

NEW RULES NOT APPLYING UNIVERSALLY JUST YET:

(Classical reference in headline.)

A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, MASQUERADING AS A POLITICAL PARTY:

(Classical reference in headline.)

THE BANALITY OF EVIL, AGAIN:

President Donald Trump erupted in anger at CBS journalist Norah O’Donnell after she read him excerpts from what is said to be a manifesto written by Cole Tomas Allen, the man charged with trying to kill Trump at Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Association dinner. Some conservatives seem to think no good can be served from reading these words, but that’s a mistake: It’s always useful to be reminded, again, of the banality of evil.

The distinguishing feature of the manifesto is its insipidity. “I am a citizen of the United States,” Allen writes. “What my representatives do reflects on me.” Later, he justifies the possibility that he might harm the people in the ballroom “on the basis that most people chose to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist and traitor, and are thus complicit,” although he adds that “I really hope it doesn’t come to that.”

The manifesto lays out five objections to what he is about to attempt — starting with “As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek” — followed by his brief rebuttals. The impression is less of a person struggling with an anguished conscience than of someone not bright enough to come up with objections that would force anything but glib self-justification.

Finally, the author is at pains to convey the impression that he’s a nice guy with a sense of humor. He apologizes to everyone he deceived and offers copious thanks to family, friends, colleagues and students. His final words are that he experiences “rage thinking about everything this administration has done,” followed by “Stay in school, kids.” He is — or so he thinks — Guy Fawkes by way of Sesame Street.

In addition to his ridiculous “manifesto,” Allen posed for a selfie on the way to his failed assassination attempt:

Of course, that was far from the most embarrassing look for Allen on Saturday night. As Blehar wrote yesterday, “A potential atrocity was instantly prevented. The most memorable image from Saturday’s WHCD will not be one of blood, or tears, or spectacularly televised violence; it will be that of a naked, hog-tied Cole Allen kissing the carpet as he lies prone with a Mylar blanket draped over his raggedy hindquarters to hide his shame. (Police had stripped him to search for weapons.)”

HOW IT STARTED: Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past.

—The London Independent, March 20th, 2000.

How It’s Going: Al Gore invokes disaster film, warns of ice age within 25 years.

Former Vice President Al Gore warned a Hollywood audience Thursday that a Gulf Stream collapse could occur within 25 years, remarks that came 20 years after his climate documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” drew criticism for predictions that did not bear out.

Mr. Gore, 78, appeared at the inaugural Sustainability in Entertainment Honors, co-hosted by The Hollywood Reporter and the Sustainable Entertainment Alliance at Hotel Bel-Air in Los Angeles. He participated in a keynote conversation with actor Bradley Whitford of “The West Wing,” timed to the 20th anniversary of “An Inconvenient Truth.”

According to a Breitbart account of the event, Mr. Gore invoked the scenario depicted in the 2004 disaster film “The Day After Tomorrow” — though he repeatedly referred to it as “The Day After,” the title of a separate 1983 television film about nuclear war — saying a shutdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, commonly called the Gulf Stream, is “a very real threat within the next 25 years.”

“That movie that I mentioned, ’The Day After’ about the Gulf Stream shutting down, well, this morning in one of the English newspapers is a whole big article summarizing the recent dire warnings of the scientists who found yet more confirmatory information that this is a very real threat within the next 25 years,” Mr. Gore said, according to Breitbart.

Mr. Whitford raised a more compressed timeline, suggesting that a Gulf Stream collapse could put the world “in an ice age in, like, 10 years.” Mr. Gore pushed back, saying such a scenario would unfold more slowly, while acknowledging the consequences would be severe.

“It would be bad. It would be very bad and would be bad on a scale that is beyond our, anything we can compare it to today,” Mr. Gore said, according to Breitbart.

With America about to celebrate its 250th anniversary and with many of its citizens still having fond memories of the bicentennial, the return to global cooling is also a return to the zanier aspects of the decade that never dies, the 1970s. Leonard Nimoy tried to warn us of “the coming ice age” in 1978, but alas to no avail:

As did Walter Cronkite in 1972:

Exit question from the late Scott Adams in 2018: “How many heads would explode if global temperatures head lower during the Trump administration?”

Via Lee Zeldin:

COVID SIX YEARS AGO TODAY: Actual headline (still up) at The AtlanticGeorgia’s Experiment in Human Sacrifice.

Three weeks later, The Week reported that the Mull’s dark dreams fortunately did not come true: We should be grateful for good news in Georgia.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but Atlanta is not burning. Bodies are not piled up in the streets. Hospitals in Georgia are not being overwhelmed; in fact, they are virtually empty. There is no mad rush for ventilators (remember those?). Instead, men, women, and children in the Peach State are returning to some semblance of normal life: working outside their homes, going to restaurants and bars, getting haircuts, exercising, and most important, spending time with their friends and families and worshipping God. The opening that began more than three weeks ago is continuing apace.

Oh, my apologies, you were waiting for bad news? Sorry, I forgot, we were actually not supposed to be rooting for the virus. Despite the apparent relish behind headlines like “Georgia’s Experiment in Human Sacrifice,” one assumes that most Americans, even the ones most committed to omnidirectional prophecies of doom, were actually hoping this would happen. While it really is a shame that we do not get to gloat about the cravenness and stupidity of yet another GOP politician, I think on balance most of us will be glad to hear that Gov. Brian Kemp was not badly wrong here.

What is happening instead of the widely predicted bloodbath? Confirmed cases of the virus are obviously increasing (though the actual rolling weekly average of new ones have been headed down for nearly a month) while deaths remain more or less flat. This is in fact what happens when you test more people for a disease that is not fatal or even particularly serious for the vast majority of those who contract it, for which the median age of death is higher than the American life expectancy.

How was this possible? One answer is that the lockdown did not in fact do what it was supposed to do, which is to say, meaningfully impede transmission of the virus. In fact, data both from states like Georgia and from abroad suggests that the lifting of lockdowns is positively correlated with a decrease in rates of infection. This could be because lockdowns are inherently ineffective at slowing down a disease whose spread appears to be largely intrafamilial and nosocomial.

Georgia’s Republican governor earned bipartisan attacks when he wisely reopened his state in late April: Brian Kemp, Georgia’s Affable Culture Warrior.

In April 2020, businesses in Georgia were shuttered by government decree as in most of the rest of the country. Mr. Kemp was hearing from desperate entrepreneurs: “ ‘Look man, we’re losing everything we’ve got. We can’t keep doing this.’ And I really felt like there was a lot of people fixin’ to revolt against the government.”

The Trump administration “had that damn graph or matrix or whatever that you had to fit into to be able to do certain things,” Mr. Kemp recalls. “Your cases had to be going down and whatever. Well, we felt like we met the matrix, and so I decided to move forward and open up.” He alerted Vice President Mike Pence, who headed the White House’s coronavirus task force, before publicly announcing his intentions on April 20.

That afternoon Mr. Trump called Mr. Kemp, “and he was furious.” Mr. Kemp recounts the conversation as follows:

“Look, the national media’s all over me about letting you do this,” Mr. Trump said. “And they’re saying you don’t meet whatever.”

Mr. Kemp replied: “Well, Mr. President, we sent your team everything, and they knew what we were doing. You’ve been saying the whole pandemic you trust the governors because we’re closest to the people. Just tell them you may not like what I’m doing, but you’re trusting me because I’m the governor of Georgia and leave it at that. I’ll take the heat.”

“Well, see what you can do,” the president said. “Hair salons aren’t essential and bowling alleys, tattoo parlors aren’t essential.”

“With all due respect, those are our people,” Mr. Kemp said. “They’re the people that elected us. They’re the people that are wondering who’s fighting for them. We’re fixin’ to lose them over this, because they’re about to lose everything. They are not going to sit in their basement and lose everything they got over a virus.”

Mr. Trump publicly attacked Mr. Kemp: “He went on the news at 5 o’clock and just absolutely trashed me. . . . Then the local media’s all over me—it was brutal.” The president was still holding daily press briefings on Covid. “After running over me with the bus on Monday, he backed over me on Tuesday,” Mr. Kemp says. “I could either back down and look weak and lose all respect with the legislators and get hammered in the media, or I could just say, ‘You know what? Screw it, we’re holding the line. We’re going to do what’s right.’ ” He chose the latter course. “Then on Wednesday, him and [Anthony] Fauci did it again, but at that point it didn’t really matter. The damage had already been done there, for me anyway.”

The damage healed quickly once businesses began reopening on Friday, April 24. Mr. Kemp quotes a state lawmaker who said in a phone call: “I went and got my hair cut, and the lady that cuts my hair wanted me to tell you—and she started crying when she told me this story—she said, ‘You tell the governor I appreciate him reopening, to allow me to make a choice, because . . . if I’d have stayed closed, I had a 95% chance of losing everything I’ve ever worked for. But if I open, I only had a 5% chance of getting Covid. And so I decided to open, and the governor gave me that choice.’”

At that point, Florida was still shut down. Mr. DeSantis issued his first reopening order on April 29, nine days after Mr. Kemp’s. On April 28, the Florida governor had visited the White House, where, as CNN reported, “he made sure to compliment the President and his handling of the crisis, praise Trump returned in spades.”

Three years later, here’s the thanks Mr. DeSantis gets: This Wednesday Mr. Trump issued a statement excoriating “Ron DeSanctimonious” as “a big Lockdown Governor on the China Virus.” As Mr. Trump now tells the tale, “other Republican Governors did MUCH BETTER than Ron and, because I allowed them this ‘freedom,’ never closed their States. Remember, I left that decision up to the Governors!”

Of course, by 2023, Trump was far from the only former official distancing himself from the debacle of 2020: Anthony Fauci Says Don’t Blame Him for COVID Lockdowns and School Closures.

Amanda Mull of the Atlantic’s about-face was much faster, taking only a month: Atlantic writer who warned of Georgia’s human sacrifice by reopening says New York’s 8 p.m. curfew is ‘absolutely insane.’

NEW CIVILITY WATCH: The Dems’ newest phrase in raging at the GOP is to go ‘Kill yourself.’

In almost any other era, the hostile exchange between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) would have been an instant embarrassment on Capitol Hill.

But at a time when political violence is becoming frighteningly common and widely accepted, DeLauro’s nasty suggestion that Zeldin drink a glass of weed killer marked just another day in the trenches.

Dripping with bitterness, the 83-year-old, purple-haired DeLauro is often an embarrassment to Connecticut and more sober-minded Democrats with her nutty bluster.

She outdid herself Monday, and certainly wasn’t interested in Zeldin’s factual and workmanlike testimony, saying it sounded “like a climate change denier’s manifesto.”

When he countered by citing court rulings in the EPA’s favor, she was ignorant of the cases, but in no mood to learn.

“I don’t have to listen to this BS!” she raged.

Writing later on X, Zeldin said she “apparently believes that when you don’t have anything good to say, you should instruct the person you are debating to kill themself.”

In 1987’s The Closing of the American Mind, Allan Bloom wrote, “We have here the peculiarly American way digesting Continental despair. It is nihilism with a happy ending,” adding that “the new American life-style has become a Disneyland version of the Weimar Republic for the whole family.” That Weimar-style nihilism has taken a far darker turn over the past decade:

The establishment left accepting such a dark worldview is what leads to headlines such as this:

CHANGE: Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana’s Congressional Map in Major Voting Rights Ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down Louisiana’s congressional map in Louisiana v. Callais, finding that the state’s second majority-Black district violated the Equal Protection Clause.

In the 6-3 decision, Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. The court held that the Voting Rights Act did not require Louisiana to draw a second majority-minority district. Without that requirement, the state had no compelling reason to use race in drawing its lines.

SB8, enacted in 2024, created a District 6 stretching roughly 250 miles from Shreveport through Alexandria and Lafayette to Baton Rouge. Louisiana drew the district after a federal judge in Robinson v. Ardoin found the previous map likely violated Section 2.

Related: Virginia Supreme Court Denies Dem AG’s Attempt To Ram Through Gerrymander Vote Certification.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS:

“TO MISTAKE [PAM BONDI’S] FIFTEEN-MONTH TOUR FOR FAILURE IS TO MISUNDERSTAND THE ARCHITECTURE OF POWER ITSELF:”

BRACE YOURSELF FOR MAXIMUM GASLIGHTING:

GREAT MOMENTS IN STOCK PHOTOS:

DEVELOPING:

 

BRENDAN O’NEILL: The bougie nihilism that is killing America.

We now have an extraordinary situation where the university campus, once the great refiner of minds, seems to be indoctrinating the young with a fancy for violence. It seems that if you teach people that their self-esteem is the most sacred thing on Earth, and anyone who dents it deserves instant cancellation, then you will give rise to an army of the intolerant. That’s what we are witnessing, in the UK too: a style of politics that feels haughty, dogmatic and tinged with violence. From the trans lobby (‘Kill all TERFs’) to the orgy of Israelophobia that followed 7 October (‘Globalise the intifada’), silence through violence is the dream of those who LARP as progressive. A society where the educated openly clamour for the death of women and Jews is a society that is ill indeed. This is the jagged debris of cancel culture.

Ours is the age of bougie nihilism. That was brought home to me by Zohran Mamdani’s tweet about Saturday’s shooting. ‘Political violence is absolutely unacceptable’, said the New York City mayor. This is a man whose wife liked social-media posts that celebrated the most catastrophic act of political violence of this century so far: 7 October. This is a man who rubs shoulders with Hasan Piker, the leftie influencer who just last week was titillating the silver-spoon socialists of the keffiyeh classes by celebrating bank robberies and making excuses for Luigi Mangione’s murder of healthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Bougie nihilism has broken free of the quad and now infects even City Hall. Where next?

Jeffrey Blehar adds, “We Are Sometimes Blessed by the Arrogance of Fools:”

On Saturday, a heavily armed lunatic attempted to gate-crash the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington, D.C., Hilton, while the president and most of his senior administration were in attendance. Cole Allen — the gunman, whose name sounds like a shoe brand from the racks at Payless — was thankfully tackled by Secret Service agents almost instantly after he dashed past the first layer of security, and although he fired several shots, nobody was killed. (One agent was clipped in his bulletproof vest, but his gear kept him safe.)

A potential atrocity was instantly prevented. The most memorable image from Saturday’s WHCD will not be one of blood, or tears, or spectacularly televised violence; it will be that of a naked, hog-tied Cole Allen kissing the carpet as he lies prone with a Mylar blanket draped over his raggedy hindquarters to hide his shame. (Police had stripped him to search for weapons.)

I would have let him lie there myself, but then again, Allen exposed himself in a far funnier way: with his ridiculously cocksure manifesto, written in eager anticipation of a massacre. Leave aside for a moment (but only for a moment) the fact that Allen seems to have been deeply affected by Bluesky-like progressive rhetoric in labeling Trump and his administration a bunch of Epstein-associated rapist pedophiles. Instead, breathe a sigh of relief at the fact that this man was undone in the most Zoomer way possible — by his own unearned and undeserved belief in himself.

How on earth could Allen have become so radicalized?

CHANGE: Columnist George Will Drops 50 Years of Support for Mass Migration.

Establishment oracle George Will has reversed himself after a career of praising mass migration, dating back to the Reagan administration.

Will’s sudden renunciation of establishment orthodoxy after 50 years of support for mass migration was signaled with a single adjective in his April 24 column, as he lamented slow population growth under President Donald Trump’s low migration policy:

There is one promising solution. Increasing skilled immigration into our nation [emphasis added].

Not “mass migration,” not even just “migration.” Will is now backing only “skilled migration.”

The shift to “skilled” is a big change for 84-year-old Will, whose carefully written nationwide op-ed columns have shaped Baby Boomers, Millennials, and Generation X since 1974.

His careful word choice of “skilled” implies a smaller-scale inflow of highly productive people who can complement, but not replace or sideline, the native wisdom, diligence, and productivity of America’s vast citizenry.

But Will has spent the last 50 years and eight presidencies praising the elite-engineered mass immigration that has changed the United States’ suburban station-wagon politics into a battleground for myriad counterproductive ethnic rivalries.

“I do not believe that the solution to our problem is simply to elect the right people,” Milton Friedman once said. “The important thing is to establish a political climate of opinion which will make it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing. Unless it is politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing, the right people will not do the right thing either, or if they try, they will shortly be out of office.”

YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK:

Exit questions:

Related:

FACT-CHECKING SOCIAL MEDIA CLAIMS LINKING HAIR DYEING TO MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS:

Many people change aspects of themselves to fit in or stand out, and sometimes even as a coping mechanism during stressful times in their lives.

These changes are often seen in how people style their clothes, play with new makeup trends, or dye their hair.

Online platforms such as Instagram and TikTok are filled with posts about dyeing hair—especially unnatural colours.

On Instagram, there are posts about how unnatural hair dyeing can be linked to mental illnesses.

And TikTok is filled with stories about how dyeing your hair is related to “having a mental breakdown.”

These trends have grown in popularity since 2019, becoming popular during the pandemic.

But is there a link between mental well-being and hair colouring?

Well, based on anecdotal evidence…

UPDATE:

MORE: “Zeldin told DeLauro that people should not drink or inject glyphosate, the active ingredient in pesticides such as Roundup, to which she responded, ‘Maybe you should try doing that.’ She then quickly added, ‘Excuse me,’ in an apologetic tone.” That’s not much of an “apologetic tone” on display here, so why is Bloomberg.com covering for a Democratic congresswoman suggesting that the head of the EPA kill himself, only a couple of days after someone from her party tried to kill Zeldin’s boss? To ask the question is to answer it:

ALL THIS AND WORLD WAR ELEVEN:

WE’VE DESCENDED INTO SOME SORT OF BIZARRE HELL-WORLD IN WHICH BILL MAHER IS A VOICE OF SANITY:

Exit quote: “Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost and this is a case of that.”

CHRISTIAN TOTO: Melania’s Right, But Firing Jimmy Kimmel Would Be Wrong.

The First Amendment allows for Kimmel’s brand of misinformation and hate. It’s up to audiences to either tune away or hang on every bit of his propaganda.

Firing Kimmel now is akin to wiping conspiracy monger Alex Jones off of social media a few years back. It might have felt good and righteous, but what happened next? Well, we all saw that scenario.

At this point, if ABC actually did the moral thing and fired Kimmel it would look like the Trumps made it happen. Instead of the truth – a late-night show host has lost his way, spreads rage on a nightly basis and has forgotten what his job description entails.

Still, what the First Lady said needed to be shared. It matters. Now, it’s up to the rest of us to reject Kimmel or allow more of his unhinged commentary.

That’s the American way, for better and worse.

Kimmel only gets about “2.17 million viewers,” according to TV Insider in March, so it seems as if the vast majority of Americans have rejected that “unhinged commentary” already.

EUROPE IN THE TWILIGHT:

Tweet continues:

Today I do not see this anymore.

The men have become weak and subservient to women

The women have become masculine and lost all femininity

It is not pretty anymore

LGBTQ? Mass Immigration? Islam? Great!!

This all started because men tried to be nice and listened to women. But it destroyed Europe.

If the West, Europe or Germany wants to become great again, we need to not let women rule society.

Flashback: The Merkel Catastrophe:

Angela Merkel on Monday downed what she no doubt viewed as a poisoned chalice. To keep her power and her grand coalition, the German chancellor agreed finally to stanch the flow of migrants by setting up camps at the border and turning away those who had already applied for asylum in other European countries. The concession comes three years after Merkel flung open the gates to more than a million newcomers from the Middle East and Africa. For much of that time, she refused to put a cap on the number Germany would accept.

Whatever the immediate political outcome—Merkel’s position remains tenuous amid a mighty anti-immigration backlash on the center and far right—she has already cemented her legacy. And it is a baleful one. Inspired by what can only be described as a kind of liberal fundamentalism, Merkel’s response to the migrant crisis destabilized Europe and discredited the Western project in the eyes of global multitudes. Behind Donald Trump and Brexit and other populist uprisings of our time lies the figure of “Mama Merkel,” as Syrian refugees to Germany lovingly nicknamed their patroness.

As Jim Geraghty tweeted in 2015:

Related: We’ve “defined deviancy down.” What happens when the real thing shows up en masse?