Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

ACE OF SPADES: 20th Anniversary Repost: Kaboom Kids.

They should have called it “Kabul.” Just come right out with it. Let the people know what they’re in for.

This is a cereal intended for bulk purchase by the United States Department of Agriculture to feed dirty foreign children. And their animals, too. One stop shopping– they can all feed out of the same trough.

The cereal’s chief use was as a humanitarian insult.

You might wonder at this point, What possible connection is there between the clown theme and explosions, as suggested by the name “Kaboom”? Well, don’t bother thinking about it too hard. They sure didn’t. This product was slapped together more or less randomly by People Who Didn’t Even Care, intended for sale to People Who Care Just a Little Bit Less Than That.

Kaboom is not really a product designed for those who enjoy the life of the mind. Quite the opposite. It’s a product designed for those whose subnormal IQs locate them in the brutish twilight existence that divides, hazily, the crude human from the cunning beast.

The cereal is essentially designed with an eye towards the inevitable devolution of the species. Future-proof, if you will.

If the Morlocks had a cereal it would be Kaboom. But they’d insist on more flavor.

Pour yourself a huge bowl of Kaboom and read the whole thing.

QUESTION ASKED: Why does no one write like Tom Wolfe any more?

The conservative hypothesis, however, fails to explain why it is that liberals are less willing today to read and enjoy writing that is sardonic or critical towards parties dear to them. The explanation for the change ­of heart is simple and has little to do with any moral failing on the part of liberals – still less heady notions of a “woke mind virus”. In Wolfe’s 1970s heyday liberalism, and with it the Democratic Party, still felt itself to be hegemonic in American life. Democrats had run both chambers of the legislature with only brief interruptions since the 1930s. Civil rights and a new set of social welfare policies enacted under Johnson represented recent testaments of political strength.

In such an environment, liberals could easily afford to laugh along as Wolfe took aim at their darlings. It was not until the election of Ronald Reagan, in 1980, that the balance shifted and the US entered an age, one still with us, in which American conservatism and liberalism represent roughly equivalent political forces.

It took longer for intellectual culture to catch up to political fact. In time, as Wolfe faded from the scene, a more strident liberalism emerged – not, as conservatives often assume, more strident because more powerful, but the opposite. A politically weakened liberalism found the joke wasn’t funny any more.

Here it has to be admitted that the problem is not merely one of liberal demand for writers like Wolfe but also one of conservative supply. Liberals, after all, also have a ready answer for why there aren’t any Tom Wolfes any more: it is because conservatives are just so angry these days. Gone are the days of William F Buckley, of a wry, patrician conservatism that delivered its message with dry wit in mellifluous mid-Atlantic tones, goes the argument, now it’s all invective, all rage. To write like Wolfe, after all, it is necessary to sublimate one’s resentment of liberals into the wry detachment that is a prerequisite for satire, something fewer conservatives are capable of today.

Wolfe famously told the story many times of how he managed to show up at Lenny and Felicia’s Park Ave. duplex in 1970 to record their infamous fundraiser for the Black Panthers (ellipses in original):

“One day I was hanging around a hallway at Harper’s … I wandered next door into the office of David Halberstam, who wasn’t there. Nosily I noticed a rather fancy card on his desktop … It was an invitation from Leonard Bernstein and his wife, Felicia, for a reception at their apartment at 895 Park Avenue, corner of Park and 79th Street, in support of the Black Panthers. Now, there was a match made on Donkey Island for you … You were supposed to RSVP to a certain telephone number. So I called it, using David Halberstam’s telephone, and said, ‘This is Tom Wolfe, and I accept’ …

Today, such Cold War behind Communist lines reconnoiters still occur, but for both better and worse, in the age of YouTube and Twitter, they’re much more likely to involve hidden camera video rather than something approximating Wolfe’s killer prose. (And anybody who tried to imitate Wolfe’s highly caffeinated style in 2023 would instantly be seen as a cheap copy anyhow.) But when moments occur such as the tony law firm of WilmerHale coaching all three of the Ivy League presidents who thought they could make mincemeat of Rep. Stefanik’s grilling at the start of the month on campus anti-Semitism, they cry out for some sort of recreation of Radical Chic, if only to be, as Wolfe said of his role in documenting the original affair, “the man who laughed in church.” Unfortunately though, there’s no doubt that with Wolfe’s death in 2018 and P.J. O’Rourke’s last year, the right lost two of its very best satirists and prose stylists.

Earlier: Radical Wolfe: Does the New Tom Wolfe Documentary Cover the Man in Full?

THE SUMMER OF LOVE CONCLUDES IN A DARK WINTER: Seattle dismantles BLM garden after rampant homelessness, drug use create ‘public health and … safety issues.’

The city of Seattle has dismantled the Black Lives Matter Memorial Garden after rampant homelessness and drug use overran the area, posing significant risks to the public.

In 2020, amid heightened racial tensions and anti-police fervor, Seattle activists established the garden in Cal Anderson Park, located in Capitol Hill, the home of the infamous former Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone. Organizers of the garden claimed it was intended to memorialize victims of police violence and to provide organic food for underserved communities.

However, seemingly from the beginning, the garden has been plagued by violence and filth, creating significant “public health and public safety issues” in the area, a statement from Seattle Parks and Recreation claimed. According to the statement, members of Seattle’s Unified Care Team have conducted 76 tent encampment removals in just the past year alone “to keep public spaces clean, open, and accessible to all.”

The garden has also become a hotspot for illicit drug use, creating other issues for area residents. Other problems in the garden include “vandalism of Cal Anderson public bathrooms” and an infestation of rodents, the statement said.

Naturally, “Seattle Bulldozed Its Communist BLM Garden [and] Liberals Are Reacting Exactly How You’d Expect” (Video):

In a surprising move, the city of Seattle decided to remove the community garden co-op that sprung up following the riots of 2020 and the creation of the “autonomous zone.” Now, liberals can’t cope with the reality that it’s gone.

But why? The message of the left in 2020 was any property memorializing the past misdeeds of out-of-control totalitarian leftists was fair game for destruction, no matter what strange misbegotten notions true believers had of any historic significance. Why should the memorial for CHAZ be treated any differently?

PRESIDENT HINDENBURG RAILS AGAINST HIS PARTEIFUNKTIONÄRE IN ZEITUNGEN: Biden tells reporters to start reporting on the economy ‘the right way.’

President Joe Biden hit out against recent news coverage of his economic policies, expressing confidence in the state of the economy heading into 2024 and criticizing reporters for failing to represent the current economy in “the right way.”

“All good,” Biden said in brief remarks over the weekend when asked about his outlook on the economy next year. “Take a look. Start reporting it the right way.”

Biden has been treating reporters shabbily long before his brain became tapioca. Just think of the media as Democratic Party operatives with bylines to understand why they’ve taken all of his insults without pushing back over the decades. Or as America’s Newspaper of Record reported in September: Journalists Anxiously Wait For Email From Biden Administration With Today’s Instructions.

UPDATE: “Since taking office, Biden has been haunted by poor marks from voters on the economy. His current approval rating on the issue sits at 37.2% while 59.7% of Americans disapprove of his economic stewardship, according to the latest RealClearPolitics average. Shortly after he became president, Biden presided over decades-high inflation, supply chain snarls, and other economic woes. While inflation has cooled, wages and incomes have yet to catch up with price increases, leaving he president stuck in neutral with the electorate. For November, inflation came in at 3.1% for the previous 12 months, stubbornly higher than the 2% target figure set by the Federal Reserve, but well below the 9.1% high from June 2022.”

(Updated and bumped.)

CURIOUSLY, THAT’S THE ONE CONTINGENT OF VOTERS BIDEN DOESN’T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT: Biden Gives Bureaucrats Biggest Pay Bump Since The Carter* Admin As Americans Feel Crushed By Inflation.

Beginning in January, federal civilian employees will see their salaries increase by the largest percentage since the Carter administration.

President Joe Biden signed an executive order in December giving federal employees an average of a 5.2% increase in pay, the largest increase since former President Jimmy Carter raised federal salaries by 9.1% in 1980. Meanwhile, Americans are dealing with inflation and a generally poor economy, with some blaming high government spending, according to recent polling.

Seventy-six percent of Americans reported that their income is not keeping up with inflation, according to a poll conducted by CBS News and YouGov this month. Fifty-six percent of Americans polled felt government spending, like the pay increases Biden is giving to federal bureaucrats, is causing high inflation.

Federal employees will see a 4.7% pay increase across the board as well as an additional bump, averaging 0.5%, depending on where they are based. Federal workers in the San Francisco area, for instance, will get an additional 0.9% raise, according to the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Members of the armed forces will also receive an average pay bump of 5.2% in the coming year, per the National Defense Authorization Act. Their pay increase, however, was approved by Congress through the  while the pay increase for civilian bureaucrats was implemented unilaterally by Biden.

“The Federal government is the nation’s largest employer and must ensure it has the talent to meet the needs of the American people,” a spokesperson for the Office of Management and Budget told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Imagine the sort of staffers we’d be stuck with if the Federal government were underfunded, crazed GOP fiscal hatchet men!

* Carter, you say? Biden Knew Carter Was in Trouble in 1979. Now He’s in the Same Boat.

“That man’s in trouble, politically in trouble,” Joe Biden said of then-President Jimmy Carter in July 1979, according to an account at the time in the Wilmington Evening Journal. Biden had held off on publicly backing Carter because he wanted to endorse a candidate who would ensure Democrats retained the White House in the 1980 election. “I’m not certain that’s Jimmy Carter right now,” he told the paper.

Biden was in a position to know. He held a leadership post in Carter’s successful 1976 presidential bid after becoming the first sitting U.S. senator to endorse him. Biden eventually backed Carter’s failed 1980 re-election bid, and the bond they formed early in Biden’s career lasted through a large part of their lives.

Now Biden is himself in the White House and stumbling in some of the same ways as Carter as he sets out to win a second term. Both men struggled to sell legislative victories and retain the party’s core voters as high inflation and foreign-policy disasters eroded their support. And both men had a disconnect with voters that’s leaving Democrats afraid that Biden could share Carter’s political fate of being a one-term president.

“They both have made important decisions that are substantively in the interests of the country—but when they charge up the hill and they look behind them, there are not a hell of a lot of people following,” said Jonathan Alter, a Carter biographer. “Biden is experiencing some of the basic leadership challenges that Carter did where he’s losing his connection to the American people as Carter did.”

To be fair, as this 1978 campaign ad highlights, that Biden, or at least his comms team back then, was slightly more astute about shifting his message to appeal to his then-voters’ concerns: How Biden Stopped Worrying and Learned To Love Inflation.

21st CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS:

BENJAMIN WEINGARTEN: Here’s why Obama stepped in to save Harvard prez Claudine Gay.

But Obama’s defense of Gay almost assuredly transcends sympathy for her remarks and the students for whom she spoke, concern about Harvard’s stability or a desire to effectively defend a political ally, given Pritzker’s responsibility for Gay’s presidency.

Like l’affaire Gay broadly, Obama’s intervention should be seen as a major salvo in the broader war over diversity, equity and inclusion in America’s most influential institutions.

Obama is making a play to protect the DEI regime itself — a regime, already roiled by the backlash against wokeism and the Supreme Court’s strike against affirmative action in schools, critical to maintaining political power.

Barack Obama is the leader of the Democratic Party in everything but name and the face of our credentialed pseudo-elites.

Harvard is arguably the most prestigious university in the world.

Claudine Gay, proudly touted as Harvard’s first black and second female president, has devoted much of her career to advancing DEI and led the creation of a sprawling DEI administrative state, injecting racist “anti-racism” and anti-equality “equity” into every aspect of the school.

This parallels what Obama’s progressive successors have done to the federal government under the Biden administration.

Israel- and Jew-hatred on college campuses is a natural byproduct of DEI.

The ideology, rooted in cultural Marxism, divides the world into oppressors and oppressed, casting Judeo-Christian Western civilization and its defenders as uniquely evil and Israel, the collective Jew — a state whose modern incarnation emerged out of the Holocaust and thrived despite perpetual attempts by tyrannical Jew-hating neighbors to destroy her — as most evil of all.

DEI cloaks leftism, and its rotted and corrupted core, in race and identity to provide it a moral and virtuous veneer and make it unassailable; to organize a coalition of otherwise disparate groups; and pit them against other Americans as part of a divide-and-conquer strategy.

DEI, in short, is a tool of power and control — engendering political and ideological conformity and the mobilization and weaponization of its cadres — the left has wielded to maximum effect as it’s taken over every influential institution.

If Claudine Gay were to fall, it could topple the entire house of cards the left, led by Barack Obama, helped build.

QED: “Barack’s Lieutenant: The Racism, Revenge, and Ruin of Claudine Gay,” a topic explored by Scott McKay at the American Spectator:

Indeed, there is no more apt poster child for the America Obama left us than the pathetic Ms. Gay. In a time when not just race but adherence to noxious neo-Marxism govern hiring decisions everywhere from the campus to the “entertainment” world, (and, increasingly, Fortune 500 boardrooms), no one better exemplifies the ruinous legacy of our 44th president.

And ruinous by intention. This is only one facet of the “fundamental transformation” of America that Obama promised on the eve of his 2008 election. All the American people really wanted in electing Obama was to neutralize race as a persistent issue in politics and culture, thinking that taking a chance on a not-particularly-qualified politician as our president would prove we aren’t a racist country, and further, we’d be proving that we’d realized the dream of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., that men and women would be judged in America by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.

What a vile bait-and-switch that was.

Barack Obama’s own academic qualifications were dubious. It’s still not particularly well-understood how he managed to secure admission to Columbia and Harvard with undistinguished grades or how he managed to serve as president of Harvard’s law review without authoring a single article in that publication.

He advanced based on the color of his skin and not his individual merit. Everyone understands that now. Obama then demonstrated at Harvard Law along with the bizarre racist professor Derrick Bell, the inventor of Critical Race Theory, when the latter demanded the university hire more black faculty simply because they were black. This after Obama was made president of the law review simply because he was black.

As Claudine Gay was made president of the university simply because she is black.

Finally, there’s their shared apparent love of the P-word, Lloyd Billingsley writes at Power Line: Presidential Plagiarism.

“He wants people to believe his story,” David Garrow told Samuels. “For me to conclude that Dreams from My Father was historical fiction—oh God, did that infuriate him.”

It’s hard to exaggerate the fakery of the composite character, the fathomless credulity with which he was received, and the fallout now on full display. In “The Obama Factor,” David Samuels saw Obama’s hand in “the disaster we are living through now.”

No surprise that the composite character president, whose book ripped off Ralph Ellison and Kuki Gallmann, should support the plagiarist Claudine Gay, who says anti-Semitism depends “on the context.”  As this plays out, don’t forget White House resident Joe Biden.

As Mark Bowden noted in 2010, the Delaware Democrat was basically a “salesman,” and showed little sign that he had ever read or written anything of importance. So no surprise that in his 1988 presidential run, Biden plagiarized a speech by British Marxist Neil Kinnock. Consider also “presidential historian,” and one-time Harvard “overseer” Doris Kearns Goodwin, author of The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys.

“Goodwin’s plagiarism of sentences, nearly verbatim, from source materials is inexcusable,” the Harvard Crimson editorialized in 2002. “She should recognize that her action is unbecoming an Overseer and resign her post immediately, sending the clear message to the campus that she understands the gravity of the offense she has committed.”

Exit quote: “At this writing, Claudine Gay is still president of Harvard. As Donald Trump likes to say, we’ll have to see what happens.”

OWN GOAL: Nikki Haley declines to say slavery was cause of Civil War.

The former UN Ambassador and South Carolina governor, who has seen her star rise in the first-in-the-nation primary state, was appearing at a town hall event in Berlin, New Hampshire, when a voter asked her to identify the cause of the war.

“I think the cause of the Civil War was basically how government was going to run,” she responded. “The freedoms and what people could and couldn’t do. What do you think the cause of the Civil War was or argument?”

The questioner, who could not be easily heard off camera, was apparently unpersuaded by Haley’s response. When she asked him what he believed the cause of the war was, he replied that he wasn’t running for president.

“I think it always comes down to the role of government and what the rights of the people are,” Haley replied. “And I will always stand by the fact that I think government was intended to secure the rights and freedoms of the people. It was never meant to be all things to all people. Government doesn’t need to tell you how to live your life. They don’t need to tell you what you can and can’t do. They don’t need to be a part of your life. They need to make sure that you have freedom. We need to have capitalism. We need to have economic freedom. We need to make sure that we do all things so that individuals have the liberties so that they can have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to do or be anything they want to be without government getting in the way.”

When the questioner said it was “astonishing” to hear her respond “without mentioning the word slavery,” Haley replied: “What do you want me to say about slavery?” She then asked for the next question.

The exchange, which took place roughly an hour and a half into the town hall event, underscored the unique nature and customary pitfalls that often await candidates in New Hampshire, where direct exchanges with voters are the norm.

Despite Biden’s even worse statements on this issue, whoever is running the (p)resident’s social media account was quick to highlight Haley’s gaffe:

UPDATE: Haley is now blaming a “Democratic plant” for her gaffe last night:

Having the president’s comms team put the spotlight on you will certainly slow the news cycle shifting, particularly during the media’s holiday “silly season” period when journalists are desperate for something, anything juicy to occupy the news. Why did Haley give them such a story?

Ed Morrissey adds: “Most conservatives would agree that ‘government doesn’t need to tell you how to live your life,’ and it largely didn’t at that time — except where state governments kept people in slavery:”

The real question here is: why can’t Haley just say, “Slavery”? It really is an easy question and a one-word answer. And the reason is that conservatives have been pandering to the Lost Cause fantasy of the Confederacy for far too long, hoping to avoid alienating its adherents. Haley may be worried that South Carolina primary voters don’t want to hear a straightforward and honest answer, or perhaps more simply, that she doesn’t want to give those voters an excuse to flip back to Trump on this pretext. Not exactly a “Profiles in Courage” moment for Haley, or even a “Profiles in Reality” moment.

In the above clip, CNN’s commentators shrug off any damage from this exchange to Haley. They may be right in terms of her electoral performance in South Carolina, but I’m not sure that will just get shrugged off similarly by voters in Iowa or New Hampshire. Haley didn’t have much chance of winning either state before this, and while this may not damage her, it certainly doesn’t help — especially for a candidate who’s been bragging about her five-inch combat heels for the last few months to sell herself as the toughest candidate on the ballot.

At NRO, Jeffrey Blehar describes this as essentially a Kinsley gaffe by Haley: “We can be told the Civil War was about slavery, Nikki — we’re all adults here. Few politicians look good when caught nakedly pandering in public, but Nikki Haley wears the look witheringly poorly — it knocks out one of the key underlying struts currently upholding her fragile public brand. That’s why this little gaffe, however minor, memorably reveals something about Haley; we rarely get such accidental insight into how little politicians think of their own voters.”

(Updated and bumped.)

SOCIALISTS KEEP LOOKING TO “UNEXPECTEDLY” NATIONALIZE: Nationalize Greyhound.

Jacobin, today.

If only there was a nationalized transportation system that has existed for decades that we could use as a benchmark to see how nationalizing Greyhound would likely proceed:

After posting historic spending deficits in 2021 and 2022, Amtrak is planning to spend more in fiscal year 2024 as federal funding expands to “unprecedented” levels.

Amtrak posted operating losses of $1.08 billion in 2021 and $886.8 million in 2022, far greater than pre-COVID losses, but is still going ahead with expansion. By comparison, Amtrak lost $29.4 million in 2019, the year before the pandemic hit.

The increase in spending was pandemic-related, according to Amtrak.

Amtrak asked Congress for a $350 million bump in funding for fiscal year 2024 to $3.65 billion.

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) was signed into law by President Joe Biden on November 15, 2021. The law authorizes $1.2 trillion for transportation and infrastructure spending with $550 billion of that figure going toward “new” investments and programs. Amtrak will receive $85.2 billion via IIJA from FY 2022 through FY 2026.

Amtrak presses on with more funding and expansion despite historic losses, the Washington Examiner, May 19th.

And it’s curious that Jacobin doesn’t want competition for Greyhound’s services, when they exist as competition among the left for Salon’s longstanding goals of nationalizing every industry in the US:

—Salon.com, March 6, 2013.

—Salon.com, January 18, 2014.

Easy Riders, Raging Stasists, Ed Driscoll.com, February 22, 2014.

Salon.com, July 8, 2014.

DAVID THOMPSON: The Year Reheated.

In which we marvel at the mental contortions of our self-imagined betters.

The year began with a tale of oysters and college lesbianism, via Bon Appétit magazine, in which Brooklynite pronoun-stipulator Isha Maratha was keen to overshare. For Ms Maratha, “My first time eating an oyster was an act of queer intimacy.” Indeed, we were told by an obliging editor, “The act of eating an oyster uniquely and intimately expresses her queerness.” And so, we were regaled, at length, with descriptions of mollusc-gobbling, stolen glances, and lemon wedges being squeezed. “There is something uniquely unspoken,” we learned, “between the eater and the eaten.”

Spartacus, call your office!

HOLOCAUST MUSEUM WEIGHS IN AS ANTI-ISRAEL GROUP FURIOUSLY BACKTRACKS ON MUSEUM STORMING EVENT:

Contrary to popular belief, apparently there are some lines that even anti-Israel types won’t cross after all. But only when they’re shamed into doing so.

As RedState previously reported, the newly formed “Doctors Against Genocide” (DAG) anti-Israel group, whose powerful allies include antisemitic members of Congress like House Hamas Caucus members Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.), announced on Christmas Day of all days that it was holding a “Stop the Genocide in Gaza” event inside the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. on Thursday, encouraging their supporters to obtain free tickets from the museum.

“Doctors Against Genocide,” huh?

On the flipside, just like that, the Middle East is prepared to — at least for the moment — pretend that the Holocaust actually happened. That’s real (and likely temporary) progress, in less than a year: On Social Media, Arabs And Muslims Deny The Holocaust.

TAKE A BOW TIKTOK: One in five young Americans has a positive view of Osama Bin Laden: Disturbing Daily Mail poll results also reveal three in 10 Gen-Zers think the views of the 9/11 mastermind were a ‘force for good.’

One in five young Americans has a positive view of 9/11 mastermind and Al Qaeda founder Osama Bin Laden, according to disturbing results of a DailyMail.com poll.

The alarming survey also found three in 10 Gen Z voters believe the views of the anti-Semitic terrorist leader who slaughtered thousands of innocent people were a ‘force for good’.

Family members of 9/11 victims said the findings are ‘horrifying’ and proof of a startling trend suggesting some in the younger generation are growing sympathetic to terrorists.

* * * * * * * *

The stunning results of DailyMail.com’s poll reveal a stark change in attitudes and follow worrying examples in recent months of younger Americans questioning Bin Laden’s evil.

In November, anti-Israel TikTok users sent Bin Laden’s 2002 ‘Letter to America’ with his justification for 9/11 viral.

Some users said their ‘eyes had been opened’ and backed his claim that the attacks were a retaliation for the U.S. supporting Israel.

In the letter he also accused the American government of spreading AIDS throughout the world and described homosexuality as ‘immoral’.

So basically, the Unabomber on steroids; as this 2021 article notes, TikTok users discovering murderous primitives for the first time isn’t all that new a development: Influencer Society and Its Future. Swallow the Ted pill on Unabomber stan TikTok.

I’m so old, I can remember last month when this tweet was satire:

Earlier: TikTok May Be A Chinese Superweapon.

KYLE SMITH: Ferrari Review: Adam Driver in a Drama of Speed and Steel.

[Michael] Mann has been developing this project for more than 20 years. His screenwriter, Troy Kennedy Martin, died in 2009. Mr. Mann’s first choice to play the lead, Christian Bale, eventually backed off and made another movie about the same milieu, 2019’s “Ford v. Ferrari.”

Now Adam Driver is the one with his foot on the gas, and it’s a relief to note that Mr. Driver, who gave a cartoonish performance as another Italian icon in the awful “House of Gucci,” this time is elegantly restrained, without overdoing the accent, as the man who in 1939 founded the eponymous car company. He tells us all we need to know about his obsession when he says, “Jaguar races to sell cars. I sell cars in order to race.” Enzo isn’t an especially likable man: He has adopted a strategy of steadfast stoicism in the face of adversity, which looks like coldness when one of his racers gets killed, seemingly because of a manufacturing flaw in one of Ferrari’s cars. He cheats on his wife, who sometimes responds with gunfire. But with all of his personal failings, Mr. Driver’s Ferrari becomes a monument to all of the fanatically obsessed men who, determined to produce something great, correctly bet that their creations would outlive the memories of their sins.

Mr. Mann’s slow-burning, intensely focused drama is occasionally ponderous, especially in its sleepy midsection, but its third act is absolutely thrilling.

It’s not a great film, and no one will mistake Mann’s Ferrari with Thief, Manhunter, or Heat. But as a biopic with some brilliant racing scenes, it’s well worth a watch on the big screen during the holiday season, if only to see Driver performing a grownup character, rather than Kylo Ren in yet another execrable Disney Star Wars sequel.

QUOTE OF THE DAY:

I wonder if I might crave your momentary indulgence in order to discharge a by no means disagreeable obligation which has, over the years, become more or less established practice in government service as we approach the terminal period of the year — calendar, of course, not financial — in fact, not to put too fine a point on it, Week Fifty-One — and submit to you, with all appropriate deference, for your consideration at a convenient juncture, a sincere and sanguine expectation — indeed confidence — indeed one might go so far as to say hope — that the aforementioned period may be, at the end of the day, when all relevant factors have been taken into consideration, susceptible to being deemed to be such as to merit a final verdict of having been by no means unsatisfactory in its overall outcome and, in the final analysis, to give grounds for being judged, on mature reflection, to have been conducive to generating a degree of gratification which will be seen in retrospect to have been significantly higher than the general average.

In other words:

WE’VE DESCENDED INTO SOME SORT OF BIZARRE HELL-WORLD IN WHICH PIERS MORGAN IS A VOICE OF SANITY: Piers Morgan dismantled cancel culture for ‘ruining’ Christmas: ‘Sucking joy out of life.’

Beloved Christmas song “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” which was written by Frank Loesser and popularised in the 40s film “Neptune’s Daughter”, has caused controversy in the past decade. The song, which has been covered by world-famous crooners such as Dean Martin, has faced criticism among some listeners for the alleged implications of its lyrics. The male vocal part’s unrelenting pressure for the female to “stay” despite repeated suggestions she should go home have been described in certain quarters as suggestive of sexual harassment.

The first time the song was widely criticised for its lyrics was 12 years ago.

Then, in 2018 “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” was cancelled by a number of radio stations in Canada and the US after social media criticism and public pressure.

In a throwback episode of Good Morning Britain, Mr Morgan was apoplectic about efforts to ban the song, and suggested that cancel culture was “sucking the joy out of life”.

As Mark Steyn wrote in 2014:

A few decades back, a young middle-class Egyptian spending some time in the US had the misfortune to be invited to a dance one weekend and was horrified at what he witnessed:

The room convulsed with the feverish music from the gramophone. Dancing naked legs filled the hall, arms draped around the waists, chests met chests, lips met lips . . .

Where was this den of debauchery? Studio 54 in the 1970s? Haight-Ashbury in the summer of love? No, the throbbing pulsating sewer of sin was Greeley, Colorado, in 1949. As it happens, Greeley, Colorado, in 1949 was a dry town. The dance was a church social. And the feverish music was “Baby, It’s Cold Outside,” as introduced by Esther Williams in “Neptune’s Daughter.” Revolted by the experience, Sayyid Qutb decided that America (and modernity in general) was an abomination, returned to Egypt, became the leading intellectual muscle in the Muslim Brotherhood, and set off a chain that led from Qutb to Zawahiri to bin Laden to the Hindu Kush to the Balkans to 9/11 to the brief Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt to the Islamic State marching across Syria and Iraq. Indeed, Qutb’s view of the West is the merest extension of “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” — America as the ultimate seducer, the Great Satan.

I’m a reasonable chap, and I’d be willing to meet the Muslim Brotherhood chaps halfway on a lot of the peripheral stuff like beheadings, stonings, clitoridectomies and whatnot. But you’ll have to pry “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” from my cold dead hands and my dancing naked legs. A world without “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” would be very cold indeed.

Indeed.™

CHRISTMAS IN NAZI GERMANY: How Nazis Stole Christmas & Turned Adolf Hitler into Messiah (Video).

Earlier: The National Socialists Fought the Original War on Christmas.

Who knew? Other than everyone who read Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism in 2008, or this London Daily Mail article the following year. But it’s good to see this sort of thing in the Smithsonian’s house organ. Or as author Dave Shiflett quipped in 2002 at NRO, “A shocking story has been revealed: Adolf Hitler was not a Christian after all. Instead, he hoped to destroy Christianity.”

To borrow a line from another 19th-century born socialist God killer, as a reminder of the first time as tragedy and the second time as farce — while killing time before engineering the next tragedy — I found that above quote in a post of mine from right around this time in 2012. A few years before Angela Merkel turned the lights out on 21st Germany, Yahoo was reporting that “A minister in Angela Merkel’s government has sparked a pre-Christmas row among Germany’s ruling parties by suggesting God be referred to with the neutral article ‘das’ instead of the masculine ‘der.’”

But then, political correctness is what governments do in order to ignore their nation’s real, structural problems.

Related: Nazi Caroling: The Extremes Hitler Wanted to Go To in Order to Replace Christianity with the “Religion” of National Socialism).

And in the adjacent world of International Socialism, Peter Hitchens: The last Noël in the USSR.