Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

ROD STEWART, 81, CONFIRMS FINAL TOUR AFTER HEART PROCEDURE AND HEALTH SCARES:

Rod Stewart is ready for one final encore.

The rock legend announced “The Final Encore Tour” Monday, revealing that next year will mark his last-ever tour after facing a series of health issues.

“Well, here we go… one last time!” Stewart wrote on Instagram. “Come and see me on my The Final Encore Tour for one more round of rock ’n’ roll. I’m really looking forward to it.”

Stewart opened up about his decision to make the tour his last in an emotional video message.

“Ladies and gentlemen, after much deliberation and sadness, I have to announce next year will be my last tour ever, ever, ever,” he told fans.

“I’m not retiring, but this will be the last rock and roll tour,” he clarified.

“I wanna thank you for everything you’ve given me, and hopefully I’ve given you something in return,” Stewart said before singing, “Please come out and see me on the tour. It’s gonna be great!”

In 2021, Damon Linker wrote: What Rock Fans Don’t Want to Admit.

The recent death of Rolling Stones drummer Charlie Watts at the age of 80 is just the latest rude reminder of what all of us know in our bones but nonetheless choose to ignore most days: The classic rock era is nearly dead and buried — and so are its greatest icons.

I wrote about this two years ago, and, inevitably, things are looking even bleaker now. Bob Dylan is 80. Paul McCartney and Paul Simon are 79. And not far behind them are a host of rock stars well into their 70s: Brian Wilson, Carole King, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Joni Mitchell, Jimmy Page, Robert Plant, Ray Davies, Roger Daltrey, Pete Townshend, Roger Waters, David Gilmour, Rod Stewart, Eric Clapton, Debbie Harry, Neil Young, Van Morrison, Bryan Ferry, Elton John, and Don Henley. James Taylor and Jackson Browne just completed a tour together; the former is 73, the latter 72. The baby of the bunch, Bruce Springsteen, currently wrapping up another residency on Broadway, turns 72 next month.

Over the next decade, most of these superstars are going to die, and the remaining holdouts soon after. On one level, this will be a terrible loss. These are people we care about deeply, who write and perform music that means the world to us.

But if we’re honest, we also have to admit that the loss is largely a function of nostalgia, of feelings attached to sounds and sights from long ago. Yes, many of these legends still take to the road to play live. Some produce new music from time to time. But none of these artists — not one — is doing work to rival the quality of what they produced at their peak. And in every case, that high point was decades ago.

And after they’re gone, sadly comes what Kyle Smith dubbed in 2019, The Great Forgetting:

As the Who suit up for what I suppose will be their final tour (“Who’s Left”?), Chuck Klosterman points out in his book But What if We’re Wrong? that whole forms die out. He compares rock to 19th-century marching music: nothing left of the latter except John Philip Sousa. That’s it. And Sousa himself is barely remembered. In 100 years rock might be gone too, Klosterman guesses. Maybe we’ll remember one rock act. Who will it be? Maybe none of the obvious answers. It certainly wasn’t obvious at the time of Fitzgerald’s death that The Great Gatsby would be the best-remembered novel he or anyone else wrote in the first half of the 20th century. As for the novels of the second half of the 20th century, the clock is ticking on them. The Catcher in the Rye is moribund. Generation X was the last to revere that book. Teaching it to young people today would get you ridiculed. To Kill a Mockingbird? It had a good run but it’s now being labeled a “white savior” story by the grandchildren of those who revered it. Soon schools and teachers will be shunning it.

To Kill a Mockingbird? Atticus Finch is literature’s most celebrated rape apologist!

HOW IT STARTED: MSNBC Goes Full Racist, Attacking Sydney Sweeney Ad Campaign.

Remember how, in recent years, nearly every high-profile “racist incident” that dominated the headlines eventually turned out to be a false flag or outright hoax? Well, nothing’s changed. The outrage-obsessed left has apparently run out of real things to be angry about, so now they’re inventing reasons to keep the mob frothing.

Case in point: the latest American Eagle ad campaign featuring actress Sydney Sweeney. According to some perpetually offended leftists, it’s somehow Nazi propaganda*. Yes, really.

 

—Matt Margolis, PJ Media.com, July 29th, 2025.

How it’s going: Sydney Sweeney converting to Judaism? Rosh Hashanah outing fuels rumors.

Sydney Sweeney is at the center of fresh conversion rumors after reportedly attending Rosh Hashanah services with boyfriend Scooter Braun, as their relationship grows increasingly serious.

Celebrity gossip account Deuxmoi reported that the 29-year-old “Euphoria” and “The White Lotus” star is considering converting to Judaism. The speculation intensified after she was reportedly spotted attending synagogue with Braun, 45, during the Jewish High Holidays.

—Ynet, today.

Like Trump, Worst. Nazi. Ever.

* I’m so old, I can remember the last days of Obama’s second term, when they media was seeing the Reich Stuff coded into Taylor Swift’s image.

WELL, THIS IS THE 21st CENTURY, YOU KNOW:

GOSH, THAT WAS FAST: RAF base terror suspects released on bail.

Five men arrested over a suspected bomb plot targeting RAF Fairford have been released on bail.

The men, who are all British nationals aged 23 to 25, were arrested on Sunday on suspicion of terrorism and explosives offences, after three vans were discovered 400m from the Gloucestershire air base.

The suspects are from the London areas of Camden, Westminster and Willesden, police confirmed on Monday.

Laurence Taylor, the Met Police’s assistant commissioner for special operations, said: “I can confirm that, following extensive interviews and inquiries, the five men who were arrested are being released on police bail this afternoon.

“To be very clear, this does not mean that the investigation is over. They are subject to stringent conditions on their movement and contact with others. They absolutely remain under investigation as we explore multiple lines of inquiry.”

Police are understood to be investigating a possible Iranian link to the alleged plot. However, the Iranian embassy “categorically rejected” it had any involvement.

Unexpectedly! Regarding that “British nationals” reference, at Hot Air, Beege Welborn responds: RAF Fairford Plot, Day 2: Public Demanding Answers — Officials, Media Channel Norm MacDonald.

The government just released a teaser on the suspects – all ‘British nationals,’ which settles everything.

So shut up already.

 

People are pointing out how worthless that ‘British national’ statement is.

All it means is someone has a British passport, which any old terrorist can get.

Ebola’s been sending me some hilarious memes that have been appearing on his former Cirencester/Gloucestershire neighborhood Facebook message boards. I thought I’d share a couple that nearly had me ruining my monitor this morning.

The first should be an addition to the recent handouts the British government created so their incoming asylum-seeking boat hordes understood that, like, rape, knifeyness, etc., are not considered cultural enhancements in England.

Don’t blow RAF bases up:

And some Sharpe’s Rifles is always appropriate.

Nahh – it’s just those exuberant “British nationalists” once again. Move along, nothing to see here.

HOW THE WEST WAS LOST:

Tweet concludes:

Then when the group from this patriarchal society is big enough, they take over the host country. There is some pushback but many people in the host country join with the society in crushing it.

“Nope. The plot won’t work. It’s unbelievable.”

That’s what I thought but this is a history book about the spread of Islam through immigration.

Related: “Muslims have finally cracked the code on the West”; For Islam, “Socialism Is THE Trojan Horse” to power — Larry Taunton’s September 11th keynote address.

THE PAST IS A FOREIGN COUNTRY, THEY DIDN’T BELIEVE THAT PLANET EARTH ONLY HAD TEN YEARS TO SURVIVE BACK THEN:

THE DOG WALKERS OF WAR:

Shades of Michelle Kosinski’s infamous “flood” reporting during her stint with NBC’s Today Show: 

PEOPLE MAGAZINE WAS MUCH BETTER WHEN GENE BARRY WAS PUBLISHING IT:

Related:

SEPTEMBER 26, 1960: THE NIXON-KENNEDY DEBATE:

September 26, 1960, is an interesting date in American history. Sixty-six years ago, as of the date I write this, was the first televised presidential debate in the United States, wherein the Republican candidate, Vice President Richard Milhous Nixon, squared off against the Democrat, an upstart Senator from Massachusetts named John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Opinions about the debate, then and now, are varied, as are opinions about every presidential debate before and since, but since this was the first one where the candidates appeared on screen in American homes, things were a little different. Two years ago, the Conversation’s W. Joseph Campbell examined this debate and compared it to the 2024 Trump/Biden debate, and their report is still worth reading.

The run-up to the Joe Biden-Donald Trump debate at the end of June 2024 has brought reminders about the first-ever televised presidential debate – and how Vice President Richard Nixon’s sweaty, haggard appearance that autumn night in 1960 opened a pathway to the White House for the tanned and telegenic Sen. John F. Kennedy.

That, at least, is conventional wisdom about the Kennedy-Nixon debate of Sept. 26, 1960: Image prevailed, rewarding Kennedy and punishing Nixon.

“Kennedy went on to narrowly win the election that most say he never would have had a shot at without that first debate,” Time magazine declared in 2016, in recounting the greatest missteps in political debates. “It seems Nixon’s fatal flub was in failing to recognize the power of the visual image.”

Or as Max Frankel, then the executive editor of The New York Times, wrote sardonically several months after Nixon’s death in 1994, “Nixon lost a TV debate, and the Presidency, to John F. Kennedy in 1960 because of a sweaty upper lip.”

Or to put it another way, Kennedy won thanks to a lot of help from Don Hewitt of CBS News, who was supported him: “Hewitt convinced JFK to wear pancake make-up to soften the harsh glare of the studio klieg lights. During the broadcast, Hewitt instructed the camera operators to frame Kennedy in profile with a wide angle. For Nixon, Hewitt ordered straight-on extreme close-ups — the equivalent of a mug shot. Don Hewitt, by the way, perfected his craft as founder and producer of CBS’ 60 Minutes. The ‘villain’ of each 60 Minutes segment has always gotten the Nixonian treatment. (Welcome to the world of objective television journalism.)”

K-12 IMPLOSION UPDATE: Has Nikole Hannah-Jones just written a new version of The Jungle?

[C]ongratulations, Nikole Hannah-Jones.

You’re a regular Nick Shirley, exposing the outrageous fraud of public school education in New York City, even as you think you are promoting DEI or rage over racism or something.

Or more specifically, you are becoming the new Upton Sinclair.

Sinclair, recall, was a progressive-era muckraker who wrote ‘The Jungle’ in 1906, with the express aim of converting America to socialism.

His book described the filthy meat-packing plants of Chicago and the terrible labor conditions experienced by America’s Lithuanian and other immigrant workers in a wrenching, emotionally engaging book that became a massive bestseller.

But much to his surprise, he didn’t convert anyone to socialism.

People read about those filthy meat-packing plants where chemicals and spoilage were present, and absolutely shuddered at the thought that they were eating from them.

That prompted major legislation to reform food sanitation practices, including the Meat Inspection Act, and the Pure Food and Drug Act by Congress.

Sinclair never quite knew what hit him, famously saying:

I aimed at the public’s heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach.

That’s what Hannah-Jones just did: she shined a spotlight on the rotten meat of New York City’s educational ‘product,’ and like Sinclair, drew huge attention.

Exit quote: “How ironic that it comes from her when all she wanted to do was preach DEI.”

ROGER KIMBALL: Varieties of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

There are two things to register about TDS. The first is how virulent it is. The second is how it tends to worsen, not attenuate, with the passage of time. Farr’s Law does not seem to be operative in the career of this virus. During Trump’s first term, we saw things we had never seen in this country before. The parade of women in pink “pussy hats” was just a local variation on the sort of thing that might have plagued George W. Bush. But as Trump’s first term unfolded, the insanity increased. There was the whole “Russia Collusion Hoax,” for example, a caper hatched in the White House in the final days of Barack Obama’s second term. It was meant to delegitimize and ultimately end the Trump administration, and it very nearly did.

Then there came the systematic censorship and deplatforming of the president of the United States. He was booted off various social media platforms—what were then Twitter, Facebook, etc.—and essentially denied an effective means of communicating with his supporters. Pause for a moment to consider how bizarre it was that the president of the United States was censored and denied a place in the national conversation.

It gets worse. “Grok: Is it true that Trump was debanked?” “Yes—in 2021, after January 6, several large banks closed accounts tied to Donald Trump and Trump businesses.”

Beginning in 2028, the rehabilitation of Trump’s reputation will begin in the legacy media, softening him as a wise elder statesman, when a new Hitler emerges — a man far worse than the current Hitler — and campaigns to succeed him.

DISPATCHES FROM THE EDUCATION APOCALYPSE: Cambridge University abandons full investigation into hiring of plagiarist professor Jason Arday. 

Cambridge University will no longer fully investigate its hiring of Professor Jason Arday. The university had previously said it would investigate the circumstances surrounding the professor’s appointment and his time at Cambridge.

Arday was found dead by apparent suicide last month after facing public scrutiny for allegations concerning plagiarism in portions of his doctoral thesis and other work. Cambridge announced its review would instead look into whether the university had adequately supported Arday amid allegations of plagiarism.

The move is a departure from a promise made by the school’s Vice-Chancellor, Deborah Prentice, who said there would be a “thorough and transparent” investigation into the hiring of Arday. It is now unclear if Cambridge will ever publicly address the vetting process used for Arday to obtain his senior teaching job.

They won’t, or at least not until much more pressure is applied. And thus, nothing will change. Professor Kingsfield and even Dean Wormer left the academy a long time ago:

 

 

HOARDERS AND WRECKERS DESCEND UPON THE LAST DITCH: Paranoid owner of woke Mass. lesbian bar puts big restrictions on mask-free Saturday over ‘infiltrator’ fear.

The first mask-free Saturday since a Massachusetts lesbian bar went viral for descending into a catty culture war was nearly canceled after its last remaining owner claimed the venue was being “infiltrated.”

Greenfield’s Last Ditch Bar caused an uproar when it broke the news last month to its “immunocompromised disabled divas” it was lifting its mandatory mask policy for just one night a week in a bid to boost business — six full years after the COVID-19 pandemic.

More than one dozen patrons gathered at the door shortly after 7 p.m. for a “goth night” with underground DJs “Hannibal Directive” and “Puppy Synthesis” were turned away and told to come back at 10 p.m. because staff was holding a last-minute emergency meeting. Most hadn’t gotten the memo about theme.

When they returned, the by now nearly 100 people rushing to get in were promptly informed by the financially struggling establishment that because of unspecified “safety breaches,” the mask-free dance night they’d been eagerly anticipating for the past three hours was now a private event — and that if they couldn’t name someone they knew inside, they were being 86’d.

Patrons also had to hand over their ID to staff as a supposed “security measure,” and could only pick it up on the way out.

Despite the outcry about the decision to go mask-free one night a week by those who called it a “mass disabling event” and a “eugenicist” attack, on Saturday fewer than a dozen patrons were masked.

“It just feels off-putting,” said Pete, 43, who lives in nearby Northampton, the city that’s been labeled “Lesbianville, USA,” of wearing a mask.

“I thought it would be more inclusive for me to go on Saturdays,” Patricia Sonaike, 24, a Houston, Texas, native who is a junior at UMass Amherst studying biology and member of the LGBTQ+ community, told The Post.

“In my humblest of opinions, the moral grandstanding that is happening right now is like how a lot of these queer and BIPOC spaces won’t last.”

The crowd danced to techno pop music on the black and white checkered dance floor that had a stripper pole in the middle, as anime cartoons played on a projector screen and neon lights flashed.

Yesterday, I described the Last Ditch as a prewritten Saturday Night Live sketch that the show wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot stripper pole. But a story this bonkers deserves a much bigger screen, or at the very least a TV series all its own: Viral Lesbian Bar Article From Boston Globe Is Piquing Hollywood’s Interest.

Of course it’s peaking Hollywood’s interest:

A REMINDER OF WHAT IS AT STAKE IN NOVEMBER:

 

OUT ON A LIMB: AOC’s team admitted it: The Green New Deal was never about saving the planet.

The Green New Deal is all about power and control.

Shortly after Ocasio-Cortez introduced the Green New Deal, her chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, let the cat out of the bag.

“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti admitted to reporters. “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing? Because we really think of it as a ‘how do you change the entire economy’ thing.”

With most Americans no longer worried about a climate change apocalypse, I suspect the left will simply invent another scaremongering campaign to justify the Green New Deal.

Whatever they come up with, Americans should remain skeptical because the Green New Deal is just a mechanism for the far Left to exert unprecedented command and control.

As summer wound down, the left seamlessly transferred the “we only have five/ten/12 years to save the planet” rhetoric of radical environmentalism to AI doomsday rhetoric:

THE DNC-MSM’S BATTLEFIELD PREP FOR THE MIDTERMS:

THE FUNERAL OF CNN:

CNN is getting a new owner, on a short clock. Paramount Skydance is expected to complete its acquisition of WBD by early October, according to reports from KVIA — which means whatever CNN becomes next gets decided by people who didn’t build it.

Leadership is a question mark. Mark Thompson’s future at the network remains unresolved, and Fox News reports that Paramount CEO David Ellison still has to figure out how CNN fits alongside CBS News — two once-fierce competitors about to share a corporate parent, with no clear answer yet on who runs what. Attention, Bari Weiss: I’d not be spending much time unpacking just yet.

Layoffs are coming, and CNN’s own people are saying so. Brian Stelter, still on CNN’s payroll, (why I have no idea) said on air that layoffs and cost-cutting are “almost certainly” coming as Paramount hunts for efficiencies and works off the debt load from the deal, according to CNN’s own transcripts. When the in-house media reporter is narrating his own newsroom’s layoffs on air, that’s not spin — that’s a company bracing for it in real time.

And the audience problem hasn’t gone anywhere. Variety notes CNN’s linear ratings sit well below where they were during Trump’s first term, even as the company has poured effort into building out a digital subscription business to compensate. The cable-news gravy train that used to cover for everything else isn’t pulling its weight anymore.

Here’s the detail that makes the whole thing almost too perfect: this isn’t the funeral of a company hemorrhaging money. WBD had actually projected CNN would pull in roughly $600 million in profit on $1.8 billion in revenue in 2026. So nobody’s burying a corpse. They’re burying the CNN its own employees thought they worked for — the assumptions, the standing, the sense of being untouchable, all going into the ground at once, while the balance sheet, ironically, still looks fine. Traditionally, that’s the description of a company chugging along on a reputation it no longer deserves, if it ever did.

That’s the real story here, and it’s worth stating plainly: CNN isn’t being buried because it lost money. It’s being buried because the business model, the audience, the ownership, the management, and every assumption that defined the network for three decades are all getting interred simultaneously, on the same afternoon, by a company that didn’t build any of it and owes it nothing sentimental.

And the symbolism practically writes itself from here. CNN is about to join the same corporate family as CBS News — a rival network it spent decades trying to beat — while Paramount reportedly contemplates real structural changes to both operations at once. The merger settlement even mandates the creation of a joint News Editorial Independence Board covering both CNN and CBS, which Investing.com reports experts are already warning will be toothless in practice — a supervisory body built mainly to look reassuring on paper.

Exit quote:

The truth is that CNN spent the better part of two decades building a newsroom that half the country correctly identified as leaning against it, then acted surprised when half the country stopped showing up. You don’t get to alienate an audience for twenty years and call the funeral a mystery.

As late as 1992, you could be a journalist like the late Ginny Carroll, a bureau chief with the then-Washington Post-owned Newsweek, who admitted on C-SPAN that she wore a button with “Yeah, I’m in the Media. Screw You” printed on it at that year’s Republican convention, and suffer no repercussions. CNN was the first attempt to build a 24/7 news channel, kicking off a new era of what Alvin Toffler dubbed the “demassification” of media. Too bad its on-air newsreaders had exactly the same worldview as those on the original Big Three American television networks, before the other half of the viewing public was finally given choices that aligned with their ideology.

GREAT MOMENTS IN SPORTSMANSHIP: Texas defensive star flagged for pretending to urinate on field after sack in ‘idiotic move.’

Colin Simmons’ crude celebration flushed any positives from his sack.

The Texas edge rusher pretended to urinate on the field after taking down Tennessee freshman quarterback Faizon Brandon in the second quarter of the No. 1 Longhorns’ road game Saturday, with President Donald Trump in attendance.

Simmons got flagged almost immediately for an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty, turning what would’ve been a 16-yard loss for Tennessee into a 15-yard gain and an automatic first down for the Volunteers.

The celebration from the Longhorns captain was so daunting that it riled up ESPN’s Kirk Herbstreit, leaving him stunned on the ABC broadcast.

“Just an absolute idiotic move by Colin Simmons doing that,” Herbstreit said.

Added play-by-play man Chris Fowler: “It’s idiotic, and it doesn’t get much more vulgar, either.”

The disturbing display comes after a spectacular season for the All-America Second Team pick. He’s fresh off a 2025 season in which he had 43 tackles, 12 sacks and three forced fumbles.

Shouldn’t coaches be instructing their players not to do stupid taunts that cost their teams yardage and downs?

Translated, the tweet reads, “DE Collin Simmons has just been penalized for: ‘Simulating going to the bathroom!'”

My extremely well-worn 1982 edition of The Illustrated NFL Playbook begins with the following anecdote:

Once during a Green Bay Packers offensive slump, head coach Vince Lombardi called a team meeting. “We’re going back to basics, he said. “Back to fundamentals.”

“Now this,” he said, holding up a ball, “is a football.”

“Hold on, coach,” interrupted split end Max McGee. “You’re going too fast.”

Perhaps additional fundamentals need to be taught as well, in all levels of football.

UPDATE: This incident also happened, apparently: Texas’s Touchdown Celebrations Are Officially Unhinged — Raleek Brown Just Sniffed His Balls And Passed Out. “And now we’re sniffing balls and passing out. Just two of THE most ridiculous celebrations you will ever see by the same team in the same game. Remarkable stuff. And to think the NFL gives out fines for beer drinking. NFL would ban them for life if they saw this stuff on a Sunday. Insane. Compliance office gonna have a field day on Monday!”

OLD AND BUSTED: Charles Manson interpreted the songs on the Beatles’ “White Album” as being a call for a titanic race war.

The New Hotness? Columbia professor wins award for book on ‘white paint’ being racist.

Among the many woke winners of this year’s prestigious National Book Awards is a black Columbia University professor whose screed attacks “white paint” as racist.

Professor Wendy Walters’ new book, “A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint,” claims that white paint is not the “neutral” architectural design element that it initially appears to be.

Instead, she “interrogates all that we have taken for granted about the substance that colors, or fails to color, the structures and objects that surround us—and what the collective impulse toward white paint can tell us about culture, politics, and individual desire,” the publisher’s description states, in part.

The idea for the book originated with the Ivy League professor’s “genuine and visceral dislike of white paint – a feeling that is at times overwhelming,” she explained in a 2021 video for Creative Capital Foundation on YouTube.

But Walters pushed back on the idea that her emotional response is “possibly irrational.”

“As I tried to understand why my response to white paint was so strong, I discovered numerous examples of the way that it figured into systems of erasure, exclusion, violence, and the masking of power in the social and natural world,” she said in the video.

Most of the examples she gave linked white paint to racism.

In one, white supremacists splattered white paint outside the Rothko Chapel in Houston, Texas in 2018, and, in another, white paint was used to vandalize a 100th anniversary memorial gallery to the Tulsa race massacre in 2021.

She also mentioned a rainbow crosswalk for “LGBTQIA+ persons” in New Brunswick, Canada being painted over with white paint in an “act of intolerance.”
“I hope to encourage the reader to think about how practices of decoration and adornment might allude to hidden narratives of power, whether or not they recognize them as being so,” she said in the video.

Haven’t we been here before though? In December of 2023, Red State’s Mike Miller wrote: ‘Interior Race Theory:’ Your Home Is Likely ‘Racist,’ White People.

According to interior designer Jacquelyn Ogorchukwu Iyamah, people can creatively resist “structures of domination in their homes by challenging themselves to think about the various ways that politics are embedded into the built environment and encouraging more ‘racial wellness’ within the spaces they create” — particularly concerning the objects they display.

Iyamah also warns that people of color shouldn’t emulate white people in the interior design of their homes.

* * * * * * * * *

The Use of the Color White

You knew we’d get around to this, right?

In addition to the unforgivable sin of decorating a home with “racist objects” like “mammy jars, colonial busts, war memorabilia, and Confederate flags,” Iyamah argues that the use of white paint is just as “racist.”

The use of the color white has been weaponized to symbolize purity…. There’s [sic] a lot of ways that this theory can deconstruct conservative values that really align with whiteness.

So there you have it. Before you buy that next can of white paint to, say, repaint your kitchen, remember: the color white has been “weaponized to symbolize purity.”

Not to mention, weaponized to attack the socialist founders of modern architecture, who were obsessed with white on white buildings for the sake of minimalism. I don’t think they were intending their work to be coded as white supremacism, but given their ideological leanings in the 1930s and ’40s, perhaps Walters and Iyamah are on to something. From Bauhaus to David Duke’s House?

Or, as Northern Barbarian tweets, “Just when you think they couldn’t get weirder.”

JONAH GOLDBERG: The Last Ditch for Mask Hysteria.

“The Western Massachusetts [Communist Party USA] rejects the use of conflicts among LGBTQIA+ people and organizations as a tool of division by the extreme right,” the statement said. “We reaffirm our solidarity with all those struggling against the genocide of transgender people.”

Okay, like whatever. But here’s the thing. Or a thing. Or something. The people profiled in the story aren’t mobilizing and protesting against Donald Trump or Republican governors. They’re tearing down a lesbian bar opened to be a safe haven for “dykes, transsexuals, gender freaks, workers, and their friends.” It even welcomes the “poor and unhoused” and serves them for free when necessary. The only condition: You had to wear a KN-95—or higher filtration—mask.

Because the bar was struggling financially—who could’ve guessed that serving people for free was not a great business model?—its operators announced, very politely, that they were going to go mask-optional on Saturday nights. A fierce backlash ensued. One patron replied, “I hope you get firebombed for robbing my fellow immunocompromised people of their Saturday plans just to scrape extra revenue from ablists[sic].”

Now, call me a cis-heteronormative, sellout-to-neoliberalism-and-patriarchal-values square, but I kinda think this is overkill.

One of the central themes of communist history, and radicalism generally, is the tendency to tear down the groups, institutions, tribes, whatever, closest to you. Who were the first victims of the Jacobin Reign of Terror? Their fellow revolutionaries, the Girondins. Long before the Nazis turned on the Jews, they first turned on the leadership of the SA, aka the Brownshirts. Stalin’s Terror mostly liquidated fellow Communists. In the 1960s, the new left disliked conservatives and Republicans, but they hated liberals and moderate Democrats. The radical jabronis of the new right hate the Reaganites and Bushies, maybe not more than they hate the left, but they dedicate a lot more time and energy to them.

I think there’s a lot of this kind of dynamic in the riot of dysfunction chronicled by the Globe. But the more interesting thing to me is how the ideological rhetoric the angry patrons of the Last Ditch deployed is really a mask for something else. For instance, Soe Noire, the stage name of a leading critic of the bar and the head of another “Queer COVID-conscious collective in Western Massachusetts,” hurls all sorts of ideological buzz phrases at the bar’s proprietor during a struggle session. Noire accuses the owner of shedding “WHITE THEY THEM TEARS” and accuses the Last Ditch of not being “a safe environment nor interested in revolutionary praxis.”

If your irreducible requirement for a good bar is that it be dedicated to “revolutionary praxis,” you might end up drinking alone more than you want. That’s late capitalism for you.

Read the whole thing. The surprise that the struggle session over the Last Ditch and its perma-marked barflies went viral is vaguely reminiscent of the reaction to Leonard Bernstein’s infamous fundraising party for the members of the Black Panthers being tried by the state of New York for terrorism-related charges, which Tom Wolfe memorialized in his legendary1970 article for New York magazine, “Radical Chic: That Party at Lenny’s.” After its publication, all of the participants were surprised at just how weird they looked to everyday Americans when the spotlight was shown on them.

But why did the left-leaning Boston Globe of all publications write up the story of the Last Ditch? At NRO, Jeffrey Blehar adds: Beleaguered Lesbian Bar Hits Potential Jackpot.

This story perfectly embodies and makes human a dynamic they’ve been living through for 20 years. Armand Domalewski, a YIMBY San Francisco progressive (which is to say, not leftist enough for many activists in the city) put it perfectly last night: “The reason this lesbian bar story went so viral is that basically every left wing person in America has personally experienced some version of this story in their life over the course of the last decade and is really goddam sick of it.”

If these bar owners are smart, they’ll manage to turn all of this new attention into a profit. (Rosa DeLauro, the famously blue-haired crone/representative from nearby Connecticut, proposed a solidarity trip over the state border on Twitter, which is honestly kind of touching.) But chances are they’re not all that smart, because — in a development no professional comedy writer in modern times would have been daring enough to script — at least one of them has already dropped out of the entire rotten, debt-ridden commitment . . . to instead attend clown school. Good writers would consider themselves too sophisticated to write on-the-nose, audience-pandering slop like that. Or the detail where one patron mused about how to save the Last Ditch, proposing a Lady Gaga–themed dance night: “Gaga is canceled,” she says. “Gaga is Zionist.” But the Boston Globe didn’t have to invent the comedic absurdities; they only had to report on them.

There’s likely no way someone writing fiction could invent a story this crazy. At Spiked, Jenny Holland writes: That lesbian Covid-conscious bar is beyond a satirist’s wildest dreams.

Another attendee, a person by the name of Yams – a ‘gender fluid, racially ambiguous, black biracial, a mom, low income’ – offered some real talk: ‘Nobody is owed comfort on land in which rape and pillage has happened.’

Not surprisingly, Soe Noire features heavily in the struggle session as well. ‘I’m rescinding all my monetary support from now on’, ‘he’ (she) huffs. And then issues the demand: ‘Pay me.’

There is not a single comedian or satirist on Earth who could come up with a better parody of woke. Yet however much we might laugh, this lunatic fringe is not exactly fringe any longer. The obsessions these ladies demonstrate – with disability, with Covid, with queerness – have made their way into the bloodstream of the body politic through an increasingly influential Democratic Socialists of America and an increasingly radicalised cohort of downwardly mobile, overeducated and unemployable children of elites. It was only two weeks ago that I was writing about the socialist conference that damned GLP-1s, fitness and even healthcare as fascist. And yet, here we are, once again.

These people take themselves very seriously. We should take them seriously as well.

In the 1970s, liberal satirists could poke fun at their fellow leftists. A thinly disguised Patty Hearst and the Symbionese Liberation Army were an important plot point in Paddy Chayefsky’s Network. In 2026 though, the Last Ditch is a Saturday Night Live sketch begging to happen, but likely no writer on the show will touch this story.

Related:

DISPATCHES FROM THE EDUCATION APOCALYPSE: Cambridge Cancels Probe into Jason Arday Hiring, Will Instead Focus on University Support.

Cambridge University has decided against investigating how and why the late professor Jason Arday was hired despite his lack of qualifications and will instead look into whether staff offered him sufficient support after he was accused of plagiarizing large sections of his published work and fabricating a series of personal achievements.

Touted as the youngest black Cambridge professor in history when he was hired in 2022, Arday came under significant public scrutiny earlier this year after fellow academics and journalists began surfacing evidence of extensive plagiarism throughout his publication record. That scrutiny extended to Arday’s professed personal biography, which featured staggering athletic achievements and acts of philanthropy.

Arday was found dead in his south London home on August 14, nine days after resigning as a professor of sociology of education at Cambridge. Police on scene described his death as “non-suspicious,” and his family later commented that the “campaign of misinformation was too much” for him.

Cambridge has learned nothing and forgotten nothing about the Arday debacle, and their role in making it happen.