Archive for 2025

ED MORRISSEY: Harris to Colbert: Trump Broke Me.

If anyone has reason for gratitude toward “the system,” it’s Harris. She is and has always been an intellectual lightweight who counted on “the system” to keep her in office. It was the Democrat establishment that ensured she kept winning elections in California despite her demonstrable lack of talent for campaigning or even for normal conversation. It was “the system,” among Democrats, that carried her to the US Senate, where she could have spent several successful decades safely ensconced in the system’s Club of Clubs, cosseted forever by California Democrats as the incumbent.

Instead, Harris got bored with the lifetime sinecure less than halfway through her first term, choosing to run for president in 2019. She then jumped at the chance to play second banana to the man she accused of being racist in the primary when her bid flopped, in a process where “the system” ensured nearly no other competition except Karen Bass and maybe Val Demings. (Biden pledged to pick a black woman as his running mate, you will recall.)  Harris proved herself so inept at the VP role that the White House sidelined her within the first five months of the Biden Regency.

Read the whole thing. As Ed writes, “That’s not to say this clip doesn’t feature the broken, however. Both Harris and Colbert are broken. Donald Trump broke them both. And they resent the hell out of it.”

And Colbert, at least according to New York Post, got the better of the exchange with the would-be president: Stephen Colbert needles Kamala Harris after she fails to answer simple question.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris was unable to say who the current leader of the Democratic Party was in an interview with Stephen Colbert — leaving even the lefty talk show host exasperated.

“The Late Show” host asked Harris — who announced this week she would not be running for governor of California next year — to identify who she believes is in the driver’s seat for her party.

But Harris balked at the simple question and refused to name a single Democrat.

“There are lots of leaders,” she said.

Colbert, who wasn’t satisfied with the answer, pressed her, asserting there’s “generally a leader” of the party and asking again if any names came to mind.

Harris wouldn’t budge.

“I think there are a lot — I’m not going to go through names because then I’m going to leave somebody out and then I’m going to hear about it,” she said.

She doesn’t have the chutzpah to identify herself as leading the party, and she’s so toxic as a brand, she can’t name someone else, lest he or she be tainted by being associated with her: Not Me! Book-Peddling Kamala Harris Tells Stephen Colbert Who’s Leading the Democrat Party (Watch).

In February of last year, after her heavily edited interview with 60 Minutes, I wrote, “Kamala flubbed the ‘why do you want to be president’ layup question even worse than Ted Kennedy in 1980.” A year and a half later, again on friendly turf with a CBS interviewer, she still can’t make the sale.

RENDEZVOUS WITH RAMA: Existing NASA Spacecraft Could Intercept the Weird Interstellar Object Cruising Into Our Star System.

It’s an exceedingly rare occurrence, marking only the third confirmed interstellar object to have ventured into our solar system, all of which have been detected since 2017.

Harvard astronomer and alien hunter Avi Loeb was quick to raise the tantalizing — albeit admittedly far-fetched — possibility that the object, dubbed 3I/ATLAS, could have been an alien probe sent to us by an intelligent civilization.

And now, in a twist right out of Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 “2001: A Space Odyssey,” he’s suggesting a way that we could use an existing spacecraft to intercept the object’s path to test that very hypothesis.

In a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed paper, the researcher argued that NASA’s Juno spacecraft, which was designed to study Jupiter and launched in 2011, could get eerily close to 3I/ATLAS by March 14, 2026.

Juno would have to apply a thrust of 1.66 miles per second on September 14, 2025, Loeb calculated, to intercept the mysterious object’s path.

On a side note, spotting three interstellar objects all since 2017 makes me think it isn’t “an exceedingly rare occurrence,” but just stuff we’ve gotten better at spotting.

DAVID MANNEY: Not One More Number: Say Their Names or Admit You Don’t Care. “We count those successful ICE raids like wins on the scoreboard. It’s what sits underneath the scoreboard that hits hard: Each raid is also a confession of how a system failed, resulting in a child paying the ultimate price.”

PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THING THEY DO TO ALL THE OTHER RIGHTS: Chris Murphy Gives Gun Owners a Preview of What Dems Would Do to Gun Rights If and When They Regain Power.

U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) slipped a proposed amendment into a defense spending bill that would skyrocket the National Firearms Act tax to $4,709. That proposal comes just weeks after Congress reduced the tax to $0 from the previous $200 where it’s been since 1934.

Gun control advocates like Sen. Murphy don’t just recoil at the idea of lawful gun ownership. Politicians like him, bought and paid for by billionaire gun control benefactors, absolutely loathe Americans exercising their Second Amendment. And they’re willing to make gun owners pay the price. Literally.

Sen. Murphy slipped his proposed amendment into the House bill for Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies. That bill, H.R. 3944, is currently being considered in the Senate. That’s where Murphy proposed Senate Amendment 2973, which states, “There shall be levied, collected, and paid on firearms transferred a tax at the rate of $4,709 for each firearm transferred.” That’s specific to the tax levied by the 1934 NFA, so it would apply to all tax stamps for suppressors, short-barrel rifles, short-barrel shotguns. The $5 tax on “Any Other Weapon” would increase to $55.

Sen. Murphy didn’t feel the need to punish gun owners for exercising their Second Amendment rights when they were paying the $200 tax. It’s only now that the tax has been eliminated that he’s taking out his frustrations that he couldn’t stop the changes included in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill.

The power to tax is the power to destroy.

ABOUT THAT “WEAK” JOBS REPORT:

We’re transitioning to a workforce much less dependent on cheap, illegal labor — and the pain is largely borne by illegals leaving the country one way or another.

The attendant effects on wages and the domestic labor force participation rate ought to be splendid.

MAKE THEM PAY. MAKE THEM ALL PAY.

THEY’RE TERRIFIED OF A PREFERENCE CASCADE, BUT THIS WILL MAKE IT WORSE SINCE IT MAKES IT OBVIOUS THEY’RE HIDING STUFF. AND THAT THEY’RE TERRIFIED.

WELL, EUROPE:

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEFING: Gender Sanity Is Slowly Returning to the World of Sports. “This obviously isn’t a result of Trump’s executive order, but that is what got this ball rolling. We are no longer being forced to praise an alternative-reality which posits that our eyes are lying to us. It’s still stunning to think of just how dystopian and surreal the Democrats’ version of the real world is.”

I VOTED SO HARD FOR THIS: Trump killing federal regulations at 10-1 rate, tops first term’s 4-1 cut.

Early indications from a key regulation watcher confirm that President Donald Trump is not just making good on a campaign promise to cut 10 regulations for every new one his team proposes, but has also paused issuing new regulations.

The change from the Biden approach is so radical that Washington’s regulation watchdog, Clyde Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, dubbed the new campaign the “Unrule.”

He said, “What we’re witnessing is the rise of the ‘Unrule,’ a revolt against the machinery of the administrative state.”

In a pending blog post shared with Washington Secrets, he said that many of the rules the Trump administration is imposing are actually targeting those on the books for elimination. “Many of the so-called ‘rules’ that have appeared this year aren’t new mandates at all. They’re reversals, delays, withdrawals — and a government-wide recognition that certain, perhaps most, regulations are not merely unjustified but actively harmful.”

Crews added that some deregulatory moves are significant, such as pulling back the Biden Environmental Protection Agency’s demand for clean vehicles, which Detroit said was unrealistic.

Much more like this, please.