DISPATCHES FROM THE ICE FLOE: Why Furious Progressives Probably Can’t Do Anything About Chuck Schumer.
But okay, progressive grassroots, let’s concede that Schumer, who turns 75 later this month, is the embodiment of old school Establishment Democrats. He’s usually a weak communicator; he’s got a nasal, hectoring voice and he does not look inspiring or vigorous with his slumped shoulders and glasses perched at the end of his nose. He’s led the Democrats in the Senate since 2016, and you can easily make a case that it’s time for some new blood.
One problem for Democrats is that just about everybody in their current Senate leadership is similarly old and uninspiring. The current whip is Dick Durbin of Illinois, who voted to reopen the government and turns 81 later this month. Conference vice chair Elizabeth Warren is 76 and in her third term. Fellow vice chair Mark Warner is 70 and he is in his third term. The Senate Democratic Outreach chair is . . . er, 84-year-old Bernie Sanders.
Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, secretary of the caucus, is the young one, at age 63.
So, who do you want to replace Schumer, progressives?
(One reason to doubt that Schumer will be knocked off his perch anytime soon is the lack of buzz around any other Democratic senator as an alternative.)
Keep in mind, a significant chunk of the Democratic Senate caucus is thinking of running for president in 2028. Almost all of them have no chance, but that’s not going to stop them. Some of them ran in 2020 and got nowhere, and they’re still not deterred. Apparently, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York are all thinking about it, believing that Democratic primary voters will say, “Oh, we made a terrible mistake last time. We should have nominated you now.”
(That woman in Iowa still just wants some ranch.)
Flashback: The Democratic Party’s Ice Floe Politics. “The next time a Democratic politician makes an anonymous observation about the age or vigor of a colleague with whom they disagree, be skeptical. The remarks are made to reporters as if in sorrow, but the message is about as subtle as a shiv in the prison yard.”
And while, as Steve noted earlier, “on the off chance Schumer doesn’t actually intend to retire at the end of his term, party insiders want to escort him out like Tessio in the last act of The Godfather,” who are the Dems lining up to replace him as their party’s leader in the Senate?
UPDATE: Spartacus is ready to toss Schumer onto the ice floe: Dem Sen. Cory Booker Does Not Shy Away From Answering Query About Chuck Schumer’s Future.
The reporter then asked if the comments were pointed directly at Schumer, and if Booker felt that the New York senator was “still up for the job.”
“Chuck Schumer’s generation, Nancy Pelosi’s generation, John Lewis’s generation. They have so much to be proud of,” Booker said. “It is time, though, for new leadership.”
Boom, there it is. We will at least give credit to the New Jersey senator who showed more courage when asked about Schumer’s future, more so than the likes of New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-14), who refused to call him out when asked if Schumer should stay as minority leader, my RedState colleague Nick Arama reported.
“Should Schumer stay as minority leader?” the reporter asked.
“I think what is so important for folks to understand is that this problem is bigger than one person,” AOC replied. “And it actually is bigger than the minority leader in the Senate…A leader is a reflection of the party and Senate Democrats have selected their leadership to represent them.”
To be fair, AOC wants everyone in the gulag, not just Chuck Schumer.