RACIAL DISPARITIES IN CRIME VICTIMIZATION:  On November 17th, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will be holding a briefing on crime victimization.  (You’d be shocked at how difficult it was to get the full Commission to agree to hold this briefing, but that another story.) Witnesses who will be testifying include John Lott, Rafael Mangual, and John Paul Wright.

If you would like to submit a comment on this subject, you can do so at .

ARE DOCTORS AND NURSES RACIST?:  Racial disparities in maternal mortality are a favorite topic for leftist activists these days.  And they continue to believe it is mainly a matter of racist doctors and nurses.  (Of course, this doesn’t explain why white mothers have higher rates of mortality than Hispanic mothers, but whatever …)

In keeping with the narrative, California law requires maternity care staff to complete “racism in medicine” training.  Evidently, most hospitals are out of compliance, and the California Attorney General is upset about it.  But, as I’ve written before, racist healthcare providers are unlikely to be the cause of the racial disparities in maternal mortality.  Differences in rates of obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, and multiple births are the more likely culprits. California would do better with mandatory training on how to recognize and deal with high-risk pregnancies.

Meanwhile, the article says Centinela Hospital in Inglewood (a heavily minority suburb of Los Angeles) plans to close its maternity ward permanently.  The hospital is being accused of malpractice in connection with a maternal death.  I can’t tell whether the lawsuit has merit or not.  But the closure of a hospital maternity ward is a bigger cause for concern than the failure of healthcare workers to get their “racism in medicine” training.

FAKE NEWS:  Before the Commission on Civil Rights releases a report, we try to agree on findings and recommendations.  It’s hard.  But for our report on Anti-Asian Racism, the Commission was able to muster a majority in favor of a limited number of recommendations.  That’s progress–at least for those who like to see a little bipartisanship now and then.  Unfortunately, it hasn’t done us a bit of good.  The Commission’s staff recently issued an “infographic” on the report that lists “Key Recommendations for Action.” But with one exception, they’re not the recommendations the Commission actually agreed to.  We figured in that it was a mistake of some sort.  But no.  When four Commissioner informed the Staff Director of the problem, we expected he’d fix it quickly.  But he has declined to do so.

The bureaucracy is out of control.

ALL GOD’S CREATURE HAVE GOT A PLACE IN THE CHOIR:  Constable gives snake the kiss of life.

EMPLOYERS ARE INCREASINGLY SKEPTICAL OF COLLEGE CREDENTIALS:  A thoughtful correspondent (himself an employer) sent me this.

WE ARE SO DOOMED:  “California Students Can No Longer Be Suspended for ‘Willful Defiance’:  Could Nationwide Change Be Next?”  This evidently is a response to the fact that African American and disabled students are suspended for willful defiance more often than whites, Asians, or non-disabled students.  Otherwise, suspensions would be fine with the California legislature.

This issue came before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights a few years ago.  Somehow our chairwoman at the time got it into her head that all races misbehave at the same rate and that the only reason African American students get punished more is that teachers are racist.  The other aspect of that report that was surreal was the notion that we should be upset that disabled students get disciplined more than nondisabled students.  For Pete’s sake, we DEFINE students who misbehave a lot as “disabled.”  Then we act surprised that students who misbehave a lot continue to misbehave a lot.  Yes, of course, I dissented.

ELON MUSK ON ASIAN TEEN REJECTED BY 16 COLLEGES:  “The left hates Asians.”

Some evidence for Musk’s position:  At a briefing on Anti-Asian racism, the Staff Director of the Commission on Civil Rights interrupted a speaker who mentioned the discrimination Asian Americans face when trying to get into Ivy League universities.  The speaker was admonished that this was off topic.  (It wasn’t, and never since I’ve been on the Commission has a speaker been admonished that way.) Left really doesn’t want to talk about it.

“WE ARE NOT A RACIST COUNTRY“:  Jacinta Nampijinpa Price Speaks Out After Defeat of Australian “Voice” Referendum.

THE AUSSIES HAVE SPOKEN:  Down Under voters reject special rights for indigenous people. 

EXODUS OF THE WRONGTHINKERS FROM AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES:  The author interviewed me and several of my USD colleagues (including the dean) for this article.

ANOTHER JEWISH HOMELAND:  I found I couldn’t read any more about the events in Israel.  It was just too gut wrenching.  I therefore started thinking about a different (though related) topic:

Before there was a modern Israel (and before modern Zionism), there was  … South Carolina.  Two wealthy Sephardic families living in London—the DaCostas and the Salvadors—purchased 200,000 acres in what was then South Carolina’s frontier sometime in the 1730s or so.  Their intent was for the land to become a refuge for poor Sephardic families then living in England.  (The land was located in what is now the town of Ninety Six in Greenwood County.)

It wasn’t a crazy an idea—not too crazy anyway.  Evidently, a small group of Sephardic Jews had settled in Savannah, Georgia in 1733, but had fled to Charleston when it looked like the Spaniards in Florida had designs on Georgia.  The Spanish Inquisition was still in business then, so this was a prudent move.  For most of the 18^th as well as the early 19^th century, South Carolina was the destination of choice for Jewish immigrants to America.

(more…)

SIGH:  Fox News 23 (Tulsa) believes that ending the special subminimum wage for individuals with severe disabilities will “eliminate a hurdle to fair pay for people with disabilities.”  And so apparently do some Oklahoma legislators.  But it’s nonsense.  Eliminating the subminimum wage will eliminate jobs, not hurdles to fair pay.

When the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights did a report on this topic in 2020, we were inundated with public comments from family members of individuals with Down Syndrome.  I’m told it was more comments than we’d ever received for a single report in our history.  Overwhelmingly, the commenters wanted the subminimum wage program kept.  They knew their loved one would not have a job at all without it.  You’d think that would be obvious to more people.  But I guess the world’s gone mad.

“FLORIDA LAWMAKER FILES BILL CURTAILING ‘STAND YOUR GROUND’ LAW”:  Weirdly, this article tries to relate the “stand your ground” law to the death of Trayvon Martin, who is described as “an unarmed teenager,” even though the “stand your ground” law was not at issue.  The author seems to have forgotten the part about Martin beating Zimmerman’s head against the pavement.  By the time Zimmerman realized what was happening, he couldn’t have retreated if he’d tried.

Here’s more on “stand your ground” laws.  There’s a lot of misconception about these laws.

USCCR:  GianCarlo Canaparo may be onto something here.

HERE’S MY AGENDA FOR CONGRESS:  Last week, the House Education and Workforce Committee held a hearing entitled, “How SCOTUS’s Decision on Race-Based Admissions is Shaping University Policies,” with the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Alison Somin testifying (among others).

My experience with GOP Members of Congress is that they tend to get the deer-in-the-headlights whenever issues of race and sex are brought to their attention.  They much prefer the courts to solve the problems (while the courts prefer Congress to do so).

Is the fact they were willing to hold this hearing a sign that’s changing?  Well … I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

BIT BY BIT, THE ASIAN AMERICAN VOTE IS TRENDING GOP:  Some of the reasons for this are contained in my Statement written in connection with the Commissioner on Civil Rights’ report of Anti-Asian racism.

ANOTHER TRANSGENDER BATHROOM LAWSUIT HAS BEEN FILED:  Again, here is my simple step-by-step legal argument for why it is perfectly okay to require individuals to use the facilities set aside for their biological sex.  The argument can be easily adapted to fit Title VII.  More argument here.

EBOLA IS A RIVER, ZIKA IS A FOREST:  My Civil Right Commission colleagues rightly say that opposition hate crimes shouldn’t be a partisan issue.  But for something nonpartisan, the Commission’s report on Anti-Asian Racism (released Wednesday) spends an awful lot of time suggesting Trump’s use of the term “China virus” and “Wuhan virus” inspired violent crime against Asians.  In my response to the report, I point out just how many diseases are named for their point of origin.

HOT! HOT! HOT!:  Today, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is releasing its report on Anti-Asian Racism.  My Commissioner Statement is here.  I learned an important thing from this report:  Only topics that are consistent with the progressive agenda can be the subject of a Commission report.  In other words, it’s fine to demand accurate counts of hate crimes, but the question of how to prevent those crimes is of little interest. (And heaven forbid that we should discuss race-preferential college admissions policies!)

I’D BEEN WAITING FOR IT:  Thomas Sowell’s new book–Social Justice Fallacies–is out.  I received my copy yesterday evening.   If I am lucky enough to make it to 93 years old, I’ll be happy if I can write a coherent blog post.

He cites me–or rather he cites this article of mine.  Twice.  Purr.

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP:  I am reviewing the Freedom of Information Act response I recently received from Michigan State University College of Law.  One of the documents briefly describes the ways an assistant dean modified MSU’s marketing materials in order to show the school’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.  In an apparent effort to be “mindful of potential triggers for survivors of sexual assault,” the deanlet removed the MSU helmet from at least some of those materials.  Unless, I am mistaken, that means this was removed:

It’s MSU’s Spartan helmet logo.  Is anyone seriously triggered by MSU’s Spartan helmet?  If they are, maybe MSU is not the school for them. Moreover, regardless of the reason for one’s anxiety, is it a good idea to go to law school if one is so easily triggered?  Lawyers are supposed to be champions for their clients.  That’s what lawyers do.  Is it fair to wish a lawyer who gets triggered by a university logo on a client who is in trouble and needs help?

THEY WANT US TO KEEP VOTING UNTIL WE GET IT RIGHT:  Yesterday afternoon, the California Assembly passed ACA7.  For those of you who haven’t been following my posts, ACA7 is the latest attempt to destroy Prop 209–the 1996 initiative that prohibited the State of California from engaging in preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.

Three years ago, with Prop 16, our esteemed legislature tried to get voters to repeal Prop 209.  They failed in that effort big time.  Now the Assembly wants voters to adopt an “exception” that will swallow the rule.  If the California Senate concurs (32 Dems, 8 Reps), the issue will go on the ballot.

I was struck by the “argument” put forth by Assemblyman Corey Jackson in favor of ACA7:  ” [T]here is no room for respectfully disagreeing on this issue.  There is no room for decorum when it comes to the very existence and atonement of my people.”

QUELLE SURPRISE:  The Los Angeles Times reports that a poll finds 59% of California voters oppose cash reparations for the African American descendants of slaves.  Only 28% support the idea.

Prediction:  The “nonprofit” organizations that have been arguing for reparations will soon ask that reparations be paid through them instead.

THANK YOU, FIRE:  My cute little university won’t let Matt Walsh of “What is a Woman?” fame speak on campus.  According to FIRE’s letter to University of San Diego president James Harris, USD’s College Republicans sought to bring in Walsh as a speaker, but were told by the Director of Student Activities and Involvement that Walsh’s views are “transphobic,” “offensive,” and would make USD students feel “unsafe,” “not comfortable,” and “offended and hurt.”  Later, the Vice President for Student Life confirmed that USD would not allow Walsh to speak on campus, stating that “all guest speakers … [must] engage in perspectives in a manner consistent with USD’s mission and core values” and that Walsh was “very disrespectful” and “grossly offensive.”

FIRE points out that USD claims to be a school that protects free speech. But this is hardly USD’s first offense against free expression.  Over the last three or four years, there have been quite a few.  This isn’t even the first one this summer.  It’s a shame.  This used to be a university.

IF YOU’RE IN MISSISSIPPI NEXT WEEK:  On Thursday, September 14, David Bernstein, Peter Kirsanow, and I will be joining Chris Green at Ole Miss for a Constitution Day discussion of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions on issues of equality.

This is a presentation of the Declaration of Independence Center for the Study of American Freedom.  I hope you’ll join us if you’re in the area.

This will be my first trip to Mississippi.  I’m looking forward to it.