Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

STUFF WHITE PEOPLE LIKE: Too MSNBC To Check: MSNOW Launch Ad Uses Black Actors to Highlight White Hosts?

Why the generic musical accompaniment? The licensing for Procul Harem’s A Whiter Shade of Pale probably cost too much. The Washington Free Beacon took note of the casting of this commercial in comparison to the casting of its anchor positions, and … well

First off, let’s make one thing clear. This is not intended as a criticism of the actors involved. I seldom begrudge a working actor his/her paycheck, especially at this level. Can we rip Leonardo DiCaprio, Meryl Streep, George Clooney, and other A-listers for their projects? Absolutely; they have the money and power to make those choices. The actors in this ad are likely working hard to put food on their tables, and this is legitimate work — for them.

As for the still-weirdly-named MSNOW, however, this looks like an ad for The AWFL Channel. Want to help MLK’s legacy for civil rights? Support the network of white affluent liberal hosts, who will explain what it means! This would be less egregious if the channel hadn’t recently cut loose Joy-Ann Reid and Jonathan Capehart from their previous hosting gigs, along with Katie Phang and Ayman Mohyeldin.

Wow, this all sounds really bad, both the ad above and all of the layoffs of people of color. I’ll bet Al Sharpton will really lower the boom when he finds out about this…

ROD DREHER: What I Saw And Heard In Washington. “I don’t know what you did on Friday night, but I spent about 90 minutes in the vice president’s study with him and the men you see above, talking geopolitics, Hungary, and the survival of Christianity in Europe, among other things. Of course I can’t be indiscreet about the discussion, but it was rich and vigorous. I’m really glad that JD got to experience the actual, living Viktor Orban in person, and to see for himself how wrong the propaganda is. They got on very, very well,” later adding, “I talked to one MAGA Zoomer, a policy wonk who is a person of color. He is beside himself with frustration over the rise of Groyperism in his circles, and within the party:”

Well, they do want to burn it all down, I was told. And I came away with the feeling that they are only tenuously dedicated to democratic politics. I told one very smart and decent Zoomercon who despises the anti-Semitic turn in his circles that I’ve been hearing that fascism — actual ideological fascism, not the media’s idea of anybody to the Right of Lindsey Graham — is gaining traction among young white British males.

He said, innocently, “So what’s wrong with fascism?” He meant it, not in a challenging way, but in a way that conveyed the sense of we have to think about this now. He talked about how the disintegration of our culture is accelerating, and liberal democracy seems impotent to stop it. He went on to explain that if he had to choose between living under left-wing authoritarianism or the right-wing version, then that wouldn’t be much of a choice. To be clear, he wants neither, but he fears that the disintegration of our culture is going to put us all in the position to have to reconcile ourselves to one or the other.

We talked about the Spanish Civil War, and how neutrality wasn’t a live option for the Spaniards back then. He brought up Gen. Pinochet in Chile. Not a good man, he said, acknowledging that Pinochet killed tens of thousands. But (said the young man) Pinochet saved his country from communism, and we know very well that communism’s historical record is far bloodier. That is true.

Let me emphasize here that my interlocutor was NOT cheering for fascism. As our conversation went on, I heard real despair — and well-informed despair — that democracy is going to hold in the West, because the conditions that make for a viable democracy are disappearing: the dissolution of a common culture, the collapse of religion in his generation, the material impoverishment of his generation, and so forth.

I tell you, it was dark. But I kept hearing this, over and over, and I concluded that it cannot be dismissed.

The inability of us older people — Boomers, Xers, and older Millennials — to comprehend the world through the eyes of Zoomers is a big, big problem. Another strong theme: while it’s important to take a clear stand against anti-Semitism in the ranks, there is no way to gatekeep our way out of this. You cannot simply point at the Zoomers and say, “Thou shalt not,” and expect it to work. The problems are too deep and complex, and anyway, they have learned to have no respect for authority.

Why should they? The institutions of our society, as they see it, have lied and lied and lied, and still lie. They still lie in many ways about race (e.g., refusing to be honest about black crime), they lied about Covid, they lied about males and females, and they forced the insanity of gender ideology on us all. The military lied about Iraq. The universities embraced and enforced ideologies of lies. The Catholic Church lied about sexual abuse, and the connection to the prevalence of sexually active gay priests honeycombing the institution. They lied about the benefits of mass migration and diversity. They lied about Trump and Russia. The political parties and their corporate allies lied about what globalism would mean for ordinary people.

Speaking of which, the very definition of the Education Apocalypse:

DISPATCHES FROM THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH: How the BBC became the propaganda arm of Hamas.

Funny how it was the Trump thing that cost BBC director-general Tim Davie and his head of news, Deborah Turness, their jobs. Of course, doctoring footage of The Donald’s ‘January 6’ speech, to make it appear as if he had explicitly incited the Capitol riot, was remarkably egregious and brazen, a prime example of the BBC deciding not to bother with the mask for once. But what about its relentless bias – also exposed by that recent internal memo leaked to the Telegraph – against Jews and Israel?

In a way, that is the more serious problem. All over the world, antipathy towards the Jewish minority and their national home is simply the tip of a spear of hostility towards the West and everything it stands for.

How biased is the BBC on this topic? BBC forced to correct two Gaza stories a week. “The BBC has been forced to correct two stories a week about the Gaza conflict since the Oct 7 attacks on Israel, The Telegraph can reveal. BBC Arabic has had to make 215 corrections and clarifications over the past two years on stories that were found to be biased, inaccurate or misleading.”

 

NUKE-I-FIED! Mollie Hemingway DOGWALKS Jake Tapper for Tantruming Over Trump Pardoning ‘Fake’ Electors.

Related:

More:

OPEN THREAD: mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. These are nice. Little Roquefort cheese morsels rolled in crushed nuts. Very tasty. Very subtle. It’s the way the dry sackiness of the nuts tiptoes up against the dour savor of the cheese that is so nice, so subtle, especially when attending that Radical Chic Open Thread at Lenny’s.

WHEN POLITICS BREAKS YOUR BRAIN: Left-Wing Radio Host Literally Kisses Feet Of Jasmine Crockett In Deranged Act Of ‘Worship.’

Progressive radio personality Stephanie Miller took political fandom to a bizarre new level after boasting online that she literally kissed the shoes of Democratic Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett.

Crockett has emerged as a leading voice among Democrats, positioning herself as one of the party’s most aggressive critics of President Donald Trump as she signals she might expand her influence with a potential Senate bid. Her growing prominence reached a high point over the weekend when liberal radio host Miller gushed on social media that she kissed Crockett’s sneakers.

“Why, yes I DID kiss the sneakers of @JasmineForUS and I DO worship the ground she walks on! And she was LOVELY about it! 🤣,” Miller wrote.

Leftists in 2025 are too crazy for even the Babylon Bee to satirize:

KURT SCHLICHTER: Maybe Totally Legalizing Vice Was Not Such a Great Idea After All.

We stamped out regular smoking pretty effectively; I freak young people out with tales of the smoking section and theaters where you couldn’t see the screen through the haze of burning tobacco. But somehow pot is different. You walk down any urban street and it’s like a Cypress Hill concert; you’re lucky if you don’t wander off the sidewalk and into traffic from the contact high. Even in the most conservative states, you will find dispensaries passing out supercharged ganja with 10 times the THC of the old skunk weed that stoner guy in your dorm used to fire up. Medicinal my tush; the only things it’s treating are boredom and ambition. Really, the smart play would have been legalizing cocaine, since people would at least be motivated to do something useful, like clean up their condo, sell junk bonds, or greenlight “Caddyshack.” Just what America needed – a drug designed to make our citizens lazier, dumber, and less interesting.

Related:

THE CRITICAL DRINKER: Production Hell — Groundhog Day. 

No doubt, the movie was the very definition of “production hell,” so much so that Bill Murray ended his longtime friendship with director Harold Ramis before the shoot was even over. But whatever the hell of making it, the results showed luminously on the screen.

QED: Jonah Goldberg from 2006 on Groundhog Day: A Movie For All Time. “When I set out to write this article, I thought it’d be fun to do a quirky homage to an offbeat flick, one I think is brilliant as both comedy and moral philosophy. But while doing what I intended to be cursory research–how much reporting do you need for a review of a twelve-year-old movie that plays constantly on cable?–I discovered that I wasn’t alone in my interest. In the years since its release the film has been taken up by Jews, Catholics, Evangelicals, Hindus, Buddhists, Wiccans, and followers of the oppressed Chinese Falun Gong movement. Meanwhile, the Internet brims with weighty philosophical treatises on the deep Platonist, Aristotelian, and existentialist themes providing the skin and bones beneath the film’s clown makeup. On National Review Online’s group blog, The Corner, I asked readers to send in their views on the film. Over 200 e-mails later I had learned that countless professors use it to teach ethics and a host of philosophical approaches. Several pastors sent me excerpts from sermons in which Groundhog Day was the central metaphor. And dozens of committed Christians of all denominations related that it was one of their most cherished movies.”

DAVID MARCUS: Nancy Pelosi’s legacy is the socialist takeover of her party.

The year was 1987 and the Democrat speaker of the House of Representatives was a moderate Texan named Jim Wright, the Senate majority leader was West Virginia’s Robert Byrd, and socialism was a dirty word in the Party of Jefferson and Jackson.

This was the year that San Francisco’s Nancy Pelosi would begin her career in Congress, and regarding both her and her Democrat Party, we can surely say, you’ve come a long way, baby.

Former Speaker Pelosi announced this week that she would not be seeking a 900th (or whatever it is) term in the House, and at 85 years old, she leaves a Democrat Party that has all but fully embraced socialism. She is arguably the biggest reason why.

Last month, amid growing pressure from the left, Pelosi’s hand-picked successor to hold the House gavel, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., endorsed a full-on socialist to be mayor of his hometown of New York City in what looked like a hostage video.

Pelosi is praised to high heaven by both parties for her ability to rule her conference with an iron fist and brook no quarter to opposition, but in practice, this clearly alienated moderate Democrats. In the case of New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew, he became a Republican.

There is no indication that Pelosi is upset that hers is now the Democrat Socialist Party in all but name. We can imagine former GOP Speaker John Boehner ruefully deploring how the Tea Party and Trump captured his party over a cigarette and glass of red wine, but Pelosi seems pleased as punch.

Who will replace Pelosi in Congress? Two names have been floated so far, California State Sen. Scott Wiener and Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former chief of staff. First up, Wiener: Scott Wiener Makes Pelosi Look Normal, and He Wants to Fill Her Seat.

A sanitized, family-friendly Wiener biography would show that he’s a Harvard‑trained lawyer and longtime San Francisco resident who began his public career on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 2010. There, he built his reputation as a progressive advocate on issues ranging from civil rights to public health. In 2016, San Franciscans promoted him to the California State Senate. As with Pelosi herself, the state’s government unions, especially firefighters, love Wiener.

But in the legislature, Wiener has established a record that might have given Pelosi a case of the fantods. Of course, Wiener’s success there is not his alone. He has operated in a political environment shaped by Governor Newsom, progressive state legislators, and a San Francisco electorate that repeatedly sends him to office.

But the record he’s built there is entirely his own — a made-for-Netflix tragicomic collection of utterly bonkers legislation that would almost certainly weigh on Democratic candidates everywhere, offering proof that their party cannot be trusted around children.

In 2019, Wiener authored SB  145: “Ending Discrimination Against LGBTQ People Regarding Sex Offender Registration.” The bill amended California’s sex offender registry law so that judges have discretion in cases involving sex between minors as young as 14 and adults within ten years of that. Wiener claimed that he was merely bringing parity to the way in which judges handled cases involving sex between straight adults and their under-18 sexual partners. He might more reasonably have simply said there should be no judicial discretion when it comes to adults, whatever their gender or self-declared “identity,” having sex with kids.

Wiener’s SB  107 made California a sanctuary state for kids seeking medical support for their desire to transition, regardless of where they live in the United States or what their parents say. Team Wiener says the law, which Newsom signed in 2022, protects vulnerable kids from bad parents and regressive red-state policies. You might say it violates parental rights, encourages runaways, and makes those kids vulnerable to abuse, including sex trafficking. In 2023, Wiener championed SB  407, which required foster homes to provide explicit support for LGBTQ youth and regular assessments of their putative needs.

Then there’s Chakrabarti:  Who will replace Nancy Pelosi after she leaves Congress in January 2027?

[F]ormer Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur Saikat Chakrabarti, had well beforehand launched a primary campaign against Pelosi.

Chakrabarti was New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign manager during her 2018 primary upset against incumbent Joe Crowley, which kicked off Ocasio-Cortez’s meteoric rise. He got his start in politics working on Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign and is a founding engineer of the online payment platform Stripe.

Chakrabarti told ABC News in April that he felt he could beat Pelosi in the primary because he saw echoes of the 2018 “blue wave” in 2025: a post-Trump election environment marked by frustration among Democrats over their party’s defeat. “That moment of change, in my opinion, is dwarfed by the moment of change you see right now. The level of anger at the Democratic Party for failing is huge,” Chakrabarti said.

In a statement on Thursday, Chakrabarti thanked Pelosi “for your decades of service that defined a generation of politics and for doing something truly rare in Washington: making room for the next one. Our campaign is ready to build on that legacy by fighting to create a San Francisco and an America that works for everyone.”

The filing period for California’s congressional primary does not open until February 9, 2026 and closes on March 6, so there is still plenty of time for other challengers to enter the ring.

Chakrabarti carries a fair amount of baggage of his own. In addition to ghostwriting the infamous “farting cows and airplanes” first draft of the Green Nude Eel in early 2019, Chakrabarti was tossed overboard by AOC later that year, possibly in order to distance herself from this story: Feds probing AOC’s chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti after sudden resignation.

The brash Chakrabarti, who masterminded Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign and steered her proposed Green New Deal, had caused uproar in the halls of Congress with a series of combative tweets that contributed to a rift between his rookie boss and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“People were not happy that he used his Twitter account to comment about members and the bills that he and his boss oppose,” a senior House Democratic staffer said. “There was a series of colliding and cascading grievances.”

The two PACs being probed, Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats, were both set up by Chakrabarti to support progressive candidates across the country.

But they funneled more than $1 million in political donations into two private companies that Chakrabarti also incorporated and controlled, according to Federal Election Commission filings and a complaint filed in March with the regulatory agency.

Then there were his sartorial excesses: AOC chief of staff criticized for wearing shirt touting Nazi collaborator:

Chakrabarti’s choice of apparel is receiving a fresh round of criticism after Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, positively quoted Nazi sympathizer Eva Perón, the former first lady of Argentina.

Saikat Chakrabarti, the chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, came under scrutiny for having worn a T-shirt that featured Nazi collaborator Subhas Chandra Bose.

In December 2018, following his boss’s congressional victory, Chakrabarti did a video with NowThis News, titled “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Chief of Staff on Acting Fast in Congress,” in which he wore a T-shirt with Bose’s face.

If he wins and takes office at the beginning of 2027, I assume Chakrabarti would want to pack in as much legislating as possible before it’s too late (possibly working with potential Senator Graham Platner, another enthusiast of Germany’s post-Weimar era, if he’s elected as well). While Chakrabarti was serving as AOC’s ghostwriter, she assured us all that the world would be coming to an end in 2030.

UPDATE: Christine Pelosi passes on bid for retiring mother’s House seat.

TRUMP TAKES ON THE BRITISH DISINFORMATION COMPLEX:

The Trump administration has taken an interest in free speech in Britain as a cautionary tale of how the left’s obsession with policing “digital hate” and “misinformation” can lead to imprisonment for social media posts, as in the case of Lucy Connolly. The resignations over the weekend of two of the BBC’s highest executives, director-general Tim Davie and CEO Deborah Turness, are major victories in Trump’s war on Britain’s censorship complex.

Davie and Turness both resigned after revelations about the BBC’s bias against the President. Britain’s national broadcaster was exposed by the Telegraph for doctoring a speech Trump gave on January 6, 2021. The edited clip, which aired in a TV program a week before the 2024 election, made it sound like he was urging supporters to storm the Capitol, rather than telling them to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

The two snippets which were spliced into one – “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you” and “We fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not gonna have a country anymore” – occurred nearly an hour apart in the actual speech Trump gave. When BBC executives were presented with the now-leaked internal report, which voiced concerns about this program and other distortions in reporting, they ignored it.

Spiked editor Tim Slater mischievously asks, “Have you heard? There’s been a right-wing coup at the BBC.”

Apparently, a ‘cabal’ of ‘populists’ has just succeeded in ousting director-general Tim Davie and CEO of news and current affairs Deborah Turness. That, remarkably, is the high-status take following the shock resignations of Davie and Turness last night, following the outrageous, flagrant examples not simply of BBC bias, but of it pushing flat-out misinformation, detailed in an internal memo leaked to the Telegraph.

To call this a misreading of the situation is generous. It’s totally demented. BBC Panorama was caught out doctoring footage of Donald Trump’s ‘January 6’ speech, stitching together two bits, an hour apart, to make it appear as if he had explicitly incited the mob that later attacked the Capitol on that grim day in 2021. Unsurprisingly, the White House has taken a dim view of this – as has the British government. And yet our national, ‘impartial’ broadcaster being found to have spread lies about a politician – who we all know is loathed by those who work there – is being treated as if it’s a big fat nothing cooked up by a blood-scenting right.

It would be bad enough if the usual suspects were simply ranting – tinfoil hat at a jaunty angle – into their X feeds, like Belsize Park’s answer to Alex Jones. But they were also all over the BBC this morning. Former Murdoch newspaper man turned BBC podcaster David Yelland was on Today, airing his conspiracy theory that a ‘cabal of toxic plotters with links to the BBC board’ had ‘designed and executed a coup’, as he had put it on social media. When pressed, he couldn’t present a scrap of proof for this. But this claim was revisited time and again throughout the show.

At the London Times, Tom Peck describes this as something out of Monty Python and the Holy Grail: The BBC announces the BBC has launched a coup against the BBC.

Traditionally, you know there’s been a coup when a man in military fatigues turns up on the state broadcaster to announce that there hasn’t been a coup.

So when the familiar voice of the state broadcaster, that of the BBC’s Nick Robinson, keeps waking you up at 7am to warn that a coup at the BBC is under way, you know it’s probably OK to go back to sleep.

Not just OK, but positively encouraged. If you try to actually understand what’s going on at the BBC you might not sleep again until you’ve sat in a dark room for quite some time, with a wet towel wrapped around your head.

All we can know for sure, at this point, is that the director-general, Tim Davie, and the chief executive of BBC News, Deborah Turness, have resigned. Technically this was because last year, without anyone actually noticing until now, someone on BBC Panorama casually snipped out a minor, inconsequential, 50-minute-long segment of President Trump’s notorious speech on January 6, 2021, and welded together the front end and back end of what was left. What was broadcast was a cut-and-shut of a speech, which, with terrible inevitability, has now been involved in a horrific accident.

But it’s far more complicated than that. In fact if the BBC would like, at this point, to produce some genuine public service broadcasting, it could do worse than commission an eight-part series explaining the coup at the BBC, ideally featuring Professor Brian Cox, possibly standing on the slopes of a supervolcano on one of Saturn’s more hostile moons.

The main reason the coup is hard to understand is because the BBC is, according to itself, in on it. The implication from the BBC’s Nick Robinson, made live on the BBC Today programme, seems to be that the BBC’s Sir Robbie Gibb wants to bring down the BBC. Sensing opportunity, the BBC board, which gives the appearance of hating the BBC, wouldn’t let the BBC just admit it made a mistake and move on, and so the BBC has forced itself into full-blown crisis instead.

In one grim way, suddenly it all makes sense. For a lot of the last year, a lot of people have been looking at the BBC and just asking, why? Why did it accidentally have a documentary on Gaza narrated by the son of a Hamas official? Why did it accidentally broadcast an apparent Hamas rally live from the West Holts stage of Glastonbury? Well now we know. They were all in on it. Mission accomplished. Bob Vylan has pulled off the unthinkable.

Meanwhile back in the States, “none other than Brian Stelter weighed in on this weekend’s developments. Instead of looking critically at the actions that have ensnared these top-rung executives, Stelter tried to recast the editing as a mere error that somehow flummoxed those putting together this documentary, timed to be released just days ahead of the election.”

Stelter tweeted, “In a vacuum, a more-than-a-year-old editing misstep by unnamed producers would not cause the very top heads of the BBC to roll. But…”

This is the man who hosted Dan Rather for years on his CNN program titled “Reliable Sources,” so naturally, he’s perfectly fine looking the other way when it comes to the Beeb’s “editing misstep.”

THIS JUST IN: BELTWAY BUREAUCRATS HATE TRUMP! Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Trump Takes in an NFL Game and Lefties Lose Their Ever Lovin’ Minds.

So it’s a two-fer: Trump’s mere presence causes the left to have the ultimate ’60s acid flashback and boo the president and the troops. Things got a little out of hand. It’s just this war and that lying son of a bitch, Johnson!

THIS JUST IN: KAMALA HARRIS HAS SOLD AT LEAST ONE BOOK.

CHANGE: Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events.

In this April 9, 2018 file photo, New Zealand’s Laurel Hubbard lifts in the snatch of the women’s +90kg weightlifting final at the 2018 Commonwealth Games on the Gold Coast, Australia. Hubbard will be the first transgender athlete to compete at the Olympics. (AP File Photo.)

 

KEN BURNS, TRAPPED IN 1967:

Note that Burns is being interviewed by John Avlon, who for years was a commentator on CNN, which debuted in 1980, the first of numerous American cable news and opinion channels producing content for a variety of ideologies from left to right. His tweet was published by the Bulwark, one of many never-Trump Websites that sprouted up since 2016. It’s on Twitter, where anyone can sign up and publish anything they want. It’s on a medium called the Internet, where anyone can launch a Website, Weblog, or upload audio and video and cater to every ideology imaginable.

I’m glad to see that Burns, age 72, has finally ditched his long-running Sgt. Pepper-era Beatles coiffure, but why does he still act like it’s 1967 when there still only three commercial television networks, when LBJ signed the Public Broadcasting Act?

UPDATE (FROM GLENN):

21st CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS: The Chatbot Diaries: How AI Sex Is Getting Mainstreamed.

[OpenAI CEO Sam Altman] added that he wanted to loosen restrictions to allow more sexual content.

If everything goes according to that plan, ChatGPT will allow “erotica” for “verified users” in the coming months.

“In December, as we roll out age-gating more fully and as part of our ‘treat adult users like adults’ principle, we will allow even more, like erotica for verified adults,” Altman said.

The company in charge of the most popular AI chatbot in the world is not only endorsing AI’s leap into sex — it’s actively seeking ways to ensure that “verified users” can engage with sexual content on its platform.

Currently, ChatGPT does not interact erotically with users. When asked if the chatbot could generate an erotic story, ChatGPT replied, “I can’t create explicit erotic content. However, if you’re writing a story and need help with romantic tension, character development, emotional intimacy, or sensual atmosphere — without crossing into explicit territory — I can help with that.”

ChatGPT also would not engage in any type of “romantic” or “flirtatious” conversations. But it appears that those guidelines are about to get tossed out the window, at least for “verified users.”

To boldly go where Scarlett Johansson has gone before: 2013’s Her: Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson Go Twenty Minutes Into the Future of AI.

BELIEVE IN SOMETHING. EVEN IF IT MEANS SACRIFICING RATIONALITY:

OCEANIA HAS ALWAYS BEEN AGAINST SNAP BENEFITS:

UPDATE (FROM GLENN):

HOW IT STARTED: “It is not clear if Biden gave the green light to the acts of clemency that night on January 16, however, the exchange suggests that the Biden aides instead took action on what Posada said Biden ‘intended’ to do. The three documents signed early the next morning were for around 2,500 commutations. Biden has since said that the autopen was used to sign the clemency documents because there were ‘a lot of them,’ but there were only three documents that day that were signed with the autopen.”

How It’s Going: Trump pardons Giuliani, Powell, Chesebro and dozens more involved in 2020 ‘fake electors’ case. “President Trump granted pardons for 77 individuals tied to a plot to overturn the 2020 presidential election – including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Kenneth Chesebro, the White House announced late Sunday night.”