Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

TEDDY ROOSEVELT, UNCANCELLED: Salena Zito: Theodore Roosevelt Jumps Out of the Pages in Bret Baier’s Newest Book.

The book is nothing short of enthralling, delivered in a way that makes it difficult to set aside. Baier details Roosevelt’s life, from his triumph over a series of tragic events that rocked his world and left him looking for purpose in the wide and wild wonders of the American West to the man he became in battle, in conservation and in politics — all different aspects of his life that still affect our country today.

Baier details Roosevelt’s turn in the New York legislature as a champion of ridding the state’s politics of corruption. He follows his nightly city walks as the New York City commissioner and reveals his stubborn efforts to bring reform to government as New York governor — efforts that earned him powerful enemies.

He had particularly powerful and corrupt enemies in 2020, when self-described “Progressives” were obsessed with cancelling a legendary progressive icon: Adieu, Teddy Roosevelt.

I think it is a pity that the Traveling Racism Outrage Mob (TROM) has it in for Teddy Roosevelt. I agree with President Trump who, when he heard the news, tweeted “Ridiculous, don’t do it!” Quite right. For one thing, TROM could learn some useful life lessons from Teddy Roosevelt. Although there is much in his progressive politics with which I disagree, I greatly admire him for his character and determination. A sickly boy, plagued by asthma, he nonetheless devoted himself to the “strenuous life” and achieved great things. Above all, he did not whine.

That is one thing our professional anti-racists and identity-politics ideologues — especially feminists — could learn with profit: stop whining about how unfair life is to you and do something to improve your lot. You would thus make everyone around you happier, and you would be happier yourself.

Teddy Roosevelt also had a deep social-political message that our generation, especially paid-up members of TROM, should rediscover. “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin,’ he wrote in his autobiography, ‘would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.”

He was thinking of the habit of calling recent immigrants Italian-American or Irish-Americans or German-Americans. He was dead set against this practice of coining “hyphenated Americans.” He would not have been surprised to discover that the lowly hyphen was a potent weapon in the divisive armory of multiculturalism and identity politics. When we speak of an African-American or Mexican-American or Asian-American these days, the aim is not descriptive but deconstructive. There is a polemical edge to it, a provocation. The hyphen does not mean “American, but hailing at some point in the past from someplace else.” It means “only provisionally American: my allegiance is divided at best.”

Curiously, no “Progressive” journalists ever asked Hillary about her repeated praise of Teddy prior to the Color Revolution:

● Shot: “I think that Teddy Roosevelt was a great American.”

—Hillary Clinton in a May 1, 2008 interview with Bill O’Reilly.

● Double-Shot: “It’s time to take a page from Teddy Roosevelt’s book and get our economy working for Americans again. That’s what I’ll do as president.”

—Hillary, as quoted in an October 28, 2015 Dow Jones Marketwatch.com article titled “Hillary Clinton wants to be Teddy Roosevelt.”

● Hangover  — though of course, all of 2020 seemed like one-long massive hangover:

HEH, INDEED:

 

A TALE OF TWO ICE-AVOIDING JUDGES:

It is good that the judge who let a wanted illegal immigrant out the back door of the courthouse to avoid waiting ICE agents will stand trial.

No one is above the law, including judges.

So, the judge will face federal obstruction of justice charges when her trial begins next month and, if found guilty, could face six years in prison.

That is the way politicians say the system works or is supposed to work.

Only in this case the judge is not Boston Municipal Court Judge Shelley Joseph who was once charged with the same thing, but Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan.

While Dugan may go to prison, Joseph walks.

Like Joseph before her, Dugan is charged with federal obstruction of justice for letting wanted illegal immigrant Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, sneak through a side door of her courthouse to avoid waiting ICE agents.

Flores-Ruiz was arrested after a foot chase and has since been deported to Mexico.

After seven months in detention, Flores-Ruiz promised never to come back. Before shipping out, he said, “I am grateful and happy I was able to work here,” which is something you do not ordinarily hear from illegal immigrants.

Joseph, a Democrat, was appointed to the bench by Republican Charlie Baker, who later found her actions “extremely troubling.” He said, “Judges are not supposed to be in the business of obstructing justice.”

Read the whole thing.

GREAT MOMENTS IN QUALITY CONTROL: Coca-Cola’s AI ad just ruined Christmas… again.

One AI-generated Christmas ad could have be brushed off as a novelty experiment. With two in a two in a row, Coca-Cola is making AI slop a new festive tradition.

Despite the backlash last year (or because of it?), the soft drinks giant has again decided to start the season with an AI-generated mess that sabotages its brand. Somehow it still doesn’t see the contradiction of its ‘real magic’ tagline.

The 60-second spot was produced by AI studio Secret Level. Like last year’s effort, it references the classic Holidays Are Coming ad with Coca-Cola’s red trucks crossing snowy landscapes to deliver Christmas cheer. The polar bears of old are now joined by an incongruous mix of gawping AI critters, from rabbits to seals, before the piece end with a jump scare: an AI-animated Santa Claus inspired by Haddon Sundblom’s 1930s illustrations.

Coca-Cola is so proud of the monstrosity that it’s even posted a bizarre behind-the-scenes video that appears to have an AI-generated voiceover. Two anonymous observers marvel over how a “tiny team of five specialists” managed to “churn out and carefully refine” over 70,000 video clips in 30 days.

Those video clips weren’t refined carefully enough: Devastating graphic shows just how bad the Coca-Cola Christmas ad really is. “Based on what the company’s been saying, it sounds like the aim of this year’s Christmas ad was less about building brand storytelling and more about trying to prove itself right after last year’s disaster. Pratik Thakar, Coca-Cola’s global VP of generative AI, said that this time around the brand ‘controlled every cinematic detail’ to achieve ‘seamless narrative continuity and character consistency’. But it seems the public at large has a better eye for detail than Coca-Cola’s own team.”

Exit quote: “The only explanation people can think of is that Coca-Cola is running the campaign for rage engagement, but that seems bizarrely off brand, and particularly for a Christmas ad.”

There’s only one thing Coca-Cola can do at this point to soothe the public’s collective ire: Hire Dylan Mulvaney in an effort to make us all forget the bad AI Christmas ad.

OLD AND BUSTED: #MeToo, #BelieveAllWomen. 

The New Hotness? Oh My: Dem Received Texts from Epstein During 2019 Congressional Hearing – and It Gets Worse.

I don’t think the Democrats really thought about the can of worms they were opening up when they tried to smear President Donald Trump over the Epstein files.

The Democrats’ X account ran with the ridiculous story that Trump spent Thanksgiving 2017 with Epstein, even though his every movement was tracked that day as president. He spent it visiting military members and with family. The Democrats account then deleted the tweet they had posted.

Now it’s getting even more problematic for them; new information is coming back on one of their own, big time.

The Washington Post dropped a bombshell that Epstein appeared to have been communicating with Democrat Del. Stacey Plaskett, the non-voting delegate from the Virgin Islands, during a congressional hearing in February 2019. So this would have been well after the allegations about Epstein were all over the news, and he was a known convicted sex offender. The Virgin Islands is where Epstein’s infamous island is Little St. James.

The name was redacted in the documents. I wonder why? But the WaPo was able to figure out who it was by comparing the texts to the action at the hearing.

The hearing involved Democrats trying to go after Trump for the umpteenth time by questioning Michael Cohen, his former attorney. Epstein appeared to be feeding her information to influence her questioning. They matched up the time stamps on the texts that were released and the video of the hearing, so you can read what he was communicating while the hearing was in progress.

Clearly the WaPo revealing that a Democrat was texting Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing is (checks notes) “a far right hit job!

DISPATCHES FROM THE ICE FLOE: Why Furious Progressives Probably Can’t Do Anything About Chuck Schumer.

But okay, progressive grassroots, let’s concede that Schumer, who turns 75 later this month, is the embodiment of old school Establishment Democrats. He’s usually a weak communicator; he’s got a nasal, hectoring voice and he does not look inspiring or vigorous with his slumped shoulders and glasses perched at the end of his nose. He’s led the Democrats in the Senate since 2016, and you can easily make a case that it’s time for some new blood.

One problem for Democrats is that just about everybody in their current Senate leadership is similarly old and uninspiring. The current whip is Dick Durbin of Illinois, who voted to reopen the government and turns 81 later this month. Conference vice chair Elizabeth Warren is 76 and in her third term. Fellow vice chair Mark Warner is 70 and he is in his third term. The Senate Democratic Outreach chair is . . . er, 84-year-old Bernie Sanders.

Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, secretary of the caucus, is the young one, at age 63.

So, who do you want to replace Schumer, progressives?

(One reason to doubt that Schumer will be knocked off his perch anytime soon is the lack of buzz around any other Democratic senator as an alternative.)

Keep in mind, a significant chunk of the Democratic Senate caucus is thinking of running for president in 2028. Almost all of them have no chance, but that’s not going to stop them. Some of them ran in 2020 and got nowhere, and they’re still not deterred. Apparently, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York are all thinking about it, believing that Democratic primary voters will say, “Oh, we made a terrible mistake last time. We should have nominated you now.”

(That woman in Iowa still just wants some ranch.)

Flashback: The Democratic Party’s Ice Floe Politics. “The next time a Democratic politician makes an anonymous observation about the age or vigor of a colleague with whom they disagree, be skeptical. The remarks are made to reporters as if in sorrow, but the message is about as subtle as a shiv in the prison yard.”

And while, as Steve noted earlier, “on the off chance Schumer doesn’t actually intend to retire at the end of his term, party insiders want to escort him out like Tessio in the last act of The Godfather,” who are the Dems lining up to replace him as their party’s leader in the Senate?

UPDATE: Spartacus is ready to toss Schumer onto the ice floe: Dem Sen. Cory Booker Does Not Shy Away From Answering Query About Chuck Schumer’s Future.

The reporter then asked if the comments were pointed directly at Schumer, and if Booker felt that the New York senator was “still up for the job.”

“Chuck Schumer’s generation, Nancy Pelosi’s generation, John Lewis’s generation. They have so much to be proud of,” Booker said. “It is time, though, for new leadership.”

Boom, there it is. We will at least give credit to the New Jersey senator who showed more courage when asked about Schumer’s future, more so than the likes of New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-14), who refused to call him out when asked if Schumer should stay as minority leader, my RedState colleague Nick Arama reported.

“Should Schumer stay as minority leader?” the reporter asked.

“I think what is so important for folks to understand is that this problem is bigger than one person,” AOC replied. “And it actually is bigger than the minority leader in the Senate…A leader is a reflection of the party and Senate Democrats have selected their leadership to represent them.”

To be fair, AOC wants everyone in the gulag, not just Chuck Schumer.

BOTTOM STORY OF THE DAY: MSNBC Changes to MS NOW Today: What’s behind the network’s branding makeover?

Saturday will mark the end of an era for MSNBC as the liberal cable network moves forward under new ownership and a new name: MS NOW.

The media shakeup was nearly a year in the making after Comcast announced it would spin off its cable networks into its own company called Versant, separating MSNBC from its sister broadcast network NBC, which will remain under the NBCUniversal umbrella.

The looming split led to many burning questions about MSNBC’s future, including how it would operate without NBC News’ resources, who gets what in the corporate divorce, and whether MSNBC could even keep its name.

* * * * * * * * *

In an effort to distance itself from NBC as part of the corporate separation, MSNBC is changing its name to MS NOW, an acronym for “My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.”

When MSNBC first launched in 1996, “MS” originally stood for Microsoft, NBC’s former partner in launching the network, although the company divested decades ago.

Notably, CNBC, MSNBC’s sister network that Comcast is also spinning off into Versant, will keep its name as it has always stood for Consumer News and Business Channel.

The New York Times reported MSNBC employed a $20 million ad campaign this month to sell viewers on the change, including an ad where Rachel Maddow reads the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. Another series of spots featured MSNBC hosts promising, “Same mission, new name.”

Earlier: MSNBC Hires Black Actors To Feature Alongside Its White Anchors in Racial Justice-Themed Ad Promoting ‘MS NOW’ Name Change.

Stephanie Ruhle rifles through a rolodex of pretend emotions as MSNBC signs off for the last time:

Fortunately, we’ll always have the memories: Dan Gainor: Five ridiculous moments to remember MSNBC as it transitions to MS NOW.

3. And then there’s “Morning Joe”: Just as the thrill up the leg comment defined the Obama era, Joe Scarborough, the host of “Morning Joe” served up the garbage that defined the Biden presidency. We had a president who people knew was unable to speak coherently and unable to run the country. We all saw it. Biden held an embarrassing February press conference and was fond of saying he had talked to foreign leaders who were already deceased.

None of that mattered to Scarborough. It wasn’t long after that presser when he was defending Biden. On “Morning Joe” in March 2024, Scarborough said of Biden, “I’ve said it for years now, he’s cogent. But I undersold it when I said he was cogent, he’s far beyond cogent. In fact, I think he’s better than he’s ever been, intellectually, analytically, because he’s been around for 50 years.”

Then he put the cherry on top of the lie sundae: “Start your tape right now because I’m about to tell you the truth. And f— you if you can’t handle the truth. This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best Biden ever.” He ended up apologizing, but the damage to his reputation was toast.

4. Hating Charlie Kirk: The number of awful things said by the left and media about Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk’s death is difficult to count. One of them was so bad, it cost an MSNBC employee his job. The network fired political analyst Matthew Dowd for his comments about Kirk. Dowd, a rhetorical bomb thrower, said Kirk has been “one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.

It was so awful, that Kutler had to issue an apology: When you’ve lost MSNBC…

Still though, meet the new network, just the same as the old network: MS NOW Only Goes 4.5 Hours Before Making First Nazi Analogy.

MEET CHATBOT JESUS: Churches tap AI to save souls — and time.

A new digital awakening is unfolding in churches, where pastors and prayer apps are turning to artificial intelligence to reach worshippers, personalize sermons, and power chatbots that resemble God.

Why it matters: AI is helping some churches stay relevant in the face of shrinking staff, empty pews and growing online audiences. But the practice raises new questions about who, or what, is guiding the flock.

  • New AI-powered apps allow you to “text with Jesus” or “talk to the Bible,” giving the impression you are communicating with a deity or angel.
  • Other apps can create personalized prayers, let you confess your sins or offer religious advice on life’s decisions.
  • “What could go wrong?” Robert P. Jones, CEO of the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute, sarcastically asks.

I’m pretty sure George Lucas wrote THX-1138 as a warning, not a how-to guide for shaping what the future would look like. But still: Why Does So Much New Technology Feel Inspired by Dystopian Sci-Fi Movies?

WE AS A NATION CONTINUE TO DISAPPOINT MICHELLE OBAMA:

Back in 2010 at the New Criterion, the late Kenneth Minogue warned:

My concern with democracy is highly specific. It begins in observing the remarkable fact that, while democracy means a government accountable to the electorate, our rulers now make us accountable to them. Most Western governments hate me smoking, or eating the wrong kind of food, or hunting foxes, or drinking too much, and these are merely the surface disapprovals, the ones that provoke legislation or public campaigns. We also borrow too much money for our personal pleasures, and many of us are very bad parents. Ministers of state have been known to instruct us in elementary matters, such as the importance of reading stories to our children. Again, many of us have unsound views about people of other races, cultures, or religions, and the distribution of our friends does not always correspond, as governments think that it ought, to the cultural diversity of our society. We must face up to the grim fact that the rulers we elect are losing patience with us.

Earlier: Michelle Obama Takes Victimhood As Currency to Another Level in Latest Interview.

UPDATE: At the PJ Mothership, Matt Margolis writes: Michelle Obama Is an Insufferable Racist.

“It is exhausting and it’s so expensive and it takes up so much time. Braids are for y’all, so we can work harder and focus on the work,” she claimed.

Wait, WHAT? Braids are… for white people? So Black women style their hair specifically to please… whom, exactly? This makes zero sense, but okay, Michelle, whatever helps you sleep at night in your multimillion-dollar mansion.

But buckle up, because here comes the pièce de résistance:

“So… why do we need an act, a-, g-, an active law to tell white folks to get outta our hair? Don’t— Don’t tell me how to wear my hair. Don’t wonder about it. Don’t touch it. Just don’t.”

Perhaps this is the new libertarian side of Michelle Obama — Virginia Postrel was writing about oppressive state hair braiding laws back in the 1990s.

Oh, and speaking of being oppressed:

MRS GÖRING IS FAR TOO SYMPATHETIC: Nuremberg reviewed.

The first half is often comic. One fellow prisoner is Rudolf Hess (Andreas Pietschmann) who is feigning amnesia, and whose backstory is a farce. When Göring [Russell Crowe] and other Nazi leaders are subjected to Rorschach tests, it’s done for laughs. But the second half is the trial itself, where real footage from the concentration camps is shown. It’s so horrifying it makes everything else feel phoney. This is the moment when the penny finally drops for Kelley [Rami Malek] and he sees that Göring is a monster and not his pal. Well done.

It serves as a decent enough history lesson. And it’s watchable. The message? That evil is within us all*. But all the characters could have been sharper. Crowe, bursting from the seams of his Luftwaffe uniform, is at least physically mesmerising. But you may still need a Red Bull or two.

*Lionel Chetwynd, call your office!

Chetwynd is a longtime naturalized American citizen who was born in England and raised in Montreal. He’d remembered from Canadian regimental history that of the 4,400-odd Canadians sent to Dieppe, about 3,600 were killed. Although they knew it was basically a suicide mission, not one man failed to report for duty. Chetwynd asked one of the old soldiers in his regiment, Sgt. Gordon Betts, why.

“My generation had to figure out what we were ready to die for,” Chetwynd recalled Betts telling him. “You kids don’t even know what to live for.”

Many years later, when Chetwynd was a successful Hollywood writer specializing in historical dramas, he told the Dieppe story during a Malibu dinner party–as a sort of tribute to the men who died there so people could sit around debating politics at Malibu dinner parties. One of the guests was a network head who asked Chetwynd to come in and pitch the story.

“So I went in,” Chetwynd told me, “and someone there said, ‘So these bloodthirsty generals sent these men to a certain death?’

“And I said, ‘Well, they weren’t bloodthirsty; they wept. But how else were we to know how Hitler could be toppled from Europe?’ And she said, ‘Well, who’s the enemy?’ I said, ‘Hitler. The Nazis.’ And she said, ‘Oh, no, no, no. I mean, who’s the real enemy?’”

“It was the first time I realized,” Chetwynd continued, “that for many people evil such as Nazism can only be understood as a cipher for evil within ourselves. They’ve become so persuaded of the essential ugliness of our society and its military, that to tell a war story is to tell the story of evil people.”

That’s when Hollywood is telling story of the Allies, the good guys of WWII (unless you’re a devotee of Tucker Carlson). When Hollywood is telling the story of one of the leaders of the Nazi party, in that case, the “evil is within us all.” Probably doubly so for those who historically vote for men with an (R) after their names. Or as Matt Zoller Seitz “unexpectedly” writes at Roger Ebert.com, “At one point, a character tells us that it ‘happened here’ because ‘the people made it happen, because they didn’t stand up until it was too late.’ He’s talking about Germany, among other places.”

DOWNFALL: Poll Suggests the Platner Campaign Is in Trouble.

Graham Platner has been dubbed Maine’s Mamdani by some because his views, as revealed by his deleted Reddit messages, suggest he is genuine socialist. Platner’s campaign took off quickly as a kind of insurgent, blue-collar challenge to Senator Susan Collins, but his rise has been sidetracked by those deleted messages along with a mini-scandal about a Nazi tattoo he’d had for decades. A poll released this week suggests Platner may be too damaged to topple Collins.

But who will make the trains run on time?

21st CENTURY HEADLINES: Sam Altman and husband fund startup to edit babies’ genes.

The OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and his husband are backing a controversial startup exploring the genetic engineering of babies to eliminate hereditary diseases.

Preventive says its goal is to “correct devastating genetic conditions” and that if successful, gene editing could be one of the most important health breakthroughs of the century.

Preventive has raised $30 million from private backers and set up headquarters in San Francisco. It is a public-benefit corporation, meaning it is a for-profit entity legally committed to a public good other than maximising shareholder value.

Altman, his husband Oliver Mulherin and Brian Armstrong, the chief executive of cryptocurrency platform Coinbase, are among the investors.

Gene editing in sperm, eggs or embryos is highly controversial. Opponents say it raises critical ethical questions and its safety has not been proven. Gene editing with the intention of creating a baby is illegal in the US, UK and many countries around the world.

Decades of watching Star Trek lead me to ask, what could possibly go wrong?

YET ANOTHER HIGH QUALITY CHINESE IMPORT:

As Victoria Taft warned in July of 2021: Democrats Move to Take Over Your Credit Score and Go Full ‘Woke’ – Just Like Communist China.

Evergreen:

THE STRUGGLE IS REAL:

Spare a thought for the pressure they’ve created for themselves over the decades:

If they’re old enough, the same people who have TDS also suffered through Bush Derangement Syndrome twenty years ago, and have spent the last half century believing that the world was perpetually going to end in five years, and as a result:

GAMBLING DISCOVERED IN RICK’S CAFÉ: Corruption Is Slowly Engulfing Zelensky and His Allies.

Kyiv is keen to speed up EU accession talks and is preparing to bring top European leaders together to show force against those blocking the move. But the case of these opponents is growing stronger as more and more reports emerge about possible corruption within Volodymyr Zelensky’s administration.

Justice Minister German Galushchenko was suspended from his post on Wednesday morning amid a corruption investigation into the country’s energy sector. This was just two days after anti-corruption agencies announced their probe into a “large-scale” corruption scheme in the country’s energy sector, which is said to have taken place while Galushchenko was energy minister. The investigation is linked to money laundering of as much as $100 million (€86.4 million) through an office in Kyiv.

No word yet if the big guy got his ten percent, or when Zelensky, that paragon of democracy, will allow elections and open media again:

Not Smart: Zelenskyy Just Blocked Truth Social in Ukraine.

Ukraine’s Zelensky stays in power despite term expiring.

Ukraine’s election day dawned with no vote in sight and little appetite for one – for now, anyway.

Why hasn’t Ukraine held elections since the war began?

THE BBC ABANDONED IMPARTIALITY YEARS AGO. A reckoning for the Covid lockdowns is overdue:

The BBC’s editors and producers, like a majority of the lanyard class, seemed to take it for granted that these costs would be more than outweighed by the benefits, even though there was precious little evidence that locking people in their homes would stop the spread of the virus. Indeed, the evidence soon began to point the other way: Sweden, which imposed much more moderate restrictions, had the second lowest excess mortality in Europe between March 2020 and July 2022.

Such was the BBC’s enthusiasm for the lockdown policy, it pumped out nightly “Covid porn”, with Clive Myrie and other correspondents filing reports from “the frontline” where doctors and nurses struggled to contain the deadly virus. It’s no wonder the government’s draconian response commanded such widespread public support. This news footage gave the impression that anyone who breached the social distancing rules was at serious risk of dying. This was not the reality: in 2021 the global infection fatality rate was reckoned by John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine at Stanford, to be 0.27 per cent.

But the Beeb went further than this, combining with other news organisations to discredit anyone casting doubt on the wisdom of the lockdown policy. It leveraged its status as the founder of the Trusted News Initiative (TNI), a partnership with Reuters, the Associated Press, Agence France-Press, the Financial Times, the New York Times and the Washington Post to suppress sceptical voices on social media – the subject of an anti-trust law suit in the US brought by various independent news publishers. Indeed, the founder of the TNI, a senior BBC executive called Jessica Cecil, was a member of the Counter Disinformation Policy Forum, a shadowy group of “experts” convened by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to monitor criticism of the government’s pandemic response.

But like America’s news media and healthcare professionals, come the summer of 2020, the Beeb went all-in on championing the George Floyd Riots both in America and in England, as this June 6th, 2020 BBC headline illustrates: George Floyd death: Thousands turn out for UK anti-racism protests.

There’s not very much social distancing going on in the photos that accompany the article. As Glenn Greenwald tweeted about this Oceania-level pivot in December of 2021, “This was a pivotal moment in the pandemic’s history: For 4 months, the message was clear and unrelenting: everyone must stay home. Those who leave – even to go to a deserted beach – are reckless sociopaths. It flipped overnight to endorse a mass protest movement liberals liked.”

Not least of which, Britain’s current prime minister: George Floyd death: Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer takes a knee in support of Black Lives Matter movement.

Sky News, June 9th, 2020.

QUESTION ASKED AND ANSWERED: Why No One Cares About the Climate Conference.

Suppose they held an international summit and nobody came? The Brazilian organizers of the annual United Nations climate conference are close to finding out. They pulled out all the stops, including bulldozing tens of thousands of acres of rainforest to clear a new highway to the host city, Belém. International business leaders flocked to earlier summits, and 150 heads of government attended the one in Dubai two years ago. The moguls are steering clear of Brazil, though, and only 53 national leaders are making the trek (a shame, considering all those temporarily converted “love motels“).

The sudden bursting of the climate-alarmism bubble is nearly as shocking as the global shrug that has accompanied it. Not so long ago, the climate movement was widely believed to be the most urgent cause of our time. Global do-gooders flew around the world urging others to cut transportation-related greenhouse gases, agencies and bureaucracies developed plans to slash carbon emissions, and C-suites lobbied their governments for green targets and subsidies. Now Germany is trying to avoid hosting next year’s climate gabfest.

Back in 2020, Nancy Pelosi sputtered that climate change “is a religious issue:”

 

But while every obsession of the left functions as a substitute religion, in order to advance technology such as AI, it looks like the business community is desperate to find a separation of the climate church and state, Pelosi, Al Gore, and John Kerry be damned.

JOSEPH P. KENNEDY, JFK, GRAHAM PLATNER SMILE: Kennedy Heir and House Candidate Jack Schlossberg Performed Nazi Salute in Since-Deleted Swipe at Elon Musk.

Jack Schlossberg, a Kennedy family scion and Democratic primary candidate for New York’s 12th Congressional District, performed a Nazi salute in a since-deleted Instagram video reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.

“Yo, yo, check this out,” Schlossberg said repeatedly into the camera as he performed the salute multiple times.

Schlossberg posted the video—since scrubbed from his social media—in January, likely intending to mock Elon Musk. The billionaire was the subject of controversy that same month when critics accused him of making a Nazi salute while telling an audience, “My heart goes out to you” during a rally celebrating President Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

I’m not sure why a Kennedy scion would want 21st century voters to be reminded of his family’s embrace of post-Weimar Germany and its ethos over the years: Joseph Kennedy, American Fascist.

In this meticulous, relentless biography, Joseph P. Kennedy is now firmly established in the annals of twentieth-century fascism. When he arrived in England in early 1938, he quickly found a home among the ruling elite who believed, as Susan Ronald puts it, that “fascism was the cure for communism.” Notwithstanding FDR’s unprecedented provocation of sending an Irishman with no diplomatic skills to Great Britain, Kennedy immediately sided with Prime Minister Chamberlain and the appeasers, believing that any deal with Hitler—no matter how humiliating and lethal to the lives of millions—was preferable to war. Kennedy never stopped believing that Hitler could be bought off, that businessmen could do business with fascists.

But appeasement, in and of itself, is not, of course, a form of fascism. Even Neville Chamberlain eventually realized that Hitler’s cruel lust for power could not be satiated by offering so much of Europe to his suzerainty. FDR understood that Hitler could not be appeased and became increasingly wary of Kennedy, but kept him in England because the President felt the Ambassador’s defeatist attitudes would demoralize the American people and undermine democratic life. Kennedy, on his leaves home, lectured FDR and said “very frankly” that the United States “would have to come to some form of Fascism here.” He did not believe Great Britain could survive a war against the fascist powers and that America would become increasingly isolated and lose control of its markets if FDR’s government did not take over control of the economy to counter Hitler’s hegemony over his capitalists. Kennedy proposed that the President “organize a small powerful committee under himself as chairman and this committee would run the country without much reference to Congress.”

Kennedy thought solely in terms of economics. Although he said he cared about the fate of Jews and persecuted minorities, in the end he thought they would have to be sacrificed for the greater good of the United States and its allies. Like Hitler, Kennedy believed in a Jewish cabal, which had thwarted him and that was intent on instigating incidents that would draw America into a disastrous war. “To defeat fascism,” Kennedy argued in a memorandum, the United States would “have to adopt totalitarian methods” and strike deals with dictators.

When the war actually began, Kennedy remained defeatist, proclaiming to journalists, to his British colleagues, and to FDR himself that Great Britain was finished as a world power and that a German invasion of the UK would succeed. Even after the heroic RAF victories during the Blitz and the Battle of Britain, Kennedy predicted defeat. In short, he never acknowledged that the will, the spirit, or the values of the democracies would triumph in war. Democracy, he insisted, would be vanquished.

Like father, like sons: Did John F. Kennedy Admire Adolf Hitler?

John F. Kennedy admired Hitler as a young man and felt fascism was right for Germany, according to a new book in German that mines the future president’s diaries.

According to Spiegel Online’s article on the book, the 20-year-old Kennedy pondered on August 3, 1937: What are the evils of fascism compared to communism? On August 21 he added that the Germans had been ganged up on.

The book is “John F. Kennedy Unter Deutschen” (“John F. Kennedy Among the Germans”) – featuring travel diaries and letters between 1937 and 1945. The work, edited by Oliver Lubrich, documents three visits by Kennedy to Germany – in 1937, 1939 and 1945. “At first glance, one could get the impression that Kennedy endorsed fascism and even admired Hitler,” Spiegel writes.

Bobby Kennedy’s Fascist Moment: “If our colleges and universities do not breed men who riot, who rebel, who attack life with all their youthful vision and vigor then there is something wrong with our colleges. The more riots that come on college campuses, the better the world for tomorrow.”

IT’S COME TO THIS: ‘Utter Stupidity:’ Conservatives Appalled by Tucker Carlson’s Latest Target.

Tucker Carlson has his newest target: Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the anti-Nazi, Christian evangelist executed by the Third Reich in 1945.

In the latest episode of his show, which was dedicated to denouncing Jewish-American commentators Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro, Carlson remarked that “once you start calling people Nazis, we really have no choice but to start shooting them. To be Dietrich Bonhoeffer and sort of reach the end of reason, or even Christianity. Bonhoeffer decided Christianity’s not even-, he was a Lutheran pastor. Christianity is not enough, we have to kill the guy [Adolf Hitler]. I’m not judging Bonhoeffer, who was a great man in some ways, but that’s inevitable once we decide that people are Nazis.”

Bonhoeffer was part of anti-Nazi German resistance movement, as well as an underground Christian community during Hitler’s reign. Bonhoeffer was arrested in April 1943 for helping 14 German Jews escape to Switzerland. It is a matter of historical debate what role, exactly, Bonhoeffer played in the famous, failed plot to assassinate Hitler on July 20, 1944.

Needless to say, many on the right were stunned by Carlson’s criticism of the Christian icon.

To be fair, it’s the next “logical” step in Tucker’s journey, after declaring Churchill WWII’s baddy last year.

 

Or as America’s Newspaper of Record reports:

BETTER MAN: John Fetterman Doesn’t Bite As Katie Couric Prods Him To Condemn Charlie Kirk.

“I think some people might say Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric was extreme,” Couric claimed. “You know, I think that’s the conversation that happened. People condemned political violence, but they also felt a great deal of discomfort with his language, suggesting that these kinds of words lead to violence. I don’t know. I’m just kind of sharing my observations as I saw the conversations unfold.”

“Yeah, I agree. I mean, I think we agree that we probably didn’t agree with much of what he said. And I’m sure we both agree that you shouldn’t shoot people and you shouldn’t execute them in public,” Fetterman replied. “And I think two things must be true: that free speech—I’m an absolute free speech guy and you have the right to say these things. And you definitely also have the right not to get shot by sharing your views.”

Members of the media and others with large online followings misled their audiences on Kirk’s views on topics such as race and sexuality following his assassination.

The New York Times had to issue a correction on Sept. 11 for incorrectly attributing an antisemitic comment to Kirk in an article detailing his overall political views.

“An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast,” the correction states. “He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement.”

Moreover, Fetterman said on Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime” on Nov. 3 that he refuses to demonize his opposition.

“I’m not gonna call you a fascist or a Nazi. I’m not gonna compare anyone to Hitler or anything,” he said at the time. “That’s wrong. And if you resort to that thing, you’ve lost the plot.”

Couric admitted on a Nov. 6 episode of her podcast that she no longer strives to be “impartial” when covering Trump, claiming the president’s conduct is “beyond the pale.”

Couric was never a beacon of objectivity before Trump, of course.

UPDATE: Fetterman Hospitalized After Fall: Conservatives Offer Prayers, BlueSky Descends into Vile Attacks.