Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

KEN DILANIAN: Kash Patel Has Fired a Completely Non-Partisan FBI Analyst For No Other Reason Than Disagreeing with Him About a “Shooter’s Motive” Ten Years Ago.

That’s the headline/digest this CIA operative and FusionGPS asset posted on Twitter to advertise his MSNOW article.

Based on that headline, would you care to guess who that shooter might have been, and what disagreement there might have been about his motive?

To help you out, the shooting he’s talking about happened in 2017, not quite ten years ago.

Do you have your answer?

Further hint: This analyst claimed the shooter wasn’t a domestic terrorist with any political motive, but was simply shooting rando targets in order to get police to kill him. That is, “suicide by cop.”

Yes, he’s talking about a Democrat operative who refused to acknowledge that the James Hodgkinson III, the man who shot up Republicans at a softball practice and hit Steve Scalise five times, wasn’t Aksually a Rachel Maddow fan and Bernie Sanders volunteer who hated Republicans, but just a man with no discernible motive other than seeking to end his own life in the most convoluted manner possible.

Read the whole thing.

QUESTION ASKED: How Will AOC Survive a Presidential Campaign?

It was only a month ago that Axios was telling us that while the AOC is a ubiquitous social media presence, she doesn’t like doing sit-down interviews, and when she does, “it’s usually with an ideologically sympathetic outlet or reporter.”

We saw this with Joe Biden, and we saw this with Kamala Harris. We are beset by overambitious, under-studied politicians who are absolutely convinced they’re ready to sit behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office and order U.S. troops into combat when needed, but not ready to sit down for an hour with a major cable news host who’s going to ask them tougher-than-usual questions. If you want to be president of the United States, then you need to be able to sit down with someone who’s going to say some variation of, “your policies, ideas, and agenda stink, and you should not be trusted with power” and you need to be able to respond, “no, my policies, ideas, and agenda are the right answers, and here’s why” in a persuasive matter. This is Politics 101.

If you need to be wrapped in bubble wrap to get through a national tour, you are not going to get through the challenges of a presidential campaign.

Much like Kamala during her stillborn 2020 presidential bid, AOC’s 2019 Green Nude Eel obsessions created a treasure-trove of insane rhetoric. With the left having recently backed off on their apocalyptic eco rhetoric, her manic pixie “New Socialist ‘It Girl’” phase will be studied endlessly by operatives on the left during the primaries and on the right, if she’s the Dem’s nominee.

GOP IN DC FALL INTO TWO CAMPS: “Those who still value the institutions, and those who have been destroyed by the institutions.”

Read the whole thing.

 

21st CENTURY HEADLINES: NYC Gallery Sold an AI-Generated Ansel Adams Photo Without Permission.

The New York Danziger Gallery displayed for sale an AI-generated version of Ansel Adams’ photo “Moonrise Over Hernandez” without consulting the photographer’s trust, effectively stealing the legendary artist’s work and dramatically altering it with AI for the sake of profit.

The work, which can be seen above, is described as “A.I. Generated” from the prompt “Make a realistic color version of Ansel Adams’ iconic ‘Moonrise Over Hernandez’.” It is further described as “Proofed, regenerated, & photoshopped from 11/25 – 4/26. Printed by master printer Esteban Mauchi Editions of 10 in 3 sizes – 20 x 24” , 24 x 30”, 30 x 40.’”

The image was part of The Photography Show at the Park Avenue Armory in New York City, which ran from April 22 through April 26, 2026. Images sold at this show in the past typically cost in the tens of thousands of dollars.

Ansel Adam’s trust published a public statement on Instagram over the weekend, confirming that despite its best efforts at communication, the Danziger Gallery used Adams’ name and his photo for commercial purposes without its permission.

The gallery responded: NYC Gallery Says it Has ‘Every Right’ to Create AI Version of Iconic Ansel Adams Photo.

But in a statement released last night, James Danziger says he has “every right to create a new and transformative work” since the Adams’ Moonrise photo, taken on November 1, 1941, has passed into the public domain.

“I had long believed the image was in the public domain but to confirm this beyond doubt, I hired one of the most respected copyright lawyers in the country to insure [sic] this was the case,” Danziger writes defiantly. “It was indeed confirmed to be in the public domain and I was free to create a transformative color rendition of the image and to exhibit and sell the resulting prints.”

Given the increasingly photo-realistic power of AI image creators such as Dall-E, stock image providers such as Shutterstock have got to be terrified of AI stealing their lunch.

 

DON’T KNOW MUCH ABOUT HISTORY:

Actually, based on photographic evidence, dinosaurs only fought in WWII:

And we didn’t go to war with Albania until we deployed the B-3 bomber against them in the mid-1990s. They even made a movie about it:

WHY IS THE LEFT SUCH A CESSPIT OF RACISM?

Why does the left assume every Hispanic is an illegal alien?

DISPATCHES FROM THE NATIONAL FELONS LEAGUE:

Wait, I thought the media loves it when NFL players are open about their politics:

CURIOUSLY THOUGH, HE’LL SUFFER NO REPERCUSSIONS FOR SAYING THIS: Alan Cumming: America is a fascist country.

Alan Cumming, the Scottish actor, has complained that he has to pay taxes to a “fascist country”.

The host of The Traitors US has made his home in New York for the past 25 years but is deeply unhappy to be living under Donald Trump’s administration.

“Of course, there are kind people in America, and I live in New York, which is a different kettle of fish to the rest of America, but the government… It is a fascist country and I’m paying taxes to it. It’s horrible,” he said.

* * * * * * * *

Cumming said he was lulled into a false sense of security during Barack Obama’s presidency.

He told Radio Times: “I love Obama, but I do feel he didn’t do us a favour by not letting on about the level of racism and fury he was subjected to.

I agree, and neither did the New York Times; Byron York wrote on September 24th of 2008 that “Today is a red-letter day for the New York Times. For the first time, the paper has reported in its news section that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright once uttered the phrase ‘God damn America.’” The two decades spent in the pews of Chicago’s Trinity United Church likely did much to shape the Lightworker’s worldview. And consequently, as Victor Davis Hanson wrote near the end of his time in office: Obama’s Legacy [was] The Rise Of Donald Trump.

Without policy achievements to hang his hat on, Obama’s rhetoric will be how he’s remembered – and the results have been ugly. On his recent Asian tour, President Obama characterized his fellow Americans (the most productive workers in the world) as “lazy.” In fact, he went on to deride Americans for a list of supposed transgressions ranging from the Vietnam War to environmental desecration to the 19th century treatment of Native Americans. “If you’re in the United States,” the president said, “sometimes you can feel lazy and think we’re so big we don’t have to really know anything about other people.”

The attack on supposedly insular Americans was somewhat bizarre, given that Obama himself knows no foreign languages. He often seems confused about even basic world geography. (His birthplace of Hawaii is not “Asia,” Austrians do not speak “Austrian,” and the Falkland Islands are not the Maldives).

Obama’s sense of history is equally weak. Contrary to his past remarks, the Islamic world did not spark either the Western Renaissance or the Enlightenment. Cordoba was not, as he once suggested, an Islamic center of “tolerance” during the Spanish Inquisition; in fact, its Muslim population had been expelled during the early Reconquista over two centuries earlier.

In another eerie ditto of his infamous 2008 attack on the supposedly intolerant Pennsylvania “clingers,” Obama returned to his theme that ignorant Americans “typically” become xenophobic and racist: “Typically, when people feel stressed, they turn on others who don’t look like them.” (“Typically” is not a good Obama word to use in the context of racial relations, since he once dubbed his own grandmother a “typical white person.”) Too often Obama has gratuitously aroused racial animosities with inflammatory rhetoric such as “punish our enemies,” or injected himself into the middle of hot-button controversies like the Trayvon Martin case, the Henry Louis Gates melodrama, and the “hands up, don’t shoot” Ferguson mayhem.

Most recently, Obama seemed to praise backup 49ers quarterback and multimillionaire Colin Kaepernick for his refusal to stand during the National Anthem, empathizing with Kaepernick’s claims of endemic American racism. What is going on in Obama’s home stretch? Apparently Obama is veering even further to the left, in hopes of establishing a rhetorical progressive legacy in lieu of any lasting legislative or foreign-policy achievement.

Evergreen:

THE FLAG IS ONLY ‘COMPLICATED’ IF YOU’RE A DEMOCRAT:

“I often think, when reclaiming symbols, I think about the American flag,” Talarico said. “The American flag is such a complicated symbol for most of us. In many ways like Jesus, like the cross, it’s been co-opted and, in some ways, its true meaning has been betrayed.”

The flag stands for freedom, individual liberty, and the rule of law. All things that are antithetical to Democrats like Talarico. But they’re the very things that allow the Democrats to live well, speak freely, and get rich off the backs of their fellow Americans. It’s only been ‘co-opted’ if you don’t like those things, and Democrats do not.

Instead, Talarico wants the flag to represent his radical, anti-freedom agenda — the one that believes there are multiple genders, that God is nonbinary, that freedom of religion and speech are only for Leftists, and that we can magically control the weather if we all eat grass and tofu. He’s only proud of the flag when it represents what he likes.

Yes, it could be a far more complicated symbol:

DEATH OF STALIN WRITER/DIRECTOR ARMANDO IANNUCCI HIRED TO WRITE PADDINGTON 4 SCREENPLAY. No, really:

Armando Iannucci, the Emmy-winning and Oscar-nominated Glaswegian best known for creating hit TV shows Veep and The Thick of It, will write the upcoming fourth film in Studiocanal‘s hit Paddington franchise, alongside co-writer and long-time collaborator Simon Blackwell.

Paddington 4 will follow on from 2014’s hit movie Paddington, followed in 2017 by Paddington 2 and in 2024 with Paddington in Peru. The film series has had a combined global box office in excess of $800 million. The fourth Paddington movie was officially confirmed earlier this year at CinemaCon, with Studiocanal CEO and Canal+ Chief Content Officer Anna Marsh revealing that the film was in development, and that “world-renowned comedy writers” had been hired to work on the script.

Film trade publication Variety were first to confirm the news that Iannucci had been hired and stated that Dougal Wilson, the director of the third film in the series, is in talks to return.

Paddington Meets Lavrentiy Beria is going to be lit!

WHAT WENT WRONG, KAREN?

Related: Uh-Oh: Spencer Pratt Files Complaint, Says Karen Bass Filmed Herself Violating Election Law.

More:

LEFTIST DISCOVERS MEMORY HOLE: CBS News Prez Ordered Morning Show to Ignore Colbert’s Finale Because of Late Show’s ‘Unprofessional’ Shot at Tony Dokoupil: Report.

“I’m told the ghosting was a specific directive from CBS News president Tom Cibrowski, who hated Colbert’s recent bit mocking their failure to secure a China visa for anchor Tony Dokoupil, Belloni wrote. “Colbert ‘kicked colleagues when they were down,’ one source at CBS News told me today. ‘It was unprofessional and unprovoked.’”

The segment that angered Cibrowski mocked Dokoupil for reporting from “The Wrong China” — he was forced to broadcast from Taiwan during President Donald Trump’s China trip because of the botched visa — and showed a phony version of the anchor with his head stuck inside a pumpkin.

It then showed an old lady portraying Bari Weiss entering the shot and smacking him on the head with a mallet… in an effort to help him out, apparently. The Colbert crowd seemed to find it fairly funny.

But the CBS News bosses didn’t, especially since the news unit had supported Colbert following his cancellation and in his battle with the FCC earlier this year, Belloni reported.

As Jason Zinoman wrote in his 2017 biography of David Letterman, when GE bought NBC in 1985, Letterman began to routinely tear into the giant corporation on air:

Building General Electric up as the enemy enabled Letterman, at the height of his cultural influence, to reclaim the role of the little guy. It also put him in the tradition of comedians saying the things to their bosses that you always wished you could say to yours. Letterman, who still wanted to be seen as an underdog, turned Late Night into a drama for playful complaints about the corporate giant. He staked out his most aggressive stance toward his bosses in April 1986, when he ventured out to the headquarters of General Electric to give them a welcoming gift, with a camera crew in tow. With his arm around a large fruit basket, he entered the revolving door, only to be stopped by security. “We received your letter,” a woman told him, adding that he had not gotten authorization. “We need authorization to drop off a fruit basket?” Letterman asked.

* * * * * * * * *

In the video, a GE security guard approached Letterman aggressively, and later walked up to Hal Gurnee, who had been filming the scene. Both Letterman and Gurnee extended their hands for a handshake, and the security guard started to do the same before having second thoughts, pulling his hand back abruptly. In the editing, Hal Gurnee saw this moment and knew it would make for the key part of the comedy. On the air, after showing the remote piece, Letterman gave this aborted greeting a name: the General Electric Handshake. He smiled when he said it.

But Letterman delivered good ratings for late night, and his show carried the imprimatur of Johnny Carson. At least until Carson announced his retirement in 1991, Letterman could get away with his anti-corporate shtick at NBC. In contrast, Colbert was costing CBS $40 million a year. Why should the news division lay down for him after his last show?

THE CRITICAL DRINKER: Production Hell — Megalopolis. 

I feel badly for Francis Ford Coppola having spent decades ruminating over the film and investing a fortune into it, only to have this be the result:

But as the Drinker notes, “no matter what else you might think about this film and the man who created it, I have to admit I kind of respect Coppola just for getting the thing made. The man had an artistic vision, that’s for sure. And he was willing to sacrifice half his life and all of his accumulated wealth pursuing it. And in a world of creatively bankrupt studio slop like the Mandalorian and Grou, maybe Hollywood could use a few more Francis Ford Coppolas these days.”

This was my take on the movie from October of 2024, after taking the above photo at a Fort Worth Studio Movie Grill: Megalopolis: Making Sense of Francis Ford Coppola’s Fever Dreams.

WHY IS ROLLING STONE INSULTING ITS OWN READERS?

Hey, not everyone can be totally cool and dreamy like Dzhokhar Tsarnaev:

Or Charles Manson:

As the 1960s kept ending, the next installment was the arrest of Charles Manson and four of his followers for the horrific murder of five people, including actress Sharon Tate, wife of Roman Polanski, at a luxury mansion north of Beverly Hills. When Manson’s trial began in 1970, Wenner [who would then have been about age 24–Ed] leaped at the story with an idea for the headline: “Charles Manson Is Innocent!”

Wenner’s headline was less insane than it sounds to modern ears. Manson was already an object of media obsession, a former Haight-Ashbury denizen who drifted to L.A. and collected hippie acolytes for LSD orgies and quasi-biblical prophecies. While the straight world viewed him as a monster, much of Wenner’s audience saw him, at least hypothetically, as one of their own. The underground press of Los Angeles, including the Free Press, cast him as the victim of a hippie-hating media. Manson was a rock-and-roll hanger-on. Wenner was convinced of Manson’s innocence by his own writer David Dalton, who had lived for a time with Dennis Wilson of the Beach Boys, a Manson believer. “I’d go out driving in the desert with Dennis, and he’d say things to me like ‘Charlie’s really cosmic, man.’ ”

* * * * * * * *

Meanwhile, a lawyer in the DA’s office, believing he was doing a favor for a friend of [David] Felton’s at the Los Angeles Times and that this hippie rag from San Francisco was a benign nonentity, brought Felton [then-recently hired away from the L.A. Times by Wenner] and Dalton into the office to show them the crime scene photos of the butchered bodies of Manson victims — including a man with the word war etched in his stomach with a fork. Dalton blanched when he saw the words “Healter [sic] Skelter” painted in blood on a refrigerator, instantly recalling what Dennis Wilson told him about the coded instructions Manson heard in the Beatles songs. “It must have been the most horrifying moment of my life,” said Dalton. “It was the end of the whole hippie culture.” Jann Wenner changed the headline.

And not everyone can afford to leave their city after the leftist politics that Rolling Stone has been promoting for 60 years now began to make it a hellhole:

Jann Wenner said it was [his then-wife] Jane who ultimately catalyzed Rolling Stone’s move to New York. Her paranoia and anxiety had spiked to uncomfortable levels in the wake of the Patty Hearst episode. “San Francisco got very tricky at one point, because you had the Zodiac, the Zebra, and the SLA,” she said. “It was too small. There were too many people that were just too closely removed from the SLA and the Mansons…there was something creepy happening at that point.”

Related: The staffers at Variety no doubt have “unfathomable levels of self-confidence” as well, even as they lie about Karen Bass, or know nothing about her past:

BOMB CANADA, THE CASE FOR WAR:

(Classical reference in headline.)

GREAT MOMENTS IN MULTICULTURALISM: AOC’s Former Chief of Staff ‘Threatens’ a Fellow Dem (Who’s Jewish) for Refusing to Back a Nazi *Popcorn*.

In a move that perfectly captures the modern left’s priorities, former Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez campaign manager Saikat Chakrabarti is melting down because Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Jake Auchincloss dared to call out a Nazi tattoo on Graham Platner as personally disqualifying—and suggested voters might feel the same way.

Well, maybe Nazi-adjacent or certainly willing to look the other way at those who were. Here’s a flashback to Chakrabarti’s sartorial excesses in 2019: AOC chief of staff criticized for wearing shirt touting Nazi collaborator:

Chakrabarti’s choice of apparel is receiving a fresh round of criticism after Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, positively quoted Nazi sympathizer Eva Perón, the former first lady of Argentina.

Saikat Chakrabarti, the chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, came under scrutiny for having worn a T-shirt that featured Nazi collaborator Subhas Chandra Bose.

In December 2018, following his boss’s congressional victory, Chakrabarti did a video with NowThis News, titled “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Chief of Staff on Acting Fast in Congress,” in which he wore a T-shirt with Bose’s face.

As I wrote last year, before Chakrabarti explicitly endorsed Platner, “If he wins and takes office at the beginning of 2027, I assume Chakrabarti would want to pack in as much legislating as possible before it’s too late (possibly working with potential Senator Graham Platner, another enthusiast of Germany’s post-Weimar era, if he’s elected as well). While Chakrabarti was serving as AOC’s ghostwriter, she assured us all that the world would be coming to an end in 2030.”

Related: Dave Portnoy EMBARRASSES Graham Platner’s Team for Thinking He Would ‘Play Footsy with a Nazi’ (Emails).

AND NOW A WORD FROM THE LATE CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS: “In order to begin a speech or to ask a question from the floor, all that would be necessary by way of preface would be the words: ‘Speaking as a…’ Then could follow any self-loving description…There are many ways of dating the moment when the Left lost or—I would prefer to say—discarded its moral advantage, but this was the first time that I was to see the sellout conducted so cheaply.”

OKAY, IT LOOKS MARGINALLY BETTER THAN THE ELECTRIC JAG. BUT THAT’S SETTING THE BAR AWFULLY LOW: Ferrari Luce: Everything we know about Ferrari’s first electric car.

Prepare to be shocked. Or, having seen the images, perhaps you are already flabbergasted that Ferrari, world-famous purveyor of lithe sports cars with multi-cylinder combustion engines, has produced this. Meet the Luce, powered by batteries.

I mean, just look at it. That’s not a proper Ferrari, you might be muttering. But this is different – a futuristic concept car made real. For a company such as Ferrari, with a weighty history, if you’re going to be different you might as well be radically different.

The shock of the new was evident in the criticism that greeted the Luce’s interior, co-created with LoveFrom, an agency founded by iPhone designer Sir Jony Ive and fellow designer Marc Newson.

Now the whole car has been revealed, that interior won’t be as contentious. Combined with the distinctive styling, a return to physical operations in an age dominated by touchscreens means that the Luce is redefining not only Ferrari but cars in general.

And like Jaguar in 2024, not for the better:

Was the front bumper of the new Ferrari deliberately styled to look like the pull-down handle on a Keurig dispenser?

UPDATE: Compliance math: “[E]very EV they sell pulls that average down. Which means they can keep making the V8s and AMGs and ICE cars we actually love without getting destroyed by regulators. So that MB electric GT 4-Door and the Ferrari Luce? Those aren’t passion projects. That’s compliance math. The irony is those EVs you hate might literally be the reason your favorite ICE cars still exist.”

THE VIEW OF THE WORLD FROM 9th AVENUE, 2026 EDITION: How Problematic Is Patriotism? National pride in America has plummeted in the Trump era. Is it worth trying to salvage?

I did not grow up loving America—not because I thought it didn’t deserve love but because I didn’t think about it. America was the Pledge of Allegiance and “The Star-Spangled Banner.” It was “Maverick” and “Gunsmoke.” It was Ed Sullivan and high-school dances and big cars with big fins. It was soda fountains and Elvis and stickball. It was Valley Forge and George Washington. It was also white, mostly male, and invincibly middle class, and I hardly gave a thought to race or class or much else for that matter.

Depending on where you hail from, America could be the evening sky above Northfield, Connecticut, or the fields of bluebonnets in Ennis, Texas. To a teen-ager living in New York in the nineteen-sixties, America was pretty great. It had saved the world from fascism and now stood as a bulwark against communism. Mickey Mantle, good; Nikita Khrushchev, bad. My memory may be faulty, but I can’t recall anyone I knew declaring a love for America—not, anyway, until I was twenty-five and living in Charleston, South Carolina.

It was the winter of 1973, and the words were spoken by a sixty-eight-year-old Brooklyn native named William McKissack Chapman. Tall and narrow, with stiff gray hair and a thin gray mustache, Bill had been a reporter for the long-defunct Brooklyn Eagle, an editor at Time-Life, and a founder of Sports Illustrated. He’d been too young to fight in the First World War but reported from Europe during the Second. In Paris in 1945, he’d got drunk with Ernest Hemingway, whom he considered a blowhard. Now, nearly thirty years later, in his elegant, slightly shopworn home, at 30 King Street, he was ruminating about Vietnam and Watergate, both of which dominated the news at the time. After a minute or two, he put down his drink and said in a tone at once wistful and firm, “God, I love this country.”

Alas, the New Yorker doesn’t, and apparently, on Memorial Day 2026, wishes, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, that Trump supporters would just get it over with and stab themselves:

Which seems an odd choice of images, considering the multiple assassination attempts against Trump, and the events of last year:

But actually, for the New Yorker, this may progress of a sort. In the early 1970s, their film critic could scarcely acknowledge that what we would now call Red State voters even existed:

On Friday, on the New Yorker’s website, the magazine’s film editor Richard Brody offers what may be the first accurate version of the quote I’ve ever seen (I’m assuming it’s accurate because it comes from the New Yorker itself): “Pauline Kael famously commented, after the 1972 Presidential election, ‘I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.’”

In 1976, Saul Steinberg, the New Yorker’s cover author, summed up that worldview perfectly, with a reminder that most Manhattan residents don’t think that the flyover country that Nixon voters lived in existed, either:

“How Problematic Is Patriotism?” It certainly is for the person(s) who run the Democrats’ X account: