Archive for 2024

WAR ON FIREWORKS: A response to the New York Times.

The LAPD had promised to send up drones to monitor the city, threatening to arrest anyone putting on a pyrotechnic display. They would have had to arrest 50,000 or more. The radical left and the libertarian right have both claimed the slogan “Become Ungovernable” as their own. Conservatives like to mock Californians for their willingness to submit to government micromanagement, but there was no acquiescence to authority on this night. There was only cacophony, and it was good and glorious.

As I drove the kids about, I put on a playlist of patriotic songs: plenty of John Philip Sousa and various traditional anthems. (“Columbia, Gem of the Ocean” is underrated. Mine is probably the last generation to learn it in school.) I played two different versions of “This Land is Your Land” as we drove along Slauson and Crenshaw. Heloise and David sang along.

I kept thinking of a famous line from another song I wasn’t playing. “I’m gonna kick the darkness until it bleeds daylight,” the Canadian musician Bruce Cockburn sang decades ago. I saw my city kicking darkness in joy and in fury. To see it put a lump in my throat.

As a kid I was a big fan of Henry Reed’s Journey, one theme of which was the annoying spread of anti-fireworks laws.

ICYMI: Oh, You Naughty First Amendment. “Since my managing editor won’t let me reply to Wu with any of Carlin’s seven words you can’t say on television — even though all seven would be appropriate and, I promise you, artfully arranged — I’ll have to resort to reasoned analysis.”

ROGER KIMBALL: The United States cannot afford a 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. president: The rats are cornered and can be expected to be as vicious as they are unscrupulous.

Has the uniparty changed its song about Joe Biden? There are signs that it has. In the immediate aftermath of Biden’s disastrous debate with Donald Trump last week, the narrative broke in two, or at least seemed to break in two. On one side there was horror and — word of the moment — “panic” among the Dems. The New York Times led the way in calling for Biden — for the good of the country — to resign. At the same time, there was considerable push back, encapsulated comically in the observation that dementia Joe “had a cold,” hence his gibbering incoherence. St. Barack weighed in with what appeared to be a supportive post of X: everyone has bad debate nights, he said, but “this election is still a choice between someone who has fought for ordinary people his entire life [Obama meant Biden, in case you were wondering] and someone who only cares about himself [the bad orange man].”

Was Obama serious in his support? A day or two later Tucker Carlson cast doubt on that. “From an unusually good source,” he wrote. “Obama’s tweet supporting Joe Biden was disingenuous. In private, Obama is telling people Biden can’t win, and he is therefore in favor of an open convention.”

I am not sure what that would mean. In particular, I am not sure that the Dems have taken account of their outstanding black sheep, Vice President Kamala Harris. There is a lot of blithe talk about Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer or even, God help us, Hillary Clinton stepping into the breach. In my view, none would be a plausible candidate. More to the point, I am not sure I see how we get to any other candidate than either Joe Biden or Kamala Harris.

Be certain that some people are thinking hard on that.

WARNER TODD HUSTON: We Need to Stop Calling This The ‘July Fourth Holiday.”

Today we celebrate Independence Day, the day we stepped out on our own and formally declared our intention to become our own nation and not a vassal state of England. Unfortunately, too many people keep calling this day “the July Fourth holiday.” But, we don’t celebrate a number or a month. We celebrate our independence as a nation. So, I urge everyone to stop disrespecting our nation’s birthday by calling it “July Fourth” and here is why…

Read the whole thing.

BEING A PARENT REQUIRES GROWING UP. NOBODY GROWS UP ANY MORE (GOVERNMENT DISCOURAGES IT):  Why has parenthood gone out of fashion?

Socialism kills, fast or slow. Either mass graves or not reproducing and dying early. But it always kills.

RAPE IS EVIL WHEN IT’S A TOOL OF WHITE MALE SUPREMACIST OPPRESSION, NOT WHEN IT’S A RESPONSE TO IT. WE MUST BE SENSITIVE TO DIFFERENT CULTURES AND THEIR RAPEY WAYS:  Outrage over rapists? Only when they’re white.

No, I’m not talking funny because my tongue is wedged in my cheek. I’m talking funny because my teeth are clenched so hard.

ON THIS FOURTH OF JULY, LET’S REMEMBER THAT THE ONCE-GREAT BRITAIN HAS IT WORSE THAN US:  What Have The Tories Done For Us?

IT DOESN’T MATTER. OBAMA IS JUST ANOTHER PUPPET. AT ANY RATE, BIDEN OR HIS FAMILY IS GOING TO DARE THEM TO REMOVE THEM. YOU SEE THEY KNOW IF THEY LET GO OF POWER THEY’RE ALL DEAD:  Does 0bama favor an open D convention?

They are totalitarians. Politburo rules apply.

IT SHOULDN’T NEED TO BE SAID. APPARENTLY IT IS:  Why Eugenics Is Bad.

THE BIDEN MOMENT: Biden Administration policy failure, The Propaganda Press and American disintegration.

The June 27 televised Biden-Trump debate fully exposed America’s and the Free World’s most grave strategic weakness: dominant mass media organizations that fail to hold their favored government, economic and media elites accountable for policy failures.

Strategic weakness — that’s a Washington wonk way of saying “a social, political or military flaw a dedicated enemy of America identifies and then exploits over time” with the goal of weakening or destroying the U.S.

MORE:

A dysfunctional president of the United States is a high order defense problem in a world of nuclear weapons, ICBMs, wealthy enemy states (China) and suicidal terrorists.

MORE:

The Biden Moment of one policy failure after another has been a disaster for U.S. defense.

MORE: America’s “most insidious threat is China’s “disintegrative warfare.” In a disintegrative war, a “unitary belligerent becomes increasingly fragmented by secessions.”

Is Biden’s America increasingly fragmented? Read the whole column.

OPEN THREAD: Hump day.

EVERYTHING SEEMINGLY IS SPINNING OUT OF CONTROL: “Biden at 81: Sharp and focused but sometimes confused and forgetful,” reads the headline above an article bearing five AP court stenographers’ bylines:

President Joe Biden’s conduct behind closed doors, in the Oval Office, on Air Force One and in meetings around the world is described in the same dual way by those who regularly see him in action.

He is often sharp and focused. But he also has moments, particularly later in the evening, when his thoughts seem jumbled and he trails off mid-sentence or seems confused. Sometimes he doesn’t grasp the finer points of details. He occasionally forgets people’s names, stares blankly and moves slowly around the room.

Biden’s occasional struggles with focus may not be unusual for someone his age. But at 81 years old and seeking another four years in the White House, the moments when he’s off his game have taken on a fresh resonance following his disastrous debate performance against Republican Donald Trump. The president appeared pale, gave nonsensical answers, stared blankly and lost his train of thought.

The June 27 faceoff alarmed Democrats and his financial backers, in part, because Biden seemed so much worse than during the almost routine moments when he’s less sharp. And that has raised questions about whether he’s up for a campaign that’s only going to get nastier and whether he can effectively govern for another four years if he wins.

Less than two weeks ago, AP was running columns defending Biden’s acuity: Seeing is believing? Not necessarily when it comes to video clips of Biden and Trump.

“Any misinformation that seems to reinforce or resonate perceptions or dominant narratives, whether they’re accurate or not, is very effective,” said Erik Nisbet, a professor at Northwestern University who studies media, public opinion and public policy in democracy and elections.

At the G7 summit in Italy, where Biden headed after Normandy, a clip of the president watching a skydiving demonstration was cropped to make it appear as though he wandered off for no reason. A wider view of the video shows he was greeting paratroopers who had just landed. And at a Los Angeles fundraiser last weekend, a pause by Biden as he left the stage amid cheers was used to say the president froze, while Biden’s campaign said he was only stopping to take in the applause.

The clips have been especially effective at activating concerns about Biden’s competency, according to Nisbet, because he is the oldest sitting president the U.S. has ever had, and he moves with more difficulty than he once did.

Dr. Kevin O’Connor, Biden’s physician, wrote in a February memo after the president’s annual physical that he “continues to be fit for duty” and that his stiff gait is the result of arthritic changes in his spine. He said that Biden has reported additional hip pain and started using a new device for his sleep apnea, but that he showed no signs of stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s or other similar conditions.

After the fundraiser clip spread online, Biden campaign spokesperson James Singer blasted such negative characterizations as a tactic from those who “are so scared of losing to Joe Biden, they’ll make anything up” to distract voters from Trump’s misdeeds.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre in a press briefing called the videos “cheap fakes,” a term for videos edited using cheap video editing software rather than artificial intelligence.

Trump’s campaign has doubled down on the clips and circulated a meme that defined a “cheap fake” as “any unedited video of Joe Biden’s cognitive decline that the Biden administration does not want the public to see.”

They weren’t wrong, and finally the Biden administration and its media enablers hit a news cycle they couldn’t bluff its way through.

Screenshot of headline in case AP changes their mind, as they did when they couldn’t admit last week why Jamaal Bowman lost his primary:

(Classical reference in headline — to an earlier election year showstopper from AP, back in 2008.)

WAIT, I THOUGHT BEING FORGAINST AN ISSUE WAS MORE OF A KERRY MOVE: White House contradicts itself on transgender surgeries for minors.

The Biden administration said gender-affirming surgical care should be reserved for adults, not minors.

“These are deeply personal decisions and we believe these surgeries should be limited to adults,” a White House spokesperson told the 19th News.

“We continue to support gender-affirming care for minors, which represents a continuum of care, and respect the role of parents, families, and doctors in these decisions,” they added.

The statement sparked an immediate backlash from LGBT advocates, accusing the administration of betraying its pledge to support transgender youth and interfering in private medical choices.

“The Biden administration is flat wrong on this,” Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, told the Hill. “It’s wrong on the science and wrong on the substance. It’s also inconsistent with other steps the administration has taken to support transgender youth.”

The organization has endorsed President Joe Biden and donated millions to his reelection campaign.

Given that Biden needs the LGBTQ+ crowd, Jewish-Americans and anti-gay Muslim-Americans to win, FDR, who assembled a coalition of “Progressive” northerners and stone-cold racist southern New Dealers, had nothing on the needle that team Trunalimunumaprzure is trying to thread.

LEFT-WING TIKTOKERS MELT DOWN OVER SUPREME COURT:

“It is the biggest power grab that the Supreme Court has made since 1805 … I’m not f***ing kidding!”

That was how one totally sane, rational TikToker responded to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on federal agencies’ regulatory authority, in a viral video reaching 4.7 million people.

“Do you enjoy flying in an airplane and being reasonably certain that it won’t plummet out of the sky, killing you and everyone else aboard?” another popular TikToker asked. “Well, say goodbye to that peace of mind because the Supreme Court is now in charge of the Transportation Administration.”

People need not worry just about planes falling out of the sky but also that companies will intentionally poison our drinking water after the high court’s decision, the legal scholars of TikTok claimed.

“Companies want nothing more than to put asbestos in your drinking water,” a TikToker in one viral video with 3.5 million views pronounced. “Justice Clarence Thomas will write a majority decision allowing companies to put asbestos in your drinking water and then driving away in a brand new Winnebago paid for by the asbestos company.”

Thankfully, this hysteria has no basis in reality.

Of course not. As James Lileks noted in 2003: “For all these accusations to work, you have to believe that Republicans want poisoned water. You have to believe they drink different water than everyone else. And, of course, they do:”

Doubt it? Switch parties. Join the GOP, and see what happens: cheerful clean-cut uniformed men show up the next day, and take you off the city water lines. They’ll connect you to the special Republican water system that crosses the nation, supplying pure clean perfect water to GOP households. You can get it without Fluoride, too, as a sop to the Birchers and Goldie holdovers.

And there’s more! They’ll also install special GOP “screens” for your windows — they’ll trap airborne pollutants as small as three molecule across. You’ll also have access to rich, satisfying Republican sunshine, which tans you twice as fast — just look at Bob Dole! — and you’ll enjoy even-tempered Republican weather all year long. This is why Republicans don’t care about pollution, or bad water, or the ozone layer, or global warming: for all practical purposes, they’re not living on the same planet as the rest of the people, so they don’t care at all what happens to you.

True! All true! Invite a Republican over and hand him a glass of water. Watch him avoid drinking it — sometimes they spill it, sometimes they just say “I had water earlier today, thanks anyway” — and sometimes they sneak a little sponge out of their cuff, put it in their mouth and pretend to drink. Oh, they’re clever.

Well, if this isn’t true, then perhaps . . . maybe . . . there’s another side to this arsenic debate. Is it possible? Could it be?

Nahh, that’s crazy talk.