Author Archive: Robert Shibley

GEORGIA JOINS STATES SHUTTING DOWN CAMPUS DEI PROGRAMS. I share the concerns many have that they are just moving the efforts to places where they can be hidden more easily. I am sure a lot of that will happen. At the same time, I think many will be surprised just how much the most destructive parts of DEI relied on being the established religion in our institutions.

2 MINUTES UNTIL THE LIKELY SUPREME COURT RULING ON TIKTOK. Whatever they decide, and whatever you may think of TikTok, setting the deadline at January 19 was a ridiculous stunt. If the national security concerns were so profound and obvious that they warrant banning a whole platform, they’d be just as obvious on January 21.

UPDATE: The decision is out. The Court upheld the ban, but they don’t seem all that happy about it.

REFORMERS ASK: WHAT’S THE ACTUAL GOAL OF HIGHER ED? Students overwhelmingly say it’s to get a job. But it’s not efficient at delivering on that, and that’s not the traditional goal of higher ed (nor, in my opinion, should it be–that should be K-12 and tech schools.) So what are we going for? Interesting thoughts here.

THREE-YEAR MED SCHOOLS ARE COMING. IS DOOM NIGH? I’m of two minds on this. On one hand, med school appears to have a lot of pointless scut work that is meant not to educate but to weed people out. On the other, you do have to worry about lowered standards. That said, your perspective on doctors changes a bit when you get older and you realize that the dude who was no smarter than you are and who you last saw doing a keg stand at “The Hazards of Duke” party in 1997 is now a respected cardiologist.

HIGHER ED REFORMS TO CHEER FOR IN 2025. I do a lot of Title IX stuff and I didn’t know that the Biden admin was planning to apply Title IX to name, image, and likeness money for college athletes. (The suggested reform is stopping that, BTW.) Putting access to those billions in the hands of the Title IX apparatus is a nightmare scenario.

HISTORY CENSORSHIP AT GEORGETOWN. This is why nobody “trusts the experts” — scholars no longer judge one another on expertise.

DOGE SHOULD ELIMINATE THE AIR FORCE. IT’S USELESS. They had one job–keep the bad guys out of our airspace. Unknown “car-sized” drones are flying all over NJ and NY and they do nothing. How is this not a bigger story?

NIH DESIGNEE JAY BHATTACHARYA REPORTEDLY CONSIDERING FIRE RANKINGS TO EVALUATE GRANT RECIPIENTS’ ACADEMIC FREEDOM. Whether or not FIRE’s surveys end up being considered, it’s critical that NIH grant recipients provide academic freedom so they can’t warp the results you paid for in whatever way they find politically convenient. Dr. Bhattacharya, you may remember, has plenty of reason to know the importance of scientists’ ability to follow their academic consciences.

DIFFERENTIAL TUITION: SHOULD ENGLISH MAJORS PAY LESS? Colleges are starting to charge different amounts for different majors. There are pros and cons to this. The cons worry me more – do we really want to push people into the cheapest majors to teach? – but decide for yourself.

AAUP’S JOAN SCOTT FLOPS ‘RACISM’ ATTACK ON FIRE. In the AAUP bigshot’s hit piece on FIRE in today’s Inside Higher Ed, she writes, “An initial motivating force [in FIRE’s founding] was the endorsement of the right of racist expression on the University of Pennsylvania campus. This is a telling choice of where [FIRE’s] political affiliations lie.”

Prof. Scott needs to pick up a book. The “water buffalo affair” at Penn was so deeply disturbing not just because Penn was punishing speech, “racist” or not, but because it was trying to punish a student for “racist” speech that it knew was not even racist. As the Daily Pennsylvanian wrote in a 10-year retrospective:

[L]legally minded individuals were upset by the fact that a student was charged with harassment for calling someone by a term that had no known racial connotations and were disturbed by what they perceived as the University justice system’s mishandling of the case.

That false accusation of racism in 1993 ultimately became FIRE’s “origin story.” Yet 31 years later, one of the AAUP’s leading lights on “academic freedom” parrots only the lie, now repurposed to falsely accuse FIRE instead of a hapless freshman from Long Island. It’s hard to imagine a better reminder of the need for a principled defense of free speech and due process.

THE ADVENTURES OF BEING A DUKE COLLEGE REPUBLICAN. “For the PBS event, we had a Duke media administrator watching the interview. I shared my perspectives as a Republican on campus and the fact that people aren’t willing to engage in difficult conversations. He [the administrator] was whispering to a producer, and he said, ‘Make sure you fact-check everything that he said about Duke.’ I called him out and said, “How are you gonna check my personal experiences as a Republican at Duke University?”

One of the reasons I applied for a job at the then seven-person FIRE back in 2003 was that I worked for Duke’s conservative newspaper. We alone were not allowed to use distribution bins. People routinely threw whole stacks of our paper away, to the extent that distribution routinely involved pulling unread stacks of copies out of the recycle bins for the next few days. Duke and other colleges should know they’re making tomorrow’s free speech radicals today.

AS TRUMP THREATENS DEPORTATIONS, CAMPUS LEADERS TREAD CAREFULLY.‘ Carefully? Wesleyan President Michael Roth, fresh off complaining about how college presidents are not sufficiently vocal about being leftists, proudly claims Wesleyan will do nothing to voluntarily help the government pursue undocumented students before more quietly acknowledging that yes, colleges have to obey subpoenas, etc.

In what universe is it “careful” or responsible in any way to admit students here unlawfully (and take their money) when those students can have the rug pulled out the moment someone decides to enforce the law already on the books?

WE STILL ON FOR THE COURT-PACKING? Sure, a good economy would be nice, but what I am really looking forward to is 6 new conservative justices for some solid 12-3 decisions on the Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment.

WHY WAS THE FEDERAL RESPONSE TO HELENE SO BAD? I couldn’t help but notice the overlap in these maps. It’s hard for these (traditionally very GOP, with the exception of Asheville) voters to get the polls when they’ve been left there to die. That’s the only reason NC was so close.

 

PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION WAS A MISTAKE. “The Philly juries?” Nobody believes Larry Krasner cares about enforcing the law because it’s the law. Again, it’s always, “Who, whom?”

MADDOW AND STANCIL: US SHOULD CANCEL SPACEX CONTRACTS BECAUSE MUSK SUPPORTED TRUMP. For the left it always seems to come down to the same question, ever since Lenin: Who, whom? If that means canceling the future, too bad.