Author Archive: Glenn Reynolds

PHIL HAMBURGER ASKS ME TO POST THIS, AND I’M HAPPY TO:

Dear Instapundit readers,

Please forgive me for intruding on your time, but if any of you are members of the Supreme Court bar and would be willing to file an amicus brief pro bono in defense of the Texas free-speech law in NetChoice v. Paxton, I would be grateful if you could please contact me at .

The social media platforms represented by NetChoice seem to have spread their legal work across almost all of the substantial law firms in the United States, and therefore many lawyers who are inclined to file amicus briefs on the other side have been conflicted out. This has become a serious problem for those of us defending the Texas free-speech law. In the last round at the Supreme Court, several amici were therefore unable to file. So if you don’t have a conflict, and have time to file a brief pro bono next week, please let me know.

Gratefully,

Philip Hamburger

He’s a smart guy and if you can help him out I think you should.

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THE IOWA SCHOOL SHOOTER.

UPDATE: A friend writes:

Re Iowa.

I used to wonder, when there was a mass shooting and pols started calling for gun control, why doesn’t anyone want to know why our society is producing young men who want to kill children? Seems like the pressing question at the heart of the matter.

Now I wonder why nobody wants to know why our society is producing young genderfluid men and women who want to kill children.

I don’t.

OPEN THREAD: Come inside, come inside. There behind the glass stands a real blade of grass. Be careful as you pass. Move along, move along.

HEH:

JIM TREACHER: Stealing Is Wrong (Sometimes): It literally depends on skin color, you racists.

They accused her of plagiarism! They actually claimed a Black woman rose to a position of power by stealing the work of her peers. They had the gall to allege that she did so for decades.

Now, admittedly, this is absolutely correct. She did steal other people’s work. A lot. Like, a lot a lot. The accusation is 100% true.

Which raises the obvious question:

So what?

She’s not only Black, but a woman. Those immutable physical characteristics are more important than anything she may or may not have done, even if, as in this case, she totally did it.

That is the essence of her defense.

Related: The Real Harvard Scandal:

The true scandal of the Claudine Gay affair is not a Harvard president and her plagiarism. The true scandal is that so many journalists and academics were willing, are still willing, to redefine plagiarism to suit their politics. Gay’s boosters have consistently resorted to Orwellian doublespeak—“duplicative language” and academic “sloppiness” and “technical attribution issues”—in a desperate effort to insist that lifting entire paragraphs of another scholar’s work, nearly word for word, without quotation or citation, isn’t plagiarism. Or that if it is plagiarism, it’s merely a technicality. Or that we all do it. (Soon after Rufo and Brunet made their initial accusations last month, Gay issued a statement saying, “I stand by the integrity of my scholarship.” She did not address those or subsequent plagiarism allegations in her resignation letter.)

Every institution has been corrupted. And even dictionaries are willing to change their definitions to fit the political needs of the moment.

PROF. JACOBSON: Claudine Gay “was the DEI president and that is the deeper problem that I don’t think” Harvard is “ready yet to confront.” “She was a symptom of a deeper problem at Harvard and many other elite schools…, which is that they have embraced a racialization of education under the name of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It is poisonous throughout the system. It takes away from merit, it takes away from advancement of all people equally without regard to race. And she was a big advocate of that.”

WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION IT’S USUALLY SHORTCUTS AND BRIBERY: No Shortcuts On Nuclear Deterrence. “The most dangerous global security development at the dawn of 2024 is China’s and Russia’s reliance on nuclear weapons to break the U.S.-led order. Russia is concluding a nuclear recapitalization effort and uses nuclear threats against Ukraine and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. China is expanding its nuclear forces and engaging in dangerous military behavior in international waters to threaten Taiwan. Moscow may be helping Beijing expand its warhead production capacity through Russia’s state-owned Rosatom, which has provided enriched uranium for China’s fast-breeder reactor. The U.S. plan begun in 2009 to update the nation’s nuclear deterrent can’t deter China and Russia simultaneously over the next decade. This was a conclusion of the recent report from the nonpartisan U.S. Strategic Posture Commission, on which I served as a commissioner.”