Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

BIDEN’S SOCIAL MEDIA TEAM HAVING A NORMAL ONE TODAY:

What is this “Fourth of July,” you speak of? It was still “Pride Month” on until enough people complained and the administration’s social media intern switched out the old man’s Twitter homepage:

OLD AND BUSTED: “To say that the press brought down Nixon, that’s horseshit.”

—The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward, 2004.

The New Hotness? WaPo Editorial Board Took the Liberty of Writing Biden’s Drop Out Speech (Not That She’ll Allow It).

Twitchy, today.

Democracy dies in some serious gaslighting:

Four years ago, the pandemic was raging. More than 10 million Americans were out of work. Many businesses and schools were closed. People were exhausted by Mr. Trump’s chaos. Today, our economy is the envy of the world, thanks to 15 million new jobs, extraordinarily low unemployment and a start-up boom. Record numbers of Americans have health insurance, and we have made historic investments in our infrastructure and in the fight against climate change. Our allies respect us again, as we have rallied the free world against Russian aggression.

What exactly would Biden have done differently? In 2021 the White House Christmas message to unvaccinated was: You’re looking at a winter of death for yourselves and your families, with then-President Klain tweeting:

Back then, Clay Travis asked if Biden would follow his own advice:

Belatedly, the Post is answering that question for Biden.

SKYNET SMILES: It’s Time For The Biden Campaign To Embrace AI.

The stakes of the 2024 presidential election cannot be overstated. With Donald Trump promising to act as a dictator “on day one,” it is not hyperbolic to say the future of American democracy hangs in the balance. Against this backdrop, the Biden campaign faces a critical challenge: conveying a strong and effective image of President Joe Biden to a population and media ecosystem increasingly focused on optics over substance. Given the president’s concerning performance last week, it’s time for the Biden campaign to consider leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to effectively reach the voting public.

While of course there are reasonable hesitations to break this dam on the use of modern technology in presidential campaigning, the consequences of not taking this approach could be dire. Moreover, in the currently under-regulated electoral landscape, refusing to use modern tools like AI is akin to entering the boxing ring with one hand tied behind your back.

Joe Biden is old and has had a lifelong stutter*. He acknowledged in a fiery rally following his debate performance: “I might not walk as easily or talk as smoothly as I used to.” This has impeded his ability to communicate with mass audiences with consistent success. AI augmentations and video renderings could serve to smooth out these bumps while allowing the Biden campaign to effectively disseminate true information about the state of our democracy and the Biden administration’s accomplishments. The president has limited time to campaign as he also focuses on running the country, and AI would be a cost-effective and efficient way to communicate his message personally and directly to voters.

Despite an ambitious and widely praised first term in office, he is currently trailing in polls to a man who incited an insurrection and was recently convicted on 34 felony counts. Something needs to change, and much to the chagrin of West Wing fanatics in the beltway, it won’t be the Democrats’ 2024 nominee. Modern technology offers a clear solution. AI can be used to polish how the president comes across, allowing voters to focus on his substance. How many times have we heard voters and pundits alike gripe that “Biden would be the perfect candidate if he were just 10 years younger?” With modern technology, this exact deliverable is possible.

Invariably, the rock band is either dead or far too feeble to perform before its manager or record label sends the holograms on tour in their place, so this piece in the Huffington Post by Kaivan Shroff, a “strategist with experience working for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign,” is an admission that the (p)resident has now fully checked out. It’s also a reminder that the late Andrew Breitbart’s eeeeevil plan for the creation of the HuffPost continues to bear fruit:

I went in with dual purposes. While the Huffington Post in theory served Arianna’s and the left’s goals of creating a battlefront where they could fight their battles, it served my ulterior purpose of creating preparation for talk radio and cable news, where everyone could see what lunacies constituted the thought processes of the richest noblesse oblige liberals in our land, the people who benefit the most from our way of life and yet craft the culture of our land in opposition to that way of life. Frankly, I wanted to put them on display. And, for different reasons, so did Arianna.

* No he hasn’t:

OCEANIA HAS ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH BRANDON:

Shot: Why Biden must withdraw.

THE PRESIDENTIAL debate was awful for Joe Biden, but the cover-up has been worse. It was agony to watch a befuddled old man struggling to recall words and facts. His inability to land an argument against a weak opponent was dispiriting. But the operation by his campaign to deny what tens of millions of Americans saw with their own eyes is more toxic than either, because its dishonesty provokes contempt.

The effect has been to put the White House within Donald Trump’s grasp. Fresh polls have found that voters in the states Mr Biden must win have moved against him. His lead may be in danger even in once-safe states such as Virginia, Minnesota and New Mexico.

Mr Biden deserves to be remembered for his accomplishments and his decency rather than his decline. So it is right that the first senior Democrats have begun to call openly for him to step aside. However, their public expressions are nothing compared with the building wave of private dismay. More of them urgently need to face up to the fact that if they do not speak out now, Mr Trump will win. In order to bring about the political renewal that America now so clearly needs, they must call for change. It is not too late.

Democrats argue, rightly, that Mr Trump is unfit to be president. But the debate and its aftermath have proved Mr Biden unfit, too. First, because of his mental decline. Mr Biden can still appear dynamic during short, scripted appearances. But you cannot run a superpower by autocue. And you cannot put an international crisis on hold because the president is having a bad night. Should someone who cannot finish a sentence about Medicare be trusted with the nuclear codes?

—The Economist, today.

Chaser:

“Cheap fakes” are the “newest weapon in US politics”, wrote Gary Mason in the Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper. Republicans and the far right have spread these videos, which are manipulated to the point of being “outright lies”, to erode confidence in Mr Biden’s “mental capacity”. “Millions of unsuspecting people” have been “duped”. It’s “the dystopian future predicted in sci-fi movies”, argues Mr Mason.

The Economist, June 25th.

JAWS: You’re Gonna Need a Bigger Theater.

Every summer arrives with at least a half dozen hopeful blockbusters grasping for our dollars, like beggars in designer clothes. And I’m old enough to remember before films presented themselves with such audacity; a time when movie studios assumed that we preferred to spend our summers on vacation, at the cottage or the beach, when the weeks before and after Christmas were when you booked big budget productions in every movie palace and neighbourhood theatre that would show them.

It was a long time ago, and it all ended with a movie about a fish.

But what was happening at the beginning of the summer of 1975 that made us so desperate for distraction? Well, the Watergate trials were finally ending with sentencing and imprisonments, and that episode would get capped with the release of All the President’s Men in theatres a year later, freeing baby boomers to forget Nixon and start thinking about real estate and the stock market. South Vietnam was conquered by North Vietnam and the Khmer Rouge took over Cambodia, but since Nixon ended the draft two years earlier nobody but veterans seemed to care much, and the “domino theory” was yesterday’s political rhetoric.

When June began, Israel removed its tanks and troops from the Suez Canal, the UK voted to stay in the European Community, the Soviets sent the Venera probes to Venus, Pelé signed with the New York Cosmos, the first crude was pumped from the North Sea oil fields and Sam Giancana was shot before he could testify in front of Congress.

A day later Jaws opened nationwide. It made its budget back two weeks later and by the first week of September it had outgrossed The Godfather, and it would sit at the top of the all-time box office records (unadjusted for inflation) until Star Wars unseated it two years later. The film’s production woes had been in the news for much of the previous year, with stories about malfunctioning mechanical sharks, plus budget and schedule overruns. (A 55 day shoot schedule ballooned into 159 days.) It was presumed that Jaws would tank and probably end the career of its young director, Steven Spielberg – best known for a hit TV movie (Duel) and a modestly successful crime picture (The Sugarland Express) – before it had really begun.

That alternate future died with the film’s opening scene.

Read the whole thing.

Exit quote:

Although as Rick McGinnis writes, “The problem with this meme is that there’s every reason to believe that the Mayor was reelected because everyone did vote in November. I live in Canada, you see…”

CALVIN COOLIDGE ON INDEPENDENCE DAY:

About the Declaration there is a finality that is exceedingly restful. It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning can not be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.

Read the whole thing.

WARNER TODD HUSTON: We Need to Stop Calling This The ‘July Fourth Holiday.”

Today we celebrate Independence Day, the day we stepped out on our own and formally declared our intention to become our own nation and not a vassal state of England. Unfortunately, too many people keep calling this day “the July Fourth holiday.” But, we don’t celebrate a number or a month. We celebrate our independence as a nation. So, I urge everyone to stop disrespecting our nation’s birthday by calling it “July Fourth” and here is why…

Read the whole thing.

EVERYTHING SEEMINGLY IS SPINNING OUT OF CONTROL: “Biden at 81: Sharp and focused but sometimes confused and forgetful,” reads the headline above an article bearing five AP court stenographers’ bylines:

President Joe Biden’s conduct behind closed doors, in the Oval Office, on Air Force One and in meetings around the world is described in the same dual way by those who regularly see him in action.

He is often sharp and focused. But he also has moments, particularly later in the evening, when his thoughts seem jumbled and he trails off mid-sentence or seems confused. Sometimes he doesn’t grasp the finer points of details. He occasionally forgets people’s names, stares blankly and moves slowly around the room.

Biden’s occasional struggles with focus may not be unusual for someone his age. But at 81 years old and seeking another four years in the White House, the moments when he’s off his game have taken on a fresh resonance following his disastrous debate performance against Republican Donald Trump. The president appeared pale, gave nonsensical answers, stared blankly and lost his train of thought.

The June 27 faceoff alarmed Democrats and his financial backers, in part, because Biden seemed so much worse than during the almost routine moments when he’s less sharp. And that has raised questions about whether he’s up for a campaign that’s only going to get nastier and whether he can effectively govern for another four years if he wins.

Less than two weeks ago, AP was running columns defending Biden’s acuity: Seeing is believing? Not necessarily when it comes to video clips of Biden and Trump.

“Any misinformation that seems to reinforce or resonate perceptions or dominant narratives, whether they’re accurate or not, is very effective,” said Erik Nisbet, a professor at Northwestern University who studies media, public opinion and public policy in democracy and elections.

At the G7 summit in Italy, where Biden headed after Normandy, a clip of the president watching a skydiving demonstration was cropped to make it appear as though he wandered off for no reason. A wider view of the video shows he was greeting paratroopers who had just landed. And at a Los Angeles fundraiser last weekend, a pause by Biden as he left the stage amid cheers was used to say the president froze, while Biden’s campaign said he was only stopping to take in the applause.

The clips have been especially effective at activating concerns about Biden’s competency, according to Nisbet, because he is the oldest sitting president the U.S. has ever had, and he moves with more difficulty than he once did.

Dr. Kevin O’Connor, Biden’s physician, wrote in a February memo after the president’s annual physical that he “continues to be fit for duty” and that his stiff gait is the result of arthritic changes in his spine. He said that Biden has reported additional hip pain and started using a new device for his sleep apnea, but that he showed no signs of stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s or other similar conditions.

After the fundraiser clip spread online, Biden campaign spokesperson James Singer blasted such negative characterizations as a tactic from those who “are so scared of losing to Joe Biden, they’ll make anything up” to distract voters from Trump’s misdeeds.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre in a press briefing called the videos “cheap fakes,” a term for videos edited using cheap video editing software rather than artificial intelligence.

Trump’s campaign has doubled down on the clips and circulated a meme that defined a “cheap fake” as “any unedited video of Joe Biden’s cognitive decline that the Biden administration does not want the public to see.”

They weren’t wrong, and finally the Biden administration and its media enablers hit a news cycle they couldn’t bluff its way through.

Screenshot of headline in case AP changes their mind, as they did when they couldn’t admit last week why Jamaal Bowman lost his primary:

(Classical reference in headline — to an earlier election year showstopper from AP, back in 2008.)

WAIT, I THOUGHT BEING FORGAINST AN ISSUE WAS MORE OF A KERRY MOVE: White House contradicts itself on transgender surgeries for minors.

The Biden administration said gender-affirming surgical care should be reserved for adults, not minors.

“These are deeply personal decisions and we believe these surgeries should be limited to adults,” a White House spokesperson told the 19th News.

“We continue to support gender-affirming care for minors, which represents a continuum of care, and respect the role of parents, families, and doctors in these decisions,” they added.

The statement sparked an immediate backlash from LGBT advocates, accusing the administration of betraying its pledge to support transgender youth and interfering in private medical choices.

“The Biden administration is flat wrong on this,” Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, told the Hill. “It’s wrong on the science and wrong on the substance. It’s also inconsistent with other steps the administration has taken to support transgender youth.”

The organization has endorsed President Joe Biden and donated millions to his reelection campaign.

Given that Biden needs the LGBTQ+ crowd, Jewish-Americans and anti-gay Muslim-Americans to win, FDR, who assembled a coalition of “Progressive” northerners and stone-cold racist southern New Dealers, had nothing on the needle that team Trunalimunumaprzure is trying to thread.

LEFT-WING TIKTOKERS MELT DOWN OVER SUPREME COURT:

“It is the biggest power grab that the Supreme Court has made since 1805 … I’m not f***ing kidding!”

That was how one totally sane, rational TikToker responded to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on federal agencies’ regulatory authority, in a viral video reaching 4.7 million people.

“Do you enjoy flying in an airplane and being reasonably certain that it won’t plummet out of the sky, killing you and everyone else aboard?” another popular TikToker asked. “Well, say goodbye to that peace of mind because the Supreme Court is now in charge of the Transportation Administration.”

People need not worry just about planes falling out of the sky but also that companies will intentionally poison our drinking water after the high court’s decision, the legal scholars of TikTok claimed.

“Companies want nothing more than to put asbestos in your drinking water,” a TikToker in one viral video with 3.5 million views pronounced. “Justice Clarence Thomas will write a majority decision allowing companies to put asbestos in your drinking water and then driving away in a brand new Winnebago paid for by the asbestos company.”

Thankfully, this hysteria has no basis in reality.

Of course not. As James Lileks noted in 2003: “For all these accusations to work, you have to believe that Republicans want poisoned water. You have to believe they drink different water than everyone else. And, of course, they do:”

Doubt it? Switch parties. Join the GOP, and see what happens: cheerful clean-cut uniformed men show up the next day, and take you off the city water lines. They’ll connect you to the special Republican water system that crosses the nation, supplying pure clean perfect water to GOP households. You can get it without Fluoride, too, as a sop to the Birchers and Goldie holdovers.

And there’s more! They’ll also install special GOP “screens” for your windows — they’ll trap airborne pollutants as small as three molecule across. You’ll also have access to rich, satisfying Republican sunshine, which tans you twice as fast — just look at Bob Dole! — and you’ll enjoy even-tempered Republican weather all year long. This is why Republicans don’t care about pollution, or bad water, or the ozone layer, or global warming: for all practical purposes, they’re not living on the same planet as the rest of the people, so they don’t care at all what happens to you.

True! All true! Invite a Republican over and hand him a glass of water. Watch him avoid drinking it — sometimes they spill it, sometimes they just say “I had water earlier today, thanks anyway” — and sometimes they sneak a little sponge out of their cuff, put it in their mouth and pretend to drink. Oh, they’re clever.

Well, if this isn’t true, then perhaps . . . maybe . . . there’s another side to this arsenic debate. Is it possible? Could it be?

Nahh, that’s crazy talk.

ROLL UP FOR THE MYSTERY TOUR! Hero of the Democrats: Marianne Williamson boldly volunteers to replace President Biden.

Our democracy is on the precipice of collapse!!

The evil orange dictator looks sure to defeat the aging and decrepit president! Who will save us from this fate worse than death?

One woman is answering the call:

Today, I throw my hat in the ring. I look forward to a meaningful campaign and an open convention in August. It’s imperative that this new process …

(The one that she’s just making up by herself on the spot.)

… not be guided by media and party elites who are playing in the background, engineering, manipulating anything. This must be a genuinely democratic process.

I’ve received half a million votes in the primary season … With my candidacy, I submit to the American people that a better way forward is possible.

Flashback to America’s Newspaper of Record after a Democratic Party debate in July of 2019: Marianne Williamson Not Sure What She’s Doing Up Here With All These Crazy People.

NFL OWNER HAS “FULL CONFIDENCE” IN HIS SOON-TO-BE FIRED HEAD COACH:

UPDATE:

NBC’S KELLY O’DONNELL GOES FULL CRINGE: Watch: WH Journo Rushes to Biden’s Defense After Reporter Wonders Aloud If He’s Currently Awake.

Just NBC the sycophancy! ‘That’s Inappropriate’: KJP, WHCA President Simultaneously Scold Reporter Who Takes Swipe At Biden’s Cognitive State.

Newsmax White House correspondent James Rosen interjected during O’Donnell’s questioning to ponder whether the president is even “awake” to ensure the press he is remaining in the 2024 race. The White House is asserting that Biden is remaining in the race following his lacking debate performance which has raised questions about his ability to serve a second term.

“You’re saying he’s absolutely running,” O’Donnell said during Wednesday’s press briefing.

“Well, he’s saying that and I’m sharing with you his view,” Jean-Pierre said.

“And we would invite the president to come here and tell us that directly,” O’Donnell responded.

“Noted, noted Kelly,” the press secretary said.

“If he’s awake,” Rosen chimed in.

“That’s inappropriate,” O’Donnell replied.

“As you heard from your colleague, the president of the WHCA, that’s inappropriate,” the press secretary said.

Former Daily Caller White House correspondent Saagar Enjeti noted the press corps “encouraged” former CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta “to scream like a banshee” during the briefings held by former President Donald Trump’s communications team. Acosta temporarily got his press pass revoked by the Trump administration after getting into a heated spat with the then-president and refusing to return his microphone to an intern in the room.

Jean-Pierre snapped at Rosen during Tuesday’s briefing as he shouted out whether Biden is “disabled.” The press secretary accused him of “inappropriate” behavior and did not call on him afterward.

The press secretary insisted the president suffered from a cold during the debate and has the willpower to pull through important events. The campaign and the White House never disclosed an alleged illness before the debate.

Biden’s aides have reportedly shielded the president from the public to hide his mental state, Axios reported. Many aides in the White House were also shocked by what they saw at the debate, having been kept at a distance from the president throughout his first term.

As Roger Kimball writes, “The United States cannot afford a 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. president.” But the DNC-MSM are determined to get this administration through its current modified limited hangout while they all try to work out what they’re going to do next.

SOMETIMES IT HELPS TO BE THE CRAZIEST GUY IN THE ROOM: Wesley Hunt reflects on Trump threat to Taliban leaders: ‘My favorite President Trump story.’

Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) argued former President Donald Trump was able to keep the United States safe from its enemies, recounting his “favorite” story of Trump when he negotiated with Taliban leaders.

Hunt explained how Trump wanted “a conditions-based withdrawal” of U.S. troops from Afghanistan when he and then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were negotiating with Taliban leaders. During these negotiations, Trump told Taliban leaders that he would kill them “if you harm a hair on a single American,” prompting the translator present with them to appear stunned.

“And Trump goes, ‘Tell him. Just tell him what I said!’” Hunt said on The Sage Steele Show. “Reached into his pocket, pulled out a satellite photo of the leader of the Taliban’s home, and handed it to him, got up, and walked out the room.”

More like this, please:

Exit question: Was This President Trump’s Ballsiest Play Ever?

QUEST REACHES END: Meta to kill off one of its most beloved devices — as annoyed fans beg Mark Zuckerberg to support hardware for longer.

Meta fans have been left outraged as the company announces plans to end support for one of its biggest products.

In an email sent to customers, the tech giant said it would no longer provide software updates for the original Meta Quest 1 VR headset – previously called the Oculus Quest.

Released in 2019, the headset was one of the first to offer head tracking and six degrees of motion – but will now be phased out of Meta’s growing VR line-up.

Die-hard fans will still be able to play and download apps so long as developers continue to support them, but Meta warns there could be severe security consequences.

And on social media, outraged customers have begged Mark Zuckerberg to rethink the decision, which comes into effect at the end of August.

As I wrote in 2022, the iPad was inspired by a prop in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The flip phone by the Star Trek communicator. But apparently the world isn’t ready to move into a clunky impersonation of Star Trek’s holodecks just yet.

DISPATCHES FROM THE EDUCATION APOCALYPSE: New Columbia administrator texts show deans discussing Jewish student ‘privilege’ and ‘$$$$,’ and bashing Hillel leader as a ‘problem.’

Columbia University administrators said Jewish students occupied a “place of privilege,” called a Hillel official a “problem” and wrote “Amazing what $$$$ can do,” during a panel on Jewish campus life in May, newly released text messages showed.

Columbia had already suspended three of the four administrators involved after photos of some of the texts were first published last month. Now, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, which is investigating antisemitism at Columbia and other campuses, has obtained and released the full text message exchanges.

While elements of the text messages have been previously reported, the full exchanges show the university officials downplaying students’ concerns about antisemitism, bashing the head of the school’s Hillel and suggesting that Jewish students received attention because of money.

The conversations were conducted while the administrators were attending a May 31 panel discussion titled “Jewish Life on Campus: Past, Present, and Future.”

Why are Democratic Party monopoly organizations such cesspits of antisemitism?

SLOWLY, THEN SUDDENLY: THE SAD STORY OF JOE BIDEN’S DECLINE.

“Gradually and then suddenly” is the story of Joe Biden’s physical and cognitive decline. “Gradually and then suddenly” is how his army of enablers in the media, the Democratic Party and the donor base abandoned his defense. “Gradually and then suddenly” is how he gifted his party and his country with a full-scale political crisis, centered on a president who no longer appears fit for office and whose vice president (and presumptive successor) is widely disliked.

Years ago, Ronald Reagan wrote, elegiacally, that the sun was setting on his life. But by then, he was a former president, living in retirement on his ranch. He was not occupying the Oval Office, holding down the most powerful and demanding job on earth.

Joe Biden is. The public no longer thinks he is fit to do that job. They reached that firm conclusion after watching the debate Thursday night and then hearing nothing from Biden’s allies to convince them otherwise. Whatever voters think of Biden’s performance for the last three-plus years, they simply don’t think he can continue. They are certain he won’t last another term and wonder if he will make it to the end of this one. They didn’t vote for the country to be governed by his staff.

That situation is a tragedy for Joe and his family and a source of anguish for his friends. He deserves our sympathy. But what doesn’t deserve sympathy is Joe’s decision, backed by his family and close associates, that he should stay in the race and remain on the job.

That decision affects all Americans. We depend on the president to lead the country and keep us safe in a dangerous world. That’s why Joe Biden’s decline goes far beyond a family tragedy. It’s a national tragedy and a palpable danger.

The debate made that danger conspicuous, unavoidable and indelible.

The “indelible” part is devastating politically. Most voters think, quite rightly, that the president is impaired, not temporarily but permanently. He may have good days and bad days, but he didn’t just have one bad night, as his defenders say. It was a bad night, certainly, but it was more than that. Joe Biden is visibly frail and forgetful, suffering long-term decline.

That impression has taken hold over the past few days and may already be set in concrete. If Joe cannot break it — a nearly impossible task — then he is doomed politically. Since he is currently atop the Democratic ticket, his fate will doom a lot of down-ballot contests as well.

And speaking of down-ballot, Joe is dooming those who chose to spend the last five years covering up for him:

 

REPORT: BIDEN TELLS KEY ALLY HE IS CONSIDERING DROPPING OUT.

[A] blistering new poll for President Joe Biden shows him slipping behind Trump in nearly every battleground state.

And a new Democrat frontrunner replacement for Biden has emerged – Michelle Obama, the former First Lady of the United States, currently polls with a massive 50-39 lead over former President Trump.

The Democratic revolt in the House is starting as three sitting lawmakers shocked the party by either telling Biden to drop out or stating he’s already lost the election to Donald Trump. And Biden will meet with Democrat governors later today at the White House to try and reassure them.

* * * * * * * *

Another report states the Biden ally said it’s ‘only a matter of time’ until he drops out.

But Biden’s Deputy spokesperson Andrew Bates insisted in a post on X moments after the article went live that the reporting is ‘absolutely false.’ He complained the NYT only gave the team seven minutes to reply to a request for comment.

Oh how the tide has turned:

CNN joins the dog pile:

The Comedy Continues,” ​John Hinderaker writes:

The White House denies the Times report.

This is an instance of a totally discretionary “news” story. The Times ran it, and the “ally” presumably leaked it, and maybe spun it, as part of an effort to drive Biden out of the race.

For now, we can just enjoy the Democrats’ disarray. They deserve everything they are getting, after gaslighting the rest of us for the last four years.

Meanwhile, at the Drudge Report today:

Or as America’s Newspaper of Record notes, deploying a classical reference: Report: Kamala About To Unburden Herself From What Has Been.

GREAT MOMENTS IN DISPASSIONATE OBJECTIVITY: Journalists: Don’t Blame Us, We Were Just Following Orders.

Read between the lines, and you get: if we cover this story, we help Republicans and piss off the Democrats, and we really really hate the idea of helping Republicans and can’t afford to piss off our buddies in the Democrat Party, especially those in the White House.

It’s the same argument made for why schools needed to be closed during the pandemic–Trump wanted them reopened, and we couldn’t have that.

How far we have fallen from the argument that the press is the vital “fourth estate” that needs to “hold politicians accountable.” Now we are told that journalists have a duty to harm Republicans and to help Democrats, and more importantly that even those imperatives is not to piss off the Democrats.

A motto followed by the ultimate Democratic Party operative with a byline:

TRUNALIMUNUMAPRZURE! WH staffers reportedly ‘scared s–tless’ of erratic Biden, tiptoe around ‘isolated’ president during briefings: ‘Not a pleasant person to be around.’

Some White House staffers have been forced to tiptoe around President Biden when briefing him on certain topics because they want to avoid eliciting his wrath and are “scared s–tless” of him, a new report says.

“It’s like, ‘You can’t include that, that will set him off,’ or ‘Put that in, he likes that,’”a senior administration official told Politico, referring to how some of the 81-year-old president’s aides feel they have to walk through a minefield before briefings to avoid him getting angry with them.

“It’s a Rorschach test, not a briefing,” the source said. “Because he is not a pleasant person to be around when he’s being briefed. It’s very difficult, and people are scared s—less of him.”

The ghost of Edith Wilson smiles.

UPDATE: Video has emerged of one of Biden’s worst tantrums. Frankly, I had no idea things had gotten this bad for him and his beleaguered staff:

RIP: Robert Towne, Writer of Chinatown, Dies at 89.

Writer-director Robert Towne, an Oscar winner for his original script for “Chinatown” and an acknowledged master of the art of screenwriting, has died. He was 89.

Towne died Monday at his home in Los Angeles, publicist Carrie McClure said in a statement.

During a long career that began in the 1960s, when he went to work as an actor and writer for B-movie director Roger Corman, Towne became one of the most sought-after script doctors in movie history, called on time and again to solve structural problems and create great moments for other people’s films.

Towne came to prominence in the 1970s with three critical and commercial hits released within a 14-month period: “The Last Detail” (1973), “Chinatown” (1974) and “Shampoo” (1975). All three screenplays were Oscar- nominated, with “Chinatown” winning in its year.

Hired as a “special consultant” by Warren Beatty for 1967’s “Bonnie and Clyde,” Towne restructured the picture to dramatize the outlaws’ impending doom. He also turned an inert family reunion scene with Beatty and Faye Dunaway into one of the picture’s emotional high points. Clyde’s charming bravado falls flat when Bonnie’s mother responds, “You try to live three miles from me and you won’t live long, honey.”

Director Arthur Penn was delighted with Towne’s work. “It helped Warren play the scene, and it certainly helped Faye and the mother,” Penn said.

Though most of Towne’s script doctoring went uncredited — for example, in “The Parallax View” (1974), “Marathon Man” (1976), “The Missouri Breaks” (1976) and “Heaven Can Wait” (1978) — he received a rare honor in 1973 when “The Godfather” director Francis Ford Coppola thanked him in his Oscar acceptance speech for scripting the touching and pivotal Pacino-Brando garden scene — a scene not in Mario Puzo’s book.

As Peter Biskind wrote in Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, his seminal look at the Hollywood Young Turks of the ‘60s and ’70s, “Before the ’70s, screenwriters were disposable. If a project was going badly, the studio would throw another writer on the fire. Even they didn’t take themselves seriously. Towne’s was the first generation of Hollywood writers for whom scripts were ends in themselves, not way stations on the road to the great American novel. Towne’s forte was dialogue. ‘He had this ability, in every page he wrote and rewrote, to leave a sense of moisture on the page, as if he just breathed on it in some way,’ says producer Gerald Ayres, who would hire him to write The Last Detail. ‘There was always something that jostled your sensibilities, that made the reading of the page not just a perception of plot, but the feeling that something accidental and true to the life of a human being had happened there.’”

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS: Axios Bungles the ‘Imperial Presidency.’

Axios has published a report this morning titled, “Behind the Curtain: The imperial presidency in waiting,” in which it proposes that, if he is reelected, Donald Trump “promises an unabashedly imperial presidency.” And I’m sorry to record that it’s . . . well, it’s almost entirely garbage.

I truly write that more in sorrow than in anger. We really do need to limit the power of the presidency, and, if it takes fear of Donald Trump to do it, I’m all in. Certainly, that fear is not imagined. Like Barack Obama before him, and Joe Biden after him, Trump was guilty of attempting to usurp Congress’s lawmaking powers, and, as I have written and said 359,701 times by now, he should have been impeached in January 2021 for interfering with Congress. But, as quickly becomes clear, Axios does not actually understand the problem that it believes itself to be warning about, and, as a result, those warnings fall flat.

The term “imperial presidency” was coined by Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., and it signifies two things: (1) the enormous growth of the president’s war powers over time, and (2) the president’s intrusion into areas that are supposed to be managed by Congress. Schlesinger was horribly biased as an analyst, and prior to his anti-imperial phase, he was one of the country’s most vocal champions of the presidency, but the phenomenon he described was real — and, if anything, it has got worse since he published his book in 1973. Unfortunately, though, what Axios includes as supposed examples of Schlesinger’s theory are not, in fact, examples of Schlesinger’s theory.

But the left, as Charles Cooke implies above, loves the “imperial presidency” — as long as they’re the party presiding over the empire.

QED: