Archive for 2024

DISPATCHES FROM BERNIE SANDERS’ VERMONT: The idyllic northeastern state being ravaged by drugs, crime and homelessness: ‘People don’t feel safe.’

Downtown areas of Burlington and Brattleboro, among other cities, were too dangerous to walk at night, following reports of passers-by being attacked by thugs, locals told DailyMail.com.

Some blame the crises on costly social programs in a Democrat-leaning state that has Bernie Sanders as a senator and gave President Joe Biden a 36-point landslide win in 2020.

‘People don’t feel safe going into the cities anymore,’ small business owner and Republican candidate Mark Coester told DailyMail.com.

‘They can walk down the street and visibly see people with needles stuck in their arms. Our towns and cities are suffering, and now the feeling of hopelessness is only getting worse.’

Vermont’s problems are on display in Burlington, its largest city, with some 44,000 residents, including some 350 unhoused people living on the streets or camped out on the idyllic waterfront of Lake Champlain.

Many of them congregate at night in Church Street, the beloved red-brick home to boutiques and eateries, ravaged by such drugs as fentanyl and xylazine, also known as ‘tranq,’ scaring off locals.

Residents recently told Fox News that the area gets ‘really dangerous’ at night.

An older woman remarked that locals don’t step foot in the area after dark because ‘people get beat up at nighttime.’

Since the end of August, Burlington police have been warning residents of the need to be on guard, after a string of attacks by ‘large groups of suspects and perpetrators,’ which included juveniles.

David Brooks could not be reached for comment.

DAN MCLAUGHLIN: The Obamas aren’t saving Kamala Harris. They’re exposing how bad she really is.

Obama would never have looked as flustered as Harris did on CNN and NBC trying to escape those questions. Even when Obama was vague enough to convince people he stood for two opposite things at once, he always had swagger.

Many Democrats must now be wondering if they made a mistake handing Harris the nomination by coronation. Obama is reduced to trying to shame black men into backing Harris, telling “the brothers” that he suspects “you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president”. Biden was seen chatting with Obama at Ethel Kennedy’s funeral; lip-readers concluded that the President told Obama “She’s not as strong as me,” to which Obama replied, “I know … that’s true.”

What if Michelle Obama had been the nominee instead? She’s never shown interest in going through the wringer of running for office, but nobody else could so easily have unified the party as an emergency substitute, and she could effortlessly have run more as a third Obama term than a second Biden one.

That’s a separation Harris hasn’t managed. If Barack Obama is worried about his legacy, perhaps he would have been better off keeping it in the family.

Earlier today from Glenn: The coming Clinton/Obama internecine squabble?

Related: Kamala Harris’s Man Problem! As Obama desperately pleads with black male voters to back her, Freddy Gray says: After all the Democrats’ man-bashing, it’s too little, too late.

THE OCTOBER SURPRISES ARE COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE! Kamala Booed at Rally After Beyoncé Concert Promise Turns Out to Be Another Hoax.

Can you believe it? This is now the second time the Harris campaign used rumors of Beyoncé performing to give Kamala a boost.

And it seems there were plenty of people who weren’t happy, It appears that after Beyoncé introduced Kamala without performing, rally attendees were a bit miffed, and Kamala’s speech was met with a chorus of boos from supporters who were expecting to get a concert.

This is how low Democrats think of their supporters: they dangle the promise of a Beyoncé concert just to trick people into watching her DNC acceptance speech or attending her rally! Imagine showing up, thinking you’re about to hear Beyoncé do a small concert and perform “Freedom” live as a segue into Kamala’s appearance, and then realizing you were duped. This tactic says a lot about their lack of confidence in Harris’s own star power.

Beyond the crowd’s anxiety over a lack of performance, is team Kamala marshalling the superstars who have endorsed her well? As Erick Erickson tweets, “Not that anyone asked me, but I’d have sent Springsteen to Texas and Beyonce to Georgia.”

HMM:

FACT CHECK: There was no dancing, Beyonce didn’t perform, and Kamala went all schoolmarm on protesters.

ICYMI:

ROGER KIMBALL: Kamala Harris is the worst candidate for president in American history.

Whose fault was it?

That of course is going to be the overwhelming question Democrats will be asking themselves after Kamala Harris loses on November 5.

It is worth stressing that a question can also be an accusation. Cicero reminded us of this in his first oration against Catiline, which opens with more than half a dozen questions spat out like bullets from a Gatling gun. Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra? “How long, Catiline, will you go on exhausting our patience?” Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet? “And how long will that madness of yours mock us?”

The biased circus concession that we call much of the media has an interest in drawing out the festivities surrounding an election. So in the case of Trump vs Harris, the answer to Cicero’s questions is “as long as possible”.

“The race is neck and neck, it’s just so close, it could break either way.” But by mid-October, everyone knew that the race was not close. Harris finally sat for a few interviews – with 60 Minutes, with Bret Baier, for example. They were catastrophes one and all. It did not help that CBS later edited Harris’s response to make her sound more coherent and then refused to release the unedited transcript of the exchange.

Harris held a “town hall” where she was supposed to answer audience questions off the cuff. But some alert spectator noted that Harris at least appeared to be reading answers off a teleprompter. More embarrassment.

Read the whole thing.

On the flip side, if elected, Trump will really have his work cut out for him, if he wants to become the most authoritarian president in American history:

WELL: Clinton Does It Again: Humiliates Kamala in Front of Crowd, And There’s Nothing She Can Do to Stop Him.

So here’s my theory on what’s happening. With Kamala looking likely to lose already, the Clinton forces are turning on the Obama machine. Ever since he beat Hillary in 2008, the two have been in an uneasy truce. But the knives were always waiting to come out. If Obama’s standard-bearer — and that’s what Kamala is — doesn’t just lose, but goes down in a Dukakis-level defeat, then she, and Obama, will be marginalized within the party — as was Dukakis, who became virtually a pariah.

That’s why Clinton is getting in digs at her, and it’s why Democratic institutions that are under Clinton influence, like the LAT and the WaPo, aren’t endorsing her. It’s all about making sure her loss is humiliating.

Will the Clintons be able to take advantage of this? Maybe, maybe not. But at least they’ll have revenge.