Archive for 2024

JOANNE JACOBS: A reform too far: Sorry, your kid’s only 67% of a ‘whole child.’

Thirty-ish years ago, I was invited to be on a panel at an event discussing a school district’s plans to add “whole-child” and “wellness” criteria to graduation requirements. They wanted graduates to be joyful learners and a bunch of other nice things. I said: “Imagine a student who’s unhappy, unhealthy, hates school — but he aces every class. Imagine denying this student a diploma because he’s not healthy and joyful.” A sort of groan went through the audience. “That’s right,” I said. “You wouldn’t do that. You couldn’t. So, don’t say something is a requirement if it’s not.”

The idea was dropped.

And now it’s back because government is where bad ideas go to achieve immortality.

GOOD: Amici Support NCLA’s Stance at Supreme Court in Major Social Media Censorship Injunction Case. “Forty-five Members of Congress, 16 states, state legislators, former government officials, journalists, attorneys, media personalities, academics, activist groups and research organizations have filed 27 amici curiae briefs supporting the New Civil Liberties Alliance’s position in Murthy v. Missouri against government-directed censorship. NCLA is asking the Supreme Court to uphold a preliminary injunction granted by the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that bars White House, CDC, FBI, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and Surgeon General’s office officials from significantly encouraging social media platforms to censor lawful speech. The Circuit court upheld key components of a preliminary injunction order issued by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, who described the Administration’s scheme as ‘arguably the most massive attack against free speech in United States history’ and “akin to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth.'”

Reminder/Disclosure: I’m on the advisory board of the NCLA.

“ONE CHILD POLICY” IS BECOMING AN ASPIRATION INSTEAD OF A LIMIT: You Won’t Believe What Country Will Overtake China in Population. “Each generation in China will be about half the size of the preceding generation. What that means down the road shocked even me, and I’ve been following this story for years.”

IF IT’S ‘THE NEGRO NATIONAL ANTHEM” WOULDN’T IT BE WRONG FOR WHITES TO STAND?  Democrat fumes at Super Bowl crowd for not standing during black national anthem sung by Andra Day.

Also, races are not sovereign nations. Races do not ever have an anthem. Anywhere. What is next? White and Nerdy, the white people who are into computers anthem? A Symptom of Being Human, the science fiction writers’ anthem? Sympathy for the Devil, the leftist anthem?  Next thing you know, there will be an anthem per head and we’ll never get anything done as all the anthems are sung.

Give over. The purpose of a national anthem is unity. Of the nation. Note that we don’t even have state anthems sung, do we? Not even those of the teams.

Race anthems? Get out of town. Races aren’t political units, no matter how much the left stomps hatred and victimhood and tries to make them so.

THE WHITE SETTLER COLONISTS MUST BE DRIVEN OUT!  WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO BRITAIN’S INDIGENOUS PERSONS OF COLOR?  I mean they show up in every historical movie, including all those black Vikings…  What’s next for our racist countryside?

Wildlife and Countryside Link, a charity umbrella group whose members include the RSPCA, Rewilding Britain, WWF and the National Trust, have claimed that the British countryside is a ‘racist and colonial’ white space where people of colour are often framed as ‘out of place’.

A “colonial white space.”  Wouldn’t white people be the indigenous people of England, and people “of colour” the colonialists?  I mean, on the obvious face of it and to anyone whose head isn’t chockablock with bovine excrement?

OPEN THREAD: Don’t be cruel.