Author Archive: Glenn Reynolds

FEDSTROTURF?

ICYMI: PHIL HAMBURGER: No Remedy for Censorship: The Perils of Murthy. “Last week, in Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court hammered home the distressing conclusion that, under the court’s doctrines, the First Amendment is, for all practical purposes, unenforceable against large-scale government censorship. The decision is a strong contender to be the worst speech decision in the court’s history.”

ED MORRISSEY: NYT exposes Biden radio interviews as “cheap fakes.” “Two weeks ago, the NYT was gaslighting its readers by amplifying the ‘cheap fakes’ propaganda from the White House. Now they’re essentially claiming that the White House is setting up cheap-fake interviews for Biden in an attempt to keep the cover-up over his senility in place.”

UPDATE (From Ed): Philly Radio Station ‘Parts Ways’ With Anchor Who Told CNN About Biden White House Interview Questions.

As Ed M. noted at the first link, “Book authors have interviews arranged by publishers and/or PR firms, and books get shipped to hosts ahead of the interview:”

That package comes with a publicity kit that almost always includes several questions the author is prepared to answer. For the most part I avoid those, but they can be helpful for conversation focus if there’s no time to read the book ahead of the interview. Authors are also largely focused on their own book and little else unless they are prolifically published. To a certain extent, the same is true for experts on various topics where the host has much less expertise.

It sounds very much like Philadelphia AM radio station WURD fired radio host Andrea Lawful-Sanders more for letting the cat out of the bag than for accepting questions from the Biden White House in the first place, or that the radio station was pressured by the White House to take action:

In any case, not a good look by the station.

 

OPEN THREAD: Ring out the weekend.

GOOD QUESTION: Why is the pundit class suddenly stampeding to get rid of Biden? “They seem to have gone into cabal mode to capture the post-debate narrative. Was it — to use Solnit’s phrase — ‘a sort of insider coup’? Who did this without knowing that they could — via stampede — drive their own candidate out of the race?”

Well, it’s not because the pundit class has suddenly found out he’s senile and incompetent. It’s because they realize that the voters have found that out.

JUST AS IN THE UNITED STATES, A “CABAL” TRIUMPHS OVER A POPULAR MOVEMENT: French left set to beat Le Pen’s far right in election shock: France on course for a hung parliament with the left holding the most MPs, in a defeat for the National Rally.

If you’re a French Jew, it’s time to leave. An Islamist/Left fusionist ruling coalition is about the worst possible outcome. But hey, they beat the “far right” crowd that just wanted to have a normal country.

And if the “cabal” has this much power, is it time for a revolution?

UPDATE: A cheerier take: In response to a claim that people on the right just need to persuade, a friend writes: “When Mr. Le Pen made it into the second round of the presidential election in 2002, he got 18% of the vote. When his daughter made the second round in 2017, she got 34%. When she did it again in 2022, she got 41%. They are persuading, just very slowly.”

ARNOLD KLING: The Courtier Game:
When Presidential aides are intoxicated with the thrill of being close to power.

Finally! someone else who seems worried about what Biden’s infirmities mean for the country, not just for the election.

Drum goes on to propose that Kamala Harris choose a moderate Republican as a Vice President. But my guess is that such a person would be thrown off the ticket by the Democratic convention.

In fact, if Harris gives the Democratic pros second thoughts about dumping Biden, imagine what thinking about the convention delegates does to them. I doubt that the party leaders relish creating a situation that puts the focus on convention delegates. If I were a party leader, I would not look forward to giving lots of TV exposure to the grass roots as represented at the convention, much less giving those assorted nuts real power to choose the nominees. Now, on to the topic at hand.

Read the whole thing.

GOOD NEWS YOU LIKELY WON’T BE TOLD ABOUT:

PHIL HAMBURGER: No Remedy for Censorship: The Perils of Murthy. “Last week, in Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court hammered home the distressing conclusion that, under the court’s doctrines, the First Amendment is, for all practical purposes, unenforceable against large-scale government censorship. The decision is a strong contender to be the worst speech decision in the court’s history.”

CHANGE:

This will end well.

REMEMBER THIS WHEN THE WAR COMES: