Archive for 2025

PUNCH HARD:

THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM: Grassley announces judges’ use of AI leading to court order errors, implementing new policies.

Grassley released responses he received from U.S. Southern District of Mississippi Judge Henry T. Wingate, U.S. District of New Jersey Judge Julien Xavier Neals, and the Administrative Office of the Courts Director Robert Conrad regarding the two judges’ use of generative AI to draft factually inaccurate court orders.

Wingate and Neals admitted to Grassley that their staff used AI to draft orders riddled with errors. The errors included state law that was misquoted, references to people who didn’t appear in the cases, and quotes incorrectly attributed to defendants, among other inaccuracies.

“Honesty is always the best policy. I commend Judges Wingate and Neals for acknowledging their mistakes and I’m glad to hear they’re working to make sure this doesn’t happen again,” Grassley said.

“Each federal judge, and the judiciary as an institution, has an obligation to ensure the use of generative AI does not violate litigants’ rights or prevent fair treatment under the law. The judicial branch needs to develop more decisive, meaningful and permanent AI policies and guidelines. We can’t allow laziness, apathy or overreliance on artificial assistance to upend the Judiciary’s commitment to integrity and factual accuracy. As always, my oversight will continue.”

Wingate and Neals have since implemented new policies to verify the accuracy of their court orders.

Neals instituted a written policy that prohibits all law clerks and interns from using AI when drafting opinions or orders, in addition to a multi-level opinion review policy. Wingate is requiring all draft opinions, orders, and memos to be subject to a second independent review and that all cited cases be printed and attached to the final draft.

Shouldn’t that last part have been SOP even before AI?

HARSH, BUT FAIR:

ABUSE OF POWER: Grieving Wyoming Mom Faced Retaliation by School Officials. “Her son was gone, and she wanted to understand why. Instead of getting answers from officials who she believed held some responsibility, Kari Cochran found herself standing in a courtroom defending herself against stalking allegations. Her offense? She asked school officials difficult questions and made social media posts critical of their responses.”

IT’S LIKE THE AAUP IS JUST A LEFTIST FRONT ORGANIZATION:

HUGH HEWITT AND BEN DOMENECH: How big a story is the NBA-mob scandal? Enormous.

TRUE:

FAIRNESS IN ACTION:

PETER LEMON MAMDANI:

Classical allusion in headline:

A MERE OBSERVATION: As the hooligans and heartthrobs coagulate ever more thickly until that Glorious Day of Election, we shall be bombarded with all manner of b’legs and emails for money.

OK, Fine.

But without doing any research, I’d bet very good money that no politician of any stripe has ever sent out communications saying:

“STOP! We reached our goal. Don’t send us more money!

Ever. Not even Eugene Debs.

ANDREW DOYLE: Meltdown at the Oxford Union.

Harold Macmillan once described the Oxford Union as ‘the last bastion of free speech’. Perhaps this remark made sense when it was uttered back in the 1960s, but it reads today more like a mordant quip. The recent furore over George Abaraonye, the president elect, has all but obliterated the union’s credibility.

Everything we know about Abaraonye tells us that he is profoundly unqualified to lead such an institution. He openly celebrated the shooting of Charlie Kirk, posting on his Instagram account: ‘Charlie Kirk got shot loool’. In a WhatsApp group, he wrote: ‘Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s fucking go’, ‘Scoreboard FM’ and ‘It really writes itself, doesn’t it’ in response to a fellow student’s comment that ‘He was pro guns LMFAO’. This was in spite of the fact that Abaraonye had met Kirk in person only a few months previously, shaken his hand, and debated him in the chamber.

Such musteline behaviour tells us that this is not a man of strong character, but more objectionable still are his attempts at back-pedalling. Abaraonye might at least have acknowledged that it was a hot-headed moment in which he was childishly attempting to be edgy for his friends. But unable to muster the courage to take responsibility for his own words, he instead attempted to blame the victim, saying that his reaction was ‘shaped by the context of Mr Kirk’s own rhetoric’ and ‘My words were no less insensitive than his – arguably less so’.

More here: The Oxford Union won’t miss George Abaraonye. “When Abaraonye debated Kirk, Kirk had been civil with him. Abaraonye had perhaps been less so with Kirk. He showed up in sweatpants and slippers, tetchily engaged with his opponent, before sauntering away from the exchange while yawning. That his fellow students could have watched this display and still voted for him as union president a month later is baffling. The Oxford Union will survive this controversy, just as it has survived countless others. What will be harder to recover is its reputation as a training ground for bright young minds, rather than a platform for mean-spirited provocateurs.”

MOLOTOV–RIBBENTROP PACT BINDS INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL SOCIALISTS TO RADIO SILENCE:

 

AND NOW, A WORD FROM CHUCK SCHUMER: