Author Archive: Glenn Reynolds

LEFTISTS AT PLAY:

Kevin had to go; he was pretty much the only voice of sanity left there by then.

LEFTIES ALWAYS HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR BEING NASTY TO THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS, BECAUSE EXCUSES FOR BEING NASTY TO PEOPLE ARE ONE OF THE TOP ATTRACTIONS OF LEFTISM:

Also, LOL, Rick Wilson.

THIS SHOULD BE THEIR DREAM: WTH, Cato Institute? Are You Worried That the Dept. of Ed. Will Get Too Small? “Did you ever expect CATO to express concern about whether the government had enough bureaucrats? I didn’t. And I have to say that if this pullquote–and it is entirely possible that CNN took his words out of context–is an honest reflection of CATO’s position on reductions in the Department of Education, I will have to get off every CATO mailing list, and take away their honorary chainsaw.”

While I’m always ready to be disappointed by any DC institution, if you’re playing the odds they heavily favor CNN doing something shady with the quote.

I emailed CATO to ask if the quote is correct.

NOT A CHANCE. NEXT QUESTION? Elon Musk Saves Free Speech. Again. Will Ireland Forgive Him? “This time, Musk intervened to save Gript, an independent, conservative, pro-life platform in Ireland, which reported on a grassroots demonstration against the government’s immigration and placement policies. The Irish government tried to force Twitter/X to secretly cough up Gript’s data, in an apparent attempt to retaliate for critical coverage of the policies. Musk’s X told the Irish government to pound sand, and notified Gript of the attempt in defiance of the order.”

UTTERLY ROUTINE, NOTHING TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT: USAID official tells remaining staffers: Shred and burn all your documents. “The email didn’t provide any reason for the document destruction.”

JESSE SINGAL: If The New England Journal Of Medicine Doesn’t Correct This Error, You Cannot Trust Anything It Publishes.

Back when I wrote about that white paper, I was disturbed not only by the fact that Yale Law School published and promoted such propaganda-posing-as-science on its website, but also by what happened next. Despite the fact that critics (myself included) pointed out numerous errors and distortions in the paper, some of them of a straightforward factual nature, none of the authors — Meredithe McNamara, Kellan Baker, Kara Connelly, Aron Janssen, Johanna Olson-Kennedy, Ken C. Pang, Ayden Scheim, Jack Turban, and Anne Alstott — took their names off the paper or pushed for a correction. They failed to clear the lowest bar imaginable for a public intellectual, in other words. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but if a researcher is willing to affix their name to a claim that they know is false — and I specifically emailed Alstott, Olson-Kennedy, and Jannsen about this — then what won’t they do to further whatever causes they think are righteous? If someone is openly willing to lie, it should call into question everything that comes out of their mouth.

The same thing applies to publications, from the lowliest tabloids to the most celebrated medical journals. And I think The New England Journal of Medicine is about to put itself into that camp.

Not unlikely.

ABOLISH THE UN.

THEY AREN’T SENDING THEIR BEST:

OPEN THREAD: Tuesday’s groovy.

WELL:

THERE ARE SO MANY THINGS THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND: