Archive for 2025

IS SANITY COMPLETELY GONE FROM DEMOCRATS? Judging by events of the last couple of weeks, it’s easy to conclude that sanity has departed the Democratic Party entirely.

Even James Carville — he who confidently predicted a Kamela win over Donald Trump last November — favors absurdities like Sen. Chris Van Hollen’s (D-MD.) El Salvador junket on behalf of an MS-13 terrorist.

The folks at Issues & Insights point to a new survey that graphically helps explain why things are going downhill fast for Democrats, despite the presence of a few remaining voices of something approximating political sanity:

“But this isn’t the 1990s, and there is no interest or appetite among Democrats in reviving Bill Clinton’s ‘New Democrat’ corpse. The party is now irretrievably in the grip of those toxic, party-sinking radical leftists. In the Survey USA poll, there wasn’t a single demographic group where even a plurality felt the party should be more moderate.

“More than half of young, urban, college-educated, well-paid whites – the very people who make up the “elite circles” and will never venture into “real communities” – want the party to move further to the left.”

In other words, the chickens are coming home to roost after multiple generations of children being indoctrinated in the public education system.

 

CORN, POPPED: SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Challenge on Birthright Citizenship.

What does this mean? It means that at least four of the justices want to debate this case now, rather than later. But are they debating the merits of the order, or the reach of the stays?

Today’s cert and consolidation doesn’t offer any direct clues, as usual. Occasionally, the court will issue an order defining the scope of its review, but this order contains no such limitation. It appears that the Trump administration wants to challenge district courts in their habit these days of applying stays and injunctions nationally or at least more broadly than the parties involved in these disputes. But that doesn’t mean that the Supreme Court has to limit itself to those issues; they have plenary jurisdiction over cases in the federal judiciary and can decide to hear all issues at hand if four or more justices desire. (It takes four justices to approve the writ of certiorari necessary to hear an appeal.)

ABC News reports that this was the argument that the Trump administration put before the court.

Much more at the link, courtesy of Ed Morrissey.

I MISS COMMANDER CODY: