Archive for 2016

NANCY PELOSI TO DONORS IN 2010: “I feel like I’m dealing with the junior senator from Illinois.”

California Rep. Nancy Pelosi disparagingly referred to President Obama as “the junior senator from Illinois” during a meeting with wealthy Democratic donors just after the party was trounced in 2010’s mid-term elections, according to an email that Sidney Blumenthal sent to then Sec. of State Hillary Clinton.

“When I go to the White House I feel like I’m dealing with the junior senator from Illinois,” is what Blumenthal claimed Pelosi told a group of people gathered at the Democracy Alliance’s annual meeting, held in mid-Nov. 2010.

The email was contained in the batch of records released by the State Department on Friday.

I wonder what Pelosi thinks of a former Secretary of State who lets juicy items like this one slip from her formerly private email server.

FIVE REASONS NOBODY CARES ABOUT THE OSCARS: In addition to the politics and sermons on race, gender, gun control, environmentalism, and whatever is that year’s leftwing cause of the century, Megan Fox (not the actress, alas) notes, “Kids have no idea what the Oscars are:”

When I was a kid there wasn’t much to watch on TV since we only had about six channels, so when the Oscars came on it was a big deal and we all crowded around our remoteless television to watch it. For days afterward, we would practice our acceptance speeches holding hairbrushes or piano trophies in the mirror. Nowadays, kids have unlimited entertainment choices, from iPad games to 400 cable or streaming channels. The Oscars isn’t going to draw the youngsters who will grow up with little to no concept of what an “Oscar” is. Further, any Hollywood star or starlet the kids want to see can be contacted on Twitter or Instagram and they even write back sometimes. The mystery of the Hollywood “star” is really gone.

In Sunset Boulevard, Norma Desmond famously shouted “I am big – it’s the pictures that got small!” But today’s actors have become much smaller than their predecessors, thanks to their obsession with social media in which all of their anger, foibles, and lack of impulse control are on full display. (Two words: Alec Baldwin.) But what are the Oscars?

It helped enormously that for years, the awards presentations were hosted by Bob Hope and later Johnny Carson, so you knew you were in for an evening of swank and fun, no matter how good or bad that year’s crop of movies were. But if kids have no idea what the Oscars are, few adults probably remember why the award was created.

In the 1998 A&E documentary version of Neal Gabler’s excellent 1989 book, An Empire of their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, the narrator (actor R.H. Thomson) notes that after being unable to break the monopoly that east coast-based Thomas Edison had on moviemaking at the start of the 20th century, the largely Jewish immigrants who created what we now call Hollywood went west, both for the excellent weather that allowed them to film outdoors throughout most of the year, and for the freedom to build, as Gabler dubbed it in his title, “An Empire of their Own,” far from Edison’s (often anti-Semitic) control. Eventually, with 75 percent of the public going to the movies at least once a week between the wars, “actors became the gods and goddesses of the new American religion. And where there are new gods, there must be new idols. So the studio heads began a movie guild with the lofty title of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. It was [MGM’s Louis B.] Mayer’s brilliant idea [in 1929] to create the Oscars, where the movie moguls could honor themselves by giving each other awards. In this way, they went from being a group of immigrant Jews, to award-winning American producers.”

Not to mention, as one biographer quoted Mayer, “I found that the best way to handle [filmmakers] was to hang medals all over them. […] If I got them cups and awards they’d kill themselves to produce what I wanted. That’s why the Academy Award was created.”

As Gabler notes, the original Hollywood moguls were to a man extremely pro-American, unlike today’s reactionary punitive leftists. All of which is a far cry from today’s hyper-politicized far left Academy Awards. But then, as Fox notes, so are the pictures they celebrate today. “Except for the few blockbusters that people love and the Oscars shun, I can’t say for sure that I’ve seen any movie nominated for best film in the last ten years. Whatever committee nominates the films doesn’t seem to care what people actually like.”

OSCAR RATINGS FALL LIKE A ROCK, screams Drudge’s latest headline, linking to a Deadline Hollywood article noting that “Return Of Chris Rock Sees Show Hit 8-Year Low” in the ratings.

Kudos to Rock’s efforts to pushback against his fellow leftists’ raging PC, but who wanted to watch what amounted to an evening’s worth of MSNBC, albeit with the hosts in tuxes and evening gowns?

Academy member and Maximum Pajamahadeen Emeritus Roger Simon writes “Mea Culpa… I Forgot to Vote in the Oscars!”

For the first time since I was invited into the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (writers branch) in 1983, I forgot to vote in the Oscars.  I did see the nominated movies, but somehow neglected to go online and cast my final ballot.

Freudian slip? Who knows?  But I wasn’t the only one.  America forgot to watch!

Well, not all of America.  The show got a 23.1 share in something called “metered market results.” But that was down 6% from last year, a negative trend that has been going on for a decade.

Perhaps the public is getting sick of being hectored about climate change, etc. by actors who make twenty-five million dollars a picture, own yachts, and fly around in private jets.  It’s a veritable orgy of moral narcissism.

Author/actor/game show host Ben Stein adds “No More Oscars for Me:”

But just a minute. Isn’t Biden a huge Democrat? Isn’t he a pal of Bill and Hillary? Isn’t Bill the most reckless and prolific sex abuser in state and federal government of all time? Hasn’t his whole life been about using his power and status to take advantage of young women? Hasn’t HRC’s been about intimidating and threatening and blackmailing young women to keep them hushed up about Bill’s attacks — including widely reported rapes?

Haven’t the whole Democrat party and its lackeys in the MSM united in lockstep to protect the Clintons from the consequences of his crimes? And so, now these people are preaching to us to act better about sex abuse of young girls?

And isn’t Hollywood’s main task to sell young people tickets to movies that involve illicit sex? Aren’t almost all youth comedies about seducing drunken girls? And Hollywood is not supposed to be the moral guardian of the girls and young women of the nation? Isn’t this like sending a Madam to guard a nunnery? Or a fox to guard a chicken coop?

The hypocrisy is perfect.

And fortunately, the majority of Americans know it.

Exit quip: “‘Now, gas up my private jet!’ — Leo #Oscars.”

FILE THIS STORY UNDER “ONLY IN CALIFORNIA:” Latest CHP slow-speed chase involved Unicorn: “Juliet, a white Shetland pony with a prosthetic horn and a fuzzy pink bridle, bolted from a photo shoot and led CHP officers on a lengthy, if not enchanted, pursuit.”

We know Biden was causing headaches for the CHP and L.A. motorists yesterday, but was the legendary Unicorn Rider himself also in town?

SHOT: Aaron Clarey on the “Omnipresent Noise of Gen X Bar Owners:”

Soon, just like Florida or Sturgis, you’ll have nothing but wrinkly, pruny-boobed Gen X, intellectually-inferior gray hairs coming into your club hoping to get a taste of geriatric Z-Cavaricci ass as they reminisce about the 80’s and get nostalgic about “Iron Maiden” and “The Scorpions.”  Which will be fine.

Because most will be deaf by that age anyway.

So please, turn up the music just a little bit more.  I think I could actually hear that fount of intelligence my buddy 10 inches away from me said.  And I wouldn’t want to hear anything intelligent in a public social setting because that shitty ass band you hired is doing a shitty ass rendition of Kurt Cocaine’s crappy ass 90’s song so loud it’s more important I waste some brain cells listening to that shit than merely hearing music in the background while at the same time….

GASP!!!!!

BEING ABLE TO HAVE A CONVERSATION!!!!

Oh, I’m sorry…

BEING ABLE TO HAVE A CONVERSATION!!!

Chaser: “Bling is so last decade. Now everyone wants their own bourgeois bunker,” notes a Drudge-linked London Independent headline:

Does having a home office signify anything other than the spectacular transformation of my world from an office-based, alcohol-fuelled group activity into something more resembling a cottage industry, manageable only thanks to Wi-Fi, smartphones and the after-school club. Equally, my wonderful vinyl collection doesn’t symbolise affluence. Its existence is solely due to a happy teenage life, and my nostalgia for it. If I had had a miserable time during the Eighties, would I have wanted to hang on to my copy of Sade’s Diamond Life?

Yet the list is out there, and it rings true. It is also indicative of how we have turned our homes into post-Cold War nuclear bunkers. Heated with an underfloor system, naturally. The MA [“mass affluent”] class doesn’t need to go out any more; whether due to economics, the internet, fear or, frankly, cooking standards, it more and more chooses to stay at home, drinking fine wine, looking at art and listening to professional-level music on a Sonos system. Who needs to indulge in office banter when you have your own private office? Who needs to engage with a local nursery when your child has its own playroom? The rise in home cinemas and restaurant-style range ovens is part of the same mindset.

Other than the intriguing headline, I’m not sure why Drudge chose to spotlight this article, as it’s written by a left-leaning columnist who’s updated the once-ubiquitous anti-“McMansion” essays of the 1990s (which themselves were simply that decade’s rewrite of Mencken’s circa-1920s screeds railing against “the Booboisie”) to account for an increase in the quantity and sophistication of consumer electronics. Considering what’s going on in Europe and England right now, it’s a quite understandable reaction from its citizens to hunker down and bunker in, though given that the article is appearing in the London Independent, I’m surprised that author didn’t mention the real reason why everyone in England desires “their own bourgeois bunker” — all that global warming, of course.

Related: Jude Law’s security team was attacked and mugged by migrants when the cameras stopped after the Hollywood star left the jungle camp in Calais. I’ll bet he was rather happy to retreat afterwards to his bourgeois British bunker.

AND IT’S (MOSTLY) A DEMOCRATIC VICE: Occupational Licensing As Opportunity Hoarding:

One defining characteristic of decaying blue model institutions is that they serve insiders well, while making it harder for striving outsiders trying to climb the ladder. Think of our heavily regulated and subsidized higher education system, which delivers fantastic rewards to top administrators, while creating an exploding class of low-paid, disposable adjuncts. Another example, as Richard Reeves and Edward Rodriguez point out in a Brookings Institution post, is overly restrictive occupational licensing, which can favor skilled professionals at the expense of less-credentialed workers with the same skills. . . .

Middle and working class Americans in 2016 are expressing unambiguously that they feel that America’s current political and economic system is rigged in favor of elites, and that they aren’t going to take it much longer. Though Donald Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders are answering this sentiment with their own varieties of statism, it is actually the decrepitude of the blue model—the expansion of government power at the behest and to the benefit of various interest groups—that is to blame for much unfairness. Occupational licensing might not get voters as impassioned as invectives against illegal immigration do, but it really does represent a way that elites have used their political connections to stick it to the less-connected, and reasonable reforms increase opportunities for those seeking upward mobility.

It won’t be easy to reform licensing. Just as traditional universities will resist any challenges to their dominant market position, and just as teachers’ unions will resist reforms that would hold them accountable to student performance, professional guilds will fight to keep their racket in place.

And “racket” is exactly what it is.

GEORGE KORDA: “I’m writing yet another column about the University of Tennessee’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion because the University of Tennessee won’t respond to questions or requests about its Office of Diversity and Inclusion.”

DISPATCHES FROM THE EDUCATION APOCALYPSE: “Are STEM Syllabi Gendered? A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis…there is an opportunity for STEM courses to reduce the perception of courses as difficult and unfriendly through language use in the syllabi, and also as a guide for how to use less competitive teaching methods and grading profiles that could improve the experience of female students.”

As Steve Hayward of Power Line adds, “In other words, dumb it down and practice grade inflation for the girls in the class, who are no different from boys, don’t you ever forget.”