Archive for 2012

OBAMA’S (NON) “PLAN”:   (1) Stay the course (more of the same); (2) and besides, everything is hunky dory and getting better each day!! [insert rainbows and unicorns here].  Listen and read for yourself.  It can be summed up in one word (sound):  Cha-ching!!!

THE JEWISH VOTE & THE BRADLEY EFFECT:  Ira Sharkansky at the Jerusalem Post suggests that there may be a “Bradley effect” at play among Jewish voters in the presidential election.  His definition of the Bradley effect is somewhat different, I think, than the typical one offered– namely, that voters will say they are going to vote for a non-white candidate, only to vote against the non-white candidate in the privacy of the voter booth.  The implication, then, is that there is some racial animosity going on.

But what Sharkansky suggests is actually something different, methinks: That Jewish voters will publicly maintain their allegiance to President Obama, but end up voting against him this November– not because he’s black, but because of his overtly anti-Israeli actions.  It’s a  symptom of political correctness syndrome, a nasty, ubiquitous, and contagious disease.

In an email exchange with an American Jewish colleague, Sharkansky received this confession:

My best friends would disown me, and I would lose all credibility and professional effectiveness, if I came out of the closet as an Obama-skeptic, let alone a potential Romney voter.

Ah, sweet, sweet political correctness!  Just ask black Republican congressional contender Mia loveOr actress Stacey Dash.

ROBERT SAMUELSON: Obamacare’s rhetoric vs. its reality. “Obamacare has faded as a campaign issue, perhaps because it doesn’t suit either the president or Mitt Romney. It’s not popular, a minus for Barack Obama. Its resemblance to Romney’s Massachusetts program is a minus for him. But Obamacare’s relentless march to full-fledged introduction in 2014 demonstrates that, for all its good intentions, it will make the health-care system more confusing (see above), costly and contentious. It won’t control health spending — the system’s main problem — and will weaken job creation. . . . The argument about Obamacare is often framed as a moral issue. It’s the caring and compassionate against the cruel and heartless. That’s the rhetoric; the reality is different.”

STOP THE PRESSES:  Obama has a plan.  (Okay, it’s a stupid plan, but it’s a plan.)

OBAMA VOTERS, EXPLAINED:  A postage stamp is sufficient to write what these people know about the economy.  Warning — Link goes to Democratic Underground.  But for your horrified perusal, here is an excerpt from the bucket of fail:

Let’s say that you have the ability to print your currency using your computer printer, and every merchant accepted your printouts as a valid exchange for goods and services. You need to pick up your dry cleaning? You printout a $20 bill and your cleaners hand over your garments without question. Same would be true for your mortgage, groceries, car note, etc. Your creditors even accept your printouts as payment on your debts.

Given this, how can you ever be broke? Answer, you cannot be broke. The U.S. government is not in debt simply because it can create currency to pay off the debt, and our creditors gladly accept our currency as payment on our debts. You see, the world needs our dollars because the world needs oil, and in order to buy oil, you need dollars, which means that the world needs to stockpile dollars, and that means that the U.S. can print all of the money that it wants without incurring massive hikes in interest rates to attract lenders.

WHY didn’t I think of that before?  We have a color printer.  This silly thing called a job?  Bah.  I’m printing money.  HOW is it possible these people live in the same world we do and understand so little?  HOW?

THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN:  Brought to you by the letter “B”:

quincy4

Two weeks from today. Quincy, Illinois, 2009. Taken with the Panasonic Lumix LX-3.