EUGENE VOLOKH was just on NPR’s Talk of the Nation. That doesn’t air here, but here’s reader Paul Giovanni’s reaction to the first part:

As I listen to Nine Totenberg on “Talk of the Nation”, holding forth as NPR’s “national legal correspondent” on the Second Amendment, I am reminded of the claim that NPR is not biased 95% of the time. This must be one of the other 5% of the times. Eugene Volokh is coming on now; if he is the Volokh I think he is, maybe there will be some balance.

Meanwhile Charles Murtaugh says he missed the first part, but heard the second part and “Volokh was very good.” I imagine it’ll be online shortly.

UPDATE: Kevin Hurst heard the whole show and has these comments:

I listened to the entire Talk of the Nation broadcast today and Nina Totenberg was typically insufferable. However, the two guests, Eugene Volokh and Akhil Amar of Yale, largely agreed on the salient point of discussion, i.e. “collectivist” vs. “individualist” views of the 2nd Amendment, as I knew they would given their history on the subject. The host, whose name I’ve forgotten couldn’t quite seem to grasp that the meaning of the 2nd Amendment, as written, is pretty clear when understood in the language of the period. Prof. Amar seemed to help to keep him confused. Prof. Volokh was great. Prof. Amar, IMO, got off on some strange tangents and justifications for the 2nd Amendment which seemed to be more about how a liberal can come to terms with a right to bear arms than constitutional history. Listening to the [guest] from the Violence Policy Center squirm and rant made it all worthwhile.

So there you have it.