Author Archive: Stephen Green

JOURNALISMING:

And from the thread:

And even then, the reader is left to guess at why or how he could have been found removable.

This oblique paragraph is all there is: “Aldaoud had a criminal conviction for disorderly conduct and served 17 months for a home invasion.”

Disorderly conduct is not typically something that makes you removable.

Home invasion, depending on what the home invasion really was (that’s not actually how states categorize this type crime, again, great job, journos), might be. But, again, the reader still can have no idea.

And it’s hard to believe that the failure of immigration journalists to convey the *how* and *why* people could be removed from the U.S. is anything but intentional.

Yes, it’s a sad story. They’re all sad stories. But readers deserve to know how and why individuals get removed.

It’s almost like immigration journalists want their readers to think that removal is at random. Or, even worse, that it’s purposefully sadistic.

This Politico piece almost invites the reader to think he was removed because he’s insulin-dependent. It’s bad journalism.

But it furthers the cause.

CONRAD BLACK: Trump Plays Long Game On China.

This is the time to have a nonviolent showdown, which will require reform, at least insofar as they apply to the United States, of Chinese practices in “forced technology transfer and cyber theft, intellectual property rights, services, currency, agriculture and non-tariff barriers to trade.” China purported to agree on all this in April but declined to consider any enforcement mechanism.

This is a familiar Chinese method of negotiating, which has been imitated by the North Koreans. If there is a reason for optimism in the present raucously antagonistic American political atmosphere, it is that the Democrats have generally supported the president in these positions, indicating that the old adage that “partisanship ends at the water’s edge” retains some applicability.

Yet the stock response of the president’s reflexive critics in the press is an absurd solicitude for their country’s principal rival, a chronic cheat in world trade matters by universal agreement. China is a poor country with few resources while the United States, with a year to retool and reorient itself, would not have to import any necessities except perhaps small quantities of rare earths.

China still has 300 million people who live pretty much as they did 2,000 years ago, a 40% command economy, no institutions that command any respect except the People’s Army; and not a word or figure it publishes about its economy can be unreservedly believed. It is trying an end run around the entire world economic system at the same time that it asserts itself with conjoined military and economic expansionism in susceptible areas.

Of course this president will save China’s “face” if that’s what it comes to, but in contrast to all the havering ninnies in the Economist and like-minded places, the strongest cheering section President Trump enjoys in the execution of his China policies consists of China’s neighbors: Vietnam, India, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Australia.

I’ve been referring to it as “decoupling,” the undoing of the unhealthy Frankenstein creature Niall Ferguson labeled “Chimerica.” There will be more bumps along the way, as in any contested divorce, which makes me wish that President Trump would do a better job of articulating his strategic vision. But what he’s doing is absolutely necessary, both geopolitically and economically.

WHAT? Trump on Blago: ‘I’m thinking of commuting his sentence.’

Blagojevich, the former Illinois governor, was convicted of trying to trade President Barack Obama’s vacated Senate seat for personal gain.

The Times reports that Trump described the incriminating phone call in which Blagojevich was taped discussing selling the seat as mostly a minor offense and something “many” politicians have done.

“I thought he was treated unbelievably unfairly; he was given close to 18 years in prison,” Trump said aboard Air Force One during his daylong swing through Dayton, Ohio and El Paso, Texas, in the wake of two deadly shootings there over the weekend. “And a lot of people thought it was unfair, like a lot of other things — and it was the same gang, the Comey gang and all these sleazebags that did it. And his name is Rod Blagojevich. And I’m thinking about commuting his sentence.”

The Times reports the president made plans to commute the sentence this week, citing two people with knowledge of the talks.

It’s always wise to reserve judgement on what Trump says until after Trump acts, but even then this one is still a real head-scratcher.

SPENGLER: No-One’s Life Matters. That’s Why There Are Mass Shootings.

Emil Durkheim’s 1897 diagnosis of “anomic suicide” describes the Columbine perpetrators as well as the 2016 San Bernardino attack by Muslim fanatics, the “right-wing” shooter in El Paso and the “left-wing” shooter in Dayton. They are individuals cut off from society, destabilized by change and despairing of their own place in the world. Such monsters always have been among us. But now we are cultivating such monsters by destroying the ties that bind us to each other, to our past and to our future.

Everyone used to matter. No-one matters anymore, not at least in the postmodern dystopia of invented identity. In the good old days we mattered because each of us was radically unique. We were unique as members of a congregation standing before the God who made us, and unique as parents watching over the children we had brought into the world. We knew that each of us had a singular purpose, first because God does nothing in vain. We hoped to make the previous generation proud of us, and the next generation worthy of its predecessors. Each of us had a mission that no-one else could carry out for us, and that mission was to raise children who were uniquely ours, and with whom we had a unique rapport through bonds of intimacy that no master’s degree in psychology could replace.

Read the whole thing.

HIT ‘EM SOME MORE: Facebook Hit by Apple’s Crackdown on Messaging Feature.

The change will restrict a feature that apps like Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp used to make voice calls over the internet. Right now, the calling feature in these apps runs in the background even when it’s not in use, ensuring the apps can connect calls faster but also making it possible for them to perform other, unrelated tasks such as collecting data. Now, Apple is restricting that background access so that it can only be used for internet calls.

Apple’s move will force Facebook to redesign its messaging apps, two people familiar with the issue said. It may have a particularly heavy impact on WhatsApp, which has been using the internet calling feature in a variety of ways, including for implementing the app’s end-to-end encryption, the people said. Other messaging app developers, who have long relied on the internet calling feature to keep their apps running in the background on Apple mobile devices, will also have to rebuild their apps, said people familiar with the issue.

In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson said the company was not collecting data through the calling feature.

Uh-huh.

KRUISER’S MORNING BRIEF: Me Llamo Chuck Todd Edition. “El Chucko expressed his concerns about President Trump’s ‘credibility’ as a ‘moral leader’ and ‘blah blah blah’ it means that he can’t do all of the healing and unifying that the people who keep telling him they hate him demand.”

MEANWHILE, OVER AT VODKAPUNDIT: Is the GOP Gearing up to Cave on Gun Control? It Sure Seems Like it. “Not a whole lot of sense is being made here, which is typical for lawmakers responding to a crisis. And while red flag laws have been passed in 17 states and the District of Columbia, how effective — or Constitutional — are they?”

UPDATE (FROM GLENN): A cave on gun-rights could make Trump a one-termer, the way caving on taxes did for George H.W. Bush. Democrats and the media know this, which is why they’re trying to get him to cave.