Author Archive: Glenn Reynolds

TO BE FAIR, THAT’S THE GOAL: Excessive Calls for Recusal Threaten Judicial Independence. “In this latest trend of coordinated recusal attacks, however, I see a much more malicious and dangerous long-term objective. These unfounded attacks are ultimately aimed at undermining the independence of the federal judiciary as a whole. . . . This is a well-financed and coordinated effort to lay the foundation for calls for court packing and other reform measures that would destroy the judiciary’s independence.”

EXPERT THINKS J.D. VANCE IS THE VP PICK:

The three reported finalists for vice presidential nominee are Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, North Dakoka Gov. Doug Burgum and Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance.

Christopher Devine, an associate political science professor at the University of Dayton, has written two books on the impact running mates have on a ticket.

Devine said vice presidential candidates can influence voters by providing a boost based on geography or demographics. For instance, a running mate night help deliver their home state, while a woman or candidate of color might rally voters who see themselves in the V.P. nominee.

However, Devine said those affects tend to be minimal. A more significant impression the running mate leaves is as a reflection of the presidential candidate’s judgement.

“Who they pick tells you something about their priorities in politics,” Devine said. “It tells you about how serious they are in terms of the decisions that they make.”

Devine said a V.P. nominee is most impactful when the presidential candidate isn’t particularly well-known, pointing to the 2008 campaign when voters who didn’t closely follow politics probably didn’t know much about either Barack Obama or John McCain.

He said polling showed voters thought less of McCain’s judgement after he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate. Palin, and her series of speaking gaffes, contrasted with Obama’s running mate, then-longtime Senator Joe Biden.

Well, that’s not a mark in favor of voters’ judgment.

REMAIN CALM. ALL IS WELL! PepsiCo, After Years of Price Hikes, Sounds an Alarm on Consumer Spending: Frito-Lay North America reports 4% drop in sales volume, warns that consumers are looking for more deals.

Inflation-weary shoppers are finally cutting back on potato chips.

For the past few years as prices soared, many consumers kept buying affordable treats like Doritos and Lay’s in lieu of bigger-ticket splurges such as restaurants, concerts or travel. But now, they are limiting their spending in all areas, said Jamie Caulfield, PepsiCo’s chief financial officer. . . .

Inflation in the U.S. is moderating but consumers are feeling the cumulative impact of years of steep price hikes, particularly in their grocery bills. Consumers in recent months have been pulling away from big brands like Starbucks, Chips Ahoy and McDonald’s.

Shares of Conagra Brands declined in Thursday trading after the maker of Slim Jim meat snacks and Vlasic pickles reported lower sales for its latest quarter and issued a disappointing profit outlook for its current fiscal year. . . . Shoppers are now less interested in buy-one-get-one-free promotions and want lower price points for single items, Caulfield added.

Everything is going swimmingly.

OPEN THREAD: Yo, baby, yo. Good to go.

LOL, JEN RUBIN:

THE NEW SPACE RACE:

OUR MORAL BETTERS: The crafter of language, Margaret Atwood, proffers a “hints”/”details” distinction and now proclaims what she knew but did not know to be “horrifying.” “If something horrifying might be true, but you only have ‘hints’ and not ‘details,’ you have some responsibility. Not only was Atwood Munro’s friend, but Atwood writes books that purport to nudge and instruct us about morality. ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ seems to be taken as a perceptive observation of the evils inherent in our culture, a warning to see and to act before it is too late.”

MEH, WHAT HAVE THE XENOS DONE FOR US?

Also, whenever lefties are throwing around the suffix “phobic,” it means they’re trying to con you.

COLLUSION: Matt Taibbi: FOIA Files: Clemson University: The FOIA request we sent Clemson University reveals a tight-knit relationship between university professors, federal law enforcement, and the news media.

What is the Media Forensics Hub? Described as “an interdisciplinary team of researchers working to study and combat online deception,” the project kicked off in 2017. That was the year communications professor Darren Linvill and economics professor Patrick Warren joined forces to “uncover and expose” millions of tweets they attributed to Russian trolls. Sponsored by the taxpayer-funded South Carolina Research Authority, the Hub was officially launched in May 2020. Two years later, along with the University at Buffalo and several other institutions, it received a $5 million grant from the National Science Foundation.

Last May, Racket filed a FOIA request with Clemson. Our search produced a series of emails that make explicit reference to the university’s dealings with federal law enforcement agencies (providing Clemson “help with resources,” among other things), social media companies, and the news media. The Clemson files are difficult to summarize, but offer probably the most comprehensive portrait we’ve gotten yet of the role such ostensibly non-governmental “anti-disinformation” research institutions can play as middleman organizations. These emails also document the high degree of influence the school had with federal agencies and media, even if Twitter was not always as cooperative.

A summary of key communications is listed below, while three new batches of documents have been uploaded to the Racket FOIA library, where as always, they’re not paywalled.

Read the whole thing.