Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

CNN: MAKE THE GULAGS GREAT AGAIN! CNN Uses Pompous Clooney Play to Say Trump Era WORSE THAN ‘Red Scare.’

Decades later, the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy remains a favorite liberal bogeyman. So who could possibly be worse? Why, Donald Trump, of course!

In a CNN This Morning segment promoting CNN’s broadcast of George Clooney’s Broadway play, Good Night and Good Luck, based on Edward R. Murrow’s media campaign against Sen. Joseph McCarthy, host Audie Cornish played a clip of CNN’s Anderson Cooper asking Clooney whether “it’s worse now than in McCarthy’s time.” Clooney replied: “It’s worse now.” Nobody asked what it was like to live under communism in the 1950s.

Cornish then asked Axios media reporter Sara Fischer for her take on Clooney’s claim that things are worse today, under Trump, than they were during McCarthy’s time (or Eisenhower’s time). Fischer dutifully agreed that things are indeed worse today. Whereas McCarthy was focused exclusively on uncovering Soviet spies, under Trump:

“It’s really focused on going after anyone who pushes back against the government, who questions power.”

As is common amongst liberals, Fischer displayed nostalgia for the good old days, when there were few news outlets, and all of them leaned left. “In the McCarthy era, there was [sic] three broadcast networks, maybe a handful of newspapers, that people listened to and read. In this era, it is so much easier to target journalism because the institution of journalism is disaggregated,”

Translation: the liberal media oligopoly has been weakened, and conservative voices can now compete. Fischer complained “we’re in the digital era now. It’s so much easier to bully and taunt people 24/7*, especially because we do have people in power who are very good at using social media, who might even own their social media networks.”

Related: George Clooney Thinks Trump’s Coming for Him.

George Clooney recently sat down with Anderson Cooper and expressed concern that Donald Trump might personally target him. For what? That time he murdered Batman on screen? Or perhaps for being the kind of guy who still thinks his political commentary matters.

Trump played a businessman on TV as himself. You played a space cowboy in Solaris. Maybe sit this one out.

George Clooney isn’t the target—he’s circling the White House

Clooney acts like Trump’s gonna storm into office and slap a target on his back like he’s public enemy number one. George, calm down—you’re not exactly top of mind outside the Vanity Fair cocktail circuit.

Evergreen:

* “It’s so much easier to bully and taunt people 24/7.” To be fair, that’s something that CNN were experts at during Trump’s first term:

WELCOME TO PROTEST SEASON, WHERE THE CAUSE CHANGES BUT THE TACTICS STAY THE SAME:

(Classical reference in headline.)

STEVE HAYWARD: The Tanenhaus Variations.

Other prominent nodes of the [William F. Buckley] story get fresh new details, including his time at Yale and as editor of the Yale Daily News (would he get that appointment if he was at Yale today?), and the runup and rollout of his famous first book, God and Man at Yale. (Among other things, we learn that T.S. Eliot didn’t like it.) Buckley’s support for Joseph McCarthy is explicated at length, revealing more about Buckley’s ambivalence toward the man himself rather than his cause. His ambivalent relationship with Nixon is well-covered, while his relationship with Ronald Reagan, the president with whom Buckley was clearly closer both personally and ideologically, receives strangely uneven treatment. For example, there is nothing on Buckley’s split with Reagan over arms control and U.S.-Soviet relations during Reagan’s second term, nor on many other details from Reagan’s presidency about which Buckley commented relentlessly. It is just at the point that the book loses steam completely, making the reader wonder if [Sam] Tanenhaus grew bored with the project or simply wanted to release the book on the 100th anniversary of Buckley’s birth. After 800 pages detailing the Buckley story from 1925 to 1980, the years from 1980 to his passing in 2008 are condensed into just 40 pages. This “definitive” biography is definitively unfinished.

We do receive major discussion of Buckley’s time in the CIA, his dazzling personal and precarious financial life, a roller-coaster that included a near-bankruptcy in the early 1970s (throughout which Buckley never cut back his extensive personal charity, the full scope of which is only hinted at in this book), and his most egregious and consequential mistake, championing the cause of convicted murderer Edgar Smith. Buckley’s public campaign on behalf of Smith resulted in Smith’s conviction being overturned, following which Smith committed another murder with the same MO as his initial crime.

Buckley’s gullibility toward Smith is a portal to one key aspect of Buckley’s character that Tanenhaus brings out well: he was drawn to interesting people, regardless of their ideology. This explains his friendship with numerous liberals like Ken Galbraith, Norman Mailer, and even further left figures like Allard Lowenstein. Tanenhaus thinks this explains why Buckley liked to hire liberal writers, or writers who became liberal in due course, for NR, such as Garry Wills, John Leonard, and Joan Didion. Here, Tanenhaus unwittingly, perhaps, reveals his subconscious disdain for conservatism. He says that Wills, Leonard, and Didion were the best writers NR ever produced. Can he really be so obtuse as to disregard Joseph Sobran, Keith Mano, George Will, Richard Brookhiser, or Charles Kesler (among others)—all NR discoveries? Apparently so, and it is only their ideological content that can explain why Tanenhaus would ignore their talent. Tanenhaus at one point said that Buckley did not always choose his friends and business associates well; might that observation include the choice of Tanenhaus as his biographer?

Read the whole thing.

WAIT UNTL 2025-ERA GAVIN NEWSOM DISCOVERS WHAT GAVIN NEWSOM DID IN 2020!

UPDATE: From April of 2020:

As Jack Dunphy wrote in April of 2020: Crackdowns on Lone Surfers and Paddleboarders Threaten to Erode Respect for Law Enforcement Even Further.

UPDATE: Question asked:

MORE:

RIP: Frederick Forsyth dies aged 86.

“Appalled at what he saw and using his experience during a stint as a Secret Service agent, he wrote his first and perhaps most famous novel,” the agent added.

That novel, The Day of the Jackal, was published in 1972 and propelled Forsyth to the status of a global bestselling author.

It has since been adapted into a film and more recently, a TV series starring Eddie Redmayne.

The popular novel remains the first and most enduring of his 16 thrillers and follows a hired assassin who targets Charles de Gaulle, the French president.

The TV adaptation marked the third to reach the screen, following one fronted by Edward Fox in 1973, and another that Forsyth disowns, with Bruce Willis in 1997.

Mr Lloyd said: “He will be greatly missed by his family, his friends, all of us at Curtis Brown and of course his millions of fans around the world – though his books will of course live on forever.”

* * * * * * * *

Lee Child, a fellow thriller writer, previously described The Day of the Jackal as “the book that broke the mould”.

Mr Forsyth was long known – alongside his books – for his outspokenness on political matters as a Conservative, a supporter of Brexit and a defender of traditional values.

He disliked the “woke” agenda and cancel culture, saying in 2023 that he would be “horrified” if they tried to make the TV adaptation of The Day of the Jackal “woke”.

“Touch wood, no one has yet called me out, saying my books are un-woke,” he told The Telegraph two years ago, adding: “Woke is stupid rather than sinful, but plain stupid.”

He also expressed disdain that JK Rowling was being attacked for her gender-critical views by the three former Harry Potter child stars that she was once close to.

He said he felt “particular anger on her behalf at the three young stars of the Harry Potter films – Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson – for disowning Rowling when she was attacked by trans activists”.

“These idiots were brought from nowhere to star in the films of her work and now they are against her. But without her, they’d be nowhere,” he added.

The original adaptation of The Day of the Jackal, starring Edward Fox, was of course, utterly brilliant filmmaking. As Roger Ebert wrote in 1973, “I wasn’t prepared for how good it really is: it’s not just a suspense classic, but a beautifully executed example of filmmaking. It’s put together like a fine watch. The screenplay meticulously assembles an incredible array of material, and then [Fred] Zinnemann choreographs it so that the story–complicated as it is–unfolds in almost documentary starkness.”

KURT SCHLICHTER: The LA Chaos Is an Illusion and Trump Will Not Fall for It.

The left has two main options going forward. One is to become even more violent and see if they can provoke an overreaction – remember, they don’t have the combat power to achieve anything by force. Even if they increase their level of violence, this is still an information operation. However, they risk overplaying their hand and justifying a forceful reaction by Trump. If some criminal – a substantial number of the rioters are not political activists but common street thugs – decides to shoot a fed and the feds shoot back, normal people are going to cheer.

The second and more likely course of action is for the word to go out to dial back the disorder. It’s not working. It’s not having the desired effect. It’s also hurting the Democrats, who tacitly support the violence but want to maintain distance from it. It’s their city that’s in chaos, not Trump’s. The Democrats are united in whining about Trump not submitting like cowards to the thugs, but all this is doing is making them look weak. It’s not Trump‘s forces that are getting pushed around by the rioters; it’s the Democrats’ local cops who are. The Democrats have had nothing but problems lately, and the last thing they needed was to have several days of news footage making them look ineffectual while also blowing the Elon vs. Donald cage match off the front pages.

The only real question is whether or not Donald Trump and his team planned this. It’s working to his advantage  – the Big Beautiful Bill debate just stopped being about saving a few pennies and became about saving our country from foreign invaders. You have to wonder whether the Trump 2.0 administration specifically choose a super leftist city to spin up ICE raids knowing that there would be a riotous backlash that they could then co-opt to message strength. Did they make a conscious decision to provide America a clear and unequivocal choice?

All I can say is that I hope so.

Christopher Rufo adds: Trump Should Crush the L.A. Riots—with a Subtle Hand.

In short, the Left is giving President Trump all the visual symbolism he needs to advance his immigration agenda. Most Americans see chaos in the name of a foreign flag and find it repellent. Though Trump’s language about a migrant “invasion” has sometimes been dismissed as hyperbolic, it seems that the Left is intent on turning it into a material reality.

The question: How should the president respond? Many on the right may feel an instinctual reaction to “send in the troops.” While this concern for law and order is natural and merited, it must be pursued in a way that maximizes the chance for success and minimizes the chance for blowback. As the president considers his options, he might keep in mind a number of strategic points that, if implemented, will increase his leverage in the fight for large-scale deportations.

The administration must deny the Left a strong visual counterargument. It’s easy to see how scenes of militarization, abuse of demonstrators, or a violent death could reverse public sympathies and present the administration as abusing its authority. The language of politics is visual—and therefore emotional, which means that a single mistake can reverse the flow of opinion and imperil the president’s immigration agenda. Left-wing tacticians have trained their foot soldiers to bait law enforcement into confrontation and to play victim for the press, to great effect.

To prevent this scenario, Trump has a number of strategic options available to him. First, rather than sending in more troops to stop the fires, the president might be better advised to hold off. Right now, California governor Gavin Newsom has sided with the demonstrators, but if the riots spread further, this stance will cost him in public opinion, and eventually, he will have to assume the mantle of authority. The public will expect Newsom to restore order, and he’ll have to incur the risk of using force.

Second, the president should pressure local leaders to buy in to the task of quelling the riots. He could wait for Governor Newsom to request the National Guard or appear at a press conference with Los Angeles County officials, bringing state Democrats into the risk-reward calculus and creating the option for the president to shift the blame in the future if they fail to respond effectively. California Democrats are anticipating that Trump will assume all the authority and, therefore, relieve them of any responsibility. He should resist the temptation to be the only player on the field with skin in the game.

However this plays out, as America’s Newspaper of Record notes, illegal immigrants are have surprisingly pitched in to help out the GOP’s 2028 messaging campaign:

MARTHA’S VINEYARD HAS NEVER BEEN AT WAR WITH EAST DESANTIS:

Flashback:

The WaPo’s motto is “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” Which is why they keep the fires of the memory hole glowing white hot at all times.

WAYMO TEMPORARILY SUSPENDS SERVICE IN LOS ANGELES:

As Jim Geraghty writes, in a lengthy Morning Jolt titled, “L.A. Burns, Again,” “Waymo driverless vehicles run on lithium-ion batteries. According to the company, a battery involved in a fire or exposed to high heat levels will release toxic vapors, including sulfuric acid, oxides of carbon, nickel, lithium, copper, and cobalt. Our brave new world of driverless cars now provides malevolent actors with mobile toxic bombs on demand.”

Just a bit of fun though, from the DNC-MSM’s perspective:

ROGER SIMON: Thank God I Left California.

I left California in 2018 after having lived there since 1968. Many were doing the same then.

I have written about this move many times in books, articles, blogs and on this Substack. The subject has started to bore me. I didn’t want to hear about California. I barely commented about the fires that were so mishandled by the state and city’s incompetent leadership.

But with the demonstrations of the last few days, the protestors blocking the 101 as I type, burning cars and pelting police, I cannot hold back.

President Trump has done the right thing calling in the National Guard. Otherwise we could have a situation much like Minneapolis during the George Floyd riots, which was and is a national disgrace with decent men going to jail and that once-great Minnesota city turned into an open air sewer .

In much bigger California the results would likely be worse. The state is on the verge, or over the verge, of being the world’s biggest asylum for the criminally insane and arguably irredeemable.

What else can one say about escalating demonstrations in favor of keeping in our country (and their state) rapists, murderers, human traffickers, sexual predators, pederasts, batterers, violent gang members and drug cartels (to name a few)?

The Democrat Party, by defending these people, is continuing to implode at warp speed. James Carville must be on the edge of heart failure. Bill Maher may have to bite the bullet and switch parties with Karin Jean-Pierre. (He’ll probably just blame Trump to save his audience.)

The leadership of California is a litany of some of the most immoral politicians in the country, every one of them a hypocritical fake: Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Karen Bass, Reps. Adam Schiff, Maxine Waters, and former VP Kamala Harris, among a raft of malignant narcissists in a one-party state.

Read the whole thing.

JIM TREACHER WISHES CNN LUCK WITH A CAPITAL-F: CNN Is a Riot.

CNN spent most of Saturday night smooching George Clooney’s culo because he wrote and performed a Boomer play about Journalism with a capital J, depicting events that happened 70 years ago.

Last year Clooney shoved Joe Biden out of the 2024 presidential race, after keeping his concerns about Biden’s dementia to himself until it was too late, so of course CNN rewarded him with a national platform to wag his finger at the rest of us about “truth.” CNN treated it like Oscar night, all while congratulating themselves on their #Resistance.

It was their best idea since CNN Plus.

At that very moment, Los Angeles was descending into chaos. And just like Edward R. Murrow would’ve wanted, CNN first ignored and then waved away the facts.

* * * * * * * *

This clown [Stelter] wants you to ignore that pesky little riot. “Look at all the cars that aren’t on fire!” It’s the same playbook the left used during the George Floyd riots, and it’s the opposite of journalism.

No wonder CNN is nostalgic for the 1950s, when the liberal media was the only game in town. Back then, they could’ve gotten away with this crap. Back then, America couldn’t see how the sausage is made.

As I wrote yesterday, no wonder CNN’s founder melted down so hard in 1996 when the concept of Fox News was first announced, and old media in general dived for the fainting couches when the first iteration of the Drudge Report debuted in the late-1990s, followed by the original Blogosphere. It’s somewhat ironic that CNN was simulcasting George Clooney’s Good Night and Good Luck from Broadway last night, as they would love to be Pravda in a nation without access to media with another worldview, or a platform like Twitter/X where it’s possible to see uncensored images and non-regime media approved opinions: CNN Has Always Hated the Competition.

Of course, sometimes on CNN, the left hand doesn’t know what the far left hand is doing:

(Classical reference in headline.)

OH, THAT VIOLENT LEFT:

Meanwhile, at CNN:

JAMES PIERESON on WFB: Buckley’s Life on the Firing Line. Review: Buckley: The Life and Revolution that Changed America by Sam Tanenhaus.

Buckley entered Yale in 1946, eager to make up for lost time (he had spent the previous two years in the Army) and to catch up with his brother, Jim, who had already graduated. He landed a spot on the debate team, alongside fellow student Brent Bozell, and by his third year was appointed editor of the Yale Daily News, where he published critical articles on the left-wing tilt of the faculty that got him into hot water with the administration. He would soon turn those articles, along with copious notes, into a best-selling book, God and Man at Yale, published in 1951 (after his graduation). The book claimed that Yale professors, in the name of academic freedom, were undermining Christianity and promoting collectivism by teaching Keynes and other liberal thinkers. He called upon alumni to withhold donations unless and until the university changed course.

The book was a sensation, as Tanenhaus writes, especially so for a young man with no other books to his credit. It was widely reviewed—McGeorge Bundy, a Yale graduate, wrote in the Atlantic that he found the book “dishonest in its use of facts, false in its theory, and a discredit to its author.” Others weighed in along the same lines. Buckley was unfazed and enjoyed the furor surrounding the book. He saw, as did others, that the critics missed the main point: The popularity of the book was due to its attack on the professional elites at Yale and elsewhere who pretended to be neutral and open in outlook but were in fact selling a point of view—namely, liberalism.

Buckley followed up with a new book, McCarthy and His Enemies, written jointly with Bozell, and published in 1954 just as McCarthy’s career was about to collapse in censure by the Senate. The book was not so much a defense of McCarthy as it was an attack on the security system in the State Department (and elsewhere) that allowed communists and fellow-travelers to penetrate the U.S. government. Critics panned the book because they disliked McCarthy, but that was partly the authors’ point: The communist issue was much larger than McCarthy.

With two controversial books under his belt, Buckley was by this time the acknowledged leader of a loose band of conservative writers that included Russell Kirk, James Burnham, Frank Meyer, Willmoore Kendall, and Whittaker Chambers. There was no political home for writers who were at once anti-communist and anti-statist. They were not welcome in the universities, certainly, nor in the Republican Party: Eisenhower had pushed aside their favorite (Robert Taft) for the presidential nomination, and once in office declared his support for the main themes of the New Deal and the containment doctrine favored by his Democratic predecessor.

In this circumstance, his friends prevailed upon Buckley to launch a new magazine that would at once articulate these two themes—anti-communism and anti-statism—and also unite the disparate band of conservatives around a single publication. They looked to Buckley as their leader for obvious reasons: He could debate; he had a name by virtue of his books; and, importantly, he had access to money through his father and his father’s friends. Buckley agreed to be editor of the weekly publication. The inaugural issue of National Review appeared in November 1955 with a bold statement of purpose from its editor: “[National Review] stands athwart history yelling Stop, at a time when no other is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.”

Buckley would serve as editor of National Review for the next 35 years, writing weekly columns, supervising the editorial pages, serving as referee for disputes among his writers, and, as Tanenhaus writes, trying to wall off unsavory elements (bigotry and anti-Semitism) from the magazine. Buckley denounced the John Birch Society, erstwhile allies in the anti-communist cause, for extremist claims—for example, that President Eisenhower was a communist.

As Russell Kirk famously quipped at the time, “Ike’s not a communist. He’s a golfer.

GREAT MOMENTS IN DEMOCRAT OPTICS:

ED MORRISSEY: ‘Mostly Peaceful’ 2.0: Another Great Moment in Protection Racket Media.

If this looks familiar, it’s because CNN used the same playbook as they did five years ago during the George Floyd riots:

MSNBC also used “mostly peaceful” as their motto in 2020, and the rest of the media followed suit, including and especially the coverage about the Twin Cities and the massive destruction that took place there. As John detailed in his post last night, there is a massive amount of violence sweeping through Los Angeles, much of it directed at legitimate law enforcement actions by the federal government. The local authorities didn’t lift a finger to stop it the first day, and it predictably escalated the second day.

Meanwhile, just like CNN and every single £$%^&% Protection Racket Media outlet did with Joe Biden’s cognitive incapacity for the last four years, they are going to tell you to trust them rather than your own eyes and ears. They will flat-out ignore the violence as long as they can’t use that violence to damage Republicans, and pretend that nothing’s happening as the city (or cities) burn. They want to paint the decision by Donald Trump to send in the National Guard to protect federal agents as somehow illegitimate, just in the same way these same media outlets told us that the evidence of Joe Biden’s senility was really just his “childhood stutter,” when it wasn’t “cheap fakes” and vicious Republicans making up stuff about President Sharp-As-A-Tack, Ring-Runner Around Youthful Aides.

No wonder CNN’s founder melted down so hard in 1996 when the concept of Fox News was first announced, and old media in general dived for the fainting couches when the first iteration of the Drudge Report debuted in the late-1990s, followed by the original Blogosphere. It’s somewhat ironic that CNN was simulcasting George Clooney’s Good Night and Good Luck from Broadway last night, as they would love to be Pravda in a nation without access to media with another worldview, or a platform like Twitter/X where it’s possible to see uncensored images and non-regime media approved opinions: CNN Has Always Hated the Competition.

THIS IS CNN: CNN’s Disgrace: This Is What They Call Journalism?

After Dana Bash notes (correctly, for once) that in the 1992 Rodney King riots, California’s Governor Pete Wilson — a Republican — requested the National Guard be activated, while on Saturday, President Trump activated the National Guard without such a request. She also notes that the last time a president unilaterally activated and deployed the National Guard was in Alabama in 1965.

Why did President Johnson send in the Guard in 1965? Because local authorities refused to enforce federal law.

Why did President Trump send in the Guard in 2025? Because local authorities refused to enforce federal law.

In both cases, you had local authorities either refusing to enforce federal law or actively defying federal law.

Senator Mullin defenestrated that comment.

Well, you’ve got two issues here. You’ve got a very weak, lawless, governor in Governor Newsom, who’s not enforcing the nation’s laws. And then you had a Biden administration for the last four years that didn’t enforce our immigration laws… Regardless of what they’re doing right now, they entered the country illegally, and therefore they are illegal, and they are criminals.

I don’t know why a governor would want to try to protect illegal activity inside a state. And the president has made it very clear, if the governor or the mayor of a city isn’t willing to protect the citizens of his state or the city, then the president will.

Which brings us to Dana’s real jaw-dropping assertion:

Dana Bash: I just want to state for the record that what did happen in 1992 was so different from what we’re seeing now. That was a real riot.

Dana, it’s not your job to state anything for the record. It’s your job to report. You’re interviewing a United States Senator. Let him state things for the record. Senator Mullin replied:

Dana, if you have people… You and I can look at this and we can obviously see that this is not under control. It’s not under control. You and I both can see that. And a riot is a riot. They’re throwing all types of objects at law enforcement. And the president’s absolutely right. It’s pretty bad.

The pictures, videos, and reporting, much of it right here on RedState, coming out of this disaster speak very eloquently on just how out of control this situation is.

It’s a good thing for Dana that nobody is watching this stuff: Cable News Ratings: Fox News More Dominant Than Ever, CNN A Non-Factor, Troubling Sign For MSNBC.

TELEVISION SETS: Kyle Smith on George Clooney’s adaptation of Good Night and Good Luck for Broadway. As Smith notes, “luxuriate in your fears for $300 a seat, which is the average price for tickets to George Clooney’s stage version of his 2005 film Good Night, and Good Luck (at the Winter Garden Theatre through June 8). Clooney, who seldom fails to remind interviewers that he is the son of a journalist, cowrote both the movie and the play with Grant Heslov, originally conceiving this hagiography of CBS News’s mid-century television drama queen Edward R. Murrow (played by David Strathairn in the movie and now by Clooney himself on Broadway) as a response to the George W. Bush* administration’s decision to make war in Iraq. Now, of course, the Red Scare Scare is pointing to Donald Trump:”

But his own script shows that Murrow was a preening, showboating editorialist. Positioning himself as merely an objective reporter, he strayed further and further into self-righteous, openly partisan grandstanding. Abandoning his bona fides as a war reporter, he became an on-air columnist on the program See It Now, deploying euphemism, half-truths, deliberate obfuscation, and other rhetorical maneuvers to engage in a public debate with McCarthy over his anti-Communist hearings. Far from being the opposite of today’s cable-news attention-seekers, he was essentially Rachel Maddow with a cigarette. (In an amusing montage of silly moments in television news played on a screen, the all-hysterics Maddow network gets dinged for pushing the Trump–Russia hoax, as do commentators who insisted President Biden was sharp as a tack before Clooney himself helped usher him into retirement via an open plea to step aside in The New York Times.)

Clooney simply can’t see how badly he undermines his own case here. After Murrow denounces McCarthy, CBS grants the senator equal time to respond, and McCarthy unloads on the newsman, noting that he led a Soviet “educational” front group and hence took paychecks from Moscow in 1934 while being a member of the Communism-lite group International Workers of the World. Rebutting the rebuttal on air, Murrow says nothing about serving as a Stalinist stooge in the educational group (because it was true) but issues a clipped denial of IWW membership. Oh? Wherever, then, could McCarthy have gotten the notion? Wrote Murrow’s biographer, A. M. Sperber,

To Ed Murrow, the IWW would always have the aura of the great lost cause, a soft-focus memory of stalwart men and great songs and failed native radicalism. . . . . [W]hile he alternately claimed or denied membership in later years—his lifelong favorite song would be “Joe Hill”—no one could ever prove he had or hadn’t carried the red card.

Er, if Murrow himself ever claimed membership in the IWW, McCarthy would appear to have had a decent reason to mention it, and the matter was certainly relevant to viewers who might have wondered whether Murrow’s thundering denunciations of the senator were based in ideological differences rather than objective reporting.

As is usually the case with those promoting the Red Scare Scare, the crux of the dispute is mere semantics; support for the immense evil that was Communism was to be waved away unless the ideologue in question went so far as to formally register as a member of the Party (a similarly fine distinction is at the heart of the movie Oppenheimer). The intellectual vapidity of this game is evident.

So Murrow was at least Communist-curious, and Carl Bernstein’s parents “were secret members of the Communist Party USA:”

“A case can be made that [Bernstein] should have disclosed the conflict of interest he brought to his Watergate exposes,” wrote New York media consultant Sidney Goldberg in 2003. “After all, he was brought up as a Nixon hater and readers might have been told that his family regarded Nixon as vile, as an enemy.”

As Zhou Enlai never said, “The French Revolution? Too early to say.”

* Speaking of which, wait, that George W. Bush? Oceania Has Never Been at War with East Dubya: Liz Cheney Pleads With George W. Bush to Take the Uniparty Plunge and Endorse Kamala.

Flashback: Legendary Hollywood Leftist Pines for the 1950s: Good Night, and Good Luck review: George Clooney makes his Broadway debut in a sleepy newsroom play.

And then there’s blacklist subtext of any film or play about McCarthy. That’s a topic that should never be touched by Hollywood again, since the industry has spent the last quarter century blacklisting anyone to the right of Stalin – and even blacklisting lefties who have made anti-blacklisting movies. Or as Glenn wrote in late 2020, “After a decade of seeing leftists doxxing people and getting them fired for expressing a forbidden opinion, I have to ask what’s their beef with Joe McCarthy?”

He had an (R) after his name, of course.

More: David Marcus: CNN’s airing of ‘Good Night, and Good Luck’ proves it has learned nothing.

After the play, there was an assemblage of journalists, speaking before journalism students about the importance of what they had just witnessed. Of course, the closest thing CNN had to a conservative was Brett Stephens, a nice guy, but widely acknowledged as the Washington Generals of conservative political punditry.

Needless to say, they congratulated themselves on being so enlightened and brave and speaking truth to power, while the handful of people watching threw up a little in their own mouths.

You almost have to admire the audacity of CNN. Just weeks after bombshell books and reporting finally confirmed the obvious about Biden’s incapacity and the liberal media’s lies, the network aired a play in which it dressed itself up as brave heroes of the newsroom. It’s amazing.

It’s also informative. This bizarre effort by CNN to paint itself in historical glory is proof positive that the network has learned nothing from its lies over the past eight years, and there is no reason to believe it will start being honest anytime soon.

Still though, I’m sure the simulcast worked wonders to recruit new leftists to the cause:

SOMEBODY’S GETTING A TIMEOUT: ABC News Suspends Terry Moran Over X Post That Called Trump Official Stephen Miller A “World-Class Hater.”

ABC News said that it has suspended senior national correspondent Terry Moran over a late night X post, since deleted, attacking Trump administration official Stephen Miller as a “world class hater.”

“ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage* and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others,” a network spokesperson said. “The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation.”

Top Trump administration officials had called out the X post on Sunday morning, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt saying that the network should hold him “accountable” and Vice President JD Vance asking for an apology.

The 12:06 a.m. post called Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, a “world class hater.”

“You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate.”

“Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred is only a means to an end, and that end is his own glorification. That’s his spiritual nourishment.”

Even though the post was already deleted, Leavitt flagged the post on Sunday morning and wrote, “This is unhinged and unacceptable. We have reached out to @ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable.”

* George Stephanopoulos could not be reached for comment.