Author Archive: Ed Driscoll

INSIDE HAITI: Where women are raped on the street and gangs rule.

Beatrice was wearing her school uniform the day she disappeared: a yellow blouse and blue trousers. Her mother, Roseline, had dropped her off at the bus stop that morning and waved goodbye. When she got home she realised that Beatrice had forgotten her dinner money and called the head teacher to ask him to let her get lunch from the canteen on credit. He told her Beatrice hadn’t come to school.

She had been taken by the gangs that control almost all of their home city, the Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince: teenage boys and young men who sit on broken sofas at intersections, leaning assault rifles against their knees, ruling the place after they pushed out the government a year and a half ago. Beatrice was 15 years old, her favourite subject was maths — and she was gone.

Roseline called her friends, looked around the neighbourhood. She found out that the bus had broken down on the way to school. Beatrice had been waiting by the side of the road with the other passengers when masked men came and took her and two of the others: a young woman and a young man. “I was looking everywhere, asking everyone,” Roseline, 39, told me at a women’s shelter in Port-au-Prince.

Today, Haiti is the poorest country in the Caribbean and Latin America. It has a similar GDP per capita to Bangladesh. Half the population do not have enough to eat. Hundreds of thousands of children are malnourished.

In the capital there is no accountability, no one in charge, no one who can fix things when they go wrong. In most of Port-au-Prince and its suburbs, where about a quarter of Haiti’s 12 million population live, the gangs are the only law. Police are scattered through the 10 per cent of the capital still controlled by the government, where they park their armoured cars at intersections and fire at people they think are gang members. There’s only one place you can go to find a missing person — your local “chef”, the gang leader who controls your area. Roseline was terrified, but went anyway. He said he’d do what he could.

Local “chef” could be taken quite literally in this case: There Is No Cannibalism in Haiti — Or Perhaps at Least Some.

In any case, I wonder if Conan O’Brien reads the London Times? 

ROGER KIMBALL: Trump Must Finish Off the National Endowment for Democracy.

Will the NED finally be cancelled if Trump’s “pocket rescission” succeeds? From what I have read, it is not entirely clear. Many of the cuts—totally many hundreds of millions of dollars—are from State Department initiatives that are consanguineous, as it were, the the NED. But I have not seen the NED explicitly named in the cuts.

As I noted last month, what is needed to extinguish the NED is not some magic potion but the concerted attention of Donald Trump. Perhaps, I suggested, the President had thought he had gotten rid of the NED already. I am here to remind him once again that that essential piece of work may yet to be accomplished. It is time to finish the job.

Faster, please.

BUC-EE’S AND THE INFINITE AMERICAN SPIRIT:

The evangelism of this American cultural bastion is ongoing, wielding rhetorical weapons of excess and hospitality and good-old-fashioned economic impact, all softened by its tendency to burrow within customers’ hearts. At its head is the beaver: naturally industrious, instinctively pressured to pursue productivity, representing an American ideal of indomitable economic fruitfulness. At the same time, Buc-ee himself appears both stupid-looking and overjoyed, happy not to the point of contentment, but of hysteria. A silly, goofy thing that is disarming in its unseriousness. It gazes up and to the right, somehow warmly inviting us to copy its watching. The subject of its focus is unknown, and maybe doesn’t matter (or, at least, Buc-ee’s is indifferent to its significance). It seems as likely to be staring down a hurtling, imminently earth-splitting asteroid as to be welcoming the second coming of Christ.

Buc-ee’s, a near-highway megachurch and pilgrimage destination for the uniquely American blend of comfort, commerce, spectacle, and hometown folksiness, stands unrivaled. It singlehandedly creates family memories, feeds our most desperate attempts to fill various God-shaped and antisocially created holes, raises up some of our most disavowed and disaffected, hooks us on sugar and stupid white-labeled landfill filler, and puts smiles on millions upon millions of traveling American faces. Paradoxical cultural phenomenon, beloved landmark, bona fide megastore, and bearer of the American spirit, I salute you.

The European mind cannot comprehend the wonders of Buc-ee’s. However, as the video division of America’s Newspaper of Record highlighted in 2022, a California couple moving to Texas discovered that you can immanentize the eschaton:

TIM GRAHAM: The Anniversary of Bush-Trashing Hurricane Katrina ‘News.’

One reason that many Republican voters took a shine to Donald Trump in 2016 was the way he showed no respect to the national chattering classes of the Democrat-media complex. George W. Bush was a kinder, gentler Republican – and they compared him to Hitler. No matter which flavor of  Republican was elected, the “objective” media savaged him.

We’ve reached the 20th anniversary of deadly Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf of Mexico, which killed an estimated 1,836 Americans. But misinformation landed first. NBC and MSNBC tremendously hyped Democrat Mayor Ray Nagin’s Today show estimate of 10,000 dead in New Orleans.

Appearing on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, NBC anchor Brian Williams offered a sermon: “These were Americans, and everyone watching the coverage all week, that kind of reached its peak last weekend, kept saying the same refrain: How is this happening in the United States? And the other refrain was, ‘Had this been Nantucket, had this been Boston, Cleveland, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, how many choppers would have–’” Then Williams was drowned out by applause.

Williams the serial exaggerator also claimed he could see bodies floating outside his hotel room in the French Quarter, but the New Orleans Advocate reported that the area had been largely spared in the catastrophe and experienced little flooding.

Read the whole thing.

Last October, during the run-up to the election: Scott Jennings Torches CNN Colleagues Calling for ‘Political Restraint’ Over Hurricane Response.

JENNINGS: I lived through Hurricane Katrina in the Bush White House, as I know you lived through it Anderson, covering it, and I don’t recall any restraint by Democrats or the national media coming after George W. Bush and FEMA and every other thing. It was immediately politicized, and, you know, I mean, I well remember it. It’s seared into my brain.

And so now, all these people are out here saying, “We can’t politicize this, we can’t criticize this,” you know, nothing can be said about Biden and Harris here or FEMA or anything else, and I just think, if a Republican were in the White House, and a Republican president were at the beach, and the vice president were raising money with celebrities, I guarantee you somebody would be mad about it.

As Bonchie of Red State adds, “There will be no ‘political restraint’ regarding hurricane responses after what Democrats did to George W. Bush. The Biden administration has made several mistakes that deserve to be called out before voters head to the polls in November. Perhaps one day, Democrats will learn not to set precedents that come back to bite them. Until then it’s game on.”

From Reason in December of 2005: They Shoot Helicopters, Don’t They?

On September 1, 72 hours after Hurricane Katrina ripped through New Orleans, the Associated Press news wire flashed a nightmare of a story: “Katrina Evacuation Halted Amid Gunfire…Shots Are Fired at Military Helicopter.”

* * * * * * * *

Like many early horror stories about ultra-violent New Orleans natives, whether in their home city or in far-flung temporary shelters, the A.P. article turned out to be false. Evacuation from the city of New Orleans was never “halted,” according to officials from the Coast Guard, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Louisiana National Guard. The only helicopter airlifts stopped were those by a single private company, Acadian Ambulance, from a single location: the Superdome. And Acadian officials, who had one of the only functional communications systems in all of New Orleans during those first days, were taking every opportunity to lobby for a massive military response.

* * * * * * * *

But the basic premise of the article that introduced the New Orleans helicopter sniper to a global audience was dead wrong, just like so many other widely disseminated Katrina nightmares. No 7-year-old rape victim with a slit throat was ever found, even though the atrocity was reported in scores of newspapers. The Convention Center freezer was not stacked with 30 or 40 dead bodies, nor was the Superdome a live-in morgue. (An estimated 10 people died inside the two buildings combined, and only one was slain, according to the best data from National Guard officials at press time.)

Tales of rapes, carjackings, and gang violence by Katrina refugees quickly circulated in such evacuee centers as Baton Rouge, Houston, and Leesville, Louisiana–and were almost as quickly debunked.

From a journalistic point of view, the root causes of the bogus reports were largely the same: The communication breakdown without and especially within New Orleans created an information vacuum in which wild oral rumor thrived. Reporters failed to exercise enough skepticism in passing along secondhand testimony from victims (who often just parroted what they picked up from the rumor mill), and they were far too eager to broadcast as fact apocalyptic statements from government officials–such as Mayor Ray Nagin’s prediction of 10,000 Katrina-related deaths (there were less than 900 in New Orleans at press time) and Police Superintendent Edwin Compass’ reference on The Oprah Winfrey Show to “little babies getting raped”–without factoring in discounts for incompetence and ulterior motives.

In September of 2005, Mickey Kaus wrote, “Previously, [the media] couldn’t grouse about the Iraq War without seeming defeatist (and anti-liberationist and maybe even selfishly isolationist). Even the Clintons never figured a way out of that trap…Katrina gives [the MSM] a way to talk about Iraq without talking about Iraq. No wonder Gwen Ifill smiles the ‘inner smile.’”

Such demagoguery produced results, Bryan Preston wrote in November of 2006 at Hot Air. “What cost the GOP its majorities in Congress and statehouses?… The GOP’s fortunes fatally cratered in the Fall of 2005, and were recovering ever since minus a couple of blips this year. What happened in the Fall of ‘05? Katrina. That storm turned out to be the hurricane that changed history:”

There’s a lesson in all of this, that’s an old one but an important one to remember: Demagoguery wins, and more so when it comes in the middle of a horrific disaster. Also, lies do indeed travel halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on. By the time the story of New Orleans buses surfaced (only to be buried by the AP and ignored by the national media), the disaster had been framed as a Bush failure and the damage was already done. The media’s later mea culpa did nothing to change the basic narrative that already had a life of its own.

Years later, then-DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile would later confess at CNN, “Bush came through on Katrina,” but as a wise future mayor would advise his fellow Democrats in the fall of 2008, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

THE PILOT FOR THE NEW REBOOT OF FRIENDS LOOKS QUITE PROMISING:

THIS IS CNN:

HOW WE GOT THE INTERNET ALL WRONG:

It is now hard to remember the optimism with which many people greeted the arrival of the digital world. But back in the 1990s and early 2000s, the evangelists of the internet confidently predicted that the internet would, as Thomas Friedman wrote in The Lexus and the Olive Tree, published at the cusp of the new millennium, “weave the world together.”

With the benefit of hindsight, it is easy to make fun of such predictions. But the logic for these predictions was seemingly compelling. For all of human history until recently, it had been extremely costly and cumbersome for people in different parts of the world to communicate. As late as 1930, Friedman pointed out, a three-minute phone call between London and New York cost about $300. That made it hard for people to develop a greater understanding of each other, or to recognize that they might share all kinds of interests.

By the time Friedman was writing, such a phone call was basically free. It was easy to imagine that, in a world of costless communication, most people would choose to connect with people in faraway locations who are very different from them. Society would, the hope went, grow to be far more cosmopolitan: far more interested in the well-being of people unlike ourselves, and far less likely to prioritize those who share our group identities.

The truth, as we now know, turned out to be very different. Given the opportunity to communicate with anybody they wish, most people are spending their time on social media connecting with people they already know, with those who share their identities, or with those who share the exact same political views. The greater ease of communication was supposed to help the human species transcend its traditional boundaries and expand our collective horizons; instead, it has amplified our tribal instincts and turned every aspect of our politics and culture into a fevered battle between the in-group and the out-group. Early evangelists of the internet conjured up a touching vision of universal human connection. Instead, the technology they rhapsodized has turned us into tribalist creatures, giving ever greater importance to our race, our gender, our sexual orientation, and our political convictions.

But don’t worry; things can always get worse: AI is Killing the Internet. Don’t Let It Kill the Classroom Too.

There’s a name for this phenomenon: the Dead Internet Theory, which posits that a significant amount of online content is produced not by humans but by AI. The evidence suggests a hard kernel of truth at the core of this argument. More than 40% of Facebook’s long-form posts and more than half of longer LinkedIn posts are likely generated by AI. Engagement with this content is often powered by automated click farms.

AI isn’t merely churning out fluff. In one striking example, bots fueled a disproportionate share of the online discourse following mass shootings, and AI actively spreads misinformation. Online content is increasingly spun up by algorithms for other algorithms to amplify. This deluge of automated content is drowning humanity on the internet.

Lately, it seems that a similar dynamic is charging into our college classrooms with developers of educational technology at its vanguard. Let’s call it the Dead Education Theory, and it works something like this:

A college professor uses one of many dozens of free commercial AI tools to draft a rubric and an assignment prompt for their class. A student pastes that prompt into another AI app that produces an essay that they submit as their completed assignment. Pressed for time, the professor runs the paper through an AI tool that instantly spits out tidy boilerplate feedback. Off in the background, originality checkers and paraphrasing bots duel in an endless game of evasion and detection. On paper, the learning loop is complete. The essay is written. The grade is given. And the class moves on to its next assignment.

It’s entirely likely that this scenario is playing out thousands of times every day. A 2024 global survey from the Digital Education Council found that 86% of college students use AI in their studies, with more than half (54%) deploying it at least weekly and a quarter using it daily. Faculty are increasingly using AI to create teaching materials, boost student engagement, and generate student feedback, although most report just minimal to moderate AI use.

Exit quote: “Banning AI tools isn’t realistic; the genie has escaped that bottle. But instead of allowing AI to drain higher education of its humanity, we must design a future where AI amplifies authentic human thinking. AI will be in the classroom — there’s no question about that. The urgent question is how to keep humanity there as well.”

ANNALS OF LEFTIST AUTOPHAGY: Matt Mahan, San Jose’s mayor, knocks Gov. Gavin Newsom for choosing online antics over sensible policies: How about less time breaking the Internet and more time fixing California?

Gov. Newsom’s supporters say he is “breaking the internet” and “owning” Trump. But the governor, and every elected official and leader, also need to own up to the truth. And the truth is that California has the highest unemployment rate in the nation, at 5.5%, and nearly half the nation’s unsheltered homeless people. We have the highest energy and housing costs in the continental United States, and, largely because of these high costs, the highest effective poverty rate in the nation.

And now let me give you the really bad news.

These problems are even less likely to be addressed today because of the terribly misaligned incentives being baked into our politics. As Gov. Newsom’s surge in recent polls demonstrates, politicians are being rewarded for resisting, even when such resistance moves beyond taking on the excesses and abuses of the Trump administration and begins disparaging businesses merely for expressing concerns over very real problems of crime, homelessness, and overregulation.

I was elected mayor of San Jose in 2022 after offering a simple plan for commonsense change: faster and cheaper solutions to homelessness, an increase in police hiring, and tying our elected officials’ pay to performance. These seemed like pretty radical ideas to some — although not to the majority of San Joseans demanding action.

By tuning out the political noise and focusing on the basic issues that residents care about the most, San Jose has nearly completed over 2,000 new safe and decent shelter units for homeless people in less than two years — and we are shrinking our unsheltered homeless population. We are clearing encampments and requiring that people come indoors if there is shelter available. And, under our new “Responsibility to Shelter” ordinance, if someone repeatedly refuses shelter when shelter is available, they could be charged with trespassing.

Crime is going down — in part because we helped convince Californians to embrace Proposition 36 to end a cycle of theft without consequence, sending the message that serious criminal activity, like repeated retail thefts, would carry consequences.

But we are just one city. We, and every California city, would be doing better if Sacramento was doing more. Instead of spending so much energy attacking his opponents, the governor and his team should be addressing the high cost of energy, helping hard-pressed families make ends meet and keeping them and their employers from fleeing our state. They should be addressing concerns over public safety by fully implementing the will of the voters on Proposition 36 by building enough treatment beds to ensure it doesn’t become a self-fulfilling prophecy for the opposition.

Newsom will solve no problem before its time: Gavin Newsom’s 10-year plan to end San Francisco homelessness marks 20-year anniversary.

ED MORRISSEY: Of Course: Media Freaks Out Over Normal Secret Service Provision for Kamala.

So the actual story is that the Biden administration gave Harris a stealth extension of taxpayer-funded benefits to which she was not entitled. If Congress wants to extend those benefits for former VPs, then let Congress propose and pass those into statute as amendments to the pension system for former presidents and VPs. Otherwise, Harris is no longer a public servant, and she can use her own resources for personal protection rather than sponge off the taxpayers. Trump simply canceled the illegitimate extension and restored the normal post-office benefit limitations to which all VPs are subject.

The Protection Racket Media clearly wants to push another narrative. They want to paint Trump as a revenge-driven authoritarian using his authority to punish his political opponents, oddly enough after spending four years missing the real authoritarians in the White House actually doing that to Trump and his allies. If they wanted to do their jobs as reporters, they’d be asking questions as to why Biden — or whoever ran the autopen — expanded those benefits in the first place. The PRM’s mission isn’t to report as much as it is to amplify progressive-elite propaganda messaging. And that’s exactly what they attempted this morning. Again.

Still though, think of the myriad potential dangers for secret agent Double Oh Kackle:

VDH: Europe in the Balance?

Mass protests are now common in Britain against the Labour Party’s open borders policies and generous welfare entitlements for immigrants who arrive illegally and without authentic “political refugee” status.

Greek officials, also swamped by illegal immigration, now cite President Donald Trump’s secure border policies as new models for their own.

The majority of European immigrants now come from majority-Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa. Yet many arrivals seem angrier at their newfound liberal hosts than at the dictatorships they fled back home.

Europe’s immigration policies will not work in a multi-ethnic democracy.

Too many immigrants are arriving too quickly, without sufficient diversity, language fluency, skills, or familiarity with the customs and culture of their host nations. They often enter with separatist religious and cultural values antithetical to the very place they seek refuge.

Yet, there is no European plan of civic education to assimilate immigrants and teach them the rules, laws, and culture of their hosts.

Why would there be, when European leftist elites wish to toss Europe’s past down the memory hole?

Was It Over When the Germans Bombed Pearl Harbor During the ‘European Civil War?’

Acclaimed BBC series Civilisation is given a warning over outdated attitudes.

INSIDE THE TRANS, VEGAN DEATH CULT:

There may be a tendency to treat the Zizians as just another crazy cult in a long history of crazy cults. But what is interesting about this particular crazy cult is just how contemporary it is. Uniformly transgender or nonbinary, and convinced they can make the world a better place even if that involves violence, the Zizians could only exist in the present-day West.

The story of their key figure, Jack Amadeus ‘Ziz’ LaSota, is certainly very much of our time. Growing up in Alaska, LaSota and his two younger siblings were largely home-schooled by their middle-class parents. LaSota’s father taught instructional design at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. According to one of his later blogposts, LaSota said that as a pre-teen, he began to see puberty as an ‘evil’ imposition – a belief that would fuel his embrace of transgender ideology.

By all accounts, LaSota was a bright, if troubled youth. He graduated from Fairbanks with a computer-science degree, but dropped out of graduate school. He was offered placements at both Oracle and NASA, before moving to the San Francisco Bay Area in 2016 – ‘for proximity to the tech industry which I considered sort of my destiny’, as he put it in a 2019 blog post. His ‘destiny’ was a reference to the other credo alongside transgenderism to which LaSota desperately cleaved – namely, so-called rationalism.

Rationalism here refers not to a broad Enlightenment faith in the power of human reason, but to a very 21st-century belief system. Cliquey, elitist and Very Online, the rationalist movement insists that supposedly bias-free scientific thought and probabilistic reasoning can solve virtually any issue and make the world a better place. It is a technocratic, elitist creed beloved of tech geeks. It is also an apocalyptic movement, obsessively preoccupied with the threat of AI. A fair few rationalists live in perpetual fear that machines will one day subjugate humans if preventative steps are not taken now.

Read the whole thing.

Earlier, from Andy Ngo in January: Killing of border patrol agent appears linked to ‘Zizian’ radical leftist trans cult.

And from Stacy McCain in February: Real Murders, Fake Suicides: ‘Zizian’ Death Cult Fugitives Still at Large.

Related:

EVERGREEN: GERMANS STILL GOOSESTEPPING INTO THE ABYSS.

Here’s the underlying article on the German Website Bild, published by Berlin’s Axel Springer SE (which purchased Politico and Business Insider in the US), translated in rather clunky English by Firefox, but you get the gist:

Bizarre muzzle agreement in the Cologne local election campaign! CDU, SPD, Green, FDP, Left and Volt have signed on the initiative of the association “Kölner Round Table for Integration” not to speak negatively about migration during the election campaign.

This so-called “fairness agreement” of the parties (the AfD had not even been asked at first) stipulates that “migrants, migrants and refugees must not be held responsible for negative social developments such as unemployment or the threat to internal security”. Basically, the parties signed that the election campaign “not at the expense of people living among us with a migrant background.”

Consequence: The only relevant party in the Cologne election campaign that addresses negative aspects of immigration is the AfD.

“That our parties are so stupid …”

“It is a tactical stupidity not to fill topics and to leave them to the AfD,” says political scientist Werner Patzelt about BILD. He is speechless “that our parties are so stupid that they don’t see the tactical disadvantage and that they are so weak on their chests that they don’t see that they themselves damage our democracy by not wanting to talk about important issues.”

As David Frum quipped in 2018 about the first Trump administration, “If liberals insist that enforcing borders is a job only fascists will do, then voters will hire fascists to do the job liberals won’t.”

I HOPE WE’RE NOT TOO MESSIANIC, OR A TRIFLE TOO SATANIC:

Well sure, he looks a bit unconventional, but he really knows his science:

THUNDERDOME: Scott Jennings Triggers CNN Panel Libs over ‘Pregnant People.’

The segment went sideways when Jennings pointed out that one of the resigning CDC officials, former National Monkeypox Deputy Response Coordinator Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, used the term “pregnant people” in his resignation letter. Anyone with half a brain can understand how this is actually anti-science because only women can get pregnant. The science is quite settled on that fact. And “pregnant people” presumes otherwise. This is clearly an example of politicized science.

It also bears noting that monkeypox was sold to the American people as a highly transmissible disease, when in fact it was a sexually transmitted disease- transmitted in a very specific manner. The disease would subsequently be renamed “mpox” so as to avoid stigmatizing gay men. Reasonable people might say that THIS also was politicized science and just one of the many such excesses of the Biden Era.

By throwing “pregnant people” into the discussion Jennings thus undid, or rather blew up, a carefully constructed narrative framework about the dangers of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. But the American people voted for a Make America Healthy Again agenda. And the people are entitled to the appointment of functionaries that will implement the agenda they voted for.

As for Abby Phillip, she once again interrupted and hectored and misrepresented Jennings’ arguments by suggesting that his objection was to the word “people.” It was not. Jennings once again argued the panel liberals (Phillip included) into a 5% position against 95% of America.

Related: CDC Leader Who Wrote Dramatic Anti-Trump Letter PROBABLY Seems Familiar … Here’s the Sick Reason Why.

In 2020, the left wanted carveouts from being locked down to have mostly peaceful but often quite fiery riots and looting and statue toppling. Last year, “In conversations caught on hidden camera, New York City’s former COVID czar said that he’d organized a pair of sex parties in the second half of 2020, as New Yorkers coped with peak pandemic social isolation. ‘The only way I could do this job for the city was if I had some way to blow off steam every now and then,’ Jay Varma told an undercover reporter with whom he thought he was on a date.” In 2023, Daskalakis went the full Reuters and argued, “One person’s idea of risk is another person’s idea of a great festival or Friday night.”

Incidentally, Trump could use Daskalakis’ resignation and other protests at the CDC as a tool to further accelerate the changes he desires there:

HOW IT STARTED: “I don’t understand why the Houthi terrorist group still exists. We and the UK have bombed them off and on over recent months. Whatever we have done obviously hasn’t been enough. They should share the fate of pirates through the centuries: we should kill them all.”

—John Hinderaker, Power Line, July 9th.

How it’s going: IDF said to believe entire Houthi cabinet was likely killed in yesterday’s strike.

—The Times of Israel, today.

 

THE SUICIDE OF EXPERTISE:

Spare me the crocodile tears at the CDC exits! This institution DESTROYED children and RUINED trust in health institutions for a generation. The whole place needs to be gutted!

When historians look back on the COVID years, they won’t just document a virus. They’ll document the collapse of America’s most trusted health agency into a factory of fear, censorship, and bad science. The CDC didn’t just miss the mark –> it repeatedly tripped over its own contradictions, buried evidence, and treated the public as an obstacle instead of a partner.

Read the whole thing.

Related:

(Classical reference in headline.)

EASY RIDERS, RAGING OEDIPAL RESENTMENT:

This isn’t a very new development of course. In a 2007 article by Norman Podhoretz, he quoted a Commentary staffer who said at a (very early) anti-Vietnam War protest in 1960, “Do you realize that every young person in this room is a tragedy to some family or other?”

It was of an evening in the year 1960, when I went to address a meeting of left-wing radicals on a subject that had then barely begun to show the whites of its eyes: the possibility of American military involvement in a faraway place called Vietnam and the need to begin mobilizing opposition to it. Accompanying me that evening was the late Marion Magid, a member of my staff at Commentary, of which I had recently become the editor. As we entered the drafty old hall on Union Square in Manhattan, Marion surveyed the 50 or so people in the audience and whispered to me: “Do you realize that every young person in this room is a tragedy to some family or other?”

The memory of this quip brought back to life some sense of how unpromising the future had then appeared to be for that bedraggled-looking assemblage.

Not least of which, conquering a heretofore conservative Hollywood. The estranged relationships between the leftist movie brats who became the “New Hollywood” of the late ‘60s and ‘70s and their more conservative “Greatest Generation”-era fathers is a theme that repeats frequently in Peter Biskind’s 1998 retrospective, Easy Riders, Raging Bulls:

[Candice] Bergen was deeply sympathetic to the antiwar movement, embarrassed by her father, Edgar Bergen’s, friendship with the Old Hollywood right—Ronald Reagan, Bob Hope, Charlton Heston, as well as the fact that he had made his living throwing his voice into wooden dummies.

* * * * * * * *

Carmine [Coppola] had been a child prodigy, whose instrument was the flute. He hit his peak in his twenties, and went downhill from there, once bottoming out by playing the piccolo at the track with a Nedick’s hat on his head. Like many people who flee from what they’re best at, Carmine took his talent for the flute for granted, and longed to spread his wings, compose symphonies or conduct opera.

Carmine was the “maestro,” and his wife, Italia, catered to his every whim. The emotional life of his family turned on what Francis later called the “tragedy” of his father’s career. Coppola once said of his father, he was “a frustrated man who hated anybody who was successful.” Remembers Talia, “All of us felt guilty, about being young, about having our own lives. I thought, How can I go to school, how can I be happy, how can I be anything, with my poor father not doing well. It’s a terrible thing when you feel that your success is occurring when someone close to you is experiencing failure.”

* * * * * * * * *

Once again, like Star Wars, The Godfather, and Taxi Driver, Apocalypse revolved around the issue of parricide. The New Hollywood directors were created in the crucible of generational conflict, and the highly charged relationship between fathers and sons became their core theme. Like the other Vietnam films, Apocalypse was less an attempt to grapple with the war in any realistic way than an occasion to hold up a mirror to the home-front struggles it provoked. Brando, of course, was the ur-father of this generation, the actor whose performances and rebellious example inspired its best work, yet who now stood a colossus astride the road to greatness, an obstacle Coppola—who long enjoyed a complicated love-hate relationship with the actor—had to overcome. Kurtz, lurking in shadow, clad in black, at once model and caution, became his Darth Vader, another incarnation of Charlie Manson, the scourge figure who had gone native and now, unchallenged, ruled over his family. The compound was his Spahn ranch. From another angle, Kurtz was one more incarnation of Coppola himself, or at least the monster of self-indulgence he had become.

* * * * * * * * *

The script [to Chinatown that Robert] Towne finally handed in told a long, intricate tale, teeming with characters and scenes, chock-full of detail and small touches that limned the texture of America in the ’30s. It contained a startling subplot, in which the theft of water and the rape of the land were mirrored by an unspeakable family crime, incest between Noah Cross, a rapacious developer, and his daughter, Evelyn. In the portrait of Cross, Towne may have been settling some family scores. Cross displayed a passing resemblance to Towne’s own father, Lou. Both were developers. According to Towne’s wife, Julie Payne, “Lou wanted him to go into the building business, which neither Robert nor his brother, Roger, had any interest in. I think his father hated Robert. He didn’t pay any attention to him until he became successful.”

Steven Spielberg and George Lucas eventually saw a different path forward in the plots of their movies, which were essentially 1950s b-movies and 1930s Republic serials shot on zillion-dollar budgets, rather than the dark European-inspired fare their friends had been churning out during the 1970s:

Spielberg’s father buried himself in his work, and was usually absent. He clashed with Steven over his son’s indifferent performance in school. Steven was an underachiever. He hated reading, watched TV instead, became, along with Lucas, one of the first directors of the TV generation. His great love was movies, and he occupied himself making elaborate productions in Super-8—sci-fi and World War II pictures using his classmates and contriving elaborate and resourceful do-it-yourself special effects.

* * * * * * * *

Because as much as Spielberg and Lucas wanted to indulge their Peter Pan complexes, return the boomers to the sandbox, much as they backed kids against adults, Spielberg’s movies in particular are colored by longing for the absent dad, a nostalgia for authority. His families are often fatherless; the plots are set in motion by the moral and emotional vacuum at the center of the home, and resolved by father surrogates. Both the Star Wars trilogy and the Indiana Jones trilogy end on a note of generational harmony, with the revelation that the repentant Darth Vader is Luke’s father, and the reconciliation of Indy with his father in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. Indy’s final words are, “Yes, sir!” In Close Encounters, Neary-the-child, entering the mother ship in a trancelike daze, surrenders himself to the superior power of idealized grown-ups, grown-ups as they appear to children, in the same way that Star Wars ends with the famous parody of Triumph of the Will. The evil over-thirties of the Nixon era would become the avuncular adults of the Reagan era—Reagan himself in particular. Lucas and Spielberg finally succeeded in turning the counterculture upside down.

Not coincidentally, Lucas and Spielberg ended up ruling the industry in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s.

SHE’S NOT WRONG: Karoline Leavitt Slaps Crime Deniers in Dem-Run Cities Back to Reality: ‘Your Leaders Are Lying to You.’

Democrats are hell-bent on digging in on the wrong side of every 80-20 or even 99-1 issue affecting the American people. Karoline Leavitt is delivering a strong message on one of those issues – crime in big, blue cities such as Washington, D.C., Chicago, or New York City.

That message is intended for those who genuinely believe in a resistance party that assures them everything is fine and crime is not a problem.

“Nothing to see here. Please disperse,” as Leslie Nielsen famously said in the movie The Naked Gun.

The White House Press Secretary addressed those misinformed souls directly today.

“This is our message to Americans in Democrat-run cities nationwide: decline is a choice. You don’t have to live in constant fear of being robbed, raped, or murdered,” she declared. “Your leaders are lying to you — and they have been failing you for decades.”

In the 1990s, in the wake of Rudy Giuliani’s cleanup of New York, Democrat mayors such as Philadelphia’s Ed Rendell at least paid lip service to getting serious about crime. By the 2010, and certainly after 2020, most simply gave up and started spouting sub-Butterfield leftist platitudes a la Brandon Johnson on Monday:

 

JIM TREACHER: The Man Who Shot Those Kids in Minneapolis Was Not a Woman.

I’m putting that irrefutable statement of fact in a headline, because I haven’t seen it anywhere else.

Yesterday in Minnesota, a man who claimed to be a woman shot up a Catholic church full of children. He wasn’t a “trans woman,” let alone a woman. He was a man. A very crazy man.

A lot of mainstream “news” outlets don’t want you to say that. And if you insist on pointing out the truth, they’re eager to brand you a bigot.

Read the whole thing.

CONSERVING CONSERVATISM MOST CONSERVATIVELY: David French Proposes Democrats Fight Trump On Crime By Blaming Him For 2020 Crime Spree.

Co-host Willie Geist opened up the floor, “So, David French, the question is then for Democrats, and you can offer some free political advice, too, if you’d like to. What is the way through this? We have heard Governor Moore, Governor Pritzker, Governor Newsom saying, ‘We welcome partnership, we welcome more cops. We want people in our streets to feel safe, but we’re not doing it his way. We’re not going to have troops walking down the streets of Baltimore and Chicago and Los Angeles.’”

French began, “I mean, you have to use the truth to blow up his narrative.”

According to French, the very same people who accuse Trump of acting like a king or a fascist dictator should also attack him for not micromanaging cities in 2020, “And the truth is this: that people forget he was president in 2020. And when crime really exploded, when violent crime really exploded in a way that was terrifying and dangerous, it happened in 2020, in his presidency, his first term.”

This seems to be the tactic the left has begun using to attempt to distance themselves from the Color Revolution they launched in the spring of 2020, when the narrative shifted on a dime from “we must all socially distance at home” to “we must all mass in the streets to burn buildings and topple statues and loot stores:”