THIS SOUNDS KIND OF FAMILIAR, ACTUALLY: Section Three and the “First Insurrection” … That Wasn’t. “Their brief is an unsuccessful attempt to place someone who wasn’t there at an insurrection that did not occur. Even more damningly for their side, the brief calls attention to an 1862 statute that actually blows a hole through the already weak originalist case for disqualification.”

Placing someone who wasn’t there at an insurrection that did not occur is the January 6 case against Trump.