JUDICIAL IMPROPRIETY: Lawyer Lin Wood Was Wrongly Faulted by Delaware Trial Court. “More questionable yet was the court’s insinuation that Wood was at least partially responsible for the troubling events that occurred at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021—a topic not addressed in the Rule to Show Cause. . . . Because the Superior Court’s revocation order is based on factual findings for which there is no support in the record and because the court failed to explain why Wood’s withdrawal would not moot the court’s concerns about the appropriateness or advisability of Wood’s continued admission, we find that the court’s revocation order was an abuse of discretion.”

Plus: “Both the tone and the explicit language of the Superior Court’s memorandum opinion and order suggest that the court’s interest extended beyond the mere propriety and advisability of Wood’s continued involvement in the case before it. In fact, one cannot read the court’s order without concluding that the court intended to cast aspersions on Wood’s character.”

The January 6 “riot” or “insurrection” is mostly an excuse to go after political opponents of the regime.

The lower court ruling was by Superior Court judge Craig A. Karsnitz. His bio is here.