ONE PROFESSOR PUNISHED FOR SPEECH? AN ANECDOTE. A HUNDRED? CHERRY-PICKED. A THOUSAND? SELECTION BIAS. SURVEYS? BAD QUESTIONS. BETTER SURVEYS? METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS! Welcome to the “Academic Filibuster,” academia’s remarkable talent for turning every new piece of evidence into yet another demand for proof, while the problems everyone knew about decades ago only become more entrenched. I’m unpacking this phenomenon in my new series on higher education’s resistance to reform, starting with a FREE introduction.
InstaPundit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.