NO MEANS NO, BUT SO DOES YES.

I wrote for @NRO about the mysteriously absent “no” in the Cornell 7 case :

“The end result of liberal sexual ethics writ large — according to which women seldom say no and they can be, or should be, every bit as debauched as men — has not been a joyful bacchanal but a…

— Inez Stepman ⚪️🔴⚪️ (@InezFeltscher) October 11, 2026

“Feminists understandably balk at the idea that women ought to be at all times under the supervision and control of the men around them. Yet they now claim that ‘no’ is so difficult and so beyond women’s ability that we need to reinvent the old patriarchal structure, this time made more insane by the fact that it’s no longer a woman’s father or husband — who at least presumably love her and have her best interests at heart — who is responsible for controlling or curtailing her sexual escapades, but random fraternity brothers instead.”