I WAS TRAVELING YESTERDAY, AND FELL A BIT BEHIND, but the Signal story seems like a nothingburger to me. In fact, I kind of wonder if Goldberg was deliberately included as part of an information op, allowing them to release stuff they didn’t want to be seen releasing openly. Anyway, “war plans?” Not so much, but it’s Jeffrey Goldberg so. . .

I've read the Atlantic article & Signal messages twice, top to bottom. Most of those on social media ringing alarm bells and repeating talking points have not.

Should Goldberg have been added to the chat? No.

Did Goldberg gain access to "secret" information? Kind of. He found… pic.twitter.com/KMHpFsjvT8

— Tony Kinnett (@TheTonus) March 24, 2025

The Signal chat thing is a gut check for alleged cons.

Nothing significant was revealed. Worst case, it was a mistake that will never happen again. More likely, a proven liar has now lied about at least some of it.

And yet, so many people are delighted to have the opportunity…

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) March 25, 2025