CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: In Range v. US, a win for gun rights. After the case was GVR’d back to the Third Circuit (they Granted certiorari, Vacated the judgment below, and Remanded for further consideration) after Rahimi, the Third Circuit has stuck by its, er, guns, and held that the nonviolent crime of making a false statement on a food stamp application isn’t enough for a lifelong loss of gun rights. Full opinion is here. I’ve only skimmed it briefly (all 165 pages) but I’ll probably have more later, though probably after Christmas. Interestingly, only two judges from the 15 judge en banc panel dissented.