October 2, 2005


Neither the Times nor the WaPo seem able to keep certain details of the Wilson/Plame/”16 Words” saga in proper order. . . .

The WaPo continues to amuse as they explain Wilson’s motivation:

“The Niger claim was central to the White House’s rationale for war.”

So central that it was not part of either the 2003 State of the Union or Colin Powell’s presentation to the UN on the case for war.

Read the whole thing.


Comments are closed.
InstaPundit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.