July 18, 2004

ALEX JONES writes that press credentials don’t turn bloggers into “journalists.” True enough. Of course, neither does a paycheck from the New York Times or NPR.

UPDATE: Related thoughts here.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Joe Gandelman has a well-thought-out and even-tempered commentary on Jones’s oped.

MORE: Matt Welch’s commentary is less even-tempered, but fun to read. And right.

STILL MORE: It’s worth reading this post (“The next generation of journalists will start as bloggers”) from Ernest Miller, too.

MORE STILL: Jeff Jarvis: “What, as if major media aren’t the No. 1 juicy target for manipulation? Jeesh. Wake up and smell the breath of the PR guy and the political spinmeister whispering in your ear, Alex.”

AND YET MORE: Patrick Belton: “Alex Jones of the Kennedy School of Government manages to do precisely what he accuses blogs of: making vituperative arguments driven by emotion rather than fact, and marked by remarkable lack of engagement with facts or evidence, or an understanding of the subject matter at hand. . . . Blogging, as I’ve experienced it, is characterised by polite running conversations, backed up by evidence. I have to respond to friends on my left such as Kevin Drum and Matt Yglesias, and ones to my right such as the Winds of Change. Maureen Dowd doesn’t.”

Comments are closed.
InstaPundit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.