July 9, 2002

ENDLESS REHASHING OF BUSH V. GORE leaves me cold, but here’s an oped by Julie Hilden at Findlaw arguing that subsequent decisions by the Supreme Court suggest that the decision was a principled one.

I doubt this will change anyone’s mind, which is one reason why it’s hard for me to get excited about discussions of the case.

Comments are closed.
InstaPundit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.