FROM SCOTT ADAMS, a Trump vs. Clinton Risk Assessment. I dunno about one of his factors, though — I’d take Churchill in a minute. “In most presidential elections, voters have a choice of one social drinker or the other social drinker. Risk-wise, that’s a tie. But this election features a candidate who is known to like her alcohol versus a candidate who has reportedly never had a drink, an illegal drug, or a cigarette. And that means alcohol can be considered in the risk assessment.”