Archive for 2025

OUTSIDE PRESSURE PROMOTING INTERNAL REFORM:

HAMASNIK MOB CHOOSES THE WRONG TARGET: How it started:

How it ended:

HMM: China will weaponise biotech as it ascends to dominance, may create AI-powered super-soldiers: U.S. Commission.

The world is entering the age of biotechnology, a time when biology is the basis of innovation, the report says in a sober analysis, stressing that every strategic sector — including defence, healthcare, agriculture, energy, and manufacturing — can be advanced by biotechnology, but also breached by it.

The Commission’s research indicates that China is likely to follow the same playbook with biotechnology as it has with other strategic technologies, the report said. “First, they steal. Then, they scale. Once they have cornered the market, they strangle,” it said, pointing to the Chinese restrictions on gallium and germanium in 2024 that had disrupted U.S. semiconductor production.

Noting that U.S. allies and partners offer unique capabilities, the report referred to India which it says is “prioritizing” cost-effective bio-manufacturing, particularly of vaccines. “We must do more to take advantage of our partners’ unparalleled strengths, which could include entering into reciprocal data-sharing agreements or pooling demand for biotechnology products,” it said.

Particularly focussing on biotech in the defence domain, the Commission said it has every reason to believe that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will “weaponize” biotechnology. Now, with its Military-Civil Fusion strategy, the CCP aims to use biotechnology-powered troops — terming this “intelligent warfare” — to make the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) a “world-class military” by 2049. “Drone warfare will seem quaint if we are faced with genetically enhanced PLA super-soldiers with fused human and AI,” the report warned.

To be honest, I’m much less concerned with super-soldiers than with the possibility that the COVID-19 release was a test-run for something more dangerous and more targeted.

JOSH BLACKMAN ON JUDICIAL SUPREMACY:

Fourth, speaking of President Trump, there is a big difference between Little Rock and CECOT. During the Civil Rights Era, the clash was between the Supreme Court and the states. President Eisenhower, perhaps begrudgingly, backed up the judiciary. Today we have a conflict of a very different nature between the Supreme Court and the executive. The better analogy is whether James Madison would have actually delivered Marbury’s commission, or whether President Lincoln would have ordered the release of Merryman. Here, no one will call the 101st Airborne to help Chief Justice Roberts or Judge Boasberg. To the contrary, I think most Americans would shrug their shoulders about whether aliens who are otherwise subject to removal spend their days in CECOT.

Fifth, I worry about the risk of the Supreme Court issuing an order truly out of its bounds in the separation of powers, and that order is ignored. Much of the criticism focuses how on that effort would empower Trump. But I think the even more compelling concern is how it would weaken the Court, perhaps irreparably. A court that issues a ruling that can be disregarded is no longer a court. That premise should inform the sorts of orders that are issued against the executive branch. Justice Alito stated the issue plainly: “Both the Executive and the Judiciary have an obligation to follow the law.”

Indeed they do.

PLAUSIBLE:

THAN MONKEYS ON PEYOTE?  Higher than WHAT?