Archive for 2022

HEY, HE’S AS FIT AS BIDEN IS TO BE PRESIDENT, RIGHT? Fetterman campaign: Yes, okay, fine, he doesn’t want to debate yet because of his stroke. “A few days ago Dr. Oz’s campaign mocked Fetterman for his reluctance to debate, offering to give him unlimited bathroom breaks and to “pay for any additional medical personnel he might need to have on standby.” Fetterman’s campaign seized on that as a pretext to decline the debate invitation by feigning offense. We won’t reward someone who’d be callous enough to mock a stroke survivor, they replied. But they’re not offended. Fetterman’s just not up to it. And his campaign appears to have made a strategic decision not to pretend otherwise, for now.”

Yeah, whenever they pretend to stand up for decency, it’s just about politics.

CAN’T STOP THE SIGNAL: Joe Biden Crosses Lines in Grotesque National Address, Heckler Spoils His Party. “Excerpts from Joe Biden’s “MAGA speech” previewed a gross abuse of the Executive Office of the President. Sure enough, that’s exactly what was delivered as the president appeared in Philidelphia, standing in front of a blood-red background, flanked by Marines. Lines were crossed that can’t be uncrossed, from the use of the military as props in a blatantly political speech to Biden suggesting that nearly half the country is a ‘danger’ to the republic. This was a speech that went far beyond anything seen in the modern era of presidential addresses. . . . The meat of the speech was no better than Biden’s health. He kept repeating the term ‘MAGA,’ painting those who voted for Donald Trump as evil fascists that pose a direct threat to the very well-being of the nation. That’s ludicrous, and as I’ve shared before, it’s also incredibly dangerous. When you begin attack tens of millions of Americans as scum, suggesting they are going to destroy ‘our democracy,’ that justifies just about anything in response, doesn’t it? Someone is going to get hurt based on his incitement.”

The Democrats’ attempt to criminalize opposition and treat opponents as domestic terrorists deserves more than heckling. It’s disgraceful and unAmerican.

Plus: “It sure feels like Biden wants to provoke some kind of violent response. Why else even give this speech? . . . There’s also an inherent contradiction in what Biden is saying. He continually wants to paint himself as an uniter, while his words and actions exacerbate deep, disturbing divisions. . . . This was Twitter rage wrapped into a national address, and it was sad and pathetic to witness.”

JON GABRIEL: Biden Warns That MAGA Republicans Pose ‘Clear and Present Danger’ to Nation.

It was fitting for Joe Biden to deliver Thursday night’s Independence Hall speech in a venue lit by gas lights. Backed by a blood-red background and two soldiers shrouded in darkness, the president condemned half the nation as insurrectionists who pose a “clear and present danger” to the United States.

The language was deliberate as it was divisive. “Clear and present danger” is a legal doctrine created by the Woodrow Wilson-era US Supreme Court to curtail the free speech of Americans. At the time, an antiwar activist was jailed for advocating draft resistance during World War I. In Schenck v. United States (1919), Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., wrote for the majority:

The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that the United States Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.

Thereafter, courts employed the “clear and present danger test” to limit citizens’ First Amendment rights. That is, until Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) replaced it to address only “imminent lawless action.”

Notably, Biden resurrected this extinct phrase to attack his political enemies just as the authoritarian Wilson used it to attack his detractors. He floated a legal pretext to silence Republicans heading into the midterm elections. The administration has already directed tech companies to ban dissenting voices on social media, so such a move would be in character. Not to mention his FBI’s raid on Trump’s home and his DoJ’s legal harassment of Trump’s legal team.

Woodrow Wilson, you say?

Flash-forward 14 years:

The optics alone of Biden’s speech are disastrous, making Biden look like John Hurt in V for Vendetta:

 

Related: ‘F*ck Joe Biden!’: Heckler Crashes President’s Speech in Philadelphia.

OPEN THREAD: Just do it.

‘THAT’S HOW YOU GET AWAY IT:’ Project Veritas strikes again, this time videoing a public school assistant principal as he describes why and how he refuses to hire teachers who happen to be professing Christians, so he can enable the liberal indoctrination of students. The Washington Stand’s Ben Johnson has the details. Now, back to the beach.

OPEN THE BOOKS TRIBUTE: Wife and I got an early start at the beach on the Labor Day weekend, but I found time to write this tribute to the nonprofit watchdog that has done so much to advance transparency in government.

“FOLLOW THE SCIENCE:”

There’s something appealing about the view that science floats loftily above us all, ‌ accessible to a select few with years of rigorous training in its methods. But, as romantic visions often do, it fell hard to earth. The follow-the-science logic we have lived under during Covid demands wartime sacrifices from the public while rationalizing sloth from leaders and institutions in mobilizing tools to relieve the burden. It became an easy out for bureaucratic turf protection, lost dynamism and institutional fecklessness. “Follow the science” became a failure to lead, a way to shift the onus of responsibility from presidents, Congress, health authorities and school boards onto the public.

This is a bad place for us to be.

Yep. And Fauci, et al. — with a major boost from the news media — got us there.

Plus: “While public health leaders are now gingerly attempting to confront their mistakes, what we have seen in, say, the C.D.C.’s new internal report are halfhearted, proceduralist ideas. The public health establishment will not be able to do better than this without real soul-searching. And that will require swallowing a bitter pill: labeling Dr. Fauci’s Covid legacy and the approach it embodied a failure. His retirement is an opportune moment to move on from the view of science he stood for throughout the pandemic to something new.”

LAUGHING WOLF: Into The Light: Mikhail Gorbachev. “I noted yesterday that I have mixed emotions on the passing of Gorbachev. That is being polite. The man was the enemy, on more than one level. Yet, I have come to have respect for the man, for reasons and because Boss had respect for him.”