Archive for 2020

WHO KNOWS THE DARKNESS IN THE HEARTS OF THE LEFT’S PLOTS? THE BEE KNOWS:  Walmart Thanks Government For Completely Obliterating Their Small Business Competition.

And this is why the left hates the bee, and keeps claiming they’re not satire. Because you know, they’re right. The left while claiming they don’t like corporations, actually do what they can to favor them. Because communism has melded with fascism (see China) and big corporations are easier to control (see, Joe Biden’s plans.)

THIS? THIS? THEY AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET:  The left is now reaping what it sowed.

… the problem is they’re a cult. And their revelation says that the arrow of history means they always win. May the Lord have mercy on our souls, that we let it fester this far.

THAT’S BECAUSE WE’VE NEVER DECISIVELY BEAT THE MARXISTS AND MADE THEM INTO OBJECTS OF HORROR — LIKE THE NAZIS — INSTEAD OF CUTE ACADEMIC PETS:  Learning from Experience, Not.

YOU ARE NOT ALONE. NO, WHAT YOU’RE FEELING IS NOT NORMAL, BECAUSE THE TIMES AREN’T NORMAL:  Quote of the Day.

Go read.

DUH. THIS IS WHY I KNEW WHAT WAS COMING. BECAUSE THE DEMS WEREN’T CAMPAIGNING. THEY WERE DOING A MINIMALIST, POTEMKIN CAMPAIGN. BECAUSE THE FRAUD WAS IN. IN ALL THE WAY:  Regarding post-election fraud in Pennsylvania.

So all you luvies that say “we’ll get them n 22” might want to think of the USSR elections. The DDR elections too. By 22, they’ll have 100% of the vote. And the Green Nude Heel on your neck.
Unless you intend to learn to eat grass and go “baaaah” stop that nonsense.

RIGHT NOW SURE TRUMP CONCEDED BECAUSE A PART OF THE DEEP STATE IS TALKING TO ANOTHER PART OF THE DEEP STATE:  The capitulation conservatives.

Spit out the black pill, boys and girls. If you let them take this one, with this MUCH in your face fraud? You might as well concede we couldn’t keep the republic. And if that’s what you’re going to do, go elsewhere. The adults are fighting.

Oh, and before you say there was no fraud, go here, here, and here.  And btw I live with a mathematician. Every mathematician, statistician and numbers person  who hasn’t sold his mind to the lefty cult is going nuts because the numbers make no sense. And the only way for the numbers to make no sense is for them to be cooked. Numbers people hate that. It’s like looking at a slightly ajar drawer. which in my experience mathematicians also don’t like.

Sure, convincing yourself there’s no fraud is soothing. So is an excess of sleeping pills, or opening your veins in a warm bath. NONE are healthy, though. Or survivable.

OPEN THREAD: Monday’s almost over.

SHARYL ATTKISSON: The New Woke Times.

As demanded by the mob of staff, the Times adds an editor’s note to Cotton’s column. It says the op-ed had been approved in a “rushed” editorial process that did not meet its standards. Sulzberger emails employees, “Last week we saw a significant breakdown in our editing processes, not the first we’ve experienced in recent years.”

Days later, editorial chief Bennet is finished. The Times announces he has resigned. The same newspaper that defended controversial op-eds such as the one signed by Russian president Vladimir Putin in 2013, and even an anti-Trump opinion piece that hadn’t been signed at all and was published anonymously, was now adjudicating the words of a prominent US senator to be just too incendiary.

It is a strange place, indeed, where news reporters can editorialize but op-ed editorials cannot. On June 1, 2020, after President Trump walked through a public Washington, DC, park amid national protests and riots—to a church that had been burned a block away—Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker, tweets:

Trump just stands in front of the church and holds up a bible while posing for photos. He does not even go inside for a faux tour of the damage or make a pretense of having any purpose in going there other than to pose for photos.

The latest developments remove any lingering doubt as to how the Times sees its modern mission: serving and pleasing the left-wing activists on its staff and the liberal activists who dominate on the news and social media. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger’s dictum when he fired the newspaper’s public editor in May 2017 had come to pass in a terrible way. Recall that, at the time, he declared that the Times’ followers on social media would “collectively serve as a modern watch- dog, more vigilant and forceful than one person could ever be.”

The Times let itself become hopelessly slanted. Captive to organized feedback on social media. Beholden to irredeemably conflicted staff members. Consumed by internal demons.

Make no mistake: other media outlets are taking note. In this way, they are motivated to self-censor news and information, lest they draw the wrath of the mobs. One editorial figure at a major international publication who did not want to be identified recounted numerous pieces he has recently killed for fear of the organized backlash.

“They can bankrupt me,” he tells me. “Facebook, Twitter, Google— they can ruin you in a matter of hours. For somebody like us, they can destroy you. So what do we do? We pull our punches. To raise certain issues is to cut your own throat.” He continues, “The newsman in me says, ‘Tell the truth,’ and that sounds great. But if I do that and destroy [my publication] in the process, what kind of pyrrhic victory is that?”

The information landscape becomes ever narrower, squashing diversity of thought and facts. Pretty soon, we won’t know what we don’t know. And that will be that.

All is happening in accordance with the prophecy: