Archive for 2010

DAVE KOPEL: Is the tax power infinite? “Americans today are not bound to meekly accept the most far-ranging assertions of congressional power based on large extrapolations from Supreme Court cases that themselves come from a short period (the late 1930s and early 1940s) when the Court was more supine and submissive to claims about centralized power than was any other Supreme Court before or after in our history. American citizens, in the political process and in their personal lives, will ultimately have the final word on the Constitution.”

JONAH GOLDBERG: The Reality of ObamaCare. “Insurance companies are now heavily regulated government contractors. Way to get big business out of Washington! They will clear a small, government-approved profit on top of their government-approved fees. Then, when healthcare costs rise — and they will — Democrats will insist, yet again, that the profit motive is to blame and out from this Obamacare Trojan horse will pour another army of liberals demanding a more honest version of single-payer. The Obama administration has turned the insurance industry into the Blackwater of socialized medicine.” I think that’s unfair to Blackwater . . .

MATT WELCH: Bailing Out Big Brother. “Media criticism goes from rebelling against media oligarchs to handing them a lifeline.”

THE PERFECT lemon tart.

WASHINGTON POST HIRES DAVID WEIGEL to cover the right.

A TALE OF TWO TEA PARTIES: Prof. Chris Kobus writes:

Glenn – people here are ticked off and rather than tucking tail, came out fighting today. First up was a tea party right in front of Gary Peters’ office at noon:

Then another in front of a hospital in Royal Oak where a petition drive was begun to put a ballot proposal together for a Constitutional amendment to exempt Michigan from ObamaCare.

Incidentally and appropriately, signatures are due July 5th – right after independence day.

I think we’ll see more of these.

REIHAN SALAM: PREPARED FOR FAILURE. “The Democrats already have their excuse ready when their health-care reform falls short. The solution, of course, will involve more spending.”

UPDATE: Reader C.J. Burch writes: “All the really professional con jobs work this way.”