DAVID HOROWITZ LOOKS BACK on Islamo-fascism Awareness Week and pronounces it a success.

THE LOWEST LEVEL OF HURRICANE ACTIVITY IN THIRTY YEARS. But I thought that global warming was going to produce an ever-growing number of hurricanes like Katrina . . . .

Now, however, it’s going to produce an ever-growing number of wildfires like in California. So we should be safe from those for a few years . . . .

UPDATE: The real cause of the wildfires. Unsurprisingly, it’s Bush’s fault!

ANOTHER UPDATE: At TigerHawk, thoughts on climate change tradeoffs. “The point, of course, is not that global warming is a myth. I myself attend the church of anthropogenic climate change, if only on red-letter Sundays. Rather, it is that the proclivity of the activists and journalists who are pushing this story to inflate the threat beyond all credibility is actually damaging the case for an effective response.”

MORE: Clark Stooksbury has got this right: “The irony is that most of the Southeast could use a hurricane. Whatever damage one might do on the coast, if a tropical depression were to dump heavy rains over Alabama, Georgia, Florida and Tennessee, it would be a blessing.” Yeah, I’ve been watching the computer models for Noel and wishing that the tracks would shift westward.

MORE ON THE DIFFERENCE between Libertarian and libertarian.

NEW DEVELOPMENTS in the Goose Creek terror case.

COMMON SENSE REFORM for Medicaid.

A LOOK AT HAPPENINGS IN “ever-tolerant multi-culti Europe.”

JAMES LILEKS: “I’ve noticed this: the more elaborate the grocery store promotion, the less likely I’ll care. If the store has Ten Cents Off Everything Day, I’ll show up. If they ask me to produce paperwork or enroll in a program, forget it.” I agree.

ALL I WANT FOR CHRISTMAS IS . . . “Insurgents.”

GETTING IT WRONG — AND NOT CORRECTING IT — at the Los Angeles Times.

Perhaps the correction just hasn’t appeared yet. They don’t move very fast over there.

THOUGHTS ON MANNERS, from Dan Collins.

A RETURN TO CARTERNOMICS?

That’s likely to be as popular as the movie.

THE COLBERT CAMPAIGN JUGGERNAUT, explained:

“Blogs are attracted to shiny objects, and Colbert is nothing if not a shiny object,” Beutler said. “Even serious-minded bloggers can’t resist.”

Mmm. . . . Shiny.

FRED THOMPSON ON GUN RIGHTS, at Field and Stream’s gun blog.

A 410-year-old clam. “The clam, nicknamed Ming after the Chinese dynasty in power when it was born, was in its infancy when Queen Elizabeth I was on the throne and Shakespeare was writing plays such as Othello and Hamlet.” And for all those years, it was happy as a . . . well, you know.

TOM SPAULDING remembers Porter Wagoner.

MIKE HUCKABEE responds to John Fund.

AN ELECTRIC SCOOTER with a five-mile range and a 15 mph top speed. This might actually be useful for some people’s commutes.

THE ULTIMATE LIST OF spendy DVD sets.

And I thought I was splurging when I ordered The Time Tunnel.

AN ENVIRONMENTALIST WORRIES ABOUT “PLUNDERING THE MOON.” And note the defeatist, anti-humanity tone of many of the comments to his piece. Happily, others are more sensible.

Actually, however, Rob Merges and I have this topic covered already, in this (relatively short) piece from the NYU Environmental Law Journal. You’ll pardon me if I think that our discussion is sounder, as well as more nuanced. Among other things, private property rights are likely to be both more environmentally friendly and more wealth-creating than centralized regulatory schemes.

MICHAEL YON IS WORRIED ABOUT AFGHANISTAN: “Iraq is looking better month by month. But at the current rate, surely we shall fail in Afghanistan.”

Sounds like we need to take a new approach, as we did in Iraq.

UPDATE: Lawhawk says the problem is Pakistan. “Instead of fighting to win, the Pakistani government under Musharraf is fighting to simply bide time. That’s a losing strategy for everyone but the Islamists, who use this time to regroup and rearm.”

And read this analysis from Strategypage: “While the Taliban are seen as the major problem in Afghanistan, that is not really the case. The big problems are poppies, corruption and Pushtun tribal politics. All three of these combine to produce the Taliban. But to eliminate the Taliban, you have to destroy the highly profitable drug business, curb the corruption and deal with the Pushtun problem. None of these solutions are easy to implement.”

ANOTHER UPDATE: Chuck Simmins emails:

Glenn, the problem with Afghanistan is that it is a NATO operation. The European approach, as we have seen in Basra in Iraq, involves far more accommodation, and far less giving terrorists new accommodations.

The major complaint in Afghanistan is the lack of participation by our NATO allies in the pacification / anti-terror operations. Indeed, the utter lack of preparedness for any such ops. The Canadians have been outstanding, punching well above their weight class. The Brits and Aussies have done well, too, though the Brits have given away gains through diplomacy on several occasions.

The Dutch and French Air Forces have made their ground troops look bad.

I’ve heard quite a few complaints about the NATO operation in Afghanistan.

MORE: A contrary note from Josh Foust of Registan:

I noticed you posted about some frustrations on the mission in Afghanistan. Over at Registan.net, we’ve been covering the ways it has been faltering for years, as well as a series of policy prescriptions for how to right it. The most salient to the thrust of your post is this piece on what’s going on in Pakistan’s tribal areas, and urges caution about drawing too many conclusions:
Link. (and more here: Link.)

I have to point out that with the possible exception of pointing fingers at Pervez Musharraf, your links to analysis are almost entirely flat out wrong. Strategy Page in particular seems to confuse cause and effect—poppies are a symptom of severe instability and a wrecked infrastructure, not a cause (