If Obama could say “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking painkillers” to an elderly woman with a bad heart…
… then, in parallel fashion, why shouldn’t the government tell young women who want birth control that they are better off using condoms rather than more expensive methods? Condoms, after all, give protection against STDs as well as pregnancy. It would control costs: no doctor visits needed, no calamitous side-effects to treat. Make free condoms plentifully available everywhere.
Remember, Obama took some heat for standing up to the woman who talked about the “spirit” of her 100-year-old mother. If old people are going to get pills instead of surgery, why shouldn’t young people have to accept condoms? And shouldn’t the government be promoting condoms for disease control anyway?
If it saves just one man’s life, it’s worth it.
But, from the comments: “Unless you actually make a Catholic bishop hand condoms out, you won’t satisfy the urge behind the mandate.”