MORE SYMPATHETIC, REHABILITATIVE COVERAGE OF MICHAEL BELLESILES, this time in the New York Times. I suspect that a scholar who wrote a fraudulent history suggesting that abortion shouldn’t be a constitutional right — relying, perhaps, on “records” that turned out to have been destroyed in the 1906 San Francisco earthquake — wouldn’t get the same treatment . . . .
InstaPundit is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.