Author Archive: Glenn Reynolds

WHERE WE ARE:

BRYAN CAPLAN: Why we should separate health and state. “On the surface, a free market in health care seems like the best approach. When you look a little deeper, the free-market approach seems naïve and dangerous. When you look deeper still, however, the free market approach turns out to be the best after all.”

JONATHAN TURLEY: The joy is gone: A liberal hate-fest for the holidays. “In my recent book, I discussed how addictive rage is. People do not like to admit it, but they like being angry. Sometimes, people can choose madness as a release from reality. It offers a righteous license to slip from the bounds of civility and decency. It allows people to harass Republicans in restaurants or to scream profanities outside of their homes.”

THE ONLY MORAL THING IS TO EXTERMINATE HAMAS:

And their well-insulated funders.

OPEN THREAD: Can’t stop the signal.

THIS IS AN EXCELLENT POINT. It took a combination of persistence, intellectual foundation-laying, and grassroots politics, but the progress has been unimaginable by the standards of the 1990s.

JOHN HINDERAKER: The Least Successful Conspiracy. “I don’t doubt that various people, including the press, conspired, but the fact that Joe Biden was senile was open and obvious. . . . What is striking to me is not the conspiracy to cover up his condition, which was hardly more successful than the alleged conspiracy to cover up the fact that smoking is bad for you. What is striking is how few people on the Left–approximately zero–cared about the fact that we didn’t have a functioning president. Why were Democrats so unconcerned about having a president who was basically a cardboard cutout? Because they don’t really think the president is very important. They were content to have the Executive Branch run by nameless White House aides and by party grandees like Barack Obama.”

Plus: “I think this narrative helps to explain why Democrats are so horrified at the prospect of a Trump presidency. Trump, a real, non-senile president? A president with a mandate from the voters to bring about important changes? A president who will re-assert control over the ‘fourth branch?’ A president who won’t be a pawn in the hands of Washington insiders? A president who actually understands and carries out his duties under Article II? A president capable of standing up to the Washington establishment? This is what passes for revolutionary change in our late-stage republic.”

OUT: “REVOLVERS DON’T JAM.” In: