BRIAN WANG: TESLA Singularity 2026.

NEWS YOU CAN USE: We Drove the 2025 VW Golf GTI: Here’s What You Need To Know.

HOW IS THIS GUY GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA: North Carolina Governor Vetoes Permitless Carry Bill.

MY LATEST SUBSTACK ESSAY: Five Takes on Bombing Iran.

As always, if you enjoy this essay, please consider taking out a paid subscription.

SOME MIGHT QUESTION WHETHER HIGHER EDUCATION HAS BEEN A GOOD INVESTMENT OVER THE PAST HALF CENTURY: Academics Who Call For Iranian Attacks on America. “This is an anti-Western movement. It’s not about justice or compassion, but death and destruction.”

NEWS YOU CAN USE: How your Android phone can detect earthquakes: Earthquake alerts are part of a suite of safety settings.

CAN IT PRODUCE AN END TO GEORGE R.R. MARTIN’S SERIES? Study: Meta AI model can reproduce almost half of Harry Potter book.

WELL, GOOD: Simple insulin resistance test may also predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients.

WELL, GOOD: Eli Lilly Co. to buy gene-editing startup Verve to develop cardiac drugs.

ROGER KIMBALL: On Iran, trust Trump’s instincts: Those who compare Trump’s actions to the ‘forever wars’ have seriously misjudged him.

What now?

After the daring and what everyone is describing as a “flawlessly executed” attack by the United States on Iran’s hardened nuclear facilities Saturday night, Macbeth’s words must be on the minds of many: “If it were done when ’tis done, then ‘twere well / It were done quickly.”

Things did not work out so well for the Thane of Cawdor, as Macbeth then was. But even though his attack was not “the be-all and the end-all” he wanted, everyone who wishes for peace must second his opening argument. With the ground prepared by Israel, the United States mounted Operation Midnight Hammer, a stealthy and precisely targeted attack against the infernal workshops of a terrorist state dedicated to the destruction of “The Great Satan” (America) and “The Little Satan” (Israel).

The stealth, by the way, was not confined to America’s B2 bombers. Part of that equation was Trump’s cunning declaration a few days back that he would decide about whether to launch an attack against Iran’s atomic-bomb making facilities “within two weeks.” That declaration disappointed those hoping for an early kinetic response by the United States. Doubtless, it also encouraged the Mullahs, who must have concluded that Trump was cut from the same cloth as many of his predecessors. In fact, the “two weeks” gambit was but a ruse de guerre.

In the event, Trump’s attack was breathtakingly robust. More than a dozen 30,000-pound “bunker-buster bombs” and a passel of submarine-launched cruise missiles smashed into their targets. That’s a big wallop. Was it sufficient unto the day? Did it, as President Trump declared Saturday night, “completely and totally” obliterate the hardened atomic-bomb-making facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan? Or did it merely damage and degrade them? We do not know yet. Nor do we know whether Iran has other such sites up its turban-topped sleeve.

It is worth stressing that the attack was not directed at Iranian cities (as Iranian attacks against Israel invariably are) or even against the Iranian military writ large. It was directed at the atomic-bomb making facilities that Iran has consistently lied about possessing.

Did it work? Is it done now ’tis done? Or was it merely the opening act to further bloodshed in the Middle East or even, as Steve Bannon and others have warned, the commencement of World War III?

Again, we do not know yet. There has been lots of talk about Iranian terrorist attacks in response. Sunday morning, the IRGC Commander Tahdar Tangsiri promised that “The Strait of Hormuz will be closed in a few hours.” Since a goodly percentage of the world’s oil flows through that channel, its closure would be economically unsettling and politically disruptive at best. It would also, as a canny blogger noted, be a “suicide mission” for Iran.

Both President Trump and Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth have promised that any retaliation by Iran would be met instantly by an overwhelming response. Is that a recipe for escalation? Or, as it would be for most sane people, is it a prescription for resignation and tranquillity? Again, we do not know yet.

At this early juncture, I would say that there are encouraging signs. Most of Europe and the mid-East seem to be quietly behind Trump and Israel. They have long suffered from the Shia terrorist state and would be happy to see it declawed. Even Russia, traditionally an Iranian ally, has been notably reticent about declaring support for Iran or criticizing Israel or the United States.

Most critics of Trump’s actions invoke such disasters as America’s failed regime-changing adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan in their gloomy prognosis about what to expect in the aftermath of Trump’s attack. But just as generals are often criticized for fighting the last war, so I suspect that many critics of Trump’s action are dazzled by past conflicts. They are caught fighting old battles, not the new ones that confront us now. But Donald Trump is not Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama, or George Bush (either of them). Nor is Iran Iraq or Afghanistan.

As with all contingent events, the results of Saturday’s attacks are unknown. But if they exceed our knowledge, they are not beyond the contemplation of our practical wisdom, which conjures with probabilities and likelihoods, not certainties.

Perhaps Donald Trump let the genie of war out of its bottle with his effort to end Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. Or perhaps the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, was right in describing Midnight Hammer as “a pivot of history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace.”

In any event, I think that those who compare Trump’s actions to the “forever wars” of the neoconservatives have seriously misjudged him. Trump is above all the peace president.

He realizes, though, that in the words of Keith Laumer, there’s nothing so peaceful as a dead troublemaker.

DON’T BACK DOWN: Senate tames endowment tax plan, but universities still on the hook.

WHY IS HIGHER EDUCATION SUCH A CESSPIT OF BIGOTRY? Conservative Group Accuses Michigan Law Review Of Discrimination Against Heterosexual White Men In Selection Of Members And Articles.

CHANGE: Arizona Board of Regents strips DEI terms from policies.

THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE, THE ISSUE IS ALWAYS THE REVOLUTION:

Thing that happens every weekend in New York City is happening again. Just changed the signs out. https://t.co/uPhljzpaIf

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) June 23, 2025

ABOUT TIME: The COVID Reckoning Cometh.

DON SURBER: Trump saves world, Democrats complain.

WSJ: Justice Jackson’s Strange Lament: In dissent she feeds a ‘perception’ about the Supreme Court she admits is wrong.

The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 Friday that oil refiners can challenge California’s electric-vehicle mandate. The decision shouldn’t have been controversial, but Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent accusing her colleagues of favoring “moneyed interests” deserves a rebuttal.

Refiners challenged a 2013 Environmental Protection Agency waiver (Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA) letting California impose its own greenhouse gas emissions standards and EV quotas. The Biden Administration issued a separate waiver that applies through 2035, which President Trump signed a Congressional resolution last week to repeal.

To sue in federal court, plaintiffs must demonstrate they are likely to suffer a concrete injury that can be redressed by judicial action. California and other Democratic-led states sought to have the case tossed by arguing that refiners lacked legal standing because they wouldn’t be harmed by the state’s emissions rules. Say what?

The express purpose of California’s regulations is to reduce the consumption of gasoline that the companies produce. Yet a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel agreed with California’s self-contradictory argument, holding that auto makers wouldn’t make more gas-powered cars if the EPA waiver were overturned owing to “surging consumer demand” for EVs.

As Justice Brett Kavanaugh notes in the majority opinion, “EPA’s and California’s own actions—their statements, their enforcement decisions, their litigation positions—undermine the central premise of their redressability argument.” Lo, if blocking the regulations wouldn’t have an impact, why are EPA and California seeking to defend and enforce them?

Why, indeed?

STUPID WHITE MEN:

The gall of white men, how dare they. pic.twitter.com/wpJL65lm5b

— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) June 21, 2025

REVENGE IS A DISH BEST SERVED COLD:

Reminder: Mozilla/Firefox ousted their CEO @BrendanEich because he made a donation opposing gay marriage. So Eich left and started Brave, which has now surpassed Firefox. https://t.co/gEKgjQmaNX

— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) June 22, 2025

OPEN THREAD: Ring out the weekend.

THE NEW SPACE RACE: Airbus says space business turnaround going well.

HMM: Common Antibiotic Found To Tame Blood Pressure in Surprising New Role: Scientists discovered that ciprofloxacin blocks ACE through a novel mechanism, opening new paths for safer blood pressure treatments.

MY LATEST SUBSTACK ESSAY: Five Takes on Bombing Iran.

As always, if you enjoy this essay, please consider taking out a paid subscription.

HOW IT WORKS: How the US bombarded Iranian nuclear sites without detection.

WEIRDER: The Vance Boelter Story Gets Weird.